MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON II
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District was held on Friday, March 18, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. at 6052 Pebble Beach Blvd., Winter Haven, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

James (Jim) Mecsics Bob Zelazny
Mary Clark Colette McKie Angie Littlewood

Also present were:

Jason Greenwood Sarah Sandy via Zoom Alan Rayl
Ron Lavoie Mary Bosman John Monahan Ryan Buswell

Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager, GMS District Counsel, Kutak Rock Rayl Engineering
Indigo Sports Community Director GMS

The following is a summary of the discussions and actions taken at the March 18, 2022 meeting.

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Greenwood called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. and five Supervisors were in attendance constituting a quorum. The Board recited the pledge of allegiance.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Meeting Agenda
Mr. Mecsics: Do we have approval of the meeting agenda?

On MOTION by Ms. Clark, seconded by Mr. Mecsics, with all in favor, the Meeting Agenda, was approved.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments on Specific Items
on the Agenda (the District Manager will read any questions or comments received from members of the public in advance of the meeting; we ask those members of the public wanting to address the Board directly first state his or her name and his or her address.)
Mr. Mecsics: I think we had a lot of comments at the workshop, but do we have any further comments?
Sandy Hockenberry (1178 Sawgrass Drive): I'm here to request compensation for maintenance on the easement tract between 1178 and 1174 Sawgrass Drive, which now has a cart path, and I'm requesting compensation for seven months of maintenance which includes mowing, weed eating, edging, blowing of debris, and not on this quote, but separately, we also fertilized that tract for seven months. I'm requesting $622, and that will be divided between myself and my neighbors, Mike and Cathy Williams.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. Thank you. Ms. Hockenberry: Thank you.
Mr. Mecsics: Any other comments?
Mr. Greenwood: Next we have Mr. Chuck Caesar.
Chuck Caesar (1175 Sawgrass Drive): Hi. I'm Chuck Caesar. I live at 1175 Sawgrass, and I'm also the new president of the Lake Ashton Pickleball Association, so I just wanted to take a minute. I didn't speak during the workshop because Bob eloquently expressed all of our thoughts on the pickleball courts. But I did want to take just a minute to ask for the support of the rest of the Board members for this proposal to fund the resurfacing. We have 150 active pickleball association members. We have a great facility. We know that it will really enhance not only the play but the look at the facility, and we're

very excited that this has come up for discussion and hope that we can count on the support of the rest of the Supervisors on this proposals.
Mr. Mecsics: Thank you. Congratulations. Mr. Caesar: Thank you.
Mr. Greenwood: Those were all of the speaker forms that I received.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the February
18,	2022	Board	of	Supervisors Meeting
Mr. Mecsics: Do I have approval of the minutes of February 18, Board of Supervisors Meeting?

On MOTION by Ms. Littlewood, seconded by Mr. Mecsics, with all in favor, the Minutes of the February 18, 2022 Board of Supervisors Meeting, were approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Golf Course Update from Indigo Golf
Mr. Mecsics: A golf course update is next. Ron, you've been waiting patiently.
Mr. Lavoie: Thank you. Good morning. Or is it lunchtime? We didn't get the financials until this morning. This is just a second draft, but roughly, we're going to miss budget by $2,000 and there are really two major reasons. One, the handicap expense went in last month and it's budgeted for this month, and also because we were doing so well, we paid ahead some of our prepaid expenses for the golf course to the tune of
$20,000. Overall, it was a good month. Pro Shop was down a little bit, but the good news is everybody here is still drinking. We're up 48% over budget in alcohol and 48% in foods. Vickie is doing a great job up there. It's very busy. Especially, we're down a couple of employees again, but overall, it was a good financial month. One of the things I was going to bring up to date since we're really in the middle of the season but it is the finals on the membership. Basically what we have is 76 new members compared to 89 new one's last year. Existing members, 313, meaning they paid the same this year as they did last year. Last year, that was 229. Because last year, we had 71 drops, meaning they dropped from one to another, which the 71 people dropped down to either super-senior or associate. This year, we only had 28. We have 417 memberships versus 390 last year. 189 of those

are single versus 171 last year, 228 are family versus 219 last year, and we have 645 total members versus 609 last year. It's pretty good, especially knowing that we have 32 homes left and we probably pick up another either 8-10. But overall, it's been good. One of the major differences is that we have 139 associates versus 104 last year. Where they've come from is we only have 148 annual versus 165 annuals, so we had quite a few people drop down, 17. Seasonals, we have 86 versus 75 last year, and super-seniors, we're getting a little older here, is 44 versus 37 last year. But the good news is we took in
$79,548 as of yesterday in associate greens fees versus $60,893 last year. That's a 32% increase. By the way, we've got a 32% increase in the number of associates that joined. You can sum it up by saying our associates are paying while they play. Big shout out to Dave, Matt, and Vickie for the member guests. It was a great hit, and I will say it's nice when you're having people that are coming back that haven't been here. Some people would play as member guests for 10 years and this is really the only time they play the golf course. All the comments, people come in the office saying things about the conditions and everything else that's going on, so that's good news. Again, great for Dave. Most people probably heard we had, I don't know what, a microburst, a little tiny tornado but it came right through one side of the clubhouse and I came to work the other day. I walked into the parking lot and there's seven cast iron chairs all around and four of them had the legs busted off, but you walk around and some stuff like wooden chairs didn't get touched. We did lose some tiles off the roof. One thing that I'll bring up, I know when I was sitting through the workshop listening to things, feel free to anytime you want to talk about grass or anything like that about what's going on, reach out to Dave. He knows this place, he built it for crying out loud, he's been here for 20 years and he's got some ideas outside of what some other people might have. The gentleman did spend four years at the University of Florida studying it, so he knows a lot about it. It's a freebie and it's an asset that's right there, but anyway, I just wanted to throw that out there. Other than that, like I said, things are going great. It's a height for Vickie to keep up with everything upstairs like I said. People come up here and ask why we're not open all the time for karaoke or whatever. It's strictly a staffing problem. They're down to five people and it's a lot of hours and I just want to make sure they can get through the season without anybody else quitting. But other than that, it's been good up there. It's quieted down a little bit in some

of the problems we've had, but we just want to make sure everybody knows that it is an ongoing business that's licensed and we have to follow certain rules and laws and it's not the same as here. You can't bring drinks into the place and bring food to the place. We've told the people that and we just want to keep that message out there. But other than that, any questions?
Mr. Mecsics: Any questions? Thanks for doing a great job. Mr. Lavoie: Thanks.
Mr. Zelazny: Let me just add something to what Ron was saying. We have approximately 30 free memberships this year, I think, that we anticipate a third of them will renew at this point. As Ron said, there's 32 homes that are yet to close. Those 32 homes get free golf, and then at the end of the year, I hope if we get another one-third or more return on that, we will do good. The bottom line is that we are in the profit side of the ledger, but expenses are going up as you can imagine. Especially, if you see what's going around in the world, most of the fertilizers stuff comes from gas and from Ukraine, so things will get consistently more expensive so we're going to get closer and closer to where our budget is. We don't have a detailed budget layout for you this month. It's still being compiled. Ron will forward it to Jason and he'll forward it to you guys next week. It's just a little early because Brian and them are all working on some other issues, but we'll get that to you next week under separate cover.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Engineering Staff Report
Mr. Mecsics: Engineering?
Mr. Rayl: Good morning again. I'll touch on the things we didn't go over and what I have on my list here. GMS and the golf course and the contractor are coordinating on the cart path repair behind the driving range, I think they got a contract template from Jason and there was a date issue on there that I think they worked out. Now it's down to scheduling, coordinating with the golf course to make sure they're going to be in there doing that at the best possible times. We're letting them solve that and when we know they're going to start then we'll get back involved with construction observation. Hole 6 bathroom, I would say it is a multi-layered effort. Kincaid Electric does work in the community; they work for the COD as well. They are in the forefront of what's going on

right now. They're coordinating with TECO to get legitimate service to the bathroom building, not what has been there over the years, which was not adequate. They are keeping me updated by email, I'm not spending any time looking over their shoulders, this is their arena of expertise, so they're going to get a service route established to bring in the appropriate service to power the building and the grinder pump that will pump to the septic tank and drain field. Once that is complete, the Board already hired SNS to cut the concrete and make the plumbing connection disconnect from the existing and connect it to the new. Once that is complete, Averett Septic will come in and demolish the existing and complete the connection to the new. It'll be up and running and done.
Mr. Zelazny: Alan, does that come with an additional cost over what we've already
paid?
Mr. Rayl: The electric was not contemplated. Everything else fits under what was
authorized. The electric wasn't known and Kincaid is still identifying what work they're going to have to do. I'll be bringing something from them back to the Board for approval. But everything else I outlined is all under that not to exceed threshold that the Board previously approved. If we'd stayed within what we knew, we would be on track. But this electric thing was something that everyone was unaware of. We've made our renewal submittal for the water use permit for pumping, we submitted it prior to the expiration deadline, we've received comments back from the SWFWMD reviewer, and we're doing some back-and-forth discussion with them. The shorter story is they want to cut the pumping that's allowed under the permit. Now, what they want to cut it to doesn't necessarily cripple us, but it takes away any contingency and flexibility and breathing room we had under the permit cap. I can tell you we're in an area, it's called SWUCA, the Southern Water Use Caution Area. Every governmental permit, that's what we fall under. In SWUCA, they're cutting across the board. They're being pretty aggressive about going after flows and trying to reduce pumping. As I said, we're going back and forth with the reviewer, making sure we can justify what we're doing, some of that involves some input from the golf course. There will be some requirements regenerated out of this. They wanted us to be able to distribute water conservation information to make that information available at the golf course, things like that. Those are required elements now of renewing these pumping permits. We're going to try to make use of some things that are out there

in the public domain that other golf courses and communities are using too. If we know something that's already okay with them, we're going to submit the similar format to them and follow along that route. We have until May to complete a response with them. So there's no danger of running out of time in getting this worked out. But it's all being worked out congenially with them right now. I mentioned already the Pebble Beach Boulevard budget quote that we got. Just to keep in mind, it was between $8,000 and $14,000 to make that repair, which we would recommend be included in the next round of repairs whenever the Board decides to entertain that, that will limit the number of locations that eat up 30% of that budget. We're putting together some quantities and specifications to repair. We've been calling it the blowout behind the HFC. It's going to involve adding a piece of curb from connecting one flume to the next. If you look at one of those flumes, it's got what's called an extruded curb. It's a curb that sits on top of the pavement. But what that does is that narrows the cart path driving width. We're not going to do that. We're going to add a curb and gutter to the exterior; they will stabilize the area outside the cart path. Add that on, that'll connect the two flumes together, which will carry it down to the smaller flume that direction that flows. But it won't reduce the driving area because we've got a pretty big hedge on one side and not a lot of elbow room there. We're finalizing that. We're going to get that out to the contractors. I'll have dollar amounts on that at our next meeting to present to the Board. I believe I've already given you a copy of the quote that we got for the repair of the HFC inlet whenever that's entertained. It came in under my guesstimate of, I said $5,000 to $6,000, we had a bid of $4,800 to repair that. I think we're trying to pursue insurance being involved in that.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes.
Mr. Zelazny: Alan, you recommend that we wait on that until we get the last 30 homes done? I think the builder was supposed to be out of here in April or May but it will probably be June.
Mr. Rayl: Yes sir, I would.
Mr. Mecsics: Like we talked about with roads and all this stuff until we see that last dump truck, I would not recommend that we do anything.
Mr. Zelazny: One other question, would we be wise to pull all of the crushed concrete out of there or just leave it?

Mr. Rayl: I mean, it's out of the travel way, but that doesn't stop people from traveling on it.
Mr. Zelazny: Well, it doesn't look like it's likely to fall into the drain. That would be my concern.
Mr. Rayl: I would say probably it'll be okay too if we did that just to keep any of that stuff from getting into the drain or any other issue that could happen with it. It's just loose material sitting there. Somebody could drive over it, kick up a rock, and fling it onto the golf course; a million things could happen that we wouldn't expect. It may be prudent to get it out of there and clean it up. If we don't do it, we'll have a contractor charge us to do it.
Mr. Zelazny: Alright.
Mr. Rayl: I think I mentioned last time that mandated needs analysis from the state. We're working on that now. It has to be turned in by June 30th. But once done, it only needs to be updated every five years. This is all the heavy lifting at this part. Going forward it will just be updating and there won't really be anything to update. We're not going to expand or take on new facilities or things like that. It'll be pretty minor in future updates once it's initially submitted. I don't think there's any other item other than we have been doing some preliminary investigation into cost-effectiveness of looking at thermoplastic striping at certain areas: stop bars and crosswalks. It's very durable. The striping you see on DOT roadways and things is a melted plastic. It doesn't wear off like just paint. We're checking into the appropriateness and costs of that, and I'll be able to bring something back to the Board on that next month with a recommendation.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. From the workshop, you recommended we do a condition
assessment on the bridges. Do I have a motion for us to authorize that expenditure of funds for the assessment on the bridges?
Mr. Zelazny: I make the motion that we go ahead and authorize to do the evaluation of the bridge and to make the necessary replacement of the bad boards.

On MOTION by Mr. Zelazny, seconded by Ms. McKie, with all in favor, the Authorization to Evaluate the Bridge and Make Necessary Replacements of Boards, was approved.

Mr. Mecsics: Let's take a motion from what we did on the workshop.
Mr. Rayl: Colette, we'll schedule a time that you can go with us, maybe even James goes with us. The way we did it for COD 1, we started at the downstream end of bridge x and went x number of feet. We denoted how far down the bridge the board repair needed. We marked it with some survey paint, took some photos. We ended up with a little report so you could go back and revisit that location spot whether the paint had faded or anything else. If it was past the rainy season, when we got a contract out there to repair it, they could still figure out what to repair or where to do it. We'll pick a time and get together with that.
Mr. Zelazny: Alan, two things on the tape for the stop lines and everything, before you leave, could you get with Mary and James on that particular topic? Then did you have a chance to look at the driveway coming out of the pro-shop onto Pebble Beach?
Mr. Rayl: That would be an area I would include in the next contemplated repairs. It's pretty bad, the first driveway into the parking lot off Pebble Beach is about the worst spot. It looks like it's been repaired once in the past. There's a three or four-foot strip of asphalt adjacent to the broken curb. Then it's mostly broken curb, not so much asphalt failure but it gets a lot of traffic, and it takes a lot of live load beating right there for making that turning movement into the parking lot. Once repaired, it would probably be better. There's a normal valley curb section which is commonly called the Miami Curb. It's the two-foot-wide curb everybody has at their driveway. There's a valley curb which is a three­ foot-wide section which goes across the same elevations. It just spreads it out across three feet, and it's a smoother transition for the driver, and it is less impact to the curb itself too, so I would probably recommend we do something like that when we go to repair that area.
Mr. Zelazny: It looks like you might have to change the elevation coming out of the parking lot, that three-foot valley curb might be the answer to that.
Mr. Rayl: That'd be easy to do as well. It's just asphalt there.

Mr. Mecsics: In regards to the road project, what I recommend to the Board is that you come back at our next meeting, and propose for those areas of the roads and then we can vote on that specifically and get that get going.
Mr. Rayl: Will do.
Mr. Mecsics: Let's see. Go ahead. Comment?
Ms. McKie: Bob, I've spent quite a lot of time with Mary and James about the thermoplastic so they're well-informed.
Mr. Zelazny: Yeah. It's my understanding that it's already been purchased. I just wanted to make sure.
Mr. Mecsics: No, there was a mistake and it's being returned. Mr. Zelazny: Okay.
Mr. Mecsics: It's not the stuff. Mr. Zelazny: Alright.
Mr. Mecsics: The last portion that we had from the workshop was on the flares for the golf cart paths. I know there was some discussion. Do we have any further discussion or any motions on that to do so?
Ms. Littlewood: Excuse me. I would make a motion that we do it. Mr. Mecsics: Okay. Do I have a second?
Mr. Zelazny: Second.
Mr. Mecsics: Further discussion?
Mr. Zelazny: Under discussion, Jim, I would just say that we don't need to flare to the street, we just need to flare to the cart path itself. I would leave it to Collette and Alan to figure out how far the flare continues.
Mr. Mecsics: Now, I know there was a discussion about, this is specifically about the Pebble Beach, but I know the folks over in Sawgrass were also asking about that too. I would recommend we take a look at both of those and then a part of the motion, my discussion on this, would be that if we are going to do it, then we do a conjunction with other concrete work so we're not causing these guys the mobilization to come out there. Any further discussion?

On MOTION by Ms. Littlewood, seconded by Ms. Clark, with Mr. Zelazny, Ms. Littlewood, Ms. Clark, and Mr. Mecsics in favor and Ms. McKie opposed, the Golf Cart Path Flares, was approved 4-1.

Mr. Mecsics: Passed. Alan, I'm sorry about that.
Mr. Rayl: I serve the Board with pleasure, if you all want to pave 10 feet of concrete down those things I will.
Mr. Mecsics: You are a good man. Thank you, Alan. Let's see. Anything else? I don't think I have anything else from the project there for the workshop on engineering that we had to vote on.
Mr. Zelazny: We didn't speak about the pickleball courts.
Mr. Mecsics: That comes up after this. Is that any more engineering? I'm going to put that in there after the engineering staff report. Anything else?
Mr. Rayl: I have nothing further. Thank you.
Mr. Mecsics: Thank you. Thanks. Have a good weekend, Alan. Mr. Rayl: Thank you.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
Mr. Mecsics: Before we get into the Wetlands project, we had the pickleball courts that we discussed. There were two bids of substance that were very close.
Mr. Zelazny: Varsity Courts came in at $7,937, Precision Courts came in at $7,900, and Sport Surfaces came in at $12,900. My recommendation, even though it's $37 more, would be to go with Varsity. They were the installer of the original courts and they did the resurfacing of the tennis courts, which was very successful in my opinion.

On MOTION by Mr. Zelazny, seconded by Ms. McKie, with all in favor, the Pickleball Court Proposal from Varsity, was approved.

A. Discussion Regarding Wetlands Project (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Mr. Mecsics: Discussion regarding Wetlands project, so there will be two recuses on it? They just can't talk. Alright, Collette, you gave a great discussion and an overview

of the Wetlands project and your recommendations. Let's go, and we promise to talk about this and get this thing going and done.
Ms. McKie: Do you guys have any questions?
Ms. Clark: I don't need any additional information. Even before you blessed me with the budget, my major concern was always just making sure that we're being good stewards with the money and that we had the funds in order to continue to pay for it. I feel better knowing that this is an every year decision that needs to be made. I'm still honestly concerned about the huge disparity between understanding invasive species and things that are harder to deal with. The difference between $3,000 in this area and $3,000 in another area, and then $20,000 in a third area is just concerning to me. I'm sure that's what the cost is, it's just a big difference.
Ms. McKie: It's like buying two motorcycles and a Mercedes. Mr. Mecsics: You went back to your biology days?
Ms. McKie: Well, I did.
Mr. Mecsics: Do I have a recommendation that we want to do 37, 40, 45, or 50? Ms. McKie: I move that the CDD pay 50% of the maintenance.
Mr. Mecsics: That is an impact of $13,000?
Ms. McKie: Yes. I think that's a good number. In regards to the flooring that was done here, that was around $14,000, and I think it would show good faith for the residents who raised $40,000, and per household with 50%, the Pebble Beach residents would pay about $60, the Hogan Rattlesnake $97, and the Lake Hart people $295.
Mr. Mecsics: Is that a motion? Ms. McKie: I make a motion, yes.
Ms. Littlewood and Mr. Zelazny recused themselves from the vote due to personal conflicts. Only the remaining three Board members voted on the motion below.

On MOTION by Ms. McKie, seconded by Ms. Clark, with Ms. McKie, Ms. Clark, and Mr. Mecsics in favor and Ms. Littlewood and Mr. Zelazny abstaining, the CDD's Payment of 50% of the Wetland Maintenance, was approved 3-0.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	New Business
Consideration of Resolution 2022-13 Ratification of the Series 2022 Bonds
Mr. Mecsics: New business. I think this is over to Sarah now.
Ms. Sandy: Yes. Hello Board members. This resolution is in regards to the bonds that the District just issued in order to refinance your 2006 bonds, essentially the resolution, because there are a lot of things that happened in regards to the bonds outside of the media, of course, the Board authorized the issuance of bonds, levied the assessments to support those bonds, but there are a lot of documents that the Chair has to sign, as well as other things that District staff has to do. The District manager as Secretary, he has to sign off all documents, we, as counsel, have to facilitate a lot of things. This resolution just presents to the Board the final bonds that were issued, the documents associated with that, and ratifies both the District Board members and staff actions in regards to getting those bonds issued. Happy to answer any questions that Board members have in regards to that resolution, otherwise I'd ask for a motion to approve.
Mr. Mecsics: Do I have a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Ms. McKie, seconded by Ms. Littlewood, with all in favor, Resolution 2022-13 Ratification of the Series 2022 Bonds, was approved.

Consideration of License Agreement Regarding Equipment Storage on District Property (to be provided under separate cover)
Mr. Mecsics: Alright Sarah, the next one is consideration of license agreement regarding equipment stored on District property. This was one that I asked for. We have actually two organizations; the Community Emergency Response Team, which is a county program, and then we have our Radio Club that has equipment upstairs that is used for emergency communications. There is some personal equipment up there. I've asked Sarah to just write up something so that we can make sure that if there's anything that needs to be done, that they're responsible for that. Sarah, I'll be getting with you the names of the folks that we have to work directly with that.
Ms. Sandy: Just so the Board members know, regarding this document, it's a pretty standard license agreement just basically saying that they have access to certain areas,

but it's not an exclusive access, and that they would hold the District harmless if anything were to happen to that equipment. The District can also terminate the license agreement at any time. I think in speaking with Chairman Mecsics, we were trying to figure out who would be the entity that would sign this license agreement. I think we've landed on because the groups themselves, at least one of the clubs, is not a formally legally created entity. I think the best course of action is to have the license agreement with the particular individuals who own that equipment and that'll allow the clubs to use them.
Mr. Mecsics: Good. Do we need to vote on that?
Ms. Sandy: It would be good if we could authorize it. That would be my preference.

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics, seconded by Mr. Zelazny, with all in favor, Authorizing the License Agreement Regarding Equipment Storage on District Property, was approved.

Consideration of Lease Agreement for Office Space between Lake Ashton II Community Development District & Select Rehabilitation, LLC (to be provided under separate cover)
Mr. Mecsics: The second one, and I'll bring it in on this with you Sarah, and we'll both do it. Sometime back we looked at charging Select Rehabilitation for use of the rooms that they have here that we provide for our folks. When Sarah went through the legalities of it, all of a sudden, that would open up the District to taxation, and a lot of tax questions and something we don't want to go down. My recommendation would be on this, and Sarah, you can chime in, is that we do not require a lease for that select rate. We have to leave it as a service to our clients. Because if we charge them for that, and I don't know what's happening, but obviously, we've upset somebody, if we go with the leasing, then we will subject the District to a lot of taxes and we do not want to go that way. Is that a fair assessment, Sarah?
Ms. Sandy: Correct. Yes, it would open the District up to potentially having to pay
property tax on the amenity facility, which is something that obviously we want to avoid. I think we could take a similar route of what the Chairman and I discussed with having a license agreement that just acknowledges that they're on the property, again, they are operating under their own licenses, they're responsible for their own actions, and that they

would hold the District harmless for any incidents that happened while they are on the property.
Mr. Mecsics: Can you just encapsulate that one more time before we get blown off the air again.
Ms. Sandy: The two issues; one of the main issues in having a lease agreement, especially a lease agreement where the District would be collecting payment, one is that it would open the District up to potentially have to pay property tax on the HFC, which currently the facility is tax-exempt, which is something that we certainly do not want to lose because that could be a significant amount. Then second, the District would potentially have to pay a commercial tax rate on any amount that it collected. It was such a small amount that it really doesn't seem like it is worth the headache.
Mr. Mecsics: I would recommend to the Board that we do not go forth with charging them money for the lease, but just continue it on as a service to our residents.
Ms. Clark: I have a question.
Mr. Mecsics: Discussion. I'm sorry.
Ms. Clark: Thank you. Do we charge them or do they charge anything? Do we charge them anything? Do they pay anything to offer this service? Because they're using our equipment, they're using our facilities, they're using all of those things, and yet we're still responsible for the wear and tear of the equipment, for the wear and tear on the flooring, for the wear and tear of anything else that's in the building. I have issue with that.
Mr. Mecsics: Sarah?
Ms. Sandy: That is a correct summary. In terms of the rental amounts that are charged to other individuals, I do believe we have rates. There is, I guess, the potential, based on those rates that we charge to anybody in order to reserve an area, we might be able to have based on that, but it would not be a lease agreement where they're paying a rental amount.
Mr. Mecsics: Then what I'll do is I'll amend my motion so that you go further and research legally to see how we can do something to recoup some compensation for the wear and tear on the equipment without it becoming a lease and subjecting us to taxation. Can you do that?
Ms. Sandy: Yes.

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics, seconded by Mr. Zelazny, with all in favor, for Legal Counsel to Continue Research on the Agreement, was approved.

Consideration of Letters in Support of Transportation Improvements (to be provided under separate cover)
Mr. Mecsics: Sarah, thank you. You took the lead, and I know you're working with Jan from Lake Ashton I to come up with a letter that will be presented to both Boards so that we can approve it. What it is, is essentially our either support or concern for some of the transportation things going on around us.
Ms. McKie: You're talking about due to the development? Mr. Mecsics: Yes.
Ms. Sandy: I apologize. Did the Board not receive the draft letters for this meeting? Mr. Mecsics: They didn't get them, no. Jason, you can make sure that we do?
Ms. Sandy: I apologize. We did not finalize them until Wednesday. It would've been not in your typical agenda. My apologies.
Mr. Greenwood: Are we able to discuss it and then authorize the chair to sign off after the meeting or do we just want to hold off on that for the time being.
Mr. Mecsics: Well, I think we have to wait until Sarah and Jan come to some conclusion. What we want is the letters going out from both Boards to look pretty much identical. I think ifwe let them continue on with that, then we can come back, and if, unless you want to, after they get done with that, come back with either authorizing me to continue on with signing it or the Board can hear, it's up to the Board's pleasure.
Ms. Sandy: We have. We have finalized it, at least between Jan and myself. I think Lake Ashton I Board will see those letters on Monday at their meeting. But if this Board would like to wait until the next meeting to approve it, we can let them know.
Mr. Mecsics: Yeah. Can we do that? Alright, so that's what we'll do. Mr. Zelazny: The letter doesn't commit us to anything.
Mr. Mecsics: Nothing.
Mr. Zelazny: The letter just indicates our concerns.
Ms. Sandy: It essentially supports what the residents are requesting.

on.

Mr. Zelazny: I would be in favor of wanting you to sign the letter, Jim, and move

Mr. Mecsics: We have consensus on that. That'd be, to finish it up and give it to

me. I'll approve it and then we can get it going.
Ms. Sandy: We will subject that to the Lake Ashton I Board also signing off on Monday.
Mr. Mecsics: That's correct.
Ms. McKie: Before we move forward, we authorized the purchase of the payment for the pickleball courts. I would like to know about the lift station, the dog parks, the left side of the HFC, and the Rose Garden enhancements, when will those be addressed?
Mr. Mecsics: That's my mistake. I missed those. On the lift stations. we were discussing to go forward and work on what we have to do to get that turned over too.
Ms. McKie: Well, now I'm talking about the cost for landscaping the lift stations. I mean, do we want to talk about that in May? I think the left side of the HFC where we have that dead grass needs to be addressed sooner than 2022-2023. I think the dog parks deserve attention before that as well. Then it's up to you about the Rose Garden,
$1,100 dollars to continue that renovation.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. Let's take that one at a time then. Ms. Mcl<ie: Okay.
Mr. Greenwood: Just quickly, we had the consideration of the letter. I know Bob issued a motion. Was there a second? I didn't hear a second.

On MOTION by Mr. Zelazny, seconded by Ms. Clark, with all in favor, the Letter in Support of Transportation Improvements, was approved, subject to approval of the same by the Lake Ashton COD Board.

Mr. Mecsics: Let's take this first one, the left side of the HFC with the dead grass, correct?
Ms. McKie: $500.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes.

On MOTION by Mr. Zelazny, seconded by Ms. Clark, with all in favor, $500 for the HFC, was approved.

Mr. Mecsics: The second one is the dog parks improvements for $4,000.

On MOTION by Mr. Zelazny, seconded by Mr. Mecsics, with all in favor, $4,000 for the Dog Park Improvements, was approved.

Ms. McKie: Next are the lift stations. The houses are going to be finished before our new budget comes forward. That would be $2,700 for each.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. That's good.
Ms. Littlewood: Do we not have to wait for that until we've actually got the deed in our hands to say that the land now belongs to us?
Ms. McKie: For Sawgrass, we would. For Pinehurst, we wouldn't. But I'd like to get the approval for the funding so that when the Sawgrass is transferred to us, we don't have to discuss it again.
Mr. Mecsics: This is again remembering back on a few minutes ago for the workshop. These are low maintenance as far as irrigation.
Mr. Zelazny: That is for a total of $5,400 for the two lift stations.
Ms. McKie: It might be less. They didn't think it would be more. Again, it will be just like all the other lift stations.
Mr. Zelazny: Just want the clarity on the costs.
Ms. McKie: Sure. Yes, $5,400 dollars total for the two and they are large areas.

On MOTION by Mr. Zelazny, seconded by Ms. Littlewood, with all in favor, $5,400 for the Lift Stations, was approved.

Ms. McKie: The very last question would be the $1,100 toward following up with the Rose Garden. If you want to do it in this budget or you want to move it to 2023?
Mr. Mecsics: Discussion?

Ms. Clark: I thought in our last meeting, the horticulture group was going to do some additional work on the Rose Garden.
Ms. McKie: No.
Mr. Zelazny: Collette. What specifically is the $1,100 to do? Because we funded, I think, almost $6,000 for the roses.
Ms. McKie: That's not just for that, that's for all around the HFC. That's not just for the Rose Garden. The Rose Garden right now for the HFC renovation is basically going to be taking out the old roses and putting new ones in. This would be, like I said, remove old woody plants at no charge, 12 plants, bulbs, river rock, labor to plant and spread rock. Ms. Littlewood: I thought we had already discussed that and it had been passed.
Well, what did we what did we vote on and pass? Because I abstained for the white roses. So what do we actually vote on then?
Ms. McKie: The knockout roses. The growers are not growing white knockout roses, they're going to be red. But what we voted on were for the roses to be taken out and new roses put in. That's all that was being done for the Rose Garden in the HFC renovation.
Mr. Zelazny: There was no addressing the Hawthorne stuff, the leafy hedge stuff that's out there. That's what is in this $1,100.
Ms. McKie: Those are not going to be removed. That's true.
Ms. Littlewood: Sorry. Just run by me again. What the $1,100 for?
Ms. McKie: No charge to remove old woody plants. 12 plants, I think 100 bulbs or something like that. Mary, I don't remember how many bulbs. If you look at the river rock, it's very sparse in areas, and labor to plant and spread the rocks for $1,100.
Mr. Mecsics: Yeah.
Ms. Littlewood: I'm so confused. I don't know what we voted on before.
Ms. McKie: We voted on complete renovation, which will include the, and I don't have the document with me, will include to the parking lot all around the HFC, trimming the big, huge blobby, what do they call Elaeocarpus. The big blobby Elaeocarpus here and there, the big blobby Elaeocarpus that was supposed to be a bush, and after 20 years, it's now a tree. All of that major work, the only thing that was included in that was

to take the old roses out and put new roses in. This is additional work just on the Rose Garden.
Ms. Littlewood: So the old motion was to take the old ones out and put new ones
in.
Ms. McKie: Under what we funded in the past.
Ms. Littlewood: Okay. Now we are paying for those roses again?
Mr. Mecsics: No, to get it to clean up. The roses are taken care of by the other
project we had, correct me if I'm wrong.
Ms. McKie: They will start. They will do it next week.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes. But the cleaning up of this whole entire area out here with some of the dead foliage and then replacing of the rock that's gotten sparsely pushed out around it. Then that's what this $1,100, this is really focusing on cleaning up and clearing up the rose garden area, specifically.
Ms. Littlewood: We're not paying for anymore roses? Mr. Mecsics: No. No more roses.
Ms. McKie: We've already paid for the roses that will be put in next week. Mr. Mecsics: No roses.
Ms. McKie: Great. Thank you.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. So we have a motion for $1,100. Do we have a second? I think you seconded it. So we're on to discussion. Alright, for $1,100 to clean up. Now, here's to end the discussion that we'll finish up that area. It looks nice. The rose garden area, Mary. Then there's this whole other area. So we can tidy that up, and put a bow on it, finish it up.

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics, seconded by Ms. Littlewood, with all in favor, $1,100 for Landscaping, was approved.

Mr. Zelazny: Let me just say, it's like pushing spaghetti up the wall to try to get landscaping under control. The entrance looks nice, the islands look nice, lawn's being maintained. Flower beds, we're getting there. It looks much better. I think the tree program will help. But Colette you have done great work to get this to this point. Good job.

Ms. McKie: Thank you very much.

Discussion of Tropical Temptations Maintenance Quote (requested by Supervisors McKie)
Mr. Mecsics: As we've heard from our residents, they have put in to be paid for cutting the area that was the COD tract that eventually became a golf cart path. They had their landscapers cut it. No requirement to do so, but they did, and so now they're asking for remuneration for that. Do I have any further discussion? No motions. It dies. Sorry.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney - Property Line Adjustment
Mr. Mecsics: Staff reports. Attorney, Sarah, you've been jumping back and forth.
What have you got?
Ms. Sandy: I don't have anything additional to report to the Board at this time unless you have any questions for me.
Mr. Mecsics: Any questions for Sarah?
Mr. Zelazny: Sarah, have we gotten an update on the boundary adjustment action?
Ms. Sandy: No. The Lake Ashton I Board did approve the resolution as well and now I'm going to be working with Alan on the exhibit.
Mr. Mecsics: Anything else for Sarah? Thank you, Sarah. You can tune off right now if you'd like.

Lake Ashton II Community Director (to be provided under separate cover) Mr. Mecsics: The Lake Ashton II Community Director, Ms. Mary.
Ms. Bosman: Good afternoon. The fitness center flooring is complete. I welcome anyone who hasn't gone down there to take a look at it. The residents are using it and loving the new floor as well as the sports court floor and the racquetball. We've had zero negative comments and that's quite an accomplishment here. Thank you to the Board for those good decisions for doing those floors. The fitness center, during the process, we had to change the fitness equipment orientations and we just rescheduled that for later in the week, so there were zero problems with that whole installation. The Lake Ashton Garden Club, it's been mentioned before, but they have partnered with us to bring in

plants, live plants, and do the maintenance on them as well. I also invite you to go out and take a look at those. It's quite an enhancement. As long as they were doing that, I got to thinking and we had three Bistro tables that weren't being used. So I thought, while they're making this one area and it's to the left immediately when you exit these doors that I'm pointing to, it needed something. We went and got those tables from the outside that weren't being used and we put them in that area and they're being used all day long now. That area is really enhanced. I want to thank the Garden Club for partnering with us, especially ongoing maintenance. That's a vital part of that program, so that's good. Phase 3 lighting, the LED lighting is completed. The entire west side of the health and fitness center is now complete. James is just awaiting your direction on implementing the last phase. We've had three seminars this month: a kidney seminar, a memory imbalance seminar, and understanding general surgery and how it can affect you. Successful new resident social was held, we had over 42 residents attend and that's an activity that they really enjoy helping to get them know the ins and outs of moving to Lake Ashton, who the leaders are, and who they can ask questions to. The volunteer waiver and release form has been sent out to the golf course, the dog park supervisor, Supervisor Colette McKie, and is also being used here. We're keeping master copies of them here. We worked in coordination with Sarah to get that done and done legally. Last but not least, we're looking forward to a sold-out dance here this evening. That's why all the tables are set up.
Mr. Mecsics: Thank you. Ms. Bosman: Thank you.
Mr. Mecsics: I'd like to challenge each one of our Board members. Mary works very hard and she puts out a lot of information. I want to toot our horn. I'm going to challenge each and every one of you to get with Mary and write up some kind of an article, whether it's on the cornhole tournaments or whatever we have here, I'd like to just let you write it all up and let her work with it for you so we can get that. I don't want it all falling on her because she's busy on a lot of other things, but I'm challenging everybody to sit down and just write up a little article that we can put out as a blast and tooting our own horns over here at Lake Ashton II. District Manager, Sir.
Mr. Zelazny: Before you do that, we talked to the community director talking about tooting horns. When you look at the budget and you look at the revenue, Mary and her

staff have managed to bring in, I think, almost $8,000 of unfinanced resources by virtue of the programs that they offer, which is significant in terms of our budget, what you can do with $8,000. Kudos to Crystal and Ryan and James and Karen and Mary for doing that because they don't charge a lot of money, but it's a service that we provide the residents. We still manage to make a little for the community.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. Thanks, Bob.

District Manager's Report
Mr. Mecsics: All right. Jason.
Mr. Greenwood: As you know, I've communicated with each of the Board members via email and phone conversation. Myself, Mary, and Sharyn, got together and we spoke about the budget. Obviously, we're going to be going through that budgeting process. One thing that I just wanted to bring up and it's actually something I ran by the chair as well. Your current landscape contract that you have with Prince & Sons, I know that it's been echoed that we've got some irrigation issues throughout the community. You have your irrigation carved out of your budget in line item four landscaping. I guess that the irrigation was neglected at some point I guess previous landscapers didn't really do a thorough job with the irrigation repairs. Now, your current company Prince, they're playing catch up a little bit. I did actually go to speak with James about this issue that you currently have.
Ms. McKie: He means James Smith. Mr. Mecsics: James Smith, yes.
Mr. Greenwood: James just said, they need to be allowed to go through and fix irrigation as it come up. It's one of those that James said if there's some serious issues, we need to tackle these immediately. We can't really wait. Because you give it a few days, weeks we can lose a lot of landscape material. It was this discussion I had with Jim essentially asking, if they are allowed the license to fix as they go, I believe just working with Prince, if there's an ambiguous invoice, I don't think it's going to go past Colette where she's not going to ask the question. You just have to fix in perpetuity. I think that's just something that we have to bear in mind in our budget. It's not there at the moment. I guess beforehand it was an idea to try and save money, but right now it's not one of those

we can really hold back on. It might be painful in the beginning because I see your landscape, your irrigation line item is only $2,000. That may have to be significantly increased. I think it is just something to have out in the open at this point.
Mr. Mecsics: When we did this and trying to save as much money and not realizing how much our friends at Yellowstone did not do for us, we carved that out of the irrigation. But I think it's time as we go into our budgeting process, that we include that or increase that line item along there. If there's an emergency, it's an emergency, but going forward for us for the next fiscal year, we need to include or at least up that area there, so it's covered. Anything else, sir? Colette.
Ms. McKie: I just got some more information on that. The Prince now, we have a contract for them to do irrigation and inspections every month and they send a detailed report. As they find problems, it's more efficient and cost-effective for them and us if they fix them at the time they find them. The gentleman who I've spent quite a bit of time with, the gentleman who does the irrigation inspections, he brings a truck that has pretty much everything he needs to fix something. A couple of weeks ago, there was a break out here in the Rose Garden and there was going to be an event and the concern was there would be a geyser of water if that wasn't fixed. I called Prince. Within two hours, the irrigation specialist who was working at the development across 653, he came over. He brought his truck and he has a little ATV that he brought back here and he fixed it right then and it was like 6 o'clock at night. So they're very responsive. If he hadn't been across the street, that might have been different. But I think it will save us a lot of grief and concern if they fix things as they find them.
Mr. Zelazny: Is there just a method by which then we can authorize them to make repairs as they go by just calling Mary or you to authorize the expenditures to make sure that the expenditure doesn't get to a certain level? I agree. Fixing it while you're out here is a good deal, but I don't want to wake up tomorrow and have a $1,400 bill for irrigation.
Mr. Mecsics: I think we could modify it so that when they do find it and all they're doing is putting us on notice. Again, there's oversight, that is what you're talking about.
Mr. Zelazny: I would want them to repair it while they're here with the equipment. I just don't want them to have carte blanche. There has to be some mechanism by which we say, go ahead and fix it today.

Ms. McKie: I would be the better contact for that. Mary has weekends off. I live here, and I have communicated quite a bit with Prince during the weekends. For example, I think a couple of months ago we approved expenditures for fixing dog park irrigation. Their irrigation person at that time is no longer with the company. Not for bad reasons, but he just moved on. When they came out to fix it, they said a lot of those mini jets were along where the hedges are, and they said, wait a minute, these are hedges, they're established. They don't need to be irrigated. So they capped all of those. It ended up costing much less than $1,300 and they didn't have to do that. They could've done the work and charged us. They've been very good and we have a good working relationship. But I would then want to have guidance of the funds that I could tell them to go ahead and do.
Ms. Clark: That was going to be my point. Would it make sense to authorize or can we authorize Colette to make a go-ahead decision up to a certain dollar figure and then after that, it would need to go through the process?
Mr. Zelazny: That's what I was saying. I think we can do that with no problem and we just have to have somebody who's going to be point of contact to authorize the expenditure. If it's you or Mary or if it's you first, Mary second, it doesn't matter to me. I just want to make sure that we don't expend dollars.
Mr. Mecsics: You'll have that in coordination with Jason? Ms. McKie: Yes.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. Did you have something, Angie?
Ms. Littlewood: Mary made the point. My thing would have been, could we have it written into the contract that Prince can do repairs up to $300 if they need to and then after that, they have to get permission from Colette?
Mr. Mecsics: I think it's better that they coordinate through Colette. That way we can never say that there's no Board oversight of what they're doing. Anything else, Jason? Mr. Greenwood: I know it was briefly mentioned back, I think it was either the January or February. If the Board were going to meet in April, I'm not too sure if the Board
is going to be meeting in April.
Mr. Mecsics: Yeah. That's a good point. Thanks for bringing it up. We've done some of our preliminary work for the budget. Do we want to not have a meeting in April

because we passed a lot of stuff today? Not have a meeting in April and then meet again in May in preparation for the joint meeting?
Mr. Zelazny: VVhen is the joint meeting? Mr. Greenwood: It would be the April 18th.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. That would be prior to the one at the next joint meeting.
Mr. Greenwood: Yes, the joint meeting will be April 18th and your regular one would be April 15th, sir.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. It will be prior then. Since we're going into the joint meeting, then how about if I recommend or again for consideration, we meet in April but defer May? Because by that time, we'll be getting ready for the budgetary.
Mr. Zelazny: First budget workshop is May, you can't avoid that. But what I think we could do is have a meeting prior to the joint meeting and have a one-hour session just dealing with the amenities policy, if we're going to do the amenity policy. Otherwise, we kick it down the road to September.
Mr. Mecsics: Yeah. No, I don't want to do it.
Mr. Zelazny: Based on what's been approved today, in my opinion, there's nothing that we have to attack before May, which is the first budget workshop.
Ms. McKie: As we discussed last month, I'm going to be traveling on the 15th. I would not be here and that's fine, but I won't be here on April 15th.
Mr. Mecsics: Let's do this then Bob. We'll do a focused meeting right before the budget workshop for where we just talk about the amenity policies and Angie will have that ready for us to go. We can do that. The 18th is what?
Ms. Bosman: It's a Monday.
Mr. Mecsics: Is it on a Monday?
Mr. Zelazny: Could we get work with the East and just reschedule the joint meeting till May? We do that then we're fine. I don't know. Unless there's something specific to talk about, which is the amenity policy, there's not a real reason. We do have some security issues, but you're dealing with those.
Mr. Mecsics: I'll talk with Bob Plummer and then he can take it up with his Board and see if they want to move it to May. My recommendation is that we didn't meet in April.

Mr. Greenwood: We just won't plan to meet in April, contingent, if Lake Ashton 1 is happy, then to move that meeting, we will still be at that joint meeting and if that's still going ahead.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Report
Approval of Check Register
Mr. Mecsics: Next are the financial reports. Approval of the check register.

On MOTION by Ms. McKie, seconded by Mr. Zelazny, with all in favor, the Check Register, was approved.

Combined Balance Sheet
Mr. Mecsics: You have the combined balance sheet for review. This doesn't need
action.

Special Assessment Receipts Schedule
Mr. Mecsics: Special assessment receipts schedule. That's just noted.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor Requests
Mr. Mecsics: Supervisor's requests. I'll be really quick. There has been the issue of the concrete that's along here on Pebble Beach. I've talked to the young lady about the concrete along Pebble Beach, I know she's reached out to other supervisors. I think that her first name is Jill, isn't it? I met with the builder yesterday and he's promised me that they will be out there in the next week. Because I told him if he did not be out there with a sledgehammer myself, but he's promised to have that corrected next week. That just for general information so everybody knows the matter. Any other supervisor comments? Okay, Angie.
Ms. Littlewood: Can I just go back to my proposal on the Memorial. Mr. Mecsics: Okay.
Ms. Littlewood: This is what I propose. My concern is how to start this paver program. Would it mean the Board laying out money, first of all, to get this whole area all done and then sell the bricks or the other way around? The first thing that I would like to do is I'd like to find that if there's enough interest from the residents to start this project.

It's never been raised on either of the focus groups, this one or the last one. Just a simple survey which could be picked up and dropped off here at the HFC that would answer it. The second point is that the project should not be divided into two. To avoid any misunderstanding, it should just be all one projects. The money, I think, should all come to us. That we should limit the project to either pavers or plaques. All proceeds should go to the CDD and not to the golf course. The maintenance crew could install any plaques on the golf course after consulting with the golf course management. But the trees, Ron wants to have the say on where those trees go and what kind of trees. He runs that course. He knows what trees should go where and he knows whether it's going to be an obstruction and he knows how big it's going to grow. Because the residents are not going to really be having a lot of choice in that, it just seems to defeat the object to me. The bones of the original agreements should be used but be amended to be more universal, in other words, build on that. I would like to make a motion that the Board approve the initiation of the marketing of a survey so that we can determine the amount of interest in the project before moving forward. The marketing would be something in the early time so that it could reach all residents because this will include the East as well as the West.
Mr. Mecsics: You have a motion. Do I have a second? Mr. Zelazny: It doesn't seem like it needs to be a motion.
Mr. Mecsics: Yeah. It's a Board direction. Press on with that. Yes, ma'am.
Ms. McKie: I'm confused. I thought we discussed that for the golf course portion, the golf course should handle that. That would be the golf course's thing to get trees out there and donated. I don't understand what happened to this.
Ms. Littlewood: That's the portion that we're in that I need to find out if there is an interest in having that done because that is for here. That's for here, not for the golf course.
Ms. McKie: How about the survey? Would the survey then be about this and not mention the trees because why try to mix them together? Well, I don't understand.
Mr. Mecsics: Keep talking with Ron, like you said, they know best way to put everything out and all that. Let them have that portion of that, let them administer that portion. This will be what you're going to ask that they're interested in doing that. Is that correct?

Ms. Littlewood: Anybody that wants anything done on the golf course needs to go and speak to Ron.
Mr. Mecsics: Do you have any comments from the golf course perspective?
Mr. Zelazny: As originally proposed, the golf course has positioned the trees and they have to determine the right trees so that it doesn't damage the fairways or anything like that. The plan was always if you wanted to do a memorial tree, there is a program by which you could do that. You can get one planted on the golf course, you can either get a plaque or not get a plaque. You get the plaque, good to go. It goes right below the tree, where you can cut right over it then move on.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes, ma'am?
Ms. Littlewood: The plaques that you wanted to put on the tees and things, because that one is put on the number poll thing there. I mean, that's something that James could do, that's not going to affect anybody so if they wanted to do that, we could do that. But my interest is if I'm doing it as a COD project, the money should come to the COD. That's basically where I'm going.
Ms. McKie: I'm requesting that anything to do with the golf course, the golf course handle, and we handle this. I mean, I think it's just too confusing.
Mr. Mecsics: Okay. Well, the golf course will handle the memorial program on the trees or plaques wherever they have to do that. This area here, whether it's out here or down there, well, that's a nice area too, that's where we'll do the marketing to put the survey out to see the interest. No use in going farther if nobody's interested in it. Any other further questions or discussion? Go ahead.
Mr. Zelazny: The hole sponsorship was a hole sponsorship program, not a memorial program. It was if you just wanted to just pay $10,000 to have your name on that little tee marker for 10 years, write the check.
Ms. McKie: So those are two totally different.
Mr. Zelazny: That was the whole sponsorship program initiated by Doug to try to get money into the golf course.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes, Angie?

Ms. Littlewood: Do you want me to, in the survey, mention that there is a secondary thing for the golf course if people would be interested in the golf course or just leave it all together?
Mr. Mecsics: I'd list it and say, let's leave that, we won't confuse them. You're going to go out and you're going to be the head marker for the memorial stuff. Okay. Any other comments?

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Mecsics: Any last minute public comments?

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Ms. McKie, seconded by Ms. Littlewood, with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Secretary I Assistant Secretary