Lake Ashton II Community Development District
October 5, 2018

September 28, 2018

s
Community Development
5385 N. Nob Hill Road, Sunrise, Florida .13351
Pl1011e; 954-721-8681 • Fax: 954-721-9202

tstrict

Board of Supervisors Lake Ashton II
Community Development District

Dear Board MembeTs:
A meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Lake Ashton II Community Development District is scheduled for October 5,  2018 at 11:30 a.m.  at the-  Lake Ashton  Health & Fitness Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida. Following is the advance agenda:
Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Public Comments on Specilic Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting. Individuals providing speaker cards will also have an oppor/:unitt; to speak prior to Board action)
Approval of the Minutes of Lake Ashton COD and Lake Ashton II CDD Joint Meeting held on August 10, 2018 and Minutes of the Lake Ashton II COD Meeting held on August 10, 2018
Unfinished Business
New Business/ Supervisors Requests
A Approval of Aquatic Plant Management Agreement with Applied Aquatic
Consideration of Engagement Letter with Grau & Associates to perform the Audit for Fiscal Year
Ending September 30, 2018
Consideration on Parking Barrier across the street from the HFC
Consideration of Flooring Proposals (requested by Supervisor Robertson)
Consideration of Proposals for Tree Removal/ Replacement on Ashton Boulevard (requested by Supervisor Robertson)
Consideration of Tennis Court Painting Proposals (requested by Supervisor Robertson)
Discussion on Lighting for Pick1eball Courts and Parking Lots and Consideration of Proposals
(requested by Supervisor Robertson)
Discussion on Pond Mowing Request to Yellowstone for New Phase Pond Area (requested by Supervisor Robertson)
Discussion of COD II Prngress (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Staff and Board Reports A Attorney
Engineer - Discussion on S.W.F.W.M.D. Certilication due for Permit #27710.004
CDD Manager
Lake Ashton II Community Dil'ector
Financial Reports
A Approval of Check Run Summary
B. Combined Balance Sheet

Public Comments

Adjournment

MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND
LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District and Lake Ashton II Community Development District was held on August 10, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Clubhouse Ballroom, 4141 Ashton Club Drive, Lakes Wales, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Carol Pontious Borden Deane Mike Costello Brenda VanSickle Bob Ference

Doug Robertson James Mecsics Daniel Murphey Carla Wright Stanley Williams

Also present:

Jillian Burns Darrin Mossing Jan Carpenter Andrew d'Adesky Christine Wells Mary Bosman
Numerous residents

Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Chairman  Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager District Manager District Counsel District Counsel
Lake Ashton CDD Community Director Lake Ashton II CDD Community Director

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Ms. Burns called the roll and everyone recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments on Specific Items
on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning ofthe meeting)
Ms. Pontious: We have a host of public comments. Please stay to your three minutes. I believe someone down there has a timer. We will be enforcing that. Try to listen to what is spoken ahead of you. If it has already been said, we have heard it. We are all taking notes on what is going on and we would like to get through this as quickly as we can, but we do want to hear what you have to say so we encourage just brief and concise please. I will read these in the order I have received these. It doesn't necessarily mean that is how they came in, but I am going to read the names so please be ready to speak so you are not coming from the back of the room when we call your name. Mike Holden, Ron Buran, Bob Zelazny, Gaetan Roy, LouJean Steinberg, Terry Edmunds, John Sebastian, and Joe Ellwanger. So we are going to start with Mike.

Mr. Holden: Thanks for letting us talk The issue is the Lake Ashton Golf Course not mowing, which is Agenda Item #10. I have been in this community since 2007. I have engaged in correspondence for two months with the Lake Ashton Golf Club, Ltd. because they are not mowing the property around the ponds. They have not mowed it since January. The Boards, all of you should have gotten my copies that went to Jim Lee. I actually mailed a copy to their headquarters in Lakeland in hopes that Mr. Maxwell will also get to see it. The Lake Ashton Golf Club, Ltd. response to my request that they mow the neglected areas around the ponds that belong to the golf course was "Sorry we have made a business decision due to the lack of funds and we are not going to mow it." This has gone back and forth with a couple extra comments.requesting that they maybe mow the fairways one less time a month. Their response was that they had already explained their position and didn't need to say anything more. As a result, I submitted a code violation to the City of Lake Wales. My wife and I are one voice. The CDDs represented together are over 1,000 voices so I would request that the CDD contact code enforcement to the appropriate city, Lake Wales or Winter Haven, to get this nomesident property owner within the confines of Lake Ashton to mow his property because we would not

2

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

get away with not mowing our lawn because I had a shortfall of funds so I don't understand why the authorities here in Lake Ashton, HOAs and CDDs have not gone to the city to say they need to support the residents here and get those areas mowed. It is a safety hazard. At the earlier meeting you heard about an alligator that almost attacked someone on a resident's property through the golf course's property, which wasn't mowed. The tracking from our property values is really tearing down the appearance of the community and a lot of homeowners are putting up their own money to get this property mowed that belongs to the golf course. You are going to talk today about the golf course and whether we are going to buy it or not, but they are not being a good neighbor right now. Until they do, perhaps they need some incentive or pressure, but you represent 1,100 voices and two cities that can put pressure on them to get this mowed. It is not like it is going to cost them a lot of money. Thank you.
Ms. Pontious: I apologize. I just found some more speaker cards in my stack of papers here. Jacqueline Perez, and the next one the name I cannot decipher, but the address is 1049 Sawgrass Drive. So we will add those to the list.
Mr. Buran: First of all, the first item is the unattributed email that we received through the associationvoice.com. Anybody who would send out a piece of propaganda like this that is so nonfactual and doesn't have the guts to sign his name to it should be ashamed of themselves. Does anybody here know who that person might be?
Mr. Robertson: I will address that when you have finished your comments, sir.

Mr. Buran: Okay. The National Golf Course Foundation report may be true based on historic data, but I think we are going to find in the future that greenspace is much more valuable than a golf course. ·1 don't object to spending half a million dollars or whatever to buy the entire golf course property if it includes the equipment and such, which we don't know at this point, correct? But I oppose trying to maintain 36 holes of golf because golf courses are a bottomless pit. I lived on a golf course in Maryland that is now overgrown after going through three foreclosure auctions. It is called the Easton Club. I invite you to go to the eastonclubofmaryland.com. I lived there prior to coming here for probably around 14 years. I know of four golf course down there that rolled over
3

and went belly-up. A golf course in today's world is extremely expensive to try to maintain. A greenspace is not comparable to a golf course. The amount of money it takes to maintain a greenspace is not the $800 a month figure mentioned in the particular email I had referenced because you don't have to go out and rake the sand traps every morning, you don't have to mow the greens every morning, you don't have to replace the golf holes, and mowing doesn't have to be done on the same frequency and it would still be a desirable open area that people could enjoy. Golf courses are not economically feasible.
Mr. Robertson: Carol just said she would like me to wait to give responses. Ms. Pontious: Bob?
Mr. Zelazny: Many of you who have come to the last series of meetings have heard me before on this issue, and the related golf course report. First let me say I think everybody here is in agreement that the report was incomplete. I think it was a very good initial overview and it gives the Boards the opportunity and points them in the right direction to look at certain things and get those facts nailed down. Now I am not here to advocate for purchasing the golf course against not purchasing the golf course, but I do want to point out to all of the golfers and non-golfers in the community the benefit of doing something. I look at this not as a golf course acquisition, and I have said it before, I look at it as a land acquisition and the golf club separately. I think the land acquisition includes the amenities, the greenspace, the lakes, the cart paths, and the bridges. Everybody who enjoys that and should be willing and agree that we need to have that within the community and we should all share that expense. If we decide to pursue the operations of the golf club, the golf club has to be profitable itself. So anyway, I would just like to ask everybody to keep an open mind and look at all of the.options for the land, not just use of the land. I trust that the Board is going to do due diligence. I think Stan and Mike did a great job looking at everything that is required before you do make a decision and I trust that you will do your jobs.
Ms. Pontious: Next is Gaetan Roy.
Mr. Roy: I have a few things. First of all, it has already been mentioned about the East and West combining. I really think it would be a good idea. The report that we have
4

 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

from the experts that did our survey, you are talking about bringing in "X" amount of people  that we need to  support the golf club.   They talked about Traditions.   To me common sense is the people who moved in to Traditions, if they chose here or Traditions, I think it had something to do with the money and golf fees. The golf fees here I think are now around $5,700. You think people are going to spend that kind of money to play golf here when they can go somewhere else and pay $25 to $30? That doesn't make sense and I don't think you are going to get many signups so that throws that out the door. Also, there are around 60 golf carts for 18 holes. Imagine how many you will need to have for 36. Where is the room? Garages? You think somebody is going to buy a building and do what has to be done and make a profit?  I don't see that happening.  Also to run a  golf  course,  18  holes,  I  am not  an expert,  but I  understand it is anywhere between
$750,000 to $1.2 million to run 18 holes, so you figure that out and compare that to the profit you are going to try to make, I don't see that happening. My father always told me when you buy a business, look at the expenses and profits. When you sell a house you always make it look nice, but when you buy a house, you have to look at the negatives. Right now everybody here is only looking at the positives, but there are negatives here, too.  If there is a profit, you probably want to buy it.  Thank you for your time.
Ms. Pontious: LouJean.
Ms. Steinberg: Good morning. A lot of you may recognize me as a volunteer here and former interim office manager.  I want to comment on two items on the agenda, first being the gate entry system. I really want to encourage a stronger gate entry system for our residents and our visitors. While working in the office, I can't tell you the number of gate openers I sold to new homeowners because the previous homeowners did not leave theirs behind, which means they have access into this community without going through security and we also know that there is no rule that makes you leave your identification cards behind either, so if you have a gate opener and your ID card, you can access a lot of the amenities unless someone realizes oh didn't Sally move two months ago and she is here using the pool? So again, I really encourage the gate entry system to be more secure for our residents. The other comment is on the joint amenity policy between our
5

two community centers. Again, I had instances of people corning and asking about amenities here versus amenities at the HFC and there was a difference in how things were conducted. Sometimes that was played against each other so I think if you are going to have two buildings that have similar amenities, you need to have a rule that is the same rule for both places and everyone follows them. Thank you.
Ms. Pontious: Terry.
Mr. Edmunds: First thing I want to say is I love this place. We have been here two years, love everything about it and the way it is right now. It has just worked out perfectly for us, but also for us the main draw was the golf course. I am concerned that if we lose the golf course, I am concerned about the house that I just built two years ago is going to drop dramatically in property value. Thatvery much concerns me. As it was said in one of the other meetings, if we go public, where are we going to park cars? The other thing I wanted to know is if there is a time limit on the offer we have from the builder right now because everybody is talking about taking the time to cross the t's and dot the i's and all of that, but is there a time limit? It occurred to me that if he can sell it for a lot more money, how long will he have the patience to wait for us to make a decision on the golf course? Thank you.
Ms. Pontious: Thank you. John Sebastian.
Mr. Sebastian: Mike Costello was just appointed delegate to work with the CDD II about the golf course so I am asking you to appoint a delegate to work with him and the lawyers to find out what the offer is on the table about buying the golf courses, and also I just wanted to state that I was in favor in favor of purchasing the golf courses. That is all. Thank you.
Ms. Pontious: Thank you. Joe?
Mr. Ellwanger: I live on Sawgrass Drive in the new phase that is being built currently. I have a couple questions for this group. Do you know how many lots at this point still remain unsold in the new development or throughout the community?
Mr. Robertson: About 200.
Mr. Ellwanger: I heard 200, I heard 360. I hear something different every day.

6

Mr. Robertson:   The last time I spoke to Scott Owens it was in the neighborhood of around 215 units.
Mr. Ellwanger:  Do we know for a fact that the number that is being presented to us of $470,000 for the purchase price, is that a current number? What happens to the monies paid by a new resident such as myself at closing, which amounts to $9,250, if we close on this golf course tomorrow, what happens to those monies? Is that forgotten? Now we start looking at $9,250 times 250 lots, you are talking over $1.8 million. My final question is what happens with the resales? Will there still be a golf option offered with resales and who is going to come up with that money? I am supportive of the purchase of the golf course, but I still have some questions about the finances. He said he can market this for $1.8 million. I question whether he can and whether we should be paying
$470,000 when he is still collecting a lot of money at closing time. Thank you for the opportunity to speak
Ms. Pontious: Thank you for your comments. Jackie?
Ms. Perez:  Good afternoon.  I would like to have answers to dispel the rumors of the following question. Will the contract include buying the storage equipment building? That is the first question. How about the RV garage? Is he going to keep that cash cow? I would not consider this property unless it was all included to us. Not parceled out because he can close us off on using that equipment that is needed to run a golf course.
Ms. Pontious:  I  believe the last name is Petta?  It is 1049 Sawgrass.  Tell me the last name please?
Mr. Petta: Please excuse my handwriting. How many total memberships exist in the golf course today? How many of those are freebies? How many historic freebies renew? Those are my three questions. And on a separate subject, how many people currently today pay the $2,400 to come in from outside to use our amenities? Thank you. That is all I have.
Ms. Pontious: And please keep in mind that we will give responses as we get to each of these items.

7

THIRD  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	on	National	Golf
Foundation Report
Ms. Pontious: The next item is Discussion on National Golf Foundation Report. We did spend a great deal of time on Monday going through the report. I think a lot of the questions yet to be answered so we need to do a lot more exploration. We did not have a lot of Board discussion the other day, so we will open it up to the Board for discussion on the report and maybe these questions will be answered at the same time. If not, I have them all written down so we can go back and get to them. Okay. So who wants to start?
Mr. Robertson: Carol and I were designated to look at the National Golf Foundation report and do an analysis. When the report came out in draft form, it brought up a lot more questions than should probably have been there and a lot of people were very concerned with the information, so I held public meetings in this building for a week talking to every individual who wanted to come in and find out more information. I heard a lot of people saying they were scared to death that they were going to have to sell the house because there were going to be thousands of dollars in assessments. That was a terrible situation for someone to think they would have to sell their house because of the misinformation that was put out there about the golf course. I had a responsibility to try to correct that. I sent out the email. It was supposed to have my name on it, but it didn't so the very next week I sent a letter to the Lake Ashton CDD Board apologizing that my name didn't get on it. It didn't change the information that was in the report. The report was very important to tell people that there is not going to be thousands of dollars of assessments on their homes to try_to solve the problem of what to do with this greenspace. I discussed my report with the District Manager before I issued it and I added things in there at his request. It was one means of looking at it so people could understand that there is not an overwhelming amount of assessment required. Hopefully that helped people understand. It doesn't indicate how it is going to be finished or anything else, but it did indicate that we wouldn't be seeing thousands of dollars of assessments and I hope that relieved a lot of concerns, which was my intent at that point

8

and time. I was authorized by the two Boards to do my evaluation. It wasn't just one point-of-view. There were many that I put in the report. The comment that it won't cost

$800 to maintain the greenspace, I have to disagree with you, sir, because Carol and I requested official quotes from Yellowstone, the company we currently use on both sides, to look after our community, and for the small amount of grass and things that we maintain right now, our contract is around $150,000 and theirs is a little more. So we are spending over $300,000 right now to maintain the boulevards. When you add the other space, Yellowstone gave us a quote of in excess of a million dollars, which came out to be about $750 a household. That is a fact. We got that from Yellowstone.
Ms. Pontious: I need to dispute that before it goes too far. When I went back to Yellowstone and asked for some information, they said they thought what we wanted was to mow it like a golf course. That is not the case. It needs to be mowed probably once a week like everything else is mowed. So that number went from that monthly fee down to less than $100,000 a year. So we need to make that adjustment.
Mr. Robertson: Was that shared with me? Ms. Pontious:  No, not yet.
Mr. Robertson: Okay. So that is new information to me. So it was around 39 cuts. I heard you say publicly $700 to $800 so I don't think we are disagreeing with that, and if you have new information, that is fine, but that is the figure we got. If that changes in the future, that is fine because I would love to see it be less than that, but that is the number we were given initially.

.	.

A resident: Is that an annual assessment? Not monthly?
Mr. Robertson:   Yes.   Annual.   The issue is when we asked NGF to come in, we wanted to know two things specifically. We asked NGF to evaluate the information that was given to us by Mr. Maxwell and the golf course community company. They gave us the number of $470,000.   We also asked them what the golf courses were worth.   They came back and said the golf courses were both in viable operation and they thought they were worth between $1.4 and $1.8 million at the high end. From that information, we went forward to the golf course and said, can we come up with a contract where we could
9	

consider purchasing them? All of these questions about where there is going to be space for golf carts, for people to store the machinery, etc., all of these questions aren't answered yet because it is not the right time. The right time is only if the Boards decide we should go forward with negotiating a contract with the developer. That is whatwe talked about, the long term lease on the building, and all of these pieces. At that point you sign a confidentiality agreement and work out what we are allowed to share in public versus what we are not allowed to share in public. What we are doing right now is very public in nature, but it is a private golf course and they don't have to share all of these things. They don't have to open their books to the public.   So it is a process to go through to protect their interests if we fail to negotiate a contract. If we were given permission to go ahead, and I don't know whether the Boards will do that or not, that is when we will go over all of these details and we can present all of that to the community and say based on this information, is this something we want to proceed with. If we don't enter into an attempt to write a contract to purchase the golf course, he will then offer it to someone on the outside. As soon as that happens, everyone has an opinion on whether it will sell or not.  Some people say it is impossible, but there is a company that is in Tampa that is willing to invest their money to market this golf course and their starting price is about
$2.1 million. That is a starting point they will use to sell the property to someone else. Their intention will be turn it into a public golf  course, which we would then have no
control over.  That is the avenue if we decline to negotiate.  If we do negotiate, we will
_) 

get to look at all of these pieces as to what to do with it. We have had suggestions of let's not use it as a golf course, let's use it for something else. That is a great idea, but if we don't own it, we are excluded from that decision. If we don't own the land, then someone else will come in with less interest in this community than Mr. Maxwell, and they will do whatever they want to try to make money from this community. If we were to control the space, it doesn't preclude us from doing anything we want with that land. If it is only
$100,000 to keep it a greenspace and people don't want to pay for golf, switch it over and deal with the consequences on the value of your homes. It is a choice we need to make. If we choose to say no thank you, we don't want to do it, then that whole thing is out of
10

our control and it goes in another direction. We have heard that we can't control the gates. People can come in, there can be as many people as they want. They can do big tournaments, all of these horrible things. People don't like the idea we have no control, no say because they are legally allowed to do it.
Ms. Pontious: Do we have answers to some of these questions? Do we know how many current memberships there are?
Mr. Robertson:  The analysis we had that was presented is 361.
Ms. Pontious: Do we know what the percentage of the renewal rate is after the free memberships?
Mr. Robertson: No, but we know it is 25 % residents right now who are paying golf members.

Mr. Costello: Of the 361 there are single memberships and other types. Do you have the division of what goes there?

Mr. Robertson: No, we haven't been given that breakdown yet. The issue then going forward is we were given $470,000 and we need to know if it makes sense to buy as a golf course. They came back and said it makes sense and said we have a price well under what they think is market value, but that doesn't mean we have to accept that. There are no terms agreed to yet.  All of those things come through a negotiation which comes back to both Boards.

Mr. Costello:  I don't think the decidingfactor is do we want to keep it as time goes on.   I  think  $470,000  is very reasonable for buying the courses.   It is  the upkeep and maintenance and everything else that goes along with it. Like I have said from the beginning, one of the problems with this and given the fact that quite honestly when this started, we thought we were going to get the RV garage and the buildingacross the street, but that is also going to cost us more money.
Mr. Robertson:  We made the decision as two Boards to look at the golf course first, which is very complex. There are a lot of different points-of-view. Dealing with the golf course meant that we dealt with the value of our homes. If we don't buy the golf course and it is closed, there is a consequence to the whole community. If we don't buy the RV
11

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

storage facility, there is no consequence for the community. If we don't buy the sales center there is no material change in the property value. We decided as two Boards to deal with the golf course first. It doesn't preclude us from trying to buy the other things. I know those are also available for sale. The one thing we said we wouldn't buy would be the ongoing Lake Ashton resales business because we were told the CDD should not own it. We can own the building, but we cannot run the business.
Mr. Costello: We could rent them the space though, right?

Mr. Robertson: That is the one piece we said we wouldn't buy. He offered that to us for sale, as well. We told him we weren't going to consider buying the resales business. That means the two Boards still have the choice to buy those other things because they are assets. There are not a lot of costs in running them, and there is an opportunity for revenue that would help support holding these assets down. It was decided to buy one piece of the apple first, which was the most complicated and threatening piece for our community. More questions?
Ms. VanSickle: Listening to what you just said, you said we authorized you to do the evaluation and report back. We authorized two Board members, you and Carol, and getting back to that email that was sent out as though it came from all of us. That was your interpretation. I would have hoped that you would have sat down and talked with Carol jointly or brought it up at this forum right here and let us all decide that. This was yours, things we might not all have agreed with, that you put out, and I think some of that information further scared people.

assessments.	not

Mr. Robertson: Well I did put it out because people were talking about thousands  of dollars of	.	There are other things that were done . on purpose, but
releasing a draft report was not the intention, but it got released.
Ms. VanSickle:  Public record.
Mr. Robertson: No, it is not. It was a draft. It was supposed to be done before it was published.

Ms. VanSickle: Jan, isn't it a public record?

Ms. Carpenter:  Yes.
12

Ms. VanSickle: Thank you. As I was saying, it is public record. Anything that comes to these Boards like that is public record.
Mr. Robertson: Yes, it is at some point. Did it need to become a public record when it was a draft and incomplete before we corrected the mistakes? You had complained that there were mistakes in it.  It needed to be corrected before it was put out to everyone. I don't get it.
Ms. VanSickle: That was a published piece of work. The mistakes that were in there I would hope after paying $26,000 that it would have been proofread for accuracy before it went out.   Once they send it to us, it is a public record.   These people have a vested interest in it, so no, I have no problem with it going out. I think it needed to go out far enough in advance so everybody had a chance to look at it. That 70 plus pages, I know a number of people who printed it out, put it in a three ring binder and carefully went through all of it. We have a lot of talent in this community, a lot of experts in a lot of different fields, and I think the feedback is invaluable.
Mr. Robertson: I wasn't suggesting that feedback isn't valuable.
Ms. VanSickle: That paper should have been circulated to the Boards. You should have given us a chance to discuss it before it went out.
Ms. Pontious: Do we have any more questions concerning the report? Some questions I understand didn't get answered. Do we need to have answers from them? He said when he left that he was open to additional responses or whatever we need still. You submitted questions, and they have not responded. Is that what I am understanding?
Mr. Mecsics:	I am a consultant and I don't get paid unless the report is done.  If
.	.
we have questions, we should go back to them and provide them, and tell them until
those are answered, he doesn't get paid.
Mr. d'Adesky: I will say that we did have the manager look at the scope to make sure they delivered what is under the scope. If some of the questions fall outside of what is in the scope, that might be something we are going to have to follow up with during our due diligence period. If it is outside of the scope of the contract, then that is a caveat we have to consider, as well.
13

2018	CDD	II

Ms. VanSickle: Some of the mistakes were outrageous. Anybody who had done their due diligence would have seen that.  When I went up after the meeting, I asked why a statement had been taken out for the final report that was in the draft report. He told me that somebody found controversy in it so they took it out.  That shows they didn't do their due diligence. I thought that was why we paid them the $26,000 to get this valuable information.  I don't think that we got it.
Mr. Deane: They didn't answer the questions about who owns what because the CDD does own some golf course property.
Ms. Carpenter: You'd have to look at the scope of what the report included, but I am certain they didn't look at title work or property records for ownership. An assumption going into that is whoever is selling it has title to it.  That is pretty standard for commercial and it sometimes happens. In this case, I don't think that is in the scope.
Mr. Williams:  Looking at the comments, I think we have answered most of them. One that we haven't talked about yet is about the lawn mowing and asking for the CDDs support. Is that going to be covered later?
Mr. Mecsics: That is on the agenda further down.
Mr. Williams: The other was about the combined amenities policy, so if that is also on the agenda I guess we will be doing that later also. Other than that, the ones that we could answer, I think we have answered them all. I don't see any others that we really can answer at this point and time.
Ms. Pontious: I think the one I see that hasn't been answered, and I don't know that we have an answer is the time limit.  We hear things in the community about only having so long, is there a time limit or is that negotiable? Does anyone know that?
Mr. Costello: This morning at our meeting, we decided that I would work with the attorney and hopefully CDD II would appoint one of your people to work along with us in negotiating and talking to the owners of the golf course to find out what is going on. Are you going to appoint somebody?
Mr. Mecsics:  That should be discussed at our meeting this afternoon. Mr. Costello: Okay. Then the intention is to appoint somebody?
14

 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Ms. Carpenter: I will explain that a little more. What came up in the earlier meeting after reading the report and hearing the comments from the workshop, there are questions about the scope of the offer. It appears thatthe consultants met about the price, but the issue about the free memberships and a number of other things came up, the District would have to weigh in the operations and maintenance ongoing that they pay, as well as the debt assessment because once it went to a governmental entity that debt assessment would come due. So there are a number of things that have to be worked into the price and that is when the Lake Ashton CDD Board delegated for one of their Board members to go forward with the manager and counsel to approach the developer and do basic due diligence. The golf specialist has given us the basics for this, but now we need to know specifics to know exactly what the offer is and how the Districts can respond going forward. Right now I think we have a lot of questions. The questions came up that everyone has heard that the owner is going to list it soon, but we don't know when. That has been kind of vague, at least what has been presented to the Boards and the public.
Ms. Pontious:  We need to determine what are the costs inherited in this purchase. We are going to have to deal with surveys, S.W.F.W.M.D., and possibilities that some of the property may not be in good condition. All of those things are going to have to come to light before we find huge bills of having to fix things because we now own them. I think that is part of the charge, too, to begin to assemble what it is we need to know.
Ms. Carpenter: Yes, and I would throw out really rough numbers, but you are talking about thousands of dollars for environmental reports, surveys, etc. There is talk of encroachments and water management permits.  You are probably looking at $100,000 or more so that needs to be defined and broken down.
Ms. Pontious:  With all of that I think that can reach half the purchase price pretty easily and we have to be very careful about that. So I guess where we are with this right now is we wait for them to do what they need to do this afternoon, and then we can move forward. We just don't want to sit around and do nothing because time is going and we need to move forward in some capacity and we are ready to do that as soon as we have a little more information.
15

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion on Gate Entry System
Ms. Pontious:   Next item on the agenda is Discussion on Gate Entry System.  As LouJean alluded to, I think part of our efficiency in protecting our community is right now at the gates. So again, we need to decide whether or not we want to move forward in a different kind of processing system, or how we are going to make this work. Are there any suggestions?
Mr. Mecsics: We took a look at this, and we had a meeting and discussed all of the ramifications, recognizing at first our roads are public.   No matter how you look at it, whoever wants to come in can come in. However, we can discriminate with things such as the clickers. I know some folks don't like clickers, and there is a lot of other types of technology out there because I deal with it. Anything from barcodes to satellite receivers all come with a price. Recognizing that we are all worried about monetary impacts on both of  our  CDDs, Mike and  I  have talked a  lot  about this.	Right now, we don't recommend changing the system at this point; however, we can change the system in that we have clickers, we have a system in place that does work.  What we can do if we have to is recommend a reprogramming of those clickers. He and I can sit here reprogramming them for many days if we have to.  It would be a low cost, low impact.  It will slow down anyone who is a nonresident or renter and will make the system we have right now work.
Mr. Costello: I think a big part of it would be the expense of going to another type of system. By reprogramming them on a yearly or bi-yearly process, what you are going to do is as people move in or out, they will try to get through the gate and find that their transponder isn't opening the gate.   This is one way to stop this from going on.  It will probably involve the least amount of money for us to reprogram the transponders.
Mr. Mecsics: It will not only impact the clickers, and I know it is going to be a pain for folks who have programmed it into their visor systems, as well, but if someone no longer lives here and rolls up to our gate, they can click all day long and sooner or later they will come in contact with one of security officers and be verified to come in or not.
Mr. Costello:   The only thing there is we might have to make sure that nobody accepts the excuse that they live here but the transponder isn't working at this time. They

16

 	 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

are going to have to realize that going forward, if we are reprogramming things, security is going to have to be on top of it. Like I said I don't want to bear the expense of a lot of money for something that isn't going to slow things down anyway.
Mr. Mecsics: To add to that as Mike said, with our security officers, they work for us. If we give them direction to do something, they shall do it. And the other thing is when we talk with Mary and Christine, at our amenities here, if you see someone who looks out of place, let the security officers know.
Ms. Pontious: So are you proposing that each resident should be responsible for bringing their transmitter to a site that then will be reprogrammed?
Mr. Mecsics: What I would recommend is for Mike and I to sit down and come up with a plan, pick a location, and we will get the machine to do the reprogramming.
Mr. Costello: And during this time period, what I would like to see is number every transponder and record who has what transponder. This way if someone tries to get in, we can see the transponder to see if something is wrong or if someone is letting someone else use it and we can ask the owner why you are giving your transponder out.
Ms. Pontious:  Sounds like a lot of work, but there are a lot of us to do it. Mr. Costello:  I don't really think it is going to be a time consuming thing.
Mr. Williams: I know not all resales are made by the office here, but this office here is certainly handling a large number. Is it possible to talk to them about collecting those transponders?
Mr. Murphey: How exactly are you going to handle the changeover?' Like when you change the codes, half the people might have had their transponders changed already, but half of them did not, so are both of them going to work for a while?
Mr. Costello:  Most households have two transponders.  So what you would do is you would come in have one changed and we would change the code on the gate. Then you come in after that and have the other one changed.
Ms. VanSickle: I've heard you can change the codes automatically. Is it expensive?
Mr. Costello: We don't know. We called the people who handle our gates, but I have not received a call back yet. So I have no idea.
17

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr.  Mecsics:  I  asked  some  of  my  colleagues  in  the  industry.  The  bar  code technology most people don't use anymore except for cargo companies. They are all using satellite, and that is expensive.
Ms. Pontious: So I assume we would need to wait to do this until January when most people are here.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes. After the holidays.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	on	Community
Hurricane Preparedness Plan
Ms. Pontious: Mike has been working on getting the hurricane preparedness plan in place. Do you want to talk to us about that?

Mr. Costello: I also worked with Jim on this. Jim came up with an excellent plan which was mainly through the government, so maybe he can explain it a little better.
Mr. Mecsics: We set up a plan that has been in place on the Winter Haven side that worked quite well during our last hurricane. It is based upon a FEMA and DOD plan. What is articulated in this report and plan is not only do we have it from a general perspective as Christine, Mary, Mike and I have all talked about, is having checklists for all of our staff to perform so nobody misses something.
Mr. Costello: The only other thing we do have available to us, and I know it was tested yesterday and it failed the test, but hopefully we are going to straighten that out, is the robocalls. I think Christine said this morning that we are going to look into what the problem is. Other than that, as far as a hurricane plan goes, I thought the one that Jim
came up with that we borrowed from the government is a very good one.
.	.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes. I think if we marry up the robocalls along with the blasts, since the blasts seemed to work out very well during the last hurricane, we will hit everyone every different way we can. More information is better than less.
Ms. Pontious: Do we need to accept this plan, or is it for informational purposes?
Mr. Mecsics: We already have it as ours in existence. You can accept it as a joint plan if you want to. We can make a motion from our side that we accept, it is a joint plan versus just an individual plan so we can adopt the same language on both sides.
18

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Robertsonwith all in favor the Lake Ashton II CDD Board accepted the joint hurricane preparedness plan for Lake Ashton II CDD and Lake Ashton CDD.

On MOTION by Mr. Costello seconded by Mr. Deane with all in favor the Lake Ashton CDD Board accepted the joint hurricane preparedness plan for Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II CDD.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Joint	Resident
Feedback Survey
Ms. Pontious: Consideration of Joint Resident Feedback Survey. Christine, Mary, Mike, and who was the representative from the West who worked with you?
Mr. Costello:  Actually I didn't work on that.  I think just Christine and Mary did. Ms. Pontious: So do you want to talk to us about this?
Ms. Wells: We sent it out about a month ago. Mary brought her HFC survey she has done, and I brought our survey that we have done here, and we put it together. Some of the questions do have to be separated as far as common area landscaping and there are some that have to specify labels for Winter Haven just so Mary knows someone is referring to landscaping for Winter Haven and she knows what to do and the same thing with me for Lake Wales.  We did take out some redundant questions to shorten it.  Our survey was six pages prior to joining it and we still were able to keep it at six pages after.

Ms. Bosman: I think one of the things we accomplished to make it approachable was to have only three answers: disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree. I think that derived more information from that instead of the vagueness that more options offer. Christine pretty well covered everything. As she said, we went through them line by line, do we need this, do we not need this, does someone besides us need the information, and I felt quite thorough doing so, but it is a draft so if anyone finds anything they would like to include that we have not, please let us know and we will be glad to add that.
Ms. Pontious: I understand the difference between the facilities, so in some cases you say HFC, some cases you say clubhouse. I think that is very definable, but when we

19

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

get to the third page it says Lake Ashton with Lake Wales in parenthesis so where is the same question for Winter Haven? Next one is the same thing. Where is the same question for Winter Haven? So if you can join those and it is only one response for the whole facility, then that would be fine. Otherwise I thinl, that it needs a little more proofreading with either combination or defining which area it is.
Ms. Bosman:  Thank you for finding that.
Ms. Pontious: I really like the boldness of the clubhouse, Lake Wales, or East or HFC, Winter Haven, or West, but if you are putting things together maybe we need to say joint or something in that sort so that defines that question as well. Otherwise I think you did a fabulous job and I think it will be much easier for the residents to understand and that we should get a better response rate.
Ms. Wells: Thank you.
Ms. Bosman: Thanks, Christine for working with me.
Ms. Wells: Of course. Do you have a specific date you want it to go out? Mary and I were thinldng October when there are more residents back.  Personally, and I will let Mary comment on what she thinks, I would prefer for it to go out electronic only at first, then if you want a paper copy, because we understand some people don't have computers or just prefer filling out a paper copy, you pick one up at the desk. It is just a lot easier to compile results when we get the feedback and to get it recorded to you in a timely manner.  Do any of you have any thoughts or comments on that?
Ms. Pontious:   I think that is a great idea.  It also eliminates duplicity because you know someone isn't filling out one electronically then also on paper. Maybe we can offer the service that if you want to do it here, someone here could help you do it electronically?
Ms.  Bosman:   Are we thinking possibly like a week electronically?   Then mail?
Ms. Wells: I was thinking go electronically altogether and then if you want a paper copy you would come pick it up from us or contact us like we do with the newsletter.
Ms. Pontious: Right. Do electronic only this year and see what that gets us.
Ms. Wells: And still have hardcopies available for those who don't have email access or prefer paper.
20

Ms. Pontious:  Yes.   They can fill it out and hand it to you.  That way you know they are only doing it one time, as well.  I think that would be a great idea.
Ms. Bosman: And if someone provides a paper copy, we can ask them for an updated email address.
Ms.  Pontious:   If  it  is  easier  for  you  to  compile  electronically  then  that  is  the direction we need to move to then.  Do we need to vote on this or is it just accepted?
Mr. Robertson: Just accept it.
Ms. Pontious:  We can just accept the joint survey.  Thank you both for doing this.

SEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration   of  Joint  Amenity
Policy
Ms. Pontious: Discussion of Joint Amenity Policy is our next item. I think this is a
real good endeavor. We need to have this and I hope it can be enforced equally and if there are exceptions to be made, they need to be made in certain circumstances, we know that, but if we keep the information going back and forth, then that will make things a whole lot easier to move forward with joint decisions.
Mr. Costello:  Stan, myself, Mary, and Christine sat down at two different points and we went through the two different amenities policies since there is one for the Lake Wales side and one for the Winter Haven side. We feel that quite honestly they read pretty much the same, just that they said things in different order. Yes, we did have some additions on things like the guest policy and another thing was about signs on the property, but basically when we read through it, we determined that for the most part
they pretty much said the same things in a different order. I believe Christine was the
.	.
one who sat down and put everything into order in one formation and we went from
there, but quite honestly I don't thinl< we had that many changes.
Ms.  Wells:    We  didn't  have  that  many.    There  were  some  amenities  that  are exclusive to either the clubhouse or HFC, so it is moving those amenities over.
Mr. Costello: There were minor areas that were due to the fact that they are two different buildings and two different sets of amenities where there were changes, but for the most part you are not going to see any major changes.
21

Mr. Williams: I think there is one that is kind of major that came up from Jim. He wanted us to talk about what the definition of guest was.
Mr. Costello: I think I said that we did make a change there. We did define that.
Mr. Williams: Yes, and it does have an impact on how guests can come in. We are limiting guests to 12 times.
Mr. Costello: We kicked that back and forth. I thought it was 10 times.
Mr. Williams: We will need some input on that. What it basically says is if you have someone coming in here, say you are inviting someone from a local area to come in and join you for a movie on a weekly basis, you have to sign them in as a guest. You get 12 times a year to sign them in. After that, they need to join the clubhouse at $2,400.
Mr. Costello: But we left it up to the discretion of the managers. There is going to be a situation where maybe you have a relative that lives a few miles away and may come in to visit more than 12 times a year. We get that. I have a sister who lives in Daytona and if she comes over here for the 13th time and tries to slide in, I don't want it to be a problem, but we can go to the manager of the amenities and explain the scenario.
Mr. Williams: If it is in a case like that where it is a family member or whatever, the intent was to keep folks who are just coming in all of the time and using the facilities that the members have the right to use.
Mr. Costello: We were trying to eliminate someone from coming in twice a week to use the pool or the gym. I don't think we were trying to stop visitors entirely, but like I said, we have to leave the managers of the amenities some discretion.
Mr. Williams: I guess why I brought it up is because I think that was the most major change in the whole thing. E�erything else was just this is how it is in both places and I think we need to give the folks the chance to read it, understand it, and comment on it before we vote on it.
Ms. VanSickle: I just want to make one comment. You might want to distinguish between family and somebody on the outside. If you have a grandchild living nearby, I am not fortunate enough to have mine that close, but I like to bring them in when they are here and I am sure other people do, too.
22

Mr. Williams:  That is why we want to give discretion to the amenities managers to take care of that.
Ms. VanSickle: But my concern is you have people on the outside coming in to use the pool, and then it is like they can come any time they want and it doesn't make it that you have to be with them. Now if I invite somebody over and we are going to the pool, we would go together, but if you say to someone else you want to come in and use our pool, we have a pretty cool pool, they can come in any time they want within the 12 times. Then we are overtaxing our amenities and I think this is like opening floodgates. The number 12 scares me and also the fact that we don't have to accompany them. Why would you allow somebody from the outside to come in and use our amenities? If they are visiting you and staying in your home or if they are coming over for the day, I would think you would be spending time with them. How do you account for that?
Mr. Williams:  The thing is set up as 12, but we thought family members would be excluded from that and it would be handled by the amenities managers. If it goes beyond the 12 they would look at that.  Mary, did you want to make a comment on that?
Ms. Bosman: Sometimes numbers get in the way so our thoughts on the number 12 is that would just be, and I hate to use the word flag because that sounds critical and regulatory, but Christine and I would after 12 visits take a look at the individual situation. If it is a grandchild, or child, or whatever the situation is, we are lucky enough to work here and you are lucky enough to trust us and we have both Boards as our bosses and if we are not doing it correctly, they will let us know. So I will ask that you trust us, work with us, and talk with us when a situation comes up where more than 12 visits might take place that will justify that amount. It was a number that was decided on as a guideline. I guess that should be the main word, guideline. I think the definition of guest is a properly registered guest and with inviting people in they have to be with their person.
Mr.  d'Adesky:   This is obviously  a draft that is  subject  to comment.   Both  the community and the Boards have not really reviewed it yet. When you are adopting a policy or procedural rule, you want to make sure that you avoid the possibility of it being interpreted as arbitrary in how it is applied, and while I have absolute faith in both Mary
23 

and Christine, if there is any discretion it can be perceived as arbitrary so we can take a look at it and find a way to make more of a bright line and craft out some exceptions based on the commentary and what the Boards want to actually effectuate as part of that policy.
Mr. Williams: I just wanted to bring it up because I didn't want us to vote on it at this point and time. It is not ready to be voted on yet. It is just for discussion at this time and we want to hear more comments from everyone, let the lawyers look at it, and go from there. It is a draft and we will all have a chance to comment on it.
Ms. VanSickle: I have one other comment. On page 13 under spa rules, I think it comes out a little bit confusing. "No one less than 13 years of age allowed in the spa." Then it says "Children under the age 18 much be accompanied at all times by a parent or other responsible adult." I think just to make it a little bit clearer, "Children between 13 and 17 need to be accompanied by an adult." Thank you for going through this.
Ms. Pontious: So I think we will need to leave this for the next meeting and take a look at it again. Thank you very much for the input.
EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion on Meet the Candidates
Forum
Ms. Pontious: The next item on the agenda is the candidate forum. In the past our candidates forums have been done by the HOA, but we do have a number of seats for the CDD that are open this year and we would like the people to be informed about who is running and what their viewpoints are so we are hoping to do a meet the candidates forum between now and election time. Do we want to do it together? Do we want to do it separately? You have only one person on Lake Ashton II and we have two on Lake Ashton so there are three people thatthe positions need to be filled. Whatis your opinion on that? Do we want to do them together or separately?
Mr. Mecsics: Name the place and I will be there.
Mr. Costello: And even if you are not running opposed, you should be there to answer questions of the people in the audience.
Mr. Deane: Half of the seats on this Board were up for reelection this year.

24

Ms. Carpenter: And anyone who is running in a current seat, we have Sunshine Law issues, so it should be a noticed workshop if everyone is going to be present. Excuse me since I have to run to another meeting, but Andrew is going to stay for the balance. Sorry I have to leave. I tried to stay as long as I could. Thank you.
Ms. VanSickle: I just want to make one comment. This needs to be scheduled by the first week of October because that is when the ballots go out. I would like everyone to get a chance to meet all of the candidates.
Mr. Costello: This may be our last joint meeting prior to that so I would think that maybe we should look at the calendar and set a date right now.
Ms. Pontious: I think we are going to have to have Christine and Darrin doing that so we can get calendars in both places.
Mr. Costello: If we can get something by the end of the meeting, maybe both sides can make a decision as to when we want to do this.
Ms. Wells: You are looking at the first week of October?
Ms. VanSickle:	Or the end of September. Does anyone have the date for the absentee ballots?
Mr. Deane: It is 28 days before the election.
Ms. Pontious: So we would need one of the larger rooms, either side. Before we select that, how do you want to do the moderator part?
Ms. VanSickle: You have had some good moderators and timekeepers in the past.
Maybe see if they are still interested?
Ms. Wright: Can we get back to you?
Mr. Mecsics: We have the meeting this afternoon where we can talk about that. Ms. Pontious: Okay. We just need to give them an answer so they can schedule it.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion on Interlocal Agreements
(requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Ms. Pontious: Discussion on Interlocal Agreement. That was yours, Mr. Mecsics. Mr. Mecsics: Yes. We talked about this many times and we talk about working together.	It is time to get serious and sit back and really talk about our interlocal
25

agreements and how we will work together in the future. I know there has been discussion about combining the CDDs, but for right now we need to start working together better and those interlocal agreementsneed to be looked at and maybe expanded so I would like to see us designate a member from each Board to talk about those interlocal agreements and realistically how we work together as two Boards because that is so important. I would volunteer to do that so my challenge is to my friends and neighbors on CDD I's side. Who wants to do that?
Mr. Deane:  Fine.
Mr. Mecsics: Any discussion from both Boards? Is that okay with both?
Mr.  d'Adesky:   Obviously you can come up with whatever policy you want to implement and work with us to actually draft that into the agreement.
Mr. Mecsics:  Oh, yes.  We would never leave the lawyers out of it.
Mr. Williams:   Do you have any ideas, besides what is on there right now, have you any thoughts at this point and time that you are actually looking at?
Mr. Mecsics: I think we need to talk about how we approach the joint meetings, how we approach joint concerns, but that is something that just working between Borden and I sitting down and talking about these things and then come back and report back to both of the Boards.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion on Requesting Golf Course
to Resume Mowing Areas Previously Cut (requested by Superoisor Mecsics)
Ms. Pontious: Item #10 is the mowing situation. I think Mike is requesting that we as a Board take a position on this.
Mr. Mecsics: Actually, I put that on here, Carol if that is okay. Ms. Pontious: Alright, go ahead.

Mr. Mecsics:  I got a lot of feedback from everybody and a lot people aren't happy with the way the golf course is not cutting that area right behind the houses and a lot of folks are paying the costs to do so.  I recognize legally that we are constrained from certain things, but I think as Boards we need to make out feelings for the community known as

26

well, not only to the golf course, but piggybacking what Mr. Holden said to both Winter Haven City Council and Lake Wales City Council. So I think we need to draft up a letter if our lawyers can maybe do that, voicing our concerns and request that they take affirmative action to at least alleviate some of the things we have become accustomed to in the past. It may fall on deaf ears, but it is now officially on our record.
Mr. Costello: I agree. I hope it doesn't fall on deaf ears because we vote and there are quite a few of us who pay taxes and vote here. Quite honestly, I hope they hear us and do something about it. Anybody who is thinking about running for one of those offices should do that for this community.
Ms. Burns: And just for the Board's information, Mr. Holden did send a request about contacting Code Enforcement for each of the cities. Mr. Lee was copied on that request and he sent an email back so just for the record so the Boards know his response said: "Good afternoon. This is one of the items on your agenda tomorrow. I have attached Section 5.5 of the Master Declaration. Please note that as-stated there are certain areas that can be designated by the golf course owner to be in its nature state. Additionally, please note that it adheres in the language that the homeowner is actually responsible to maintain anything abutting water life or roads. Thank you."
Mr. d1 Adesky: We cannot reply on that because that is HOA declaration items, but that is for everyone's information.
Mr. Costello: Are there any local laws that are different from what he is citing? Mr. d1 Adesky: I have not reviewed what he is citing, but I can look into it.
Mr. Deane: Isn't he required by S.W.F.W.M.D. to maintain those areas that are around the ponds?
Mr. Robertson: If S.W.F.W.M.D. had their way they would be all left uncut. They like it as natural as possible. So it is two-edged sword we have to be careful with. If you bring S.W.F.W.M.D. they will say leave it alone, let it be natural. Then it leaves more room for alligators to hide and things like that, but S.W.F.W.M.D. would say to leave it natural so we won't win that battle going in that direction. I thinl, we should as a Board

27

have a motion say we want to approach Winter Haven with the recommendation to get them to enforce all codes if possible. Does someone on CDD II want to make that motion?

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Robertson with all in favor Lake Ashton II CDD authorized staff to approach the City of Winter Haven to contact code enforcement and request for them to enforce all codes if possible.

Ms. Pontious: I have a bit of a problem with this. As a resident and an individual, I agree with what is being said. However, in reading the tone of his response to Mr. Holden, I am wondering if we as a CDD Board want to make that statement at this point prior to negotiations on something that we really want to negotiate. I am concerned about that. I am in favor of doing this as individuals, but I just don't know that we want to make it a legal thing from the CDD Board.
Ms. VanSickle: I think there are upcoming other issues such as stormwater management and that it might be a good idea for as many of our people to attend the next city commission meeting where this can be discussed and voice your opinion. I think numbers are more impressive.
Ms. Pontious: So we don't want to do the Board thing? Okay. I think maybe down the road when we see what direction these others go in, I just hate to put a black mark on moving forward.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor Requests and General
Public Comments

Ms. Pontious: We are ready for Supervisor Requests and General Public Comments. Are there any Supervisors requests? Not hearing anything, how about any public comments?
A resident: As far as Brenda just said on the city commission meeting on the stormwater, there are probably a few more people from Lake Wales in here than there
were earlier, that meeting is on Tuesday, at 6:00 p.m. That is Tuesday, the 14th of this

month. The City of Lake Wales is going to try to assess us another tax for stormwater	 prevention and we do take that already because we have our own system here. We don't

28 

need to be double-taxed, but as it has been discussed about the City of Lake Wales, getting them involved with the grass cutting and everything else, as normal they will ignore what we say to them even though we pay approximately 28 % of their tax. Now one way to get people to vote and let these people know that our fellow counts even though in the last few elections Lake Ashton has voted 20 % or less, so that doesn't mean the City of Lake Wales is going to listen to us. The one reason our vote is so small is that we have to go to the city to vote. Now we vote here in this room during general elections for state and county national offices, but the city refuses to open this up because of the cost of approximately $1,500 to open the precinct voting here. I am the Vice Chairman of the Republican Party of Polk County and I discussed it with Mr. Sutherland, who is the President of Lake Ashton's Democratic Party, and to our surprise, we both agreed that we are going to request the City of Lake Wales to open up a voting booth here for the city elections in April. This will be the only way we can get a representative from Lake Ashton. We have had two. We have had Pete Perez and Jack VanSickle representing Lake Ashton in the past years, but it is almost an impossibility to get anybody elected in this city that represents us unless we have a voting booth here. Thank you.
A resident: I would like to suggest that on the joint amenity policy that we not restrict or count the number of time that family members can come and use our facilities. I thinl<: it seems inhospitable for me who lives here to feel that my family is not welcome. I don't think members from family should count, but anything you want to do for visitors from elsewhere in the community I would support.
Ms. Jess Gordon: For the record I would like to clarify something that was stated
.	.
earlier concerning the purchases of the golf courses. It was stated that NGF recommended
that we should purchase the courses. Their position clearly stated they recommended the purchase with conditions that included spending $80,000 for the courses and $250,000 to improve the practice area, which they stated should be immediate expenses. So I
would like you to think about that when you think about the purchase price of the golf
courses. I am for the purchase of the land, but I would like to separate the business aspect	                        of the golf thing from the purchase of the land. Thank you for listening.

29	

A resident: First of all, I love the joint meetings and working together as much as possible because we will get more done. The comment I wanted to make today is I am confused about the clickers and the security at the gate. If somebody comes in says my clicker doesn't work or I forgot it, we have to let them in anyway, so from my point-of­ view the clickers are just a convenience so we don't have to stop at the security gate and there isn't a line. When we are doing security for people who are coming in that shouldn't be coming in we should be paying attention to the IDs. The IDs we issue here, I know it is not required as long as you have your driver's license, but we have updated lists of who is supposed to be here in our directory. Security and other people can check and make sure that they are legal residents because anybody can come in any time anyhow, so to me it doesn't make sense to spend the money and time to re-click everything. Thank you.
A resident: Going along with what the lady before me just said regarding the IDs, one of the things I have noticed in going to the pool, the last few times nobody is asking me who I am.  The guards do come around, but I have only been asked one time to show my identification. Never again. I realize that they will get accustomed to seeing us as we are there more often, but if it is a guard I don't recognize and I am not being questioned, I am just wondering if that is happening with anybody else who uses the pool or any of the other facilities.   Nobody is questioning who I am.   I also wanted to ask about the guests coming in. Is there data kept on those of us who do have people coming in? Are the sheets kept and then input somehow so you know that I have had my grandkids here two times? Do you put that into some kind of software system so you can see how many times we have had people come in? I thinl, we all agree that we don't want our family not allowed to come here after 12 visits. I also wanted to ask about the golf course. I keep hearing right of refusal. We have the first right of refusal. Is that true or not? You are shaking  your heads no.   It is not.   That takes care of that question.   The RV storage.   I understand that there is an offer that we would pay $1 a year rent for maintaining and keeping the maintenance vehicles there. I heard that at the last meeting.

Ms. Pontious: You need to separate that from the RV storage. It is two separate things. The RV storage is one thing and the maintenance building is another.

30

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

A resident: There are two buildings over there?
Ms. Pontious: Well there are two areas. One is the RV storage and the other is the building that is in the front. That is the place that the mowing equipment is stored.
A resident: And Maxwell would maintain ownership of that and we would pay the $1 a year so that any time he can pull the rug out from underneath us if it is a rental? Mr. Robertson: No. It would be long term contracts. It was suggested a 99 year contract at $1 a year. His intention is when the building is finished and the construction is finished, the building would be turned into self-storage units. He doesn't want to
separate half the building from the other.
A resident: Okay. Then I would like to go back and rewind to when we were first shown all of the paperwork on the golf course purchase. There were other buildings that were discussed and if I understand correctly, the other outbuildings, the marina, the sales office, the Eagle's Nest, have all been put on the backburner until some decision is made about moving forward with the golf courses? Is that correct?
Mr. Robertson: The Eagle's Nest is part of the initial consideration. The dock was suggested as being not something that we want to acquire. The reason is if we acquire it, then it becomes a public dock and has to be put on Polk County public records as a public dock and anyone can come in on the public roads and use a public dock. So I don't think that we as a community want to own the dock.
A resident: So other than the Eagle's Nestmost of those otherbuildings are off the table and there is nothing else to consider. Regarding the clickers, we do have our own resale people here. Are they under any guidelines to ask those residents who live here now when they sell ·their home that they check off that they have returned the clicker or gate opener or whatever you want to call it? Are they under any due diligence?
Mr. Costello: They own the transponder so we can't take them. You pay $37 for it.
A resident: I understand you own it, but if you are selling your home, wouldn't it be the right thing to do to give it to the new owner? None of the real estate agents do ask about turning them over as they sell the property?

31

Ms. Pontious: We have quite a few HOA people here. Is that something in the HOA that can be written in there that they are required to return those? There are other communities where you do have to return them.
Mr. Mecsics: That is something we can talk to them about with the resale office and probably they can coordinate with our legal eagles about that.
A resident: ID badges, which I mentioned that nobody has asked me about, there is no way to know year-to-year whether or not it is a current badge. Is there any way we can send out 2018, 2019, 2020 stickers to all of us who wear those badges that assures that nobody is coming back in and using the facilities. Everybody can come back from and get a little sticker to put on their badges. That is cheap to do.
Mr. Mecsics: I think that is something we can consider.
A resident: I think that is an easy fix. As a new resident here when I first moved in, I thought this was one community, Lake Ashton. My very first meeting here, I have to tell you I was so disappointed that as some of the dissention I heard between residents and the Boards. I moved to Lake Ashton. I didn't move to the East or the West or anyplace else. I am a member of this community and I would like us all to keep that in mind. We have to work together on this, guys. I have friends on both sides. We all have a vested interest. Thank you very much.

Ms. Sharon Carl: I live at 3006 Ashton Palms Drive. I have a very strong concern regarding a question that was asked to the Board and was really not answered. I thought this question was quite critical. Regarding the time limit, what is the rush? You all looked at each other, but no answer was provided. That leads me to believe that you don't know what you are talking about. The fact is it really makes me question the credibility of the Boards if you cannot answer a simple question. Secondly, right now we have two CDDs. What would happen if we go through with this and we vote as two different CDDs? What if one says yes and the other says no? Then what do we do? I would really like those answers. I also want to know why one Board member is not held accountable for sending personal and erroneous information without Board approval. Also, because I have already written the Board about this, I also have to address resuming the mowing
32 

 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

of areas. I was the one who observed the gator getting very close to a landscaper. That was my neighbor. That is a safety issue that needs to be addressed. It is not anything about finger-pointing. It is a safety issue. What would happen if that guy had been attacked by a gator? Who would be held accountable? That is what I would like to know. Mr. Holden: I would like to thank you all for your time today. I really appreciate having both CDDs here. It is good to get that level of communication going for the entire community. The only thing that is required for bad things to continue to happen is for good people to do nothing. I am disappointed in the Lake Ashton CDD Board that you are unwilling to take a stand with the City of Lake Wales. My wife and I will continue to be a lone voice crying in the wilderness and I am very disappointed that you were unable to come to a consensus supporting the members here who want this to be resolved and you are not even willing to stand up and say City of Lake Wales, please enforce whatever codes you have. That is all I am asking for. The worst thing my mother ever said to me was, and thank goodness it was only ever a couple times, is that I am disappointed. Board
members, I am disappointed.
A resident: I love following that gentleman because I think you did us a disservice by not agreeing to try to pressure Mr. Maxwell. He is not our friend. He did not offer this deal for his golf course because he is a really fine fellow. He did it because he is tired of dumping his money into the golf course, which is a bottomless pit, which I have mentioned several times. During the first meeting today, I heard severalcommentsabout how we shouldn't be spending money on that because we have several things in the fire and unless I didn't understand what was happening, you agreed for $23,000 to put up a new scoring system in the bowling alley. I grew up bowling. At every bowling alley we had a sheet of paper that we just filled out. This is quite important for the elderly population in Lake Ashton because it keeps their arithmetic skills going and they can improve their vision by looking down the alley and saying okay we started with 10 pins and now there are three remaining, that means I have knocked down 7 pins. So I write down a 7 and so on. Do you know how many pads of paper it would take to equal
$23,000? Thank you.

33

Ms. Sandra Renker: I wasn't planning to speak but I changed my mind. Lake Ashton, both East and West, is like a blue plate special. You come here, you pay for all of the amenities. You pick and choose what you want to do. You don't say, I want to do this, but I am not paying for that. It is called being kind to your fellow man. That is all that I have to say. Thank you.
Ms. Pontious: Let's answer some of these questions. Mike, I am sorry, that you feel that way. There are five us and we will follow up on what you are asking us to do. I think my opinion was just that maybe as a Board it was not a smart thing to do prior to going into negotiations, but I think all five of us stand with your support and will do that. Mr. Holden: Can you not take the additional step as a Board asking the City of

Lake Wales to enforce the codes? I appreciate what you just said, but it is the difference that makes the difference. It says the Lake Ashton CDD Board would like the City of Lake Wales to enforce the codes of the golf course. I don't know all of the codes, but I believe there is high grass, high weeds code enforcement and that is what I turned them in for. If the Board put a letter out to the City of Lake Wales, then that would be really appreciated. As for the rest of it, thank you very much for nothing if all you are going to do is say we support you and empathize with you because that doesn't give us any extra leverage whereas something official from the CDD would give us some more leverage.
Mr. Costello: Could we run this past S.W.F.W.M.D. to find out what their feelings are on something like this?
Mr. Robertson: Their feelings are let it grow.
Ms. VanSickle: Andrew, do we have any legal claim to stand on?
.	.
Mr. d'Adesky: I'd highly recommend against dragging S.W.F.W.M.D. into this.
A resident: What about safety?
Mr. d'Adesky: It is up to you all as the Boards to direct me what to do. One Board has directed me of what to do. You all also would need to provide me with such direction if you so choose to.
Mr. Costello: Well according to what we are being told, there is a safety situation here. We can't have gators going after people.
34

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Ms. Pontious:   A solution to that in the past has been that they come in and take out the gator.
Ms. Costello: Yes, I realize that, but I hope that it is not after somebody is attacked.
Ms.  VanSickle:   If what Mr. Lee said is valid, it is not going to do us any good anyway, is it? Is what he said valid?
Mr. d'Adesky:  Like I said before, I am not sure about the HOA declarations and whether or not that is valid.
A resident: The West CDD is going to do that. A letter won't hurt. It could help. Mr. Costello:  I agree. I make a motion to send a letter to the city to see what happens. Mr. Ference:  I will second that.
Ms. Pontious:  We have a motion from Mike and a second from Bob.  All in favor?
I am still not in favor of the Board doing this, but it passes with three ayes.
Ms. Burns: For the record, Brenda, were you also opposed since Carol said 3 ayes? Ms. VanSickle: Yes, opposed.

On MOTION by Mr. Costello seconded by Mr. Ference with Mr. Costello, Mr. Ference, and Mr. Deane voting aye and Ms. Pontious and Ms. VanSickle voting nay, the motion for District Counsel to send a letter to the City of Lake Wales for enforcement regarding mowing the pond banks was approved; passing 3-2.

Mr. Zacharia: Just an informational item, the code for the City of Lake Wales for the property around the ponds is a maximum of 12 inches to be maintained year-round.
Mr. Robertson:  Thanks, Murray.
Ms. Pontious: We have some other questions that need to be answered. I tried to write them all down, but I am going to need help if I didn't get them all. You wanted to know if there was indeed a written timeline.
Mr. Robertson:  There is no written timeline.  The owner can decide what he wants to do at any given time. He is going to base his actions based on the feedback that he gets from today's meeting.

35 

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Ms. VanSickle: Where did the 45 day limit come from then?
Mr. Robertson: That was written to us back in the beginning of May. He has extended that time obviously to see what the two Boards want to do. After the meetings today he will decide what he wants to do.  If he feels that there is any hope of talking to us, he might continue. If he doesn't think there is any hope for us, then that is that. We are not even in control of that process. We don't have any knowledge of that process. It is his decision.
Ms. Pontious: Okay. Are there any other questions that we didn't answer?
A resident: I just have a question for every Board member. Is there anybody on this Board that is going to get a financial something or other that nobody else is going to get if we approve this immediately without really looking into it?
Ms. Pontious:  Redefine what you are asking?  I am not understanding it.
A resident: I want to know if any of the Board members here are being paid by the developer person.
Ms. Pontious:  Absolutely not.  We are not. A resident: Nobody?
Mr. Ference:  No.
Mr. Robertson: No. Nobody gets that opportunity. That would be illegal for one, and that is not what these Boards are all about. We are all just trying to do what the best for the community.
Ms. Wright: That is true.
Ms. Pontious: Are there any other questions we didn't answer?

is	happens?

A resident: If there  . a conflict in voting with the two CDDs, what	.
Ms. Pontious: We don't know yet. That is what we are trying to tell all of you about all of this. There is much more that we don't know than what we do know.
Mr. d1 Adesky:  The question is if one was to vote to acquire and the other doesn't,
under statutes, in terms of exercising authority outside of the boundaries, it is very specific what we would have to do for that subject to a development order or interlocal agreement. It seems like based on initial review, once again not spending lots of legal
36 

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

time on this, but it seems like there would need to be some level of cooperation between both Districts. It couldn't be a unilateral decision on either part just because of the way the documents are currently.
Mr. Mossing:	In reality I don't think either CDD individually could handle this acquisition and run it on its own so it would have to be both as far as I am concerned.
Ms. Pontious:  Okay.   Anything else today for the good of the cause?   You have another meeting at 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Robertson:  Yes.
Ms. Bosman: Monday September 24th is good at either place so it would be at your discretion which location you would choose for the meet the candidates forum.
Ms. Pontious: Does Monday September 24th work for everyone? Mr. Deane:  Do it after Monday Coffee?

Ms. Pontious: Is it okay to do it after Monday Morning Coffee? Ms. Wells: From 10:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
Ms. Pontious: Okay. That should be plenty of time. We just need to find some
moderators. We have some names and will check on those if that works. Anything else? If not, thank you all for coming and for your patience in enduring all of this.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
There not being any further business to discuss,

On MOTION by Mr. Ference seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	Chairman/ Vice Chairman

37

MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON II
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
A meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District was held on Friday, August 10, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at Lake Ashton II Health & Fitness Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida 33884.
Present and constituting a quorum were:

Doug Robertson Jim Mecsics Daniel Murphey Stanley Williams Carla Wright
Also present were:
Darrin Mossing Jill Burns
Andrew d'Adesky Alan Rayl
Mary Bosman Numerous Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager GMS
District Counsel District Engineer Community Director

Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance

Ms. Burns called the meeting to order at approximately 1 :30 p.m., called the roll and the pledge of allegiance was recited. All Supervisors were present.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience	Comments	on	Specific
Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting. Individuals providing   speaker  cards  will  also  have an
opporttmitJl  to speak prior to Board action)
Mr. Robertson:   For those who don't know, the people that signed up to comment, are allowed two minutes to speak before we vote.   I have some speaker cards.   The first one is from Bob Zelazny. Bob, do you want to speak now or under each individual item?
Mr. Zelazny:  Under each individual item.
Mr. Robertson:  The next speaker card is from Joseph Volpe.

 	 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Volpe:  I had two items that I would like to speak on.  The first is about the golf course.  Only 25 % of residents play golf here, but 100 % enjoy the benefit of the golf course. Secondly, I don't know if residents are aware, but every Board member on the CDD has to file a financial disclosure form every year with the Supervisor of Elections.  The Supervisor of Elections determines the precinct, whether there was a precinct polling place here, not the city or county commission. If you were to receive any type of financial compensation from any entity that does business with the Board, you could be in violation of state statute. I said "could be" because it would be investigated. I just wanted to clarify this, since some people are unaware that there is a disclosure process that you have to go through with the state of Florida. Thanl< you.
Mr. Robertson: Next is Ms. Gloria Crary-Leh. Ms. Crary-Leh: I will wait.
Mr. Robertson:  Diane Bensonburg.
Ms. Bensonburg: I request that the CDD Board revisit the rule requesting that lap ropes be up in the pool swim lanes during exercise classes. I refer to our Aqua Aerobic Class, which is scheduled on Monday, Wednesday and Friday for 45 minutes at 10:00 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. An average of 20 to 25 people attends this class all during the season and they are restrictive. I don't know why the Board chose to institute this rule, but two weeks ago, our class was interrupted by a Supervisor, who asked why the ropes were not up during the class, so the class was stopped. The ropes were  put back  up,  but  people in those lanes had to find another place to swim. Obviously, the Board takes this rule very seriously. My question is why? The class has always immediately put the ropes back, as soon as the class was over. I talked to people who swim laps. It is a wonderful exercise, but I can't understand why someone would want to do that, when 20 to 25 people are doing something else.   One participant did go back in after class to swim laps.   He's new to the class, so I asked him if he would mind if the ropes were up during the class, and he said that he would not be in favor of it. This is a wonderful facility and we are lucky to have it.   I thank the Board for donating the time to help keep it this way, but I would ask that the lap ropes be in the pool, at all times. Thank you.

2

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr.  Edmunds:   I freely admit that I've never been to a Board meeting before.   We lived here two years.   I heard two rumors that the two Boards don't get along too well. Frankly, I thought that the Lake Wales Board was  not interested in  debating  the  merits  of the golf course issue. They withheld information and posed a personal attack  on  our Chairman, which was totally uncalled for, especially knowing how much work you have done to make this happen.   At least get to the point of where you are going to discuss it. Secondly, this is a private community and  I  want  it  to  remain  a  private  community.  I agree with you  100%, that we  have  to control the land,  because if we control it,  we remain a private community, unless we choose a vendor to run the golf course. I heard  some comments that people might leave if we buy the golf course.  Well  25 %  of us play  golf.  How many do you think will leave, if we  don't  buy  the  golf course?  I guarantee  you  that I'm gone, as the main draw for a lot of people is the  golf course.  I don't want to  lose  the front of my house, and I'm not going to  sit in my  house 24/ 7 and play bingo at  night.  It's just not going to work. There are a lot of different activities here. There is a  pool and pickleball.  Out of all of those activities,  the single  most used activity is  golf,  but  it is not  the majority. More people play golf than pickleball or tennis or swimming, so you have to  keep that in mind. Like this lady said, it's  important  for  us  to  stay  private,  maintain  control of our land and keep the golf course. The personal assassination crap that went on this morning disgusted me.  Thank you.
Mr. Robertson:  Next is Sandra Price.

Ms. Price: This is going to be a little repetitive. It is about the swim lanes. I'm asking you to reverse the rule made one-and-a-half years ago, to allow the lap lane ropes to come down during aerobics class. There have been no lap swimmers during classes, as noted on the signup sheets that we have to fill out each time we go to class. It has been said that 45 swimmers can use the available space outside of the lap lanes. We are not 6 feet tall.  We cannot use the deep end.  We need the entire pool to do our exercises.   With the lap lanes being up, the people that are close to the lap lanes are hitting the ropes while we are doing our exercises. If we use the lanes when they are available to use, you are hitting the wall. That's all I have.

3

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Robertson: John Velebir.
Mr. Velebir:  I did want to talk about the golf course a little more.  I think that ifs an emotional  issue  for  the  entire  community.   What  we  have  seen  so  far,  has  been  a fair amount of wishful thinking and the presentations are not backed  up by a lot of facts.   I think that it would be beneficial if the Boards could convene a group. I think five people were in favor of the golf course. Provide a real business plan with an analysis, so that the residents can make a decision, not based on emotions, but based on facts.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval	of	the	Minutes	of	the
Workshop Lake Ashton II CDD Meeting held on April 27, 2018, the Minutes of Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II CDD Joint Meeting held on May 11, 2018, and Minutes of the Lake Ashton II CDD  Meeting held on May 11, 2018
Mr.  Robertson:	You have the minutes  of the April  27th  CDD meeting and the joint meeting and Board meeting on May 11th. Are there any comments?
Ms. Burns:  Supervisor Williams provided me a correction on Page 28 of the joint minutes. The word " inherit" should be "inherent".

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Murphey with all in favor the Minutes of the April 27, 2018 Lake Ashton II CDD Workshop Meeting, the May 11, 2018 Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton· II CDD Joint Meeting and the May 11, 2018 Lake Ashton II CDD Meeting were approved as-amended.

Mr.  d'Adesky:	You  could  approve  the  minutes  subject  to  corrections  and scri• venerI s errors.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
Ratification of Agreement with National Golf Foundation Consulting for Acquisition Feasibility Study
Mr. Robertson:  We already approved the report and we just have to approve the expenditure.

4

August 10, 2018

Mr. Murphey:  Was it $26,000? Mr. Robertson:  Yes.
Mr. Murphey:  Are we splitting it? Mr. Robertson:  Yes.

Lake Ashton II CDD

On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Murphey  seconded  by  Ms.  Wright, with all in favor of the agreement with National Golf Foundation Consulting for the acquisition feasibility study was ratified.

Ratification of Agreement with Polk County Property Appraiser
Mr. Robertson: Each year we need to ratify the property appraiser agreement?

On MOTION by Mr. Williams seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor the agreement with the Polk County Property Appraiser was ratified.

Ms. Burns:  This County, in particular, requires a new agreement each year.	 Mr. d'Adesky:  There is no possibility of negotiation.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	New Business / Supervisors Requests
Consideration of Resolution #2018-03 Designating Darrin Mossing as Secretary and Jillian Burns as Assistant Secretary of the Lake Ashton II CDD

On MOTION by Mr. Williams seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor Resolution #2018-03 Designating Darrin Mossing as Secretary and Jillian Burns as Assistant Secretary was adopted.

Mr.  d'Adesky:   This allows Darrin Mossing and Jillian Burns to sign documents and proceed with the normal course of business for the CDD.
Discussion of Increase in Salaries in Line Item for Fiscal Year 2019
(requested by Supervisor Wright)

Ms.  Wright:   We  discussed  this  issue  several  times.   I  am  seeing more  people moving in. We have been operating with Marian and Karen for a long-long time, long before all of the homes and all of the new residents. It's time that we finally get full­ time help for the front desk They can be here every day, to do the scheduling, answer questions and learn the system, so that they can be a real help.  Having someone part-

5

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

time is not working. We had two really good volunteers, but we need a full-time  person at that desk. I provided qualifications and some figures of their vacation and personal days.  Right now, we could have one person in this building working 40 days. If they take their vacation days together, we have 20 days with no one. The budget is for $214,000, and the projected for this year is only $183,637, so we are pretty much break even with a full-time employee. In anticipation of the fact that we are due to give some of our employees raises, I thought that we should probably add, at least, another
$5,000 to $10,000 to the budget, to cover one new full-time person at the front desk and any raises. This is for the Board's consideration.
Mr. Murphey moved to hire a full-time employee and Mr. Williams seconded the motion.

Mr. Robertson: Is there any discussion?
Mr. Williams:  I don't know why we need to have a motion.   At a prior meeting, we approved a full-time person, and that included someone to work on the weekends.
Ms. Wright: We only approved a part-time person to work three days at the desk.   We  had some miscommunication about who is  responsible for assigning those duties and where that person would work.   We need to clarify that.   I don't think that we need office help here on weekends. If  we  have  specific  activities  that  require someone to be here after hours or on the  weekend,  they  can  work  that  out  for themselves. They just have to  adjust their  hours per  week in  order to  do  that  and  not use overtime. They  have  been really good about  doing  that,  but sometimes that  means  we are .short at the desk again.  Mary is responsible for  this  building  and  making  sure that it is functioning, so she should decide when  and where  people  are needed  to work. We are not here enough and don't know the schedules enough to say, " You come at 1:00
p.m. and you come back in the afternoon" . That's Mary's job.
Mr.  Williams:  I  don't  totally  disagree,  except  that  I  believe  if  we  voted  on  it before and felt that way, there should be somebody covering, at least part-time during weekends. It was in the minutes that we approved that, and I don't see any reason to

6

 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

change it. I think there are people that utilize this facility during weekends. A number of people do, and I think, at least for some amount of time, we should remain open until 4:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday or something like that.
Mr. Mecsics: Stan, I am not disagreeing that people have questions, but I was here on a weekend and there wasn't anyone around.  The person had work to do, but it was  just  a  waste  of  time  for  them  to  be  here.    I  think  whatever  we  do  as  far  as scheduling, should be at our Community Director's and the Board's discretion.

A resident: As an ARC Secretary, I frequently visit the HFC, various times on weekends to check the ARC submission box. Believe me when I tell you, barring any specific event, occasionally being held on either Saturday or Sunday, the place is basically deserted, even during the season, as Mary Bosman's study reflected, but even more so, during the summer. Anyone who has ever had management responsibility, knows Management 101, advising personnel to be placed, where and when they are most needed. So, let's have that new warm body Monday through Friday,  helping Mary and Karen when it's the busiest, with people coming in and out, asking questions, wanting copies to be made and phones are ringing, rather than having someone sitting there on weekends listening to the crickets.
Mr. Robertson: We have a Community Director that is responsible. Mary, do you have an opinion that you want to share with the Board?

Ms.  Bosman:   Karen and I work very well together.   She  is a stellar employee. She switches her schedule and I switch mine, but there are definitely times when you are better served by having another person, because there is a need Monday through Friday.  I guess that's the simplest way to say it.  In the same aspect, if there is a need to have someone here on the weekend, certainly, I will say, "Don't come in on Wednesday, come in on Saturday" . With that in mind, I think we can make it work.
Mr. Mecsics:   I would like to offer an amendment to the motion so the timing of the hours be at the discretion of the Community Director.
Ms. Wright: I think we need to specify an amount.

7

 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr.  Robertson:   After  the  motion  to  hire  a full-time  employee, we can  have  a second motion on the salaries.
Mr. Zelazny: Could I just mention one thing?
Mr. Robertson: I think that would be appropriate.
Mr. Zelazny:   Let me just say that staffing of the facility is very difficult.   I think the Board should look to Mary for advice of how many people you need. Give her the dollars to support the hours that she needs and allow her to use it where she feels it should be best used. Thank you.
Mr.  Robertson:   There's  a  motion  to  hire a full-time  person, primarily to  work Monday through Friday, with the Community Director's authority to schedule staff on the weekend as needed.
On VOICE VOTE with Mr. Robertson, Mr. Murphey, Ms. Wright and Mr. Mecsics in favor and Mr. Williams dissenting, the prior motion to hire a full-time employee and authorize the Community Director to be responsible for scheduling all HFC staff was approved; passing 4-1.

Ms. Wright: Regarding the dollar amount of the increase, Mary and I discussed between $5,000 and $10,000. We don't want to be over-budget. An additional $10,000, will cover any hourly rates. My motion is that we add $10,000 to the "salaries" line item.
Mr. Williams: Is this $10,000 for the full-time employee we are going to hire? Ms. Wright:  Yes.
Ms. Wright moved to add $10,000 to the "salaries" line item and Mr. Mecsics seconded the motion.

Mr. Robertson: The idea is that this money is available, if needed for salaries, it is based on the Community Director's discretion.
Ms. Bosman: Our maintenance people are used to getting performance reviews, which make them eligible to receive a possible raise. It's just to cover us, so we don't have to come back three of four months from now.
Mr. Robertson: Is there any further discussion?
Mr. Williams: So any increase will not come back to the Board for approval?

8

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Murphey: That's part of it.
Mr.  Wright:   Didn't we  just decide  that  Mary  was in charge of deciding when and where people worked? She can bring a recommendation back to us for an increase and hourly wage.  I don't think we need to call a Board meeting for that.
Mr. Robertson: Do you want to set a maximum percentage cap?
Mr.  d'Adesky:   Yes.   Part of the motion was to give authority to Mary to make discretionary increases on hourly wage, based on performance.
Mr. Robertson: Do you wish to cap it, so you can ask for modifications?
Mr. Williams: This is the first time that this has come up and I would like to think about it, not having looked at the numbers and the calculations. Is it a cost of living increase that we are talking about? I feel that I don't have enough information.
Mr.  Robertson:   The motion  has been made  and there's a second.   Is  there  any further discussion?
Mr. Mecsics: Yes. The way I read this, we are going to hire a full-time person at
$10 an hour, plus or minus $21,000 per year.  Correct?
Ms. Wright: Yes.
Mr. Mecsics: Then we have money leftover that we will leave to Mary's discretion, as far as any cost of living increase, based upon performance.
Ms.  Wright:    There's  already  enough  money  budgeted,  to  pay  for  a  full-time employee. The additional $10,000 in the budget, needs to cover next year and any possible raises for the current employees,  based on their performance reviews.   Didn't
we put a percentage on it?  I think the raises were either 50 cents or $1.00 an hour. That
.	.
would be based on how many hours they are working and their performance review,
whether they received a 50-cent raise, $1.00 an hour raise or no raise.

On VOICE VOTE with Mr. Robertson, Mr. Murphey, Ms. Wright   and   Mr.   Mecsics   in   favor   and   Mr.   Williams dissenting, the prior motion to add $10,000 to the "salaries" line item and authorizing the Community Director to make discretionary increases on hourly wage based on performance was approved; passing 4-1.

9

August

Mr. Murphey: I agree with some of what Stan is saying. Maybe we can get some information before, rather than having to make a snap decision. I'm still a little confused.
Mr. Robertson: We will direct Mary to do that in the future.

Mr. Williams: I sent Mary an email. I looked at the job descriptions, and there were a couple of items missing, like the monitoring of who is in the building by employees. I would like to see those items added as part of the performance review.
Ms.  Bosman:   It is grouped under "Essential Duties"  on the performance review.
We will maintain a clean and safe environment.  I'm not sure of the exact words.
Mr. Williams: Does it specifically say that we should be checking IDs? I forgot what the second one was. I sent you two different items.
Ms. Bosman: You wanted a written report.
Mr. Williams: No. I will get back to you on that. Ms. Bosman: Okay.
Mr. Robertson:  Are there any increases between now and the end of the fiscal year? Ms. Bosman: No. James's review is in November.

Mr. Robertson:  We can have Mary present a report at the next meeting.	Carla is going to give us a budget update to make sure that we are on track with the budget.
Ms. Bosman: Is it okay to have James's evaluation, at the end of September or the beginning of October?

Mr. Robertson: We could do it retroactively. Ms. Bosman: That will keep us on schedule.

Mr. Robertson: Does that sound good, Mr. Williams? Mr. Williams: Yes.
Mr. Robertson: Thank you very much.

Discussion of Interlocal Agreements (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)

Mr. Mecsics: As I said at the joint meeting, we need to work together. Part of that, is having interlocal agreements and maybe a modification, so that we work  together a lot more, because quite honestly, we are not working together.

10

2018	Ashton

Mr. Zelazny:  The subject of the interlocal agreements first came up over a year ago, as a result of the Focus 20/ 20 study group that came out. There were three interlocal agreements; one was a cost sharing for the new facilities and amenities. The second was for protection of the current amenities, to make sure that either the East or the West didn't curtain an amenity that we want to have protected, because we all came in with a certain menu of amenities. The third was a maintenance cost sharing agreement.  The facilities jointly use one, is in place right now.  It's been a year, and now we are still talking about it, so maybe we should get to it. The interlocal agreement for the cost sharing of new facilities and the maintenance and sustaining cost, has to be in place before you even think about buying the golf course. But it's been over a year, and we have to get the interlocal agreements in place and move on. That's the way that we are going to get to a WE community, be it West and East. Thank you.
Mr. Williams:  We talked about that before.  The Board asked me to look into it and talk to CDD 1 about that. I talked to a number of members over there. They were not interested.
Mr.  Mecsics:   Stan, we tried.   I think we now have it where two people are designated.  We are accountable to both Boards to bring something back at the joint meeting and that's what we are going to do.
Mr. Robertson:  I have a Sunshine Law question for Andrew.  At this point in time, because Mr. Zelazny is not a Board member, will he be allowed to participate in this process until he's· elected?

Mr. d' Adesky:  Jan alluded to this when she was talking about the Candidate Forum. The Sunshine Law attaches the night of the election, so even though Bob won't assume office until the second Tuesday, technically the Supervisor of Elections certifies those results the first Tuesday in November, and the Sunshine Law attaches to potential Supervisors, such as Mr. Zelazny or any other Supervisors.  Of course, it attaches to any Supervisor that is a current Supervisor that's running again. At this time, potential people running for office, can speak with individual Supervisors, if they so choose.

Mr. Robertson:  Mr. Zelazny, would you like to participate?

11

 	 	 	

10,

Mr. Zelazny: Certainly.
Mr. Robertson: Wonderful. Thank you. Now we have two on our side. I know that you are very enthusiastic and I look forward to receiving some good results.

Discussion	on		Requesting	Course  to	Resume	Mowing Areas Previously		(requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Mr. Mecsics: That was another item from our joint meeting. We had a meeting and discussed sending a letter, not only to the golf course, but to the City of Winter Haven, requesting them to resume cutting, and asking the city council to assume that responsibility. We voted on that and Andrew is going to write that letter. Our friends in the East, decided to do the same thing.
Mr. Zelazny: It has come to my attention that some of the property across from the CDD has golf course property behind the homes. My last discussion with Mary was a couple of weeks ago. Did we instruct Yellowstone to cut that grass?
Mr. Robertson: No. There are two different pieces. The piece that's right across the street, is part of the tee box. The golf course owner agreed to cut that and have now started cutting it. We cut it once or twice, and now the golf course owner acknowledges that they would like to see that cut. It's a benefit to them as well. I also asked them to cut a piece of property on the pond, the piece that is not adjacent to any house. He is not interested in cutting behind any individual home, but understood that cutting that piece was appropriate. He agreed to cut that piece and the piece of grass by the golf cart path. Behind the tennis courts, there is a part that the CDD owns, which we are cutting. The part that is not owned by the CDD, we are not allowed to cut it, but he agreed to. He made a small concession to look after those three areas on our behalf.
Mr. Williams: When you say "He", who do you mean? Mr. Robertson: Mr. Lee.
Mr. Murphey: So we are not cutting in between these two new houses, right across the street?
Mr. Robertson: No.
Mr. Williams: But we did a couple of times.

12

2018

Mr. Robertson: We did.
Mr. Murphey: I've been out of contact, and I asked Mary whether it was appropriate that we cut it, because there are probably two dozen other homes that we probably would have to cut their grass too?
Mr. Robertson: Right. It's just a small strip. We are undertaking to communicate our displeasure with the lack of cutting, saying that there are security and safety issues. We are expending that at this point in time. I guess S.W.F.W.M. D.'s position is that it is natural and allowed to be there. We are going to try to encourage them not to do that. In those three areas, we convinced them. The rest is to be determined as we get more data.
Mr. Murphey: That will help some, because there are six houses by the ninth tee box. Some people are cutting and some are letting it go. I pointed out to Mary a month ago, that I was looking at the plat and it turns out that the area behind the tennis courts and pool is CDD property. That grass was getting high.  It looked like it belonged to  the golf course, but it turned out to belong to the CDD. I think they started to do some work there, because it was rather scraggly in there.
Mr. Robertson: Yes. There is one more piece that's part of this discussion. Now that the north phase is open, there is one pond in the north that is being largely ignored. We are going to have to start maintaining it, because it grew wild for a while. It seems that all of the lots around that north phase are being paid for right now. The developer is paying $1,885 per lot and saying, "I've payingfor all of those lots to have them maintained properly, so I'd like to see the pond maintained". That's something we are going to have to start moving on, to get a bush hog in there, to get it to look like the other new ones.

Discussion on Board of Supervisor Operations (requested by Supervisor Murphey)
Mr. Murphey: I have a couple of different items to cover. The first is just a little background. My buddy Jim and I were first elected to the Board almost four years ago. This was the first time that the residents actually had control over the CDD Board. As you all probably know, the developer has not been paying assessments for this building

13

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Murphey moved to rescind the prior motion for authorization for the Chairman to spend $5,000, and Mr. Williams seconded the motion.

and a lot of things have to be done, a lot of emergency things. In order to expedite getting a lot of those repairs done, without having to go through an extra meeting or Board approval, we gave our Chairman the authority to spend up to $5,000, to expedite things that need to be done immediately. The roof and windows were leaking, so we gave him the authority to do that. I think the Board, Chairman and everybody has done a good job, getting all of this work completed, and now that we are in good shape, I don't think we need to have that authority anymore for the Chairman, so I wanted to make a motion that we rescind that spending authority and just go back and approve contracts, or in cases of an emergency, have a community directory. Basically, my motion would be to terminate the approval that we gave the Chairman a couple of years ago, to approve contracts up to $5,000.  That's it.

Mr.  Murphey:   We had a need for that a couple of years ago, but right now, I don't see a lot of emergencies. If there are emergencies like broken windows or something malfunctioning, I think Mary can take care of it, but I'm not sure if Mary has the authority to make decisions up to a certain amount. For future contracts, I think the Board should be more involved, other than just leaving it to one person to do that.

Mr. Williams: I understand. The concern that I had, was that someone needs to approve $5,000 to keep normal business going, but if there's a new item, it should come to the Board. For example, the foyer. There were new rugs, new chairs and new chandeliers.  We have no idea what the total cost was.   They were done in multiples.  It looks great. Don't get me wrong, and I wouldn't have done anything different,  but going forward, I think we should bring new items to the Board.

Mr. d'Adesky: From a logistical standpoint, if you were to fully rescind someone's authority, no one would have the authority to purchase anything during the interim, so you would have to call another meeting. Currently, Mary is not delegated with  that  authority.   Certain contracts  prefer the officer of the District to be  assigned

14

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD
that  authority.   Most Districts have  a  spending threshold  of $500  or  $1,000.   From an authorization standpoint, that might necessitate a meeting to approve items, which obviously has a cost.
Mr. Zelazny: What can I do in the East?
Mr. Williams: You would need the manager to do that.
Mr. d'Adesky:  I believe that the District Manager and Community Director have a spending threshold of $2,500. She has a minimal amount of spending authority.
Mr. Williams:  I think Christine does.
Mr. d' Adesky: Correct, as well as the Chairman, so the Chairman would be the one to execute it.
Mr. Zelazny: You are correct. That spending limit could stay the same; however,
for those circumstances, if we're doing something that's above and beyond, we can bring that to the Board and just re-affirm that.
Mr. Robertson: If things were brought up that approaches the $5,000 limit, I always brought that to the Board, such as the heaters for the swimming pool, which were $2,900. You don't want to have to call a Board meeting to get approval for that. I agree with you on the furniture.  I think things were requested, that were $100 here and
$250 there, but other than that, I can't think of anything. The same thing on the windows, I forced you to come back to the Board to put in the new shutters, because I didn't feel that it was adequately explained. I tried to be sensitive to that issue; however, I'm perfectly willing to go along with any recommendation.

Mr. Mecsics: I don't think that there's one person on this Board that would complain or criticize you or any of us, on what we did. Quite honestly, there are some people on this Board who paid out of pocket for things, because the CDD didn't have the money.  A lot of people don't know that; however, we are evolving.  The Board is a government, not an HOA. I think we should amend that to allow the Chairman to spend up to $5,000, but only for exigent circumstances. If something happens, he's going to let us know anyway. Would you agree to that amendment to your motion?

15

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Murphey: I guess so. There have been some contracts that I was never informed about. That's the problem. I get phone calls from people asking what was happening.    No  one  told  me  about  it.    I  feel  like  I'm  being  left  out.    There's  one particular project that upset a lot of people, which was the installation of the fence posts, marking the buffer zones. I knew nothing about that and it took me weeks and weeks to get a straight answer. Mary can confirm this. When work is scheduled to be done, other Board members should be informed, so we are not blindsided by residents.
Mr. Mecsics: I agree with you. We should put it out to everybody, but there are going to be extenuating circumstances, such as getting fined by S.W.F.W.M.D.
Mr. Murphey:  It was brought up by Mr. Williams that an email blast went out to residents that appeared to be from the entire Board, but it really wasn't. I never saw it before. It explained about the buffer zones. I talked to S.W.F.W.M.D. and they did not direct the CDD to install metal fence posts. Again, when these email blasts go out to residents and appear to be from the entire Board, people call us and ask what we are talking  about.   I  don't know because  I  never had  a chance  to  see  this.   I  think when anything goes out, like that, from the Board, it should be discussed by the Board before it goes out, so at least we are aware of it. That's the bottom line. What I'm getting at, is that we are doing some things without letting other Board members know what's going on. At least let us have a chance to comment on it.
Mr. Mecsics:  There will be times when hurricanes or something is going to cause us some trouble. I wish we didn't have to deal with those things, and I wish everybody abided by the law, but that doesn't happen.

Mr. Robertson: Let's give some detail on that. Someone from S.W.F.W.M.D. came down after the hurricane and was asked to look at whether we could remove a tree. They gave us direction that we weren't allowed to move it. At that time, she observed that we were cutting into our buffer zone. She had a choice at that point, to either put us into a legal situation that caused us to be fined or allow us to try to rectify that problem. She agreed to allow us to rectify the problem, so then we followed her direction. She wanted the buffer zones left alone, so we did that. We put stakes in as

16

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

required, but the grass continued to be cut beyond the stake line. I got direction from. District Counsel saying that it is a felony if it continues. People knew  about it and it was directed that we cut to the old line and no one would know the difference. That  was an extreme violation. We were warned, put on notice and we did it anyway.  At that point, it was discussed with District Counsel that we needed to put in stakes. The Board discussed whether to com.ply. We had a 4 to 1 vote in favor of com.plying with the buffer zone. I'm. sorry that it wasn't a unanimous decision. So, that's a sensitive subject. We would've been in deep trouble if we continued to mess with S.W.F.W.M.D. At this point, they consider us to be cooperative and we are trying to keep it that way.

Mr.   Murphey:   I  agree   with   everything   that  you   said.   We   have   to  be   in compliance with S.W.F.W.M.D., but the e-blast that went out, said that residents were continuing to trespass into this area, so phone calls went out. When I heard that people were trespassing, I'm. thinking that I can't even walk in there, so it's very misleading. Our S.W.F.W.M.D. contact, Tasha said walking and joint passive recreation in these areas, such as hiking and bird watching, is not prohibited, but reading the em.ail that went out, I heard a lot of people saying that we are not allowed to walk down there. Then we were putting up fences if they didn't com.ply. Again, her response was they have not made this requirement in Lake Ashton as long as we are in compliance.   The point that I was making, was once those stakes are up and Yellowstone starts cutting only where they are allowed to, it's going to be very obvious, because we are going to have 3-foot-high grass.   At this point, you aren't going to move those stakes anymore.
When its cut, since it's a hazard, they have to square around these things and it's a pain
.	.
to have to avoid them..  I think at this point, we don't need the stakes, because it's very
obvious where the grass needs to be cut, but I continue to receive com.plaints. Some people have no buffer at all at the end of their property line. There are at least two or three houses like that. Their buffer line goes right up to their property. Most people have 30 or 40 feet, but then I heard people say they have 200 feet.

Mr. Williams:  That has nothing to do with the $5,000 spending authority.  I don't know how we digressed.

17

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr.  Murphey:   We digressed into things getting done without our knowledge. This is very frustrating. It took me two months to find out what happened.  I even emailed the District Engineer and Mary and asked what was going on. I couldn't find any information on it for two months.
Mr. Williams:  Eventually you received a call.
Mr.  Murphey:    Yes.    It  comes  down  to  who  has  the  authority  to  approve contracts.  I'm sorry, but in a roundabout way, that's what was done.
Mr. d' Adesky:  Right now, the status is that you made a motion and Stan made a second, so you would both have to agree to rescind or modify the motion.

On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Mecsics,  seconded  by  Mr.  Williams, with all in favor, amending the prior motion to authorize the Chairman to spend $5,000, in exigent circumstances, was approved.

Mr. Mecsics:  Are we going to have a $5,000 limit for exigent circumstances? Mr. d'Adesky: For items that are a health, safety emergency.

Discussion on Yellowstone Scope of Work (requested by Supervisor Murphey)
This item was previously discussed.

Public Hearing to Adopt the Fiscal Year 2019 Budget
Motion to Open the Public Hearing
Mr.  Mossing:	At your May  11  meeting, this  Board  approved the  preliminary
proposed budget for fiscal year 2019 in accordance with Florida Statutes.   At that time,	 you scheduled this date as the public hearing to formally adopt that budget and levy
your operating and maintenance· assessments for Fiscal Year 2019.   I will briefly cover the different budgets and make a few comments, and then we will open it up for public comments. The first and most important thing is that the assessments are proposed to not  increase  from  the  prior  year.     There  is  an  overall  increase  in  some  of  your expenditures   of  approximately  $20,000   in  your  field   expenditures.   Certain  items increased for various reasons. Your first quarter operating reserve is $205,000, which is roughly  two-and-half-months  of  expenditures  that  we  need  to  retain,  prior  to you

18

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

receiving  your  assessments  from  the Tax Collector.	We  are  proposing  to  transfer
$113,000 to your capital reserve fund. There was an earlier motion to increase "Payroll" by approximately $10,000. I recommend that you decrease the $113,000 to $103,000, as part of your motion to amend the budget, to accommodate your prior motions. We structured the capital projects budget differently this year, to try to give the Board a better idea of where you are at, as it relates to your actual projected balance  at the end of this fiscal year, and then at the end of fiscal year 2019, based upon the funds being transferred in and your proposed expenditures. For the remaining three months, we projected no additional expenditures, which should leave approximately $600,000 in your capital reserve fund at the end of fiscal year 2018 . Based upon $177,000 of capital project expenditures that are in that budget, you are expected to have $535,000 at the end fiscal year 2019.   Unlike the other District, you don't have a formal capital reserve study to compare that to. You also have your debt service fund budgets for Series 2005 and 2006. The assessments on those bonds are all fully collected and those bonds are no longer in default. You are in a very strong financial position.
Mr. Robertson:  Thank you.  That's good news.
Mr. Mossing:  I need a motion to open the public hearing.

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Williams with all in favor the public hearing on the fiscal year 2019 budget was opened.

Public Comment and Discussion
Mr. Mossing: Do you want to have any Board discussion or take public comments? Mr. Robertson:  We have a comment from Mr. Zelazny.

Mr.  Zelazny:   I want to  commend Carla, for all of her efforts to  get the budget straight this year. The difference between the last two years and this year is night and day.  It is very easy to read.  I know she said that she still has a lot of work to do, but it has worked out very well, I think. She answered most of my questions, but there are a couple  of  things  that  I  would  like  some  clarification   on.     For  "Building/Grounds Maintenance Supplies" we overspent by $60,000 this year. I understand that a lot of it

19

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

was hurricane related, but I would like to know where that came from. Under "Plant/Tree Replacement" $4,500 was spent, but since that is not included in Yellowstone's plant replacement, I would like to know where that $4,500 goes, because there's $50,000 in the budget for this year. Also, the majority of capital projects, were completed. The sound system and sandblasting the patio furniture should come out of the budget. There is a large amount budgeted for LED lights, but at the last two Board meetings, we talked about how many lights were already replaced this year. I would like to know how many lights we still have to replace and what the cost is. I think two new projects need to be on that list; one is the repair of the fence along #6 and #11 . There are three posts.
Mr. Murphey: There are six.

Mr. Zelazny: Six by the bathroom. I also think we need to budget funds to resurface the tennis courts.   They are supposed to be re-coated every four years, since they were built, but they haven't been done yet. This is a prime example of how well the Board worked over the past 10 or so years, because if you go out there, there are 100 patches.  Somebody tried to maintain the tennis courts as best they could.  We have the money now, so we should clear coat it to prolong the life of that tennis court by another 5 to 10 years. That is not a very expensive item. For roadways, $75,000 was budgeted last year, and you spent $25,000. That $75,000 did not transfer down to fiscal year 2019, but it should. There needs to be money set aside for road repairs. If you drive along Pebble Beach Boulevard, you can see the effort that's been going on this year, but Lake Ashton Club Drive, the main road, is going to be a big expense this year, so I would ask you to put $75,000 into the budget. Thank you:
Mr. Robertson:  I think the fence by #6 is golf course property, as opposed to ours. Mr. Mossing:  The good thing about the capital projects fund is for the most part,
its fully funded now, so the Board has the flexibility to move money, add money to those budget expenditures and re-prioritize as deemed necessary throughout the fiscal year.
Mr. Robertson:  Bob, you said that that $75,000 is earmarked.  What we said, Bob, is that we try to set aside a certain amount of money each year for roads that had to be

20

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

repaired.  We are not going to spend $75,000 every year.  Setting aside $25,000 a year was our objective. We spent approximately $5,000 this year. That should accumulate, so when we have a major event, we don't have to look at assessments or anything else. There's money set aside for that.
Mr. Zelazny: I know, but it didn't transfer out. That's all I'm saying.
Mr. Robertson: It should have. We should see an amount of money set aside for roads and see that growing over time.
Mr. Zelazny:  It's just not in the budget. Mr. Robertson:  Good catch.
Ms. Wright: We will fix that.
Mr. Robertson:  Is there anyone who wants to come up and ask questions about the budget, at this time?
Ms. Wright:	I have some figures that I worked out on the overage for
"Building/Grounds" that will bring that back down to where it's supposed to be.
Mr. Robertson: If there are no further comments, we need a motion to close the public hearing.
A resident:	Why are we paying for the repaving of roads in The Groves?	It doesn't make any sense to me.
Mr. Robertson: I will explain that. The way that this community was set up with CDDs, is that they agreed with the cities that the roads would be public, but we would be  responsible  for the maintenance .   That's how the  developer set it up.   We are responsible for maintaining them, but they are public roads.

A resident: Is it something that we can talk to Winter Haven about?

Mr. Robertson:  No.  It's not a discussable item.  When the cities set these CDDs up and agreed to the permit, they figured out all of the cost benefits of the entire system and said that legally you can create the CDD and ask the homeowners to pay for the roads and they will be public roads, but if someone comes in and buys a property, they agree to all of these rules, which are disclosed during the initial purchase of the house.

21

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

A resident: When I bought my house, we were under the impression that it was a gated community.
Mr. Mossing:  They can take your gates down.
A resident: It doesn't make sense to me that you are able to come in here whenever you want, and I'm sure that it doesn't make any sense to anyone else.
Mr. Zelazny:   I would like make a suggestion.  After so many meetings over the last four years and all of your questions, I think when the new Board comes in, even though its only one or two members, I suggest that you hold a workshop for all of the newcomers and some of the people that don't understand what a CDD is. Just to let them know, that their tax money is being used to take care of the roads, water management system, etc. It was set up for the benefit of the homeowners.  It keeps  track of your tax assessments going up so much. They can still raise your taxes, but  your tax money is controlled by the Board. In addition, Chapter 190.6 on the Sunshine Law, only allows the Board to do so much. If all of these guys get together quietly, say that Bob and Jim talk with each other, we should know what they are talking about. Don't get mad at these people or CDD 1 or the state or Polk County. Corne to these meetings and learn about what the CDD does.  Thank you.
Mr. Robertson:  Is there any further public comment?
A resident: When we bought in here, we weren't given a packet of CDD rules and regulations. I came from a community that had an HOA, and you were given  a copy of the HOA documentation. That doesn't happen here.
Ms. Burns: There are no CDD regulations.

resident:	legally.

A .	I  don't  know what there needs to be	.
Mr. Robertson:  There's Chapter 190.
A resident: As a potential owner, you should be given a copy of the CDD rules.
Mr. Mecsics: In the sales office, there is a newcomer's information packet with an information sheet on what a CDD is. If you haven't received one, I will make sure that you get one.
A resident: It should be given by the sales office, prior to signing a contract.

22

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. d'Adesky: Everyone that is on this Board is a resident. No one represents or works with or deals with the developer, so we can't control, as a Board, what they have to disclose. That being said, there was a statute passed fairly recently, that requires the sales contract to have a disclosure that there is a CDD here. We can't say whether or not they did that. If they didn't, they may be violating state law, but we have nothing to do with that. That's with their sales team, so we can't comment on what they are doing.
A resident: So we would have to know to ask for that prior to going to contract.
Mr.  Robertson:  Yes.   Is it correct that when you purchase a property, you get a copy of that document?
Mr. d'Adesky: Yes. You can ask for it. I don't know  what  their  sales  and marketing people do.
A resident: What you are telling me is that there is no legal responsibility for the builder and seller to give us a copy of a document, prior to going to contract with them.
Mr. d'Adesky: They should've disclosed the fact that there was a CDD here. Mr. Mecsics: You can get a copy if you ask.
A resident:  I know that you can get it, but they don't offer it.
A resident: I didn't have a comment, but I have enough experience in real estate to know that if you buy a condominium, they have to give you that document. They have to disclose that to you. If staff is not doing that, someone needs to tell them and legally request that any CDD documents are available to these people.  If  the realtors are not doing that, that's a violation.

Mr. Robertson: Thank you.

Mr.  Brown:   Claude Brown,  5265  Green Drive.   My question is for the attorneys. Isn't it true that when the developer creates a community and the streets in that community, when the development is complete, the streets are dedicated to the cities. In our case, did the city refuse to accept the dedication, because the streets were too narrow?

Mr. d'Adesky: That's a very good question. I don't represent the developer or work for the developer. I wasn't even out of law school, by the time this CDD was established,  but  I  represent  CDDs  where  the  city  owns  the  roads.    If  they  are  wide

23

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

enough and meet their codes, all of the regulations, curb standards, the city accepts them. That's negotiated during the planning phase. When you are developing and planning a community, you ask who is going to take the roads. It could be the city, the CDD or HOA. In this case, for this CDD, when this community was planned, the agreement was that the CDD would own and maintain the  roads.  That's not the same in all of the CDDs, but that's the way it was done here.
Mr. Mossing: The gates are security gates. Ms. Burns:  The city won't take them.
Mr.  d'Adesky:  Right, so it's not just the narrowness of the streets.  The gates are another element. That would prevent the city from accepting them.
Ms. Wright: I just wanted to make a clarification because I've noticed that people don't seem to understand this at the various meetings that I've attended, we may have gates and consider ourselves a gated community, but these are public roads, and anybody can come to the gate, but cannot be prevented from coming in. In fact, before we lived here, we went to the restaurant and drove all over the community. They got my first name and the license plate of the car. Anybody can come into this community.
Mr. Robertson: We aren't legally allowed to ask to see somebody's driver's license.   You can ask, but they don't have to give it to you.   They can come in and be rude and belligerent and we have no choice, but to let them in. We are allowed to  record their license plate and call the roving patrol to report an aggressive person coming through the gate, but we cannot stop them. There's a legal term for what would
happen if we tried to stop them.
.	.
Mr. d'Adesky: When a lot of people are driving by and see a gate, they assume

that it's an HOA and its private.

A resident: I apologize, but I missed the first portion of the meeting, so you may have covered this. When I told my veterinarian about some of the issues that we have with S.W.F.W.M.D., he said that we can purchase the area that S.W.F.W.M.D. owns, and do whatever we want with it. I don't know, but that's what my veterinarian said. I just want the Board to consider that idea.

24

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Mr. Rayl: Nothing about that is correct. The CDD actually owns wetlands and buffers, but we are not free to do what we wish with them. There are jurisdictional wetland lines that have been delineated and platted, along with those buffers. We have the ability to get permit modifications to the buffers, which other communities have done.  Traditions has done that on Lake Ruby.  That was a client of mine.  I helped assist with that. The did a planting plan for their buffer. We are not free to do what we want with them, even if we possess the ownership of them, because those are jurisdictional lands. I can't really speak to what he's referring to.
A resident: I'm sorry. Maybe I didn't make myself clear. Across from Hogan Lane is Lake Hart. They control all of that property, all the way to the shoreline. I was under the impression that the developer purchased that, when he purchased the land. You are saying that he did, so how can they go over the shoreline and we can't?
Mr. Rayl: Those lots are owned fee simple all the way to the lake. In this case, we have fee simple lot ownership and the CDD owns the portion to the lake and a portion of the lake as well.  Those particular homes own all the way down to the buffer line. I don't know if they were developed as part of an overall  subdivision  development, or if they were done individually, or in small scale subdivisions that preceded S.W.F.W.M.D. regulations. I don't know any of those facts. I know that those homeowners own all the way to the wetland boundary of the lake.
A resident: Are the homeowners on Hogan Lane that face Lake Park, legally not able to purchase that property from S.W.F.W.M.D.?

Mr. Rayl:  S.W.F.W.M.D. doesn't own it.  The CDD owns it.  It's all drainage. A resident: The bottom line is how do we get rid of S.W.F.W.M.D.?
Mr.  d'Adesky:   That's the million-dollar  question.  I  think  what  Alan  might  be referring to, is something that S.W.F.W.M.D. has called the uniform mitigation assessment method. If you own property that happens to be in a wetland  or road  buffer, you can go to S.W.F.W.M.D. with a plan to fill in or change parts of it and can go to mitigation banks and buy mitigation credits. In essence, you would shift the wetland

25

 	 	 	 	 	 	

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

preservation elsewhere.	That's probably what your veterinarian was talking about.  Yes, the CDD could do that, but I don't have any idea what the cost is.
Mr. Robertson:  Are there any other budget items to discuss?  Hearing none,

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Williams with all in favor the public hearing on the fiscal year 2019 budget was closed.

Consideration of Resolution #2018-04 Annual Appropriation Resolution Mr. Mossing: Enclosed in your agenda package are two Resolutions. The first is

Resolution #2018-04, the Annual Appropriations Resolution, which formally adopts your General Fund, Capital Projects Fund and Debt Service Fund Budgets.
On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Williams  seconded  by  Mr.  Mecsics with all in favor Resolution #2018-04 Annual Appropriation Resolution was adopted.

Consideration of Resolution #2018-05 Levy of Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Mr.  Robertson:	Resolution  #2018-05  levies  non-ad  valorem assessments.	The
assessment hasn't changed.
On  MOTION  by  Ms.  Wright,  seconded  by  Mr.  Murphey, with all in favor, Resolution #2018-05 Levy of Non-Ad Valorem Assessments, was adopted.

Motion to Close the Public Hearing This item was discussed previously.

Discussion on Pebble Beach Dog Park (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Mr. Mecsics:  There was a request for the CDD to own the Pebble Beach Dog Park. Ms.  Thriller:   My name  is  Roni Thriller.   I'm the President of the Lake  Ashton  Pebble Beach Dog Park. I wanted to make sure that you have a copy of our proposal. The situation is that the Pebble Beach Dog Park was attained by the CDD in April 2018 and needs immediate rehabilitation. The Dog Park Association has plans to rehabilitate and enhance the park to Lake Ashton standards, as an example of providing excellent amenities  for  new residents.	The  Dog Park Association has  already received private

26

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

funding for new improvements. We are requesting $4,500 from the CDD to fund additional rehabilitative efforts for the park, such as additional pavers, parking at the entrance and providing ADA accessibility. What we have done so far with our money  is, we purchased 23 new chairs, 4 trees,  repaired the fence and helped to provide wheelchair accessibility. We saved the CDD a lot of money, by removing our own stumps. We also purchased and planted the four trees by ourselves to save money for the  CDD.    We  will  add  new  pavers  at  the  entrance  and  a  small  section.    I  have  an estimate from Unlimited Property Solutions for $4,106, to provide 756 square feet of pavers and install existing pavers that we collected. Four years ago, I sent you a copy of our least expensive bid on the same project, which was $6,700.   We also had proposals for $9,000 and $11,000. Because its summertime, we received a good deal if we take advantage of it. We currently don't have  that  much  money,  because we have done all of this other work, but we think that it's important that we go ahead and get it done, so it will bring all dog parks up to standard.  That is what we are asking for.  We think it's a great price. We would appreciate it if you would give us $4,500.
Mr.  d'Adesky:	Structurally,  just  to  make  sure  this  is  legal,  in  the  past,  the
developer owned it, so you didn't have to worry about all of these legal issues, but now this is our park, so we have to worry about public use issues. We should be doing this from a public standpoint. In terms of structuring the deal, I'm not making a comment about whether the Board should spend the money or not, but logistically  how  this should work, is just like for other projects. If a private entity wants something, they should give the money to the CDD, so the CDD could contract to do the work. We can do it cheaper, because we don't have to pay sales tax.
Mr. Robertson:	There is  a fairness issue  that we have  to address.	How much money have we spent on the other dog park? My recollection is that we paid $800.
Ms. Wright: That was the last one. Did we pay for pavers before?
Mr. Robertson: Before that, we paid $1,500 towards the improvements, prior to the hurricane. We need to research that.
Ms. Wright:  We need to get the numbers together and see where we are.

27

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Mr. Robertson:  We should confirm how much we spent on the other dog park.  I don't think we are going to get up to $4,500, so I will make a motion to give the same amount that we gave to the other dog parks.
Mr. Williams: As long as we are doing the work.
Mr. Robertson: They would give us the money and we will contract the work.

Ms. Wright moved to allocate the same amount for other dog parks for the Pebble Beach Dog Park and Mr. Mecsics seconded the motion.

Ms. Thriller: In the 2019 budget, there is a line item for "Dog Park", so we have the means of keeping back the finances on what we are spending on dog parks from here on out.
Mr. Robertson: We will try to allocate the same amount as the other dog parks.
Mr. Williams:	If we didn't approve up to the $4,500 that they need, what happens? Do they have to raise the rest of it?
Mr. Robertson: Yes.
Mr. Williams: Would we contract for just our part of it?
Mr. Robertson: No. We would contract for the whole thing and they would pay the difference. If there's $3,000 worth of paving and we said that $1,500 was appropriate, they would give us a check for the other $1,500.

On VOICE VOTE with all in favor allocating the same amount for other dog parks for the Pebble Beach Dog Park was approved.

Ms. Thriller:	Excuse me.	I paid the bill and the CDD gave me the check for
$1,500.
Mr. Robertson: Thank you for clarifying that.
Mr. Mecsics: I have one more issue, before you go to staff reports. A year or so ago, we made a mistake. We voted for the removal of the pool ropes. I recommend that we allow the placement of those ropes, at the discretion of the Amenity Manager, which would allow anyone to swim laps.
28	

Mr. Robertson:  That was a big discussion.
Mr. Williams:  There is no sense going back into it.  I just want to make sure that we are not just doing this for one group.
Mr. Robertson:  No.
Mr.  Williams:    It' s  for  any  group  that  wants  to  come  back,  and  schedule  an exercise activity. The only thing that I would suggest is to put a time limit on it, such as the morning, but you want to have the lap lanes open for a time.
Mr. Mecsics:  Exactly.

Mr. Mecsics moved to rescind the policy for the removal of the ropes from the pool lap lane, at the discretion of the Community Manager and Ms. Wright seconded the motion.

Mr. Williams:  What was the actual motion?
Mr. Mecsics:   To allow the Community Manager the discretion to place ropes in the pool lap lanes.
Mr. Robertson: If someone wants to use the pool at the same time as the exercise group, Mary would accommodate them. That's part of the agreement. It's still a shared resource. If anyone wants to share, it will be wide open for maximum pleasure. Is there any further discussion?
A resident: That suggests that it's a shared resource. If an exercise class is going on and someone wants to swim laps, you are going to let them swim.  How many  events can you schedule?
Mr. Robertson: I'm sorry, but there's a public portion and a non-public portion.
The Board has to discuss this.
Mr.  Mecsics:   If someone wants to use the lap lanes, they can discuss that with the Community Director, and she can discuss it with the group.  I was the only one that investigated it.   I was in my swimsuit with all of these ladies.   It was a pleasure.  I saw that the implications and the impact that it has on them. If there's a problem, Mary can work it out with them.

29

August 10, 2018

Mr. Williams: If there is anyone in here from the other group that came in the winter, I apologize for all of the angst that we caused. You are welcome to come back and we would like to see you come back.
On VOICE VOTE with all in favor rescinding the policy for the removal of the ropes from the pool lap lanes at the discretion of the Community Manager was approved.

Mr. Robertson: We said that we would give a report on the golf course purchase. We need to assign the responsibility to continue the discussion and work with the attorneys and the seller, to come up with accurate information on the purchase price, and write up all the details to proceed.
Mr. Mecsics: We agreed to designate one person to work with Mike Costello, the attorneys and the management company to discuss the numbers. I will come back with a report on everything.
Mr. Robertson: I would like to nominate Stan for that, if he's willing to do that. He's done a lot of work gathering information, spreadsheets, and so on. He seems interested and knows what he is doing.
Mr. Mecsics: We looked at that as well, because someone asked me about that, but there was some concern about, no due respect, having a non-developer as our representative.
Ms. Wright: Are we actually going to take the two people who have been working on this from the very beginning and not use them anymore and start all over with somebody else?
Mr. Williams:  Yes.
Ms. Wright:  I'm sorry.  That doesn't make any sense to me.
Mr. Williams: If you want someone who is not a golfer, I think that we should designate Jim.   I think we need to change  the  dynamics.   I believe that there is, for whatever reason, disc01mect between Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II, with what's taken place so far. There's been too much discussion and talk, so I do believe that it needs to change. I would say that the Vice Chair step up or Dan. I am gone for a

30

couple of weeks in September, but I would be willing to do it.  Mike and I worked well together the last month. I really believe that we need to change the dynamics. I think choosing Mike Costello was the right thing to do.
Mr.  Mecsics:   I agree.  I have had people come up to me, because of the concern about non-golfers having a say, so I would do that.
Mr. Murphey: I am only on the Board for another two months. Jim is running again, but he may not be reelected. This is going to be an ongoing process.
Mr. d'Adesky: The scope of this particular delegation was to discuss the terms and come back. This is not a long-term engagement. The mission is to get terms so we can get a firm offer that's concrete and come back and develop that. It's not in perpetuity, so if the Board wanted to make a change going forward, on behalf of those terms, the Board would be free to do that.
Mr. Mecsics: In that case, I am willing to work with Mike. I'm not a developer. Mr. Williams:  Okay.  You and Mike work well together.
Mr. Zelazny: Am I allowed to comment? Mr. Williams: Go ahead.
Mr.  Zelazny:   I  think Doug has  done  a  great  job  so  far and I hate  to  lose  that momentum. We are at the 90-yard line and have 10 yards to go. Let's allow him to finish the project. Doug has invested so much time, so I recommend allowing him to push us over to the finish line. That's all.
 	
On MOTION by Mr. Williams seconded by Mr. Murphey with all in favor the  Board authorized Mr.  Mecsics to work with Mike Costello on the golf.course acquisition.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff and Board Reports
Attorney - Discussion of Notice to Cease and Desist Activities in CDD Wetland Buffer Area
Mr. d1Adesky:  The cease and desist letters, were authorized by the Board.  I sent those letters out.  I will answer any questions.

31

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Engineer
Mr. Rayl:  I will go over a few things.  For the pickleball project, the landscaping
is completely installed. The hedge was relocated closer to the fence. There is an oak tree that looks sad. I let them know today and they are going to swap that out. They would like to hear from us that we are okay with the work that was done.  I can pause right there, if you would like to talk about it.
Mr. Robertson:  Are there any landscaping issues? Mr. Williams:  When was the hedge moved?
Ms. Bosman:  In the last couple of days.  Mr. Williams:  That's why I didn't see it. Mr. Rayl:  It was moved earlier in the week
Mr. Williams:  Is it right up against the fence? Mr. Robertson:  Yes.
Mr. Williams:  Okay good.
Mr. Rayl:	They are going to be submitting a revised invoice.	I will let Mary know when we receive it.
Ms. Bosman: Very good.  Thank you.
Mr. Rayl:   I received an email about having lighting in the parking lot at the pickleball courts.  It's never been discussed or brought up.  We have carriage lights in the parking lot at HFC, but there is nothing in this parking lot. There is lighting on the pickleball courts that are adjacent to me.   This was brought up as a concern, so I'm bringing that to your attention. We are also going to be providing a sketch to Yellowstone on the irrigation lines and battery powered clocks. We coordinated with the electrical contractor to put all of those on hard wire, because the batteries are dead by the crab grass. Finally, I am going to circle back to the City of Winter Haven to make sure that they are okay with everything that we permitted and are satisfied, because we've done what we said we were going to do. I was asked by the Board to place some stakes on a few buffers. We re-staked the areas where some of the stakes disappeared or changed position. For the most part, those buffers are now being observed.

32

Everything is now completed with the dog park. The S.W.F.W.M.D. permit was transferred, which covered the  unpermitted  wetland  impacts  in  the  original  development, which was the golf course's responsibility. That was rectified and permitted.   Any issues on title was cleared up.   We took title to it and transferred the S.W.F.W.M.D. permit to our ownership, so everything is put to bed on the dog park. That's all I have, unless the Board has anything for me.
Mr. Murphey: Did the same  company  that did the walkway,  pave the parking lot or was that a different company?
Mr. Rayl: It was all under Varsity's contract.
Mr. Murphey: Did they do the asphalt for the pickleball court and the parking lot? Mr. Rayl: That's my understanding.
Mr. Murphey: Is that the company that we had trouble with, when we asked  them to take dirt over the ponds and spread it out? They didn't do it and got someone else to do it.
Mr. Robertson: That was a separate contractor. The person who did the dirt work  was  the  same  person  that  did  most  of  the  developer's  work.    We  ended  up switching to another company.
Mr. Murphey: Regarding the parking lot, I am seeing a lot of deterioration already. There is one handicapped spot there that is already crumbling. I'm just wondering if something should be done there, before it gets any worse, like a top coating or something like that. You look puzzled. It's very obvious.
Mr. Rayl: Are there surface imperfections or is it a structural failure?
Mr. Murphey: I don't know. It looks like loose gravel, instead of a solid surface. Mr. Rayl:  I will take a look at it.
Mr. Murphey:  Take a look around, particularly around the edges.
Mr. Rayl: I've been out there quite a bit and hadn't noticed any quality or integrity issues.

33

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

COD Manager
Consideration of Proposed Fiscal Year 2019 Meeting Schedule
Ms. Burns: We need to set our meeting schedule for the upcoming fiscal year. The schedule that's in your agenda package, is the second Friday of October, December, February, May and August, with a workshop in April.
Mr. Murphey: Did the other CDD change their times?
Ms. Burns: Yes to the third Monday. I don't know if the Board wants to keep their existing schedule or has interest in changing so that they meet on the same day as the other Board.
Ms. Wright: If it's the third Monday, the meetings better be shorter.
Mr. Williams: Especially when it's a joint meeting. If we run into time constraints, it will cause more problems for staff. They have to come two different weeks in a month.
Mr. d'Adesky: It will cost more because we are not splitting the cost. Mr. Williams: Do we know what that extra cost would be?
Mr. d'Adesky: It would be $300 per meeting.
Ms. Wright: Why did the other District change their meeting schedule?
Ms. Burns: I think it was due to the timing of the financials. We are running a month behind and they moved to Monday. They thought that they would have better attendance, if they held it after Monday Morning Coffee.
Mr. Mecsics: When are our meetings?

Ms. Burns:	The second Friday of October, December, February, May and August, with a workshop in April.
Mr. Williams: You know we are going to have at least a couple of joint meetings. Mr. Mecsics: Do we have any inclination to change it around?
Mr. Williams: I don't care either way.
Ms. Bosman:	At the joint meeting, you voted to discuss when that workshop was going to be. On September 24th, you said that you would discuss it at this meeting.
Mr. Mecsics: No. That was the candidate forum.	

34

Mr. Williams:	Is there any conflict to hold our meetings on the third week, versus the third Monday?
Ms. Bosman: We have to check
Mr. Williams: We need to know that. Mr. Mecsics: We should stay the same.
Ms. Wright: Are there any classes on Monday afternoon?
Ms. Bosman: We have a very large event that people start coming in for, around 4:15 p.m. on Mondays.
Ms. Wright: I mean routine events on Monday afternoon. Ms. Bosman: No.
Mr. Robertson: So our schedule will stay the same for the time being. We can always change it.

Discussion of Financial Disclosure Report from the Commission on Ethics
Ms. Burns: It looks like all Board Members filed their financial disclosure forms.
That was all that we had.

Lake Ashton II Community Director
1) Monthly Report
Consideration of Landscape Proposals
3) Consideration of Tile Proposals

Ms. Bosman: I distributed my report. The city requires an annual fire sprinkler assessment. It's been completed and everything is working properly. The plantation shutters were installed. Many residents were very pleased with them; however, they would like to see more of them, so I asked for a quote. I have that material if you would like to look at it. Wind screens for the pickleball courts have been ordered. It should be in early next week We already received a reimbursement check from the Pickleball Association. We received the final printed copy of the Florida Wildlife Commission permit. We had a number, but did not have the actual certificate. Now we have the certificate. We had not had one request to apply. Exercise instructors including myself have been re-certified for the next year. We did get bids at the request of Mr. Robertson

35

for new tiling in the bathrooms. It would be directly on the  other side  of  the  sports court. I have those for you. One was from Jim's Floor Depot1 in the amount of $71278. That includes both the ladies and men1s bathroom1 product installation1 grout tile in the ladies and men's restrooms and in the hallway. It will be a little on the slippery side. ,
We have mats in there now to prevent problems1 but a smaller tile will be even more secure1 so that was the motivator for those. Besides the quote from Jim's Floor Depot we received a quote from WCM1 which is Todd's company. It was significantly higher. In fairness to Todd1 he was taking a guess1 so my recommendation would be to accept the quote from Jim's Floor Depot.
Ms. Wright: What was the amount from WCM? Ms. Bosman: $161275.
Mr. Williams: Was this a safety issue?
Ms. Bosman: Yes. Ifs a potential safety issue; however1 we have had no reports of any injuries.
Mr.  Robertson:	We   had   no   injuries1   but  we had  slips.	We received a recommendation that a smaller tile would be better.
Mr. Mossing: For fiscal year 20181 you have a large lump sum item called "Other
Capital Projects" for $5401000. We can re-allocate the funds.

On MOTION by Ms. Wright seconded by Mr. Murphey with all in favor the Jim1s Floor Depot proposal for new bathroom tiling was approved in the amount of $71278 .

Ms. Bosman:	Unfortunately1 our beautiful Boulevard has been affected with a
.	.
Texas tree disease that is affecting a lot of the palms in Lake Ashton. Its incurable and it
spreads.   If  someone  uses the same cutters from a diseased tree  to cut your tree1 your	 tree will get infected.	Our trees on our Boulevard are infected1 so I was tasked with
getting quotes to remove all 15 palm trees. There are only 13  left.  All of the quotes in front of you1 include stump grinding. They were all given the same criteria1 but some provided an estimate for 13 trees and some estimated 12. That might be indicative of how well  they  listen to instructions.   rm not sure.   There are some good quotes.   One

36

goes even as far as replacing the soil and checking on the irrigation system. The question is what to put in place of the diseased trees. You can't put another palm tree in there. Even the queen palms are somewhat resistant. It's affecting even some of the patio palms. Is there anything that you can do to prevent it? No. It's kind of like a stomach flu bug. It could come in here and affect a few people, but not everybody. That's the way it is with the palms. This week, I saw our tree trimmers, trimming the diseased palm trees, so I asked them if they were aware that the trees were diseased and they said yes. It was part of their contract requirements. I wondered why they were making them look pretty, when they were dying, so we saved some money by stopping that. As you can see, we need to replace the trees. I made a lot of calls. I am a master gardener. The recommendations for the most part is for Crepe Myrtles. I understand that the white Crepe Myrtles were replaced in the pickleball area. There are various types of Crepe Myrtles. I feel bad about the palms too. I wish we could get a palm tree, but the consensus was that the safest bet for your money, was Crepe Myrtles, at this point in time. They have yet to find a cure for those. If you stick something in the ground that is not resistant to that disease, it's going to happen again and you will lose whatever money you invested in those trees. You have pictures of some types of Crepe Myrtles. I have an article from the Florida Extension that says: "The Crepe Myrtle is one
of the most beautiful and popular flowering trees in Florida. They are called the "Lilac of the South". This plant is touch adaptable and showy. Its blooms are large and long lasting, up to 100 days.   The tree has great fall cover and attractive bark.   It prefers a sunny, well grated site and is relatively pest and disease free" so there's no spraying. They are a pretty durable
substitute. The type that I thought about getting is the Lagerstroemia, which are a ·nice
color. They are pink. That would be a nice contrast coming in the entryway. They get about 20 feet tall. They are not the small ones that you see in some front yards. They don't need to be cut. There is a misconception about Crepe Myrtles. They even termed it " Crepe Murder" by cutting them back too far. If you let a Crepe Myrtle grow, specifically the one that I'm recommending, they normally grow about 20 feet tall. That would create a nice canopy coming up the Boulevard. My job was to find out details for

37

you and do some research, so that's what I'm presenting.   My recommendation would be to go with a Crepe Myrtle. They all have the same instructions and meet all of our requirements. Are there any questions?
Mr. Williams: Let's start with the removal of the trees. It looks like it will cost
$12,000 to remove them, along with the stumps.
Ms. Bosman: The work is extremely labor intensive.
Mr. Williams:   I'm looking at some of these other estimates.  I thought I saw one for $3,500 to do the same thing.
Ms. Bosman:  We can piecemeal it, if you so choose. Ms. Wright: Can we study this until the next meeting? Mr. Williams: I would say so.
Ms. Bosman: The trees are not going to fall over.
Mr. Robertson: The toughest thing is that our palm Boulevard is not going to be  a palm tree Boulevard any more.
Ms. Bosman:  It was a rite of passage.  It's a sad thing that's not uncommon.
Mr.  Robertson:   What we want everyone to realize, is that in all likelihood,  the disease will spread and we will have to replace them with something else.
Mr. Williams: Is there a possibility that it could spread to other trees in the area? Ms. Bosman: Absolutely.
Mr. Williams: So we should get rid of them as quickly as possible. Right? Mr. Robertson: Yes.

Ms. Bosman: If a bug is feeding on a diseased plant and hops on to a live one, it will infect it.

Mr.  Williams:  That is only for certain types of  palms.  I don't think we have any   of those.
Ms. Bosman:  Yes, you do.  Not in the median, but we have the patio palms right in front and several queen palms.
Mr. Murphey:  We have to remove them.
Mr. Robertson: Let's get started by getting rid of them.

38

Mr. Williams: I'd try to find someone who will give us a price for the same trees.
Mr. d'Adesky: Do you want a not-to-exceed of the current bid amount and have her go out and get another bid?
Mr. Williams: There are three proposals for removing the diseased trees; one for
$2,900, another for $3,500 and a third for $5,350. The one from. Evolve is $12,000.
Ms. Bosman: Evolve is also checking the sprinkler systems and replacing soil.
Mr. Williams:	They all say that they are removing the palms, grinding the stumps and removing debris.

Ms. Bosman: Yes, but if you look on the second page of Evolve's quote, it adds replanting and checking the sprinklers. I think we need to look at the most economic and thorough price for complete removal. Will the Board make a decision at the next meeting for replacements?
Mr. Robertson: I understand that they are grinding stumps. They just grind to the terrain line and then they are done, but if we are going to put new trees in, grinding is not enough. They have to take the entire root out, so the lowest price of $3,500 is just to take the trees out, grind the stumps to the ground and then leave. Then we have to take out the old root structure going forward.
Ms. Bosman: I know from. personal experience, if you cut them one chainsaw blade, you are lucky, because they are very thick.
Mr. Williams: Every one of these just say stump grind.
Mr. Robertson: I'm just worried that if we pay $3,500, it may involve having to dig further.

Mr. Williams: We really don't have the quotes that we need.
Mr. Robertson: I want quotes to remove the old ones and be ready for a new tree. Ms. Bosman: They were all given that information.
Mr. Robertson: They didn't bid it that way. Ms. Bosman: Correct.
Mr. Mecsics: We need to know what type of grinding they are doing. Ms. Bosman: Normally it's below the ground. Otherwise, it's just a cut.

39

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Mr. Williams:  Would all of these be cut that way?
Ms. Bosman:  So many proposals came in.  I just received a couple yesterday. Mr. Williams:  I think we need that information.
Mr.  Mecsics:  I recommend we hold off so staff gets more information; although there is a risk of spreading. Bring it back in a month and we will make a decision.
Ms. Bosman:  That's fine with me.
Mr. Robertson: Put this item on the agenda for the next meeting. Ms. Bosman: Thank you.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Approval of Check Run Summary
Ms. Burns:  The check run through July 31st  for the general fund is $292,532.27 and
$43,275 .96 for the capital reserve fund.

On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Mecsics  seconded  by  Mr.  Murphey with all in favor the Check Run Summary was approved.

Combined Balance Sheet
Ms.  Burns:	These  are  the  unaudited  financials  through June.	No  actions  are
necessary by the Board and we would be happy to answer any questions.
Mr.  Robertson:	Do  we  want  to  discuss  the  elections?	We  need  one  of  the members to find a moderator for the candidate forum.
Ms. Wright:  We should have a joint one.
Mr. Robertson: Could we designate you to find a moderator? Ms. Wright:  Yes.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Robertson: Are there any public comments?
Mr. Velebir:  Yes.  If I'm reading Chapter 190 correctly, relating to the elections of Supervisors, it says that after June 1, the Board will announce, at an open meeting, the number of qualified electors in the District. Since this meeting seems to be drawing to a close, are we going to do that?

40

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. d'Adesky: That happens every year in June. That's when the Supervisor of Elections tells you how many people live in the District. Every year, we've announced the number of registered voters.
Ms. Burns: I think that was done in May.
Mr. Mossing: They provided the number of registered voters as of April 15th.
Ms. Burns: We have to send a letter to the Supervisor of Elections, designating the number of voters, as of April 15th and it has to be announced by June 1st.
Mr. Velebir: How many do we have in this District? Ms. Burns: I will check the minutes and let you know.
Mr. Velebir: The important thing, is that it's over 250. The reason why it was put there in the first place, is once it gets over 250, the Board transitions to resident control, versus developer control.
Ms. Croton: Hello. I'm Janice Croton. I am a participant in the water aerobics class. You may remember that I spoke to you a year-and-a-half ago. I would like to commend Jim Mecsics for admitting the Board's mistake and revisiting the decision. I thank the Board for changing the policy and for Mr. Williams's apology and invitation. However, I would like to request that the Board contact the 8:30 a.m. water aerobics leader who was not at this meeting, and extend the apology and invitation directly to her. Thank you.
Mr. Mecsics: I will do that.
A resident: A while ago, Alan made a statement about lights in the parking lot.

it	to

The Board didn't discuss that at all. Are there any plans to put lights in the parking lot, because . is very dark at night? We have to use flashlights . find our cars.
Mr. Williams: I guess we better consider that then. Ms. Wright: Is that on the capital project list?
Ms. Burns: Yes.

A resident: The other issue is that when security is here for an event,  do they  drive around and tell the people, that are there for the event, that they can't use  that facility. It seems like that they go out and do anything they want.

41

August 10, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Mecsics: They were tasked to check on the guests and do spot checks.
A resident: Does the money that they pay for using this facility, go into a fund to use for the HFC building?
Mr. Robertson: No, it's a separate fund.
A resident:  You need to consider lights for the parking lot.
Mr. Robertson: We are getting some streetlights. And when we have big events, we are going to turn on the pickleball lights to see if that will do the job.
A resident:  That would help.
Mr.  Robertson:   We already set that up as a policy.   We only use the parking lot for big events. If that becomes adequate, we will use that, but if not, we will consider adding more lighting.
A resident: Thank you.
Ms.  Crary-Leh:     Gloria  Crary-Leh,  5172  Pebble  Beach  Boulevard.     I'm  here because of the city moving the stakes on the buffer zone. I went to every single one  of those meetings and I feel very strongly that those stakes have to remain. They were needed  to  begin  with,  because  some  people  don't  understand  the  word  "No".    It  is putting  our  community  at  the  risk  of  being  fined.   Should  the  CDD ever  get fined,  I would expect the CDD to sue those individuals and get the money back, because this is so childish and ridiculous.  I can't even believe that it's come to this.  It's a disgrace.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Murphey seconded by Mr. Williams with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

Mr. Robertson:	If there are no further comments from the public, then  I  will entertain a motion for adjournment.	

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairman / Vice Chairman

42

Post Office Box 1469 Eagle Lake, FL 3383 9- 1469

(800) 408-8882	(863) 533-8882	(863) 534-3322

September 5, 2018 

Lake Ashton CDD II
5385 North Nob Hill Road Sunrise, FL 3335 1
RE: Aquatic Plant Management Agreement
The present term for aquatic plant maintenance for the ponds associated with Lake Ashton CDD II is due for automatic renewal in October 2018. It is the desire of AAM, Inc., to continue the maintenance program. Per term and condition 14 on the back of your agreement, even if we do not receive a signed copy back your contract will automatically renew.
AAM has decided to waive the 3% increase for this coming year. We also would like to thank you for your loyalty with AAM, Inc.
Please review the proposal. Ifthere are any questions, concerns or need for clarification, do not hesitate to call. If all meets with your approval, sign and return the FILE COPY of the agreement to our office.
We look forward to being of continued service. Ifyou have any questions, please contact our office.

Wade L. Pharis Vice President
Enclosure

appliedaquaticmgmt.com

Rene\111al

P.O. Box 1 469 Eagle Lake,  FL 33839
1 -800-408-8882

AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT
AGREEMENT
Submitted to:	Date:	September 5, 20 18 

Name Add ress City Phone

Lake Ashton  CDD II 5'.385 North Nob Hill Hoad Su nrise, FL 3335 1
407 398 -2890

This Ag reement is between Applied Aquatic Management, Inc. hereafter called "MM" and l..ake Ashton COD II hereafter called "Customer".
The parties hereto agree as follows
MM agrees to provide aquatic management services for a period of	12 rnon1hs in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Ag reement in the followi ng sites:

1 wo (2) New Ponds  in  Lake Ashton COD I! L ake Wales . FL 

The MM management program will include the control of the following categories of vegetation for the specified sum: 

Subme rsed vegetation control	Included
Emersed vegetation control	Included
Floating vegetation control	Included
Filamentous algae control	included
Shoreline g rass & brush control	Included

Service sl1a ll consist of 1T:onthly inspections and/or treatments as needed to maintain control ot noxious g rowth througt-iout the term of our service.

Customer agrees to pay MM the followi ng amounts during the term of th is Agreement: The terrns of this agreement shall be 1 0/0 1/20 18 thru 09/30/2019. 
Agreement will automatically renew as per Term and Condition 14.
Sta rt-up Charge	NA	Due at the start of work

Maintenance Fee	$1 50.00	Due	monthly
Total Annual Cost	$1 ,800 .00 

as billed

X 12 .

Invoices are due and payable within 30 days. Overdue accounts may accrue a service charge of 1 112% per month

MM agrees to commence treatment within	NA    days, weather permitting , from the date of execution or receipt of the proper permits.

VP

Customer acknowledges that he has read and is fam iliar with the additional terms and conditions printed on the reverse side which are incorporated in th is agreement.

Date:	9/5/20 18	Accepted	Date:

Customer

 	 	 	 	 	 	

PO Box 1469

Eagle Lake, FL 33839-1 469 Phone: 863.533.8882
Fax: 863 .534.3322

Customer Information

To make sure we have the correct information, please fill this out -and return to our office.

Affiliation:  ----------------------------
Contact:  ----------------------------

Address: ----------------------------

Billing Address : ___ 	_ 	_ 	____

Phone #-----------------------------

Fax #------------------------------
Email------------------------------

We look forward to being of continued service. Thank you

Grau & Associates
CERTIFIED  PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

August 14, 2018 

95 1 Yamato Road • Suite 280 Boca Raton , Florida 33431

(561) 994-9299 • (800) 299-4728
Fax (561) 994-5823
www.graucpa. com

Board of Supe rvisors Attn : Patti Powers
Lake Ashton II Community Development District 5385 N. Nob Hill Road
Sunrise, FL 33351
We a re pleased to confi rm our understanding of the services we are to provide Lake Ashton II Community Development District, Miami-Dade County, Florida ("the District") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20 18. We will audit the financial statements of the governmental activities, including the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the basic financial statements of Lake Ashton II Community Development District as of and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20 18. In addition, we wi ll examine the District's compliance with the requirements of Section 21 8.415 Florida Statutes. This letter serves to renew our agreement and establish the terms and fee for the 20 18 audit.
Accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America provide for certain requi red supplementary in formation  (RSI),  such  as  management's  discussion  and  analysis  (MD&A),  to  supplement  the  District's  basic  financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is requi red by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic fi nancial statements  in  an  appropriate  operational,  economic,  or historical  context.  As  part of our engagement,  we wi ll  apply  certain limited procedures to the District's RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. These limited procedures will consist of inquiries of management regarding the methods of p reparing the information and comparing the information for consisten cy with  management's responses to  our inquiries,  the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We will  not express an opinion or provide any assu rance on the information because the limited procedu res do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or p rovide any assurance.
The followi ng RSI is requi red by generally accepted accounting principles and wi ll be su bjected to certain limited procedures, but wi ll not be audited:
Management's Discussion and Analysis.
Budgetary comparison schedule
Audit Objectives

The objective of our audit is the expression of opinions as to whether your financial statements are fairly presented, in all material  respects,  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  and  to  report  on  the  fairness  of  the supplementary info rm ation referred to in the second paragraph when considered in relation to the fi nancial statements as a whole. Our audit wi ll be conducted in accordance with auditing standa rds generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States,  and wi ll  include tests of the accounting records of the  District and other procedu res we consider necessary to enable us to express such opinions. We will issue a written report upon completion of our audit of the District's financial statements. We cannot p rovide assuran ce that an unmodified opinion will be expressed . Circumstances may arise in which it is necessary for us to modify our opinion or add emphasis-of-matter or other-m atter paragraphs. If our opinion on the fi nancial statements  is  other than  unmodified,  we wi ll  discuss the  reasons with  you  in  advance.  If,  for any reason, we are  unable to complete the audit or are unable to form or have not formed an opinion, we may decline to express an opinion or issue a repo rt, or may withdraw from this engagement.

We wi ll also provide a report (that does not include an opinion) on internal control related to the financial statements and compliance with the provisions of laws ,  regu lations, contracts,  and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a material effect on the financial statements as required by Government Auditing Standards. The report on internal control and on compliance and other matters wi ll include a paragraph that states (1) that the purpose of the report is solely to describe the scope of testing of internal control and compliance, and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the District's internal control on compliance, and (2) that the report is an integral part of an audit performed in
accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the District's internal control and compliance. The paragraph	
wi ll also state that the report is not suitable for any other purpose. If during our audit we become aware that the District is

su bject to an audit requi rement that is not encompassed in the terms of this engagement, we will communicate to management and those charged with governance that an audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for fi nancial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards may not satisfy the relevant legal, regulatory, or contractual requirements .

Examination Objective
The o bjective of our exam ination is the expression of an opinion as to whether the District is in compliance with Florida Statute 21 8.415 in accordance with Rule 10 .556(10) of the Auditor General of the State of Florida. Our examination will be cond ucted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and will include tests of your records and other procedu res we co nsider necessary to enable us to exp ress such an opinion. We wi ll issue a written report upon completion of our examination of the District's compliance. The report wi ll include a statement that the repo rt is intended solely for the information and use of management, those charged with governance, and the Florida Auditor General, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. We cannot provide assurance that an unmodified opinion wi ll be expressed. Circumstances may arise in which it is necessary for us to modify our opinion or add emphasis-of-matter or other-matter parag raphs. If our opinion on the District's compliance is other than unmodified , we wi ll discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the examination or are unable to form or have not formed an opinion, we may decline to express an opinion or issue a repo rt, or may withd raw from this engagement.
Management Responsibilities
Management is responsible for the financial statements and all accompanying information as well as all representations contained therein. Fu rther, management is responsible fo r compliance with Florida Statute 21 8.41 5 and will p rovide us with the information required for the examination. The accuracy and completeness of such information is also management's responsibility. As part of the audit, we will assist with p reparation of your fi nancial statements and related n otes in conformity with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  based  on  information  provided  by you.  These  nonaudit  services  do  not constitute an audit under Government Auditing Standards and such services will not be conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. You agree to assume all management responsibil ities relating to the financial statements and related notes and any other nonaudit services we provide. You will be required to acknowledge in the management rep resentation letter our assistance with preparation of the financial statements and related notes and that you have reviewed and approved the financial statements and related notes prior to their issuance and have accepted responsibility for them . In addition, you will be required to make certain representations regarding compliance with Florida Statute 21 8.41 5 in the management representation letter. Further, you agree to oversee the nonaudit services by designating an individual, preferably from senior management, who possesses suitable skill, knowledge, or experience; evaluate the adequacy and results of those services; and accept responsibil ity for them .
Management  is  responsible fo r establishing  and  maintaining  effective  internal  controls,  including  evaluating  and  monitori ng ongoing activities, to help ensure that appropriate goals and objectives are met; following laws and regulations; and ensuring that management is reliable and financial info rmation is reliable and properly reported. Management is also responsible for im plementing systems designed to achieve compliance with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and g rant agreements . You  a re also responsible for the selection and application of accounting principles, for the p reparation and fair p resentation of the financial statements and all accompanying information in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and for compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements.
Management is also responsible for making all financial records and related information available to us and for the accuracy and completeness of that information. You are also responsible for providing us with (1) access to all information of which you are aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the fi nancial statements, (2) additional information that we may request for the purpose of the audit, and (3) unrestricted access to persons within the government from whom we determine it necessary to obtain audit evidence.
Your responsibilities include adjusting the fi nancial statements to correct material misstatements and for confirming to us in the written representation letter that the effects of any un corrected misstatements aggregated by us during the current engagement and pertaining to the latest period presented are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the fi nancial statements taken as a whole. As part of our engagement, we may propose standard adjusting, or correcting journal entries to your financial statements. You are responsible for reviewing the entries and understanding the nature of the proposed entries and the impact they have on the financial statements.
You are responsible for the design and implementation of p rograms and controls to prevent and detect fraud, and for informing us about all known or suspected fraud affecting the government involving (1) management, (2) employees who have significant roles in internal control, and (3) others whe re the fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements. Your responsibilities include informing us of your knowledge of any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the government received in communications from employees, former employees, granters, regulators, or othe rs. In addition, you are responsible for identifying and ensuring that the government complies with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, agreements, and grants and for taking ti mely and appropriate steps to remedy fraud and noncompliance with provisions of laws,  regulations, contracts or g rant agreements, or abuse that we report.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a process for tracking the status of audit fi ndings and recommendations. Management is also responsible for identifying and providing report copies of p revi ous financial audits, attestation engagements, performance audits or other studies related to the objectives discussed in the Audit Objectives section of this letter. This responsibility includes relayi ng to us corrective actions taken to address significant fi ndings and recommendations resu lting from those audits, attestation engagements, performance audits, or other studies. You are also responsible for providing management's views on our current findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as your planned corrective actions, fo r the report, and for the timing and format for p roviding that inform ation.
With regard to using the audit's report, you understand that you must obtai n our prior written consent to reprod uce or use our repo rt in bond offering official statements or other documents.

Lake Ashton II Comm unity Development District	3
With regard to the electronic dissemination of audited financial statements, including financial statements published electronically on your website, you understand that electronic sites are a means to distribute information and, therefo re, we are not requi red to read the information contained in these sites or to consider the consistency of other information in the electronic site with the original document.
Audit Procedures-General
An  audit includes  examining,  on  a test basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures  in the financial statements; therefore,  our  audit wi ll  involve judgment about the  number of transactions to  be  examined  and  the  areas to  be tested.  An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounti ng policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We will plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable rather than absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether from (1 ) errors, (2) fraudulent financial reporting, (3) misappropriation of assets, or (4) violations of laws or governmental regulations that are attributable to the government or to acts by management or employees acting on behalf of the government. Because the determination of abuse is subjective, Government Auditing Standards do not expect auditors to p rovide reasonable assurance of detecting abuse.
Because of the inherent lim itations of an audit, combined with the inherent lim itations of internal control, and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that m aterial misstatements may exist and not be detected by us, even though the audit is p roperly planned and performed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial misstatements or violations of laws or governmental regulations that do not have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors. 
Our procedu res wi ll include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirm ation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected individuals, funding sources, creditors, and financial institutions. We wi ll request written representations from your attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to this inquiry. At the conclusion of our audit, we will require certain written representations from you about your responsibilities for the financial statements;  compliance  with  laws,  regulations,  contracts,  and  g rant  agreements;  and  other  responsibilities  required  by generally accepted auditing standards.
Audit Procedures-Internal Control
Our audit will include obtaining an understanding of the government and its environment, including internal control, sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design the nature, timing , and extent of fu rther audit proced u res. Tests of controls may be performed to test the effectiveness of certain controls that we consider relevant to preventing and detecting errors and fraud that are material to the fi nancial statements and to preventing and detecting misstatements resulting from il legal acts and other noncompliance m atters that have a di rect and material effect on the financial statements.  Our tests,  if performed, will  be  less  in scope than would  be necessary to  render an  opinion  on  internal control and, accordingly, no opinion wi ll be expressed in our report on internal control issued pu rsuant to Government Auditing Standards.
An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses . However, during the audit, we will communicate to management and those charged with governance internal control related matters that are required to be communicated under AI CPA professional standards and Government Auditing Standards.
Audit Procedures-Compliance
As part of obtaining reason able assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we wi ll perform tests of the District's compliance with the provisions of applicable laws, regu lations, contracts, agreements, and grants. However, the o bjective of our audit wi ll not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and we wi ll not exp ress such an opinion in our report on compliance issued pu rs uant to Government Auditing Standards.
Engagement Administration, Fees, and Other
We understand that your employees wi ll p repare all cash or other confirmations we request and will locate any documents selected by us for testing. 
The audit documentation for this engagement is the property of Grau & Associates and constitutes confidential information. However, subject to applicable laws and regulations, audit documentation and appropriate individuals will be made available upon request and in a timely manner to a cognizant or oversight agency or its designee, a federal agency p roviding di rect or indi rect fu nding ,  or the  U.S.  Government Accountability Office  for purposes  of a quality review of the audit, to resolve audit findings, or to carry out oversight responsibilities . We wi ll notify you of any such request. If requested , access to such audit documentation wi ll be provided under the supervision of Grau & Associates pe rso nnel. Furthermo re, upon request, we may provide copies of selected audit documentation to the aforementioned parties. These parties may intend, or decide, to distribute the copies or information contained therein to others, including other governmental agencies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge that various documents reviewed or produced during the conduct of the audit may be public records under Florida l aw. The District ag rees to notify Grau & Associates of any public record request it receives that involves audit documentation.
Our fee for these services wi ll not exceed $5, 800 for the September 30, 2018 audit, unless there is a change in activity by the District which results in additional audit work or if additional Bonds are issued.

We wi ll complete the audit within p rescribed statutory deadlines, with the understanding that your employees will provide in form ation needed to perform the audit on a timely basis.
The audit documentation for th is engagement wi ll be retained for a minimum of five years after the report release date. If we are aware that a federal awarding agency or auditee is contesting an audit fi nding, we will contact the party(ies) contesting the audit finding for guidance prior to destroying the audit documentation.
Our invoices for these fees will be rendered each month as work progresses and are payable on presentation. I nvoices will be submitted in sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance with the terms of this ag reement. In accordance with our firm policies, work m ay be suspended if yo ur account becomes 60 days or more overdue and may not be resumed until your account is paid in fu ll. If we elect to terminate our services for nonpayment, our engagement will be deemed to have been completed upon written notification of termination, even if we have not completed our report. You wi ll be obligated to compensate us for all time expended and to reimburse us for all out-of-pocket costs through the date of termination. The above fee is based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel and the assumption that unexpected ci rcumstances wi ll not be encountered during the audit. If significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee estimate.
This ag reement may be renewed each year thereafter subject to the mutual agreement by both parties to all terms and fees. The fee for each annual renewal will be agreed upon separately.
We will provide you with a copy of our most recent external peer review report and any letter of comment, and any subsequent peer review reports and letters of comment received during the period of the contract. Our 2016 peer review report accompanies this letter.
We app reciate the opportunity to be of service to Lake Ashton II Community Development District and believe this letter accurately summarizes  the  sig nificant terms of our engagement.  If you  have  any questions,  please let  us  know.  If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign the enclosed copy and retu rn it to us.

Very truly yours, Grau & Associates

Antonio J. Grau

RESPONSE: 
This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of Lake Ashton II Community Development District. By:
Title:   	
Date:

r
!l)
;,;­ (D
)>
CJ)

0

::J""

ICPA-®

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM
is proud topresent this
Certificate of Recognition
to

Grau & Associates

:::::,
0

3

0

�­

3
C

'<
0

0

-03

(Dc5

(D

0

&

;:l..
u

For having a: system ofquality control for its accounting and. auditing practice in effect for the year ended June 30, 2016 which has been designed to meet the requirements of the quality control standards
for an accounting and auditing practice established. by the AICPA and which was complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards.

.�

-Ani.ca Ford,. Chair

AICPA ·Peer:Jle,,i'cw Roard

2¢16

µ

n'

. -�

�:;CAMELB

.�":1'l

7

OVER 50.00<J CUSTOMERSSER'IED SIi/CE 1!/93

o , s P L A Y s •·�

ACK

My Accoun t    I   View Car t   l'!;'	0

HOME	ALL PRODUCTS	RESOURCES	RENTALS	SPECIAL OFFERS	REQUEST A QUOTE	ABOUT US	CONTACT US

ml :t;-  -lt�.�,\��t�!� �J����,,,;;, "n;,.�m:n��� 'l !

'''"; :�, .

-'      ,.�	/'- c}�'. ��, ';,"::J

:· , ,	,	,   , :.,/:;,,�-

..

<

PLASTIC LANDSCAPE STANCHIONS WITH STAKE
�
Home » Proc:lucts » Crowd Control » Plastic Landscape StanchlonsWlth Stake
$24.00

t����:�

�;j

Kit tpcludes:.;,
;fi;CBD

C-Hook Assembly

3!	Online - Click here to get help 

https://www.camefbackdlsplays.com/product/plastic-landscape-stanchlons-wlth-stake/

walmart black plastic chain

All	Images

Your location: Winter Haven, FL

Show only

Maps	Shopping	More

Settings

SORT BY: DEFAULT	MY SHORTLIST (0)
Sponsored

N ew items	□

Available nearby	□

Price
Up to $20	0
$20 - $45
$45 - $1 00
Over $1 00	0
$	to
$
GO

□

Seller

Jet.com	□

Global Industrial

□

Neobits.com

□

Sustainable· Supply Zoro
MORE

US Weight Chain Boss 2-lnch Plastic Chain - 10 Feet, Black
$7.98 from 5+ stores
With a wide range of uses, plastic chain is among the most popular products in crowd control. For use either indoors or ...

ChainBoss High tensile strength 2" black plastic chain with UV protection (1 25' reel) by US Weight U2333
from BarrierWarehouse.com
�		USWeight ChainBoss High tensile strength 2" plastic chain with UV protection (1 25' reel). For use either indoor or outdoor, you can effectively close off short or long ... more »

$65.00
+$1 8.33 shipping. No tax Arrives Oct 1 - 11 BarrierWarehouse.com

X3 Ro) l s

� / 05&!]_,

I       Visit site   I

$72.99 Wayfair

Compare prices from 2 stores

Related items	Save to Shortlist

mr. chain 50003-50 pla stic chain,2 in x 50 ft:,black
$35.95 from 1 0+ stores
16 prqduct reviews
Plastic Barrier Chain, 2'' Diameter, SQ' Length, Yellow Use With St,mchion Post; and ground posts for crowd and traffic control , ..

Other options: Black • 1 -1 /2 in X 50 ft ($30) Blue • 2 In X 50 ft ($47)

50'L Plastic Chain Yellow/Black For Traffic Control
https://www.google.com/search?biw= 1 280&bih=579&tbm=shop&ei=BrurW-HUH ILitQXC5bH4Cg&q=walmart+black+plastlc+chain&oq=walmart+black+. .. 1/5

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

LAKE ASHTON 11 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPM ENT DISTRICT
Check Run Summary GF 

Date	Check Numbers	Amount	
8/2/2018	2167-2170	$15, 126.98 	
8/15/2018	2171-2184	$46,633.56 	
8/17/2018	2185-2190	$11,648.49	
8/22/2018	2191-2198	$14,254.01 	
8/30/2018	2199-2207	$28,629 .95 	
9/10/2018 	2208-2218	$31,252 .40	
9/14/2018	2219-2222	$36,171.37 	
9/25/2018	2223-2236	$30,788.27	
Total		$214,505. 03	
	Check Run Summary CR		
Date	Check Numbers	Amount	
8/15/2018	17	$18,775. 00	
8/17/2018	18	$1,080.00	
8/21/2018	19	$4,000.00	
8/30/2018	20	$3,278.00	
9/10/2018	21	$134.82 	
9/13/2018	22-23	$15,298 .00	
9/18/2018	24	$0.00	
9/25/2018	

25	$7,500.00	
Total		$50,065.82	

8/1/2018 - 9/30/2018

AP3 00R
*** CHECK NOS . 002167-050000 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/26/18 

PAGE	1

CHECK    VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . . . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT  ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

8/02/18 00150 

SUPPLIES

8/02/18 	00086 	6/25/18 	205543 0	201806 320- 572 00- 46020 	*	69 . 8 2	
		7/09/ 18 	SUPPLIES
8051633	201807 320 -57200- 46020 	*	187 .27 	

7/13/18  4052147	201807 320 -57200-46050 

SUPPLIES	HOME DEPOT CRED IT SERVICES 6/3 0/18 17-101-1 201806 310-513 00 -31100 
SERVICE THRU 06/30/2018 
7/3 1/18 17-101-1 201807 310- 51300-31100 

*

*	- - -
*

44 . 9 8

302 . 0 7	002 167 

	

-4 -, 14- 7 -. 6 5-	
002168 

	

- 9 -, 3 4- 3 -. 7 6-	
002169 	

- - - - - - - -
3 , 2 30 . 75
916 . 9 0

- - - -

8/02/18 00152 

SERVICE   THRU  07/31 /2018	RAYL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , LLC 7/19/18 E414 052 0 201807 320- 572 00-34500 

GUARD SVC 7/13 -19/2018 
7/26/18 E4 145119 201807 320- 572 00- 34500 

*	- - -
*

- - - - - - -

4, 671 . 8 8
4, 671 . 8 8

GUARD SVC 7/2 0- 26 /2018 

SECURI TAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC

- - -

- - - - - - -

8/02/18 00 094 

7/24/18 
7/24/18 
7/24/18 
7/24/18 
7/24/18 
7/24/18 

5604-072 201807 320-57200- 46400 
PURCHAS ES THRU 7/24/2018 
5604-072 201807 320- 572 00- 51000 
PURCHAS ES THRU 7/24/2018 
5604-072 201807 320 -57200- 49400 
PURCHAS ES THRU 7/24/2018 
5604-072 201807 320- 57200-46030 
PURCHAS ES THRU 7/24/2018 
5604- 072 201807 320- 57200- 46020 
PURCHAS ES THRU 7/24/2 018 
5604- 072 201807 320-572 00 -34500 
PURCHASES   THRU  7/24/2 018	WELLS FARGO

*
*
*
*
*
*

- - -

68 .35 
452 .3 4
137 . 12
408 . 0 7
199 . 6 7
67 . 9 5
- - - - - - -

- 1 -, 3 3- 3 -.5 0-

002170 

8/15/18 00 092 

7/3 1/18  1712 65 
AQUAT IC 7/3 1/18 171266 

201807  320-5 72 00 -46500 
PLANT MGMT - JUL 18 201807 320- 572 00- 46500 

*	725 . 0 0

*	150 . 0 0

8/15/18 00 14 0

8/15/18 00068 

AQUAT IC  PLANT  MGMT -JUL  18	APPLIED AQUAT IC MANAGEMENT , INC .

8/ 14 /18 AUG-18	201808 320 -572 00- 34100 
TECH   SUPPORT  THRU   8/14/18	RYAN A BUSWELL
7/3 1/18   JUL-18	201807 320-572 00 -34100 

*	-    - -
*	-   - -

- - - - - - - -
105 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -
425 . 0 0

- 8 7- 5 -. 0 -0   002171 

- 1 0- 5 -. 0 0-  002 172 

CLASS   INSTRUCTIONS	PAULETTE EDMONDS

LKA2   LAKE ASHTON  2	SROS INA

425 . 0 0 002173 

AP3 00R
*** CHECK NOS . 002167-050000 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/26/18 

PAGE	2

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .  . . . EXPENSED TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . . 
AMOUNT	#

8/15/18 00 003 

8/07/18   6D- E2 L6 I8V- E6 R6 IE2S0 1T8H0R7U3 10 70 /- 52 17 3/ 10 80- 42000 

FEDEX

*	76 .2 3

- - - - - - - - - -

76 .2 3 002 174

8/15/18 00058 

8/01/18 
8/01/18 
8/01 /18 
8/01 /18 

3MGMT  FEE2S 0-A1U8G0U8 ST3 120 0- 15 18 3 00- 34000 

3

201808 310-5 13 00- 35100 

3

COMPUTER TIME-AUGUST 2018 
201808 310-5 13 00- 31300 
DISSEMINATION-AUGUST  2018 
3	201808 310-5 13 00-51000 

3

SUPPLIES -AUGUST 2018 

*	3, 3 33 .33 
*	83 .33 
*	500 .0 0
*	3. 44
*

8/ 01/18 

3 POSTAGE -A2U0 G1U8 S0T8 

23 10 10 -8 51300- 42 000 

20 .21 
*

8/ 01/18 

201808 310-51300-42500 

COPIES-AUGUST 2018	GMS - CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLC

9. 7 5
- - - - - - - - - -

- 3 -,9 5- 0 -. 0 6-

002 175 

8/15/18 00069 

8/15/18 00170 

7/3 1/18 JUL -18	201807 320 -572 00 -34100 
CLASS  INSTRUCTIONS	LAURIE  HEVERLY
7/11/18 07638399 201807 320-57200- 23 000 

HEALTH INS RIEMB- JUL 2018 8/15/18   JMULIL-E1A8 GE  R2 I0E1M8 B0 7- JU3 L2Y0 - 25 70 12 800-46050 

*

*	- -
*

850 .0 0
- - - - - - - - -
428 . 04
44 . 17

- 8 5- 0 -.0 0-

002176 

- - - - - - - - -

- - - -

- - - -

JAMES MARGESON

- - - - - - - - - -

-  - 4 7- 2 -.2 1-

002177 

8/15/18 00 012

8/0 8/18  4651606	A2 D0 M1 I8N08 FE3 E00-36 30 0-10000 

4651606 

2017 1%

8/0 8/18	A2D0M1 I8N08 FE3 E00-20 700- 10100 

*	13 , 104 . 16

*	4, 630.4 6

8/0 8/18 
8/08/ 18 
8/0 8/18 

2017 1%
4651606 
2017 1%
4651606 
2017 1%
4651606 

A2D0M1 I8N08FE3 E00-20 700- 103 00 
201808 700-36300-10000 
ADMIN FEE
A2 D0 M1 I8N08 FE7E00-20700-10000 

*	3,3 66 .28 
*	4, 630 .46 
*	4, 630 .46- 

8/0 8/18 

2017 1% 201808 700-36300 -102 00 

*	3, 366 .28 

4651606 

ADMIN FEE

8/0 8/18 

2017 1% 201808 700-20700-10000 

*	3, 366 .2 8- 

4651606 
2017 1% 

ADMIN FEE

MARSHA FAUX , PROPERTY APPRAISER

- - - - - - - - - -

21, 100 .9 0 002178 

8/15/18 00101 

8/ 01/18 10129558 201808 320- 572 0 0-464 00 
WATER MGMT -AUGUST 2018	POOLSURE

LKA2 LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

*	540 .0 0

540 . 0 0 002179 

 	

** *

AP3 00R 
CHECK NOS . 002167-050000 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9 / 26 / 18 

PAGE	3

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT  ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

8/15 / 18 00 152 

8 / 02 / 18   E4 150599   201807   3/ 2 0 /-5 72 00- 34500 

*	4, 646 . 8 8

SERVICE THRU 08 02 

18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC

- - -

- - - - - - -

- 4 -, 6 4- 6 -. 8 -8   002180 

8 / 15 / 18 00183 

8 / 15 / 18 00124

8 / 15 / 18 00005

8 / 15 / 18 00067 

7/31/ 18 2078 / 001 201807 320-57200- 46020 
PAINT	THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO .
7/3 1/18  2396	201807 320 -57200- 493 00 
TEST  BACKFLOW PREV DEVICE	SOUTHERN UTILITY SERVICE INC .
7/18/18  L06 0G0IH 201807  310-5130 0-48000 
BOARD OF SUP MEETING	THE LEDGER/NEWS CHIEF 8 / 01/ 18 INV- 0000 201808 320- 572 00- 46200 

*
-  -  -
*
*	-   -  -
*	-   - -

13 9 . 45 
- - - - - - - -
290 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -
161 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -
13 , 0 01 . 8 3

- 13- 9 -. 4 5-
- 2 9- 0 -. 0 0-
- 1 6- 1 -. 0 0-

002181 

002182 

002183 

8 / 17/18 00 084 

LANDSCAPE MAIN-AUG 2018	YELLOWS TONE LANDSCAPE
8 / 03 / 18   AR358422   201808   320-5 7/ 2 /00-51000 

*	- -

-  -  -   -  -  -   -   -
503 . 93

1- 3 -, 0 0- 1 -. 8 3-

002 184 

COPIER RENTAL THRU 8 5

18	DEX IMAGING

- - -

- - - - - - -

-   - 5 0- 3 -. 9 3-

002185 

8 / 17/ 18 00 173 

7/3 1/18 L06G0IJZ 201807 310-5130 0-48 000 

*	26.5 0

/	/	NOTICE  OF JOINT WORKSHOP	*

8 / 17 / 18 00040 

8 / 17 / 18 00107 

8 / 17 / 18 00152 

8 / 17 / 18 00 062 

8   01  18  L06 0G0IJ 201808 310-51300- 48000 

NOTICE  OF JOINT MEETING	LAKELAND LEDGER PIBLISHING 8 /15 / 18  82099	201807 310 -51300-31500 
LEGAL  SCV THRU  07 / 31 / 18	LATHAM , SHUKER , EDEN & BEAUDINE LLP
8 / 09 / 18 080918	201808 320- 57200- 46400 
FIX  LEAK ON  PIPEWORK	POOL & PATIO CENTER
8 / 02 / 18 E415 0599 201808 320-5 72 00-34500 
EXPENSES		SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC 8 / 13 / 18 AUG-18	201808 320-57200- 43 000 
ELECTRI C-AUGUST 2018	TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY
LKA2  LAKE  ASHTON  2	SROS INA

-   -  -
*
*	-    - -
*	-   - -
*	-   -  -

29.5 0
-  -  -  -  -  -  -
635 .20 
- - - - - - -
80 . 0 0
-  -  -  -  -  -   -
25 . 0 0
-  -   -  -  -   -   -
10, 348 .36 

-   -  5- 6 -. 0 -0   002186 
-    - 6 3- 5 -.2 0-   002187 

80 . 0 0 002188 

25 . 0 0 002189 

10 , 348 .36 002190 

** *

AP3 00R 
CHECK NOS . 002167-050000 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/ 26 / 18 

PAGE	4

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

8/22/18 00051 

8/ 22 / 18 00076 

8/22 / 18 00 064 

8 / 14 / 18 30 815462 201808 320- 572 00- 43100 
PROPANE  REF  NO . 635819368	AMERIGAS
8 / 06 / 18 0501 83 00 201808 320-572 00- 41000 
6052  PEBBLE BEACH BLVD	BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS
8 / 17 / 18 AUG 18	201808 320-5 72 00-43200 

8/22/18 	00 003 	8 / 14 /18   6-275-08   201808   310 /-513/ 00- 42 000 	*	18 7 . 25 	
8/22 / 18 	00080 	8 / 14 /18 0654-818 201809 320- 5720 0-34900 	*	183 .42	

AUG   18 -UTILITY  SVCS	CITY OF WINTER HAVEN

*	1, 078 .20 

*	696 . 74

*	2, 39 1.7 1

1, 078 .20 002191 

696 . 74 002192 

2, 391 . 7 1  002193 

DELIVERIES THRU 08 14

18	FEDEX

187 .25 002 194 

8/ 22 / 18 00 152 

SEP 18-REFUSE SERVICES	REPUBLIC SERVICES #654 8 / 09 / 18 E4 157759 201808 320-572 00 -34500 

*

*	4 , 6 71 . 8 8

183 .42 002195 

8 / 16 /

AUG 18- SECURITY SVC
18 E4 163125 201808 320-5 72 00 -34500 

AUG  18- SECURITY  SVC	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC

4, 813 . 63

9,4 85 .51 002196 

8/22 / 18 00 102 

8/07 / 18  7099	201808 320-57200 -51000 
NAME  BADGE & SHIPPING	THE TROPHY SHOP

*

- - - - -

92 .5 0
- - - - -

92 . 5 0 002197 

8 /22 / 18 00 119 

8/12 / 18 
8 / 12 / 18 
/

68670092 201810 300 -15500- 10000 

/	/

KYOCERA COPIER - 10 23 18 
6867 0092 201810 300-15500-10000 
KYOCERA COPIER - 10 / 23 / 18 

*	13 8 . 6 8
V	13 8 . 68- 

*

8 12/18 

6867 0092   201808   300 - /15 5 /00-10000 

13 8 . 68 

KYOCERA COPIER - 10 23 

18	WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SERV

- - - - -

- - - - - -

- 1 3- 8 -. 6 8-   002198 

8 / 30 / 18 00081 

8/30 / 18 00 184 

8 / 01 / 18 08 0118	201808 320-5720 0- 23 000 
AUG  2018 HEALTH INSURANCE	MARY BOSMAN
8/ 18/18  081818	201808 300- 22000-10000 
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT	ADEL CI SNERO
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

*
*	- -

- - -

250 . 0 0
- - - - - -
500 . 0 0

-2 5- 0 -. 0 -0   002199 

500 . 0 0  0022 00 

* * * 

AP3 00R

CHECK NOS . 002167-050000 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9 / 26 /18 

PAGE	5

CHECK	VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

8 / 30 / 18 00 161 

8 / 16 / 18 176883	201808 320-572 00 -34510 

*	313 .80 

8 /24 /

REPLACED PULL STATION
18  177023	201808 320-57200 -34510 

AUG  18 GATE  MAINTENANCE	THE HARTLINE ALARM CO INC

*

- - -

13 0 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -

- 44- 3 -.8 0-  002201 

8/ 30 / 18 00086 

7/23 / 18 40 82424	201807 320- 5720 0-46020 

*	118 .26 

7 /	/

WATER VOLLEYBALL POLES	*

26   18   1053 701	201 8 /07   320-57200-46030 

33 . 7 9

8 / 20 /

CHAIN ( GATE ) PEBBLES

*	12 7 . 53

8/ 30 / 18 00136 

18  6043 064	201808 320-57200-46020 

SUPPLIES		HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 6 /29 / 18   45629	20 1 /806   320- 57200- 46030 

*

- - - - - - - - - - -
349 .40 

- 2 7- 9 -.5 8-

002202 

INVESTIGATE

REPAIR  ROOF	JURIN ROOFING SERVI CES , INC .

- - -

- - - - - - -

-  - 3 4- 9 -.4 0-

002203 

8/ 30 / 18 00126 

8 /27 / 18 CDDII-19 201805 320- 57200- 46010 

*	3, 280 . 0 0

/	/	MAY  2018 HFC CLEANING	*

/

8 27 18 CDDII-20 201806 320- 57200- 46010 JUNE 2018 HFC CLEANING
8 27/ 18 CDDII-20 201806 320-57200- 46010 

3 , 2 80 . 0 0
*	550 . 0 0

8 / 27 /
8 / 27 /

WINDOW CLEANING
18 CDDll-21 201807 320-57200-46010 JULY 2018 HFS CLEANING
18   CDDll-21   2/ 01807   320-57200- 46010 

*	3 , 2 80 . 0 0
*	400 . 0 0

/	/	STRIPPED POLISH TO GYM	*

8 / 30 / 18 00170 

8 31 18 CDDII-22 201808 320-57200- 46010 

*

AUG  2018 HFC CLEANING	MAGIC GENIE CLEANING SERVICES , INC .

8 / 01 / 18 08 012018 201808 320-572 00-23000 

- - -

3 , 2 80 . 0 0
- - - - - -

-  1- 4 -, 0 7- 0 -. 0 0-  002204

/	/

AUG 2018 HEALTH INSURANCE
8 31 18 AUGUST 2 201808 320-5 72 00- 46050 

MILEAGE REIMBURSE-AUG 18	JAMES MARGESON

71. 96 
*	61. 04 

133 . 00 002205 

8 / 30 / 18 00 174 

8 / 30 / 18 00 094 

7 / 31/ 18  123296	201807 310 -513 00-49000 
GOLF COURSE STUDY	NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION CONSULTING 8 / 24 / 18 5604-082 201808 320-57200- 46020 

*	-   -
*	-  -

-   -   -   -  -  -  -   -
9, 873 .42
- - - - - - - -
80 . 16

-   -   -   - -

- 9 -, 8 7- 3 -.4 2-

002206 

8 /24 /

POPCORN POPPER KETTLE
18 5604-082 201808 320- 57200- 51000 
PREMIUM MONTHLY

*	49 . 0 0

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

*** 

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS . 002167-050000 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/26/18 

PAGE	6

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
8 /24/18 5604-082 201808 320-572 00-5 1000 
GOOGLE  SUITE
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320-5 72 00 -34500 
BATTERY  FOR  AED  UNIT
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320-57200-49400 
THEME  PARTY  SUPPLIES
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320-57200- 49400 
THEME  PARTY  SUPPLIES
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320 -57200-51000 
OFFICE  SUPPLIES
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320- 57200- 51000 

PRIME MEMBERSHI P-AMAZON 8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320 -57200-46030 

STATUS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

AMOUNT

30 .00 
158 . 0 0
18 . 9 7
36 .21 
14 0 .88 
13 .2 2
10 . 52

. . . . CHECK . . . . . 
AMOUNT	#

8 /24 /

WEIGHTS/BEALL NET
18 5604- 082 201808 320 -57200-51000 
OFFICE SUPPLIES

*	13 . 8 2
*	1, 523 .7 5

8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320-57200-46030 
TENNIS  NETS
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320- 572 00- 51000 
SUPPLIES
8/24/18 5604-082 201808 320- 57200-51000 

RESTOCKIT AQUI SITIONS	WELLS FARGO

*	114 .0 5
*	542 .17

2, 730 .7 5 002207 

9/10/18 00092 

8/31/18 171844 

201808 320-572 00- 46500 

*	725 .0 0

/	AQUATIC  PLANT  MGMT 08 /18	*

8 31/18 171845 
AQUATIC

201808 320-5 72 00 -46500 

PLANT MGMT 8/31	APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT , INC .

150 . 0 0

875 . 0 0 002208 

9/10/18 00081 

9 / 10/18 00140 

9/01/18 09 012 018 201809 320-57200-23000 
INSURANCE SUPPL . 09/2018	MARY BOSMAN
8/30/18 08302018 201808 320-572 00 -34100 

*	250 .0 0

*	262 .50 

250 .0 0 002209 

P/T WORK BY RYAN BUSWELL

RYAN A BUSWELL

262 .50 002210 

9/10/18 00 058 

9/04 / 18 4	201809 310-51300- 34000 
MGMT FEES 09/2018 
9/04/18 4	201809 310-51300- 35100 
COMPUTER TIME 09/2018 
9/04/18 4	201809 310-51300- 3 1300 

*	3,3 33 .3 3

*	83 .3 3
*	500 .0 0

9/04/18 

DISSEMINATION SV 09/18 
4	20180 9 310-51300-51000 
OFFICE SUPPLIES 09/18 

*	31.02

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

AP3 00R
*** CHECK NOS . 00216 7-050000 

YEAR-TO -DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/26/18 

PAGE	7

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS
9/04/18  4	20 1809 310-51300- 42000 

9/04/18 4

POSTAGE   SV 09/18 
20 1809 310-5 13 00- 425 00 

COPIES/ PRINTING 09/18	GMS - CENTRAL FLORIDA , LLC

STATUS

*
*

AMOUNT

20 . 6 8
211 . 90 

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

4 , 1 80 .26 00 2211 

9/10/18 00170 

9/10/18 00101 

9/01 /18 09012018 201809 320-5 72 00- 23 000 
INSURANCE  SUPPLE . 09/ 2018	JAMES MARGESON
9/01 /18 10129558 20 1809 320 -5720 0-46400 
WATER MGMT 09/ 2 018	POOLSURE

*

*

*	- - -

- - -

250 . 0 0

540 . 0 0
- - - -

250 . 0 0 00 2212

-   - 5 4- 0 -. 0 0-   00 2213

9/10/18 00150 

9/10/18 00152 

9/10/18 00124 

9/10/18 00087 

9/10/18 00067 

8/31 /18 17 -101-2 201808 310-51300- 31100 
ENGINEERING SV THRU AUG .	RAYL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , LLC 8/3 0/18 E4 172 507 201808 320-57200- 34500 
GUARD SERVI CES 8/ 24 -8 /3 0
9/06/18 E4 177919 20180 9 320 -57 200- 345 00 
GUARD  SERVI CES 8/31-09/06	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVI CES USA, INC 9/02/18 244 0	20 180 9 320 -57200- 46030 
GROUND  MAINT .  09/18	SOUTHERN UTILITY SERVI CE INC .
9/01 /18 09012018 20 1809 320-57200- 23000 
INSURANCE  SUPPL . 09/2 018	KAREN VANKIRK
9/01/18 INV-0000 201809 320-5 72 00 -462 00 

LANDS CAPE MAINT .   09/2018	YELLOWSTONE LANDSCAPE

*	- -
*

*

*

*

- - -

1, 81 0 . 0 6
-   -   -   - -
4 , 6 71 . 8 8
5 , 1 56 .4 3

50 . 0 0

204 . 44

13 , 0 01 . 8 3

- 1 -, 8 1- 0 -. 0 6   002214

9, 8 28 . 3 1 002215 

50 . 0 0 002216

204 .4 4  00 2217	

13 , 0 01 . 8 3 002218 

9 /14/18 00076 

9/14/18  00 14 0

9/14/18 00028 

9/04/18 050183 00 201809 320- 57200- 41000 
SVC  THRU   9/11/18 -1 0/10/18	BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS
9/11/18 09 112 018 20 1809 320-57200- 34100 
IT WORK DONE  9HRS-9/1 1/18	RYAN A BUSWELL
9/07 /18  7694	201809 300-1 55 00-10000 

POL RENEWAL  10/18 - 10/2019	EGI S INSURANCE ADVISORS , LLC

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSINA

*	696 .49 

*	332 . 5 0

*	30 , 0 33 . 0 0

696 .49 002219 

332 . 5 0  00222 0

30, 03 3 . 0 0  002221 

 	

AP3 00R
** * CHECK NOS . 002167-050 000 

YEAR-TO -DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/26/18 

PAGE	8

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

9 /14/18 001 52 

9 /25/18 00051 

9 /25/18 00 092 

9/25/18 00074

9/25/18  00 064 

9 /25/18 000 03 

8/ 23/1 8  E4 167779 20 1808 320- 5720 0-34500	* SECURITY  SVC  8/17- 8/23 /18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVI CES USA, INC
9/12/18 3082 5471 201809 320- 57200- 43100	*
PROPANE  -  SEPT 20 18	AMERIGAS
9/11/18  172 2 04	20 180 9 320-57200-46500	*
QRTLY  SVC  SEPT- NOV 20 18	APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT , INC .
6/ 22/18 20 0260	20 1806 320-5 72 00 -34 510	*

*

GOLF CARS REPAIR/MAINT .
9/01/18 20 5214	20 1809 320- 57200-3 4510 
REPAIR/MAINT  TO GOLF CARS	ARTS GOLF  CARTS INC .
9/21/18 092120 18 20 1809 320-57200- 432 00	* WATER  SVC THRU  SEPT 201 8	CITY OF WINTER HAVEN
9/18/18 6 310073 9 201809 310-5 13 00- 42000	*

DELIVERIES THRU  9/10/18	FEDEX

5 , 1 09 .38 

1, 317 . 7 1

700 . 0 0

95 . 0 0
472 . 0 0

2 , 7 91 .28 

27 . 8 7

5 , 1 09 .38 00 2222 

1,3 17 . 7 1 002223 

7 00 . 0 0  00 2224 

567 . 0 0 002225 

2 , 7 91 .28 002226 

27 . 8 7 002227 

9 /25/18 00070 

9 /25/18 00040 

8/ 14 /18  108046	201808 320-5720 0-3 4800 
PEST CONTROL SVC 8/14/18 9/11/18 8299 39-8 20 1809 320-5 72 00-34800 
PEST  CONTROL  SVC 9/11 /18	FLORIDA PEST CONTROL
9/20/18 82618	201808 310-5130 0-31500 

*	-   -  -
*

-   -  -
*

- - - - - - -
12 8 . 0 0
12 8 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -
4, 38 1 . 7 0

- 2 5- 6 -. 0 0   00 2228 

9/25/18 00107 

ATTORNEY  SVC  THRU 8/31/ 18	LATHAM , SHUKER , EDEN & BEAUD INE LLP 8/0 2/18 080 22018 201808 320-57200- 46400 

ROPE FLOATS 8/2/18 
9/20/18 QUOTE -09 201809 320 -572 0 0 -46400 

PVC  PIPE  & HEATER COUPLIN	POOL & PATIO CENTER

*	- - - - -

*

- - - -
69 . 9 0
580 . 0 0

- - 4 -,   3 8- 1 -. 7 -0          002229 

649 .90 002 230 

9/25/18 00080 

9/ 14/18 065 4-000 20 1809 30 0-15500-10000 
PICK UP  SVC  THRU  10/3 1/1 8	REPUBLIC SERVI CES #6 54 

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

*	- - -

- - - - - - - -
183 .4 2

- - - -

1 8 3 . 42 002 231 

...   .. .. .. .. ..... .. .. ····-·--------------··---·-···--	 		------·--·-·-----·--·-·-····	 		 	

AP3 00R 
*** CHECK NOS . 0021 67-050000 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGI STER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	9/26/18 

PAGE	9

CHECK	VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .    . .  . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME	STATUS DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT  ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

9/ 25/18 00 152 

9/25/18 00 062 

9/25/18 00048 

9/25/18 000 36 

9/25/18  00 119 

*

9/13/18 E4 185814 20 1809 320-57200 -34510	* SECURITY SVC THRU 9/13/18 
9/2 0/18 E4 190395 20 1809 320-57200- 34510 
SECURITY  SVC THRU 9/20/18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVI CES USA, INC 9/14/18 09142 018 201809 320- 57200- 43 000	*
ELECTRI C  SEPT 20 18	TAMPA ELECTRI C COMPANY
9/14/18  178675	201809 300-15500-10000	*
ALARM  SVC  THRU 12 /31/18	THE HARTLINE ALARM COMPANY , INC .
7/02 /18  I716	20 1807 320-5 7200-46000	*
MINOR  REPAIRS LEVEL 2	TRADITION CENTRAL AIR , INC .
9/0 9/18 687677 14 201809 300-15500-10000	*

KYOCERA  COPIER  - 11/ 23/18	WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SERV
TOTAL FOR BANK A TOTAL FOR REGISTER

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

4, 67 1 . 8 8
4, 67 1 . 8 8

10 , 053 . 5 9

195 . 0 0

182 .36 

13 8 . 6 8

2 14 , 505 . 0 3

214 , 5 0 5 . 0 3

9, 343 . 7 6  002232 

10 , 053 . 5 9  002233 

195 . 0 0 00 2234 

182 .36 00 2235 

13 8 . 6 8 00 2236 

* * * 

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS . 000017-050000 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - CAPITAL PROJC
BANK B LAKE ASHTON II - CR

RUN	9/ 26 / 18 

PAGE	1

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME	STATUS DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

8 / 15 /18 00007 

7 / 31/ 18  144 90	201807 600-53800-63000 

*	12 , 5 16 . 6 7

7 /	/

PICKLE  BALL EXPANS ION	*

31  18  144 90	201807 600-53800 -63010 

8 / 17/ 18 00008 

8 / 13 / 18  102 734	201808 600-53800-68000 

SANDBLAST PI CKUP

*

HURRICANE SANDBLAST

8 /21 / 18 00009 

7/ 17/ 18 07172 018 201808 600-53800-68005 

*

DEPOSIT- FLOORING

JIM'S FLOOR DEPOT INC .

8 / 30 / 18 00009 

7 / 17 / 18 071717 ( 201808 600-53800-68 005 

BALANCE - FLOORING

1, 080 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - - -
4 , 0 00 . 0 0
*	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 , 2 78 . 0 0

JIM'S FLOOR DEPOT INC .

9 / 10 / 18 00 002

8 / 27 / 18 C8 08268	201808 600-53800-60000 

INSTALLED TREADMILL FAN

- - - - - - - - - -
*	134 . 82 

COMMERCIAL FITNESS PRODUCTS

9 / 13 / 18 00008 

8 / 30 / 18   102 73 7	201808   600 - /53800-68000 

FURN SUNBLASTING 08 2018 

- - - - - - - - - -
*	755 . 0 0

HURRICANE SANDBLAST

9/ 13 / 18 00 010 

9 / 12 / 18   0 9 /122 018   20 1/ 808   600-53800-680 10 

A C REPAIR MAINTENANCE

*

14 , 543 . 0 0

TRADITION CENTRAL AIR, INC

PI CKLE BALL EXPANSION	EVOLVE CONTRACTING , INC

- - -

6,2 58 .33 
- - - - - - -

18 , 7 75 . 0 0	000 017 	
- 1 -, 0 8- 0 -. 0 -0	000018 	
4, 000 . 0 0	000 019 	
- 3 -, 2 7- 8 -. 0 -0	000020 	
-   - 1 3- 4 -. 8 2-	000021 	
755 . 0 0	00 0022 	
14 , 543 . 0 0	000023 	

- - - - -

9 / 18 / 18 	00009 	7 / 17 / 18 	071717 ( 201808 600-53 800-6 8005	*	3 , 278 . 0 0	
		7 / 17 /	BALANCE- FLOORING
071717 ( 201808 600-53800-6 8005	V	3 , 2 78 . 00- 	

18 

BALANCE - FLOORING	JIM'S FLOOR DEPOT INC .

. 0 0 000024 

9 / 25 /18 00006 

6 / 01/ 18 BAL-0601 201806 600-53800-6 6000	*
PLANT . SHUTTERS BALANCE	BLACKBURN ' S INTERIORS , INC .
TOTAL FOR BANK B TOTAL FOR REGISTER
LKA2   LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

7 , 5 00 . 0 0

50 , 065 . 8 2

50 , 065 . 8 2

7 , 5 00 . 0 0 000025 

 	

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT RECEIPTS

FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

300-363-100
$:J:,3;l'OJ4t5:55

TOTAL ASSESSED AMOUNTS

300-363-100	300-363-102
0$46S;964'l5ftt  •   ;$338;750,00

$2,115,130,06 • I

DATE	GROSS TAX	DISCOUNTS		PROPERTY	INTEREST/	COMMISSIONS	NET AMOUNT RECEIVED		RECEIVED		APPRAISERS	PENALTIES			RECEIVED

001

11/15/2017

$19,515.63

$780.64

$0.00

$0.00

$374.70

'  ',) 
$18,360.29   '   .i

$11,375.00

$4,044.78

$2,940.50

$18,360.29

Percentage Collected

100% 1

D/S TRANSFERS

D/S S2005

D/S S2006

CHECK #

GENERAL FUND 61.95%

021
DS S200S 22.03%

022
DS S2006 16.02%

TOTAL 100.00%

11/17/2017	$49,722.15	$ 1,988.92	$0.00	$0.00	$954.67	$46,778.56	I	$28,981.36	$10,305.35	$7,491.85	$46,778.56	
11/22/2017	$12,361.78	$649.02	$0.00	$0.00	$234.25	$11,478.51	$7,111.44	$2,528.72	$1,838.35	$11,478.51	
12/06/17	$ 148,583.08	$5,943.44	$0.00	$0.00	$ 2,852.79	$139,786.85	$86,604.07	$30,795.13	$22,387.65	$139,786.85	
12/13/17	$308,443.04	$12,337.96	$0.00	$0.00	$5,922.11 	$290,182.97	$179,781.04	$63,927.49	$46,474.44	$290,182.97	
12/20/17	$491,082.62	$19,643.70	$0.00	$0.00	$9,428.78	$462,010. 14	$286,235.48	$101,781.13	$73,993.53	$462,010.14	
01/16/18	$419,444.96	$12,569.10	$0.00	$0.00	$8,137.52	$398,738.34	$247,035.84	$87,842.31	$63,860. 19	$398,738.34	
02/15/18	$34,624.79	$692.51	$0.00	$0.00	$678. 64	$33,253.64	$20,602.08	$7,325.80	$5,325.76	$33,253.64	
01/31/18	$815.99	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$815.99	$505.54	$179.76	$130.69	$815.99	
03/15/18	$15,744. 65	$157.43	$0.00	$0.00	$311.74	$ 15,275.48	$9,463.83	$3,365.20	$2,446.45	$15,275.48	
04/13/18	$528,265.54	$31.48	$0.00	$0.00	$10,564.68	$517,669.38	$320,718.81	$114,042.90	$82,907.67	$517,669.38	
04/26/18	$375.90	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$375.90	$375.90	$0.00	$0.00	$375.90	
05/15/18	$3,148.93	$0.00	$0.00	$94.46	$64.87	$3,178.52	$1,969.23	$700.23	$509.06	$3,178.52	
06/15/18	$3,148.93	$0.00	$0.00	$94.47	$64.87	$3,178.53	$1,969.24	$700.23	$509.06	$3,178.53	
06/21/18	$81,043.96	$0.00	$0.00	$3,647.02	$1,693.82	$82,997.16	$51,420.37	$18,284.33	$13,292.46	$82,997.16	
07/30/18	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$91.71	$0.00	$91.71	$91.71	$0.00	$0.00	$91.71	
08/08/18	$0.00	$0.00	($21,100.90)	$0.00	$0.00	($21,100.90)	($ 13,104. 16)	($4,630.46)	($3,366.28)	($21,100.90)	
TOTALS	$2,116,321.95	$54,794.20	{$21,100.90)	$3,927.66	$41,283.44	$2,003,071.07	$1,241,136.78	$441,192.91	$320,741.38	$2,003,071.07	

12/19/17	$7,199.83	$0.00 due from prior yr	
12/19/17	$9,679.02	$12,270.70	1889/1890	
01/12/18	$196,503.76	$ 142,855.62	1918/1919	
03/13/18	$95,168. 11	$69,185.95	1988/1989	
03/20/18	$179.77	$130.69	2001/2002	
04/17/18	$117,408.09	$85,354. 12	2036/2037	
07/30/18	$18,984.56	$13,801.52	2159/2160	
TOTAL TRANSFERS	$445,123.14	$323,598.60	

 	 	 	 	 	

LAKE ASHTON II 
COM MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BALANCE SHEET

August 31, 2018

ASSETS:	
GENERAL	MAJOR FUNDS DEBT
SERVICE	
CAPITAL PROJECTS	TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS	
CASH	$3,750		$35,694	$39,445	
PETTY CASH	$100			$100	
DUE FROM OTH ER FU N DS	$5,990		$797	$6,788	
INVESTM ENT - STATE BOARD - SURPLUS FU NDS
SERIES 2005A
RESERVE A	$248,412	
$288,980	$581,652	$830,064

$288,980	
PREPAYM ENT A		$26,839		$26,839	
REVENUE A		$159,224		$159,224	
DEFERRED COST A/B
SERIES 2006A
RESERVE A		$9 

$78,732		$9 

$78,732	
REVENUE A		$114,714		$114,714	
PREPAYM ENT A		$28,463		$28,463	
DEFERRED COST A/B		$1,032		$1,032	
COST OF ISSUANCE			$28	$28	
DEPOSITS	$24,488			$24,488	
PREPAID EXPENDITURES	$4,139			$4,139	
TOTAL ASSETS	$286,879	$697,994	$618,172	$1,603,045	
LIABILITIES:					
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE	$17,264		$22,933	$40, 197	
DUE TO OTHER FUNDS		$6,788		$6,788	
FUND EgUITY AND OTHER CREDITS:					
FUND BALANCES:
NONSPEN DABLES:
PREPAID EXPENSES	

$4, 139			

$4, 139	
DEPOSITS - TECO
RESTRICTED FOR:	$24,488			$24,488	
DS-SERIES 2005A		$471,123 		$471,123	
CAPITAL PROJ ECTS			$595,239	$595,239	
UNASSIGNED FOR GEN ERAL FUND 	$240,989			$240,989	
UNASSIGNED FOR DS-SERI ES 2006A		$220,084		$220,084	
TOTAL LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY					
& OTHER CREDITS	$286,879	$697,994	$618, 172	$1,603,045	

Page l

LAKE ASHTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRI CT GENERAL FUND 
STATE MENT OF REVENU ES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR TH E PERIOD ENDING

ADOPTED BUDGET

PRORATED THRU 8/31/18

ACTUAL
THRU 8/31/18	VARIANCE

August 31, 2018

REVENUES:
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - TAX COLLECTO R	$1,218,686	$1,218,686	$1,241,137	$22,450 INTEREST EARNED		$1,500		$1,375		$6,283		$4,908

$1,225,186

$1,224,645

$1,260,258

RENTAL FEES	$5,000	$4,583	$11,303	$6,719 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME		$0		$0		$1,536	$1,536
TOTAL  REVENUES
EXPENDITURES:

ADMINISTRATIVE:
ARBITRAGE	$2,500	$2,292	$600	$1,692
ANNUAL AUDIT	$5, 600	$5, 600	$5,600	$0
ATTORNEY	$20,000	$18,333	$16,850	$1,483
COMPUTER TIME	$1,000	$917	$917	$0
DISSEMINATION	$6,000	$5,500	$5,500	$0
DUES, LICENSES, SUBSCRIPTIONS		$175		$160		$175		($15) INSURANCE	$30,558	$30,558	$30,033	$525
LEGAL ADVERTISING		$500		$458		$447		$11 MANAGEMENT	$47,408	$43,457	$42,223	$1,234
OFFICE SUPPLIES	$300	$275	$102	$173

($92)

OTHER CURRENT CHARGES	$2,000	$1,833	$14,502	($ 12,669)
POSTAGE	$1,500	$1,375	$1,467
PRINTING & BINDING	$1,200	$1, 100	$1,034	$66 TELEPHONE		$SO		$46		$0	$46
TRUSTEE FEES	$6,500	$5,958 	$0	$5,958

TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES	$125,290	$117,862	$119,450	($ 1,587) 1
FIELD EXPENDITURES

$0

ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT	$6,000	$5,500	$5,500
BUILDING CONTRACT SERVICES	$46,920	$43,010	$64,472	($21,462) BUILDING GROUNDS MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES	$16,700	$15,308	$78,452	($ 63, 144)
CONTINGENCY	$20,000	$18,333	$8,713	$9,620
ENGINEERRING	$12,000	$11,000	$13,971	($2,971)
HFC SPECIAL EVENTS		$3,000		$2,750		$1,486		$1,264 LA NDSCAPE /LAKE CONTRACT SERVICES	$152,712	$139,986	$156,056	($16,070)
OFFICE SUPPLIES/PRINTING/BINDING	$10,000	$9,167	$6,408 PERMITS/INSPECTIONS		$1,500	$1,375	$1,400	($25)

$0

PERSONNEL EXPENSES	$214,455	$196,584	$172,496	$24,087

$0

PLANT/TREE REPLACEMENT	$10,000	$9,167			$9, 167 POND REPAIRS			$0	$5,900	($5,900)

SECURITY CONTRACT SERVICES	$246,300	$225,775	$232,535	($6,760)

$868,407

$914,040

 	$205,797	$0	$0	$0

($45,63211

$205,797
$1,278,441

$0
$986,270

$0
$1,033,489

($47,220) 1

$0 I

UTI LITI ES	$207,767	$190,453	$172,149	$18,303
TOTAL FIELD EXPENDITURES
FIRST Q UARTER OPERA TING RESERVES	
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
OTHER SOURCES/(USES):
INTERFUND TRANSFER IN/(OUT)	($220,000)	($220,000)	($ 220,000)	$0

TOTAL O THER SOURCES/{USES}	($220,000)	($220,0001	($220,000)	$0 I

EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)	($273,254)	$6,769	I
FUND BALANCE - Beginning	$273, 254	$262,847
FUND BALANCE - Ending	($0}	$269,615

Page 2

LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
GENERAL FU ND - FY 2018

ADOPTED BUDGET

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN 

JUL

AUG

SEPT

TOTAL

REVENUES:

SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS	$1,218,686	$47,468	$552,621	$247,S41	$20,602	$9,464	$321,095	$1,969	$53,390	$92	($13,104)	$0   $1,241,137

INTEREST EARNED	$1,500	$210	$92	$38	$279	$513	$670	$1,146	$1,144	$1,068	$S72	$0	$6,283
RENTAL FEES	$5,000	$70	$1,200	$3,750	$20	$1,800	$960	$3,013	($70)	($500)	$510	$0	$11,303

MISCELLANEOUS	$0

$0	$0

$0	$0	$0	$223	$0	$0	$1,313	$0	$1,536

CARRY FORWARD SURPLUS	$273,254	$0	$0	$0

$1,498,440

$760	$47,630

$553,858	$251,570

$21,135	$11,815

$322,725	$6,351

$54,464

$660

ITOTAl REVENUES

EXPENDITURES: ADMINISTRATIVE

$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
($10,710 )	$0 $1,260,258 1

ARBITRAGE	$2,500	$0	$0	$0	$600	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$600
ANNUAL AUDIT	$5,600	$0	$0	$2,000	$0	$0	$0	$1,500	$2,100	$0	$0	$0	$0	$5,600

$83

ATTO RNEY	$20,000	$976	$1,429	$1,847	$906	$1,702

$1,504

$2,157	$635	$4,382	$0	$16,8SO

COMPUTER TIME	$1,000	$83

$83

$83

$83	$0

DISSEMINATION	$6,000	$SOD	$500	$SOD	$500	$SOD	$500	$500	$SOD	$500	$500	$SOD	$0	$S,SOO

$30
$3,333
$3

DUES, LICENSES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS	$17S	$175	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$175

$59

INSURANCE	$30,558	$30,033	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0	$30,033

LEGAL ADVERTISING	$500

$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$118	$53	$0	$188

$0	$447

$3,951

MANAGEMENT FEES	$47,408	$3,951	$3,951

$3,951	$3,951	$3,951	$3,951	$3,951	$3,951	$3,333

$0	$42,223

$76

$27

OFFICE SUPPLIES	$300	$0	$0	$0	$0	$49	$0	$0	$0

$25

$0	$102

$495

OTHER CURRENT CHARGES	$2,000	$182	$193	$220

$294

$135	$2,677	$152	$10,090	$161	$0	$14,S02

POSTAGE	$1,500	$72	$45

$17	$123	$49

$208

$149	$207	$0	$1,467

PRINTING AND BINDING	$1,200

$35	$22	$201	$19	$128

$268	$269	$10

$1,034

$23

TELEPHONE	$SO	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

$125,289

$36,056

$6,236

$9,117

$6,342

$6,721

$5,591

$7,900

$10,342

$7,163

TRUSTEE FEES	$6,500	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

$0	$0

ITOTAL ADM. EXPENDITURES

$15,272	$8,709	$0	s119,4so I

ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT BUILDING CONTRACT SERVICES
SECURITY SERVICES
CLEANING SERVICES POOL MAINTENANCE
TOTAL BUILDING CONTRACT SERVICES
BUILDING /GROUNDS MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES GROUNDS MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES

320.572.600

320.572.34510
320.572.46010
320.572.46400

$6,000
$46,920

$0

$0
$3,280
$3,337
$6,617

$0

320.572.46020
320.572.46030

$46,920
$16,700

TOTAL BUILDING /GROUNDS MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES

PEST CONTROL

320.572.34800

CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING
HFC SPECIAL EVENTS

320.572.49000
310.513.31100
320.572.49400

$16,700
$20,000
$12,000
$3,000

$1,510
$219
$6,080 ($630)
$1,061
$0

$3,280
$500
$3,780
$2,888
$69
$125
$3,082
$0
$183
$56

$0

$S29
$3,280
$1,140
$4,949
$2,121
$24,909
$125
$27,155
$0
$1,971
$0

$130
$3,280
$2,066
$5,476
$2,978
$15,758
$204
$18,940
$0
$182
$230

$0

$190
$3,280
$1,842
$5,312
$2,929
$1,316
$125

$0
$701
$154

$3,280
$3,589
$7,194
$1,491
$3,797
$125

$4,101
$92
$0

$0
$0
$3,280
$9,123
$1,243
$194
$329
$1,766
$46
$892
$108

$0

$130
$3,280
$4,006
$7,416
$2,022
$1,811
$125

$0
$2,931
$165

$0

$95
$3,830
$815
$4,740
$2,111
$1,694
$0
$3,805
$5,046
$3,231
$581

$203
$3,680

$5,337
$827
$442
$204
$1,473
$89

$1,454

$137

$0

$444
$3,280
$804
$4,528
$750
$1,534
$128
$2,412
$61
$1,810
$55

$0

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0

$0

$2,046
$37,030
$25,396
$64,472
$23,711
$1,709
$78,452
$8,713
$13,971
$1,486

$4,351

$4,370

FIELD:

Page 3

LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

OFFICE SUPPLIES/PRINTING/BINDING

320.572.51000

$10,000

$301

$707

$650

$1,265

$189

($4)

$1,017

$262

$982

$6,408

$76

$493

$0

$0

$0

$750
$455

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$97

$391

$0

$0

$0

$0

$947,3S4

GENERAL FU ND - FY 2018

LANDSCAPE/LAKE CONTRACT SERVICES	ADOPTED BUDGET
$152,712	OCT	NOV	DEC	JAN	FEB	MAR	APR	MAY	JUN 	JUL 	AUG	SEPT	TOTAL	
LAKE MAINTENANCE	320.572.46500	$1,320	$875	$1,575	$875	$875	$1,575	$875	$875	$1,575	$875	$875		$12,170	
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE	320.572.46200	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002	$13,002		$143,020	
IRRIGATION REPAIRS	320.572.46210	$0		$0				$110	$187	$293	$0	$0		$866	
TOTAL LANDSCAPE/LAKE CONTRACT SERVICES	$152,712	$14,322	$13,877	$14,577	$14,076		$14,577	$13,987	$14,064	$14,870	$13,877	$13,877		$0	$156,056	

PERMITS/INSPECTIONS	320.572.49300	$1,500	$0	$0						$0	$420	$430	$0		$1,400	
PERSONNEL EXPENSES		$214,455														
EXERCISE INSTRUCTORS	320.572.34100		$1,700	$1,200	$1,435	$1,515	$1,416	$1,350	$1,790	$1,500	$1,415	$1,275	$368	$0	$14,964	
FICA EXPENSE	320.572.21000			$713	$790	$860	$1,323	$928	$974	$960	$943	$933	$1,317	$0	$10,491	
HEALTH INSURANCE	320.572.23000			$500	$500	$704	$704	$704	$704	$704	$704	$1,132	$322		$7,136	
SALARIES	320.572.12000		$9,806	$9,321	$10,322	$11,242	$17,296	$12,441	$12,727	$12,550	$12,324	$12,199	$17,222	$0	$137,449	
INSURANCE	320.572.45000		$0		$0	$1,998	$0		$0		$0	$0			$2,458	
PERSONNEL EXPENSES		$214,455	$12,711	$11,734	$13,047	$16,320	$20,740	$15,423	$16,195	$16,173	$15,386	$15,539	$19,229		$172,496	
PLANT/TREE REPLACEMENT	320.572.46220	$10,000			$0						$0			$0	$0	
POND REPAIRS	320-572-46600		$0	$0	$4,SSO			$0			$1,350		$0		$S,900	
SECURITY CONTRACT SERVICES		$246,300														
GATEATTENDANTS	320.572.34500		$24,999	$19,122	$18,934	$18,688	$19,199	$23,812	$19,144	$25,002	$18,688	$23,701	$19,450	$0	$230,736	
VIDEO SECURITY-ADT	320.572.34520		$524		$97	$131	$97	$99	$132	$291		$132	$99		$1,799	
TOTAL SECURITY CONTRACT SERVICES		$246,300	$25,523	$19,219	$19,031	$18,818	$19,296	$23,910	$19,276	$25,293	$18,786	$23,834	$19,549		$232,535	
UTILITIES		$207,767														
ELECTRIC	320.572.43000		$10,780	$10,380	$10,181	$10,545	$10,300	$9,755			$9,900	$10,392	$10,553		$112,408	
REFUSE	320.572.34900		$162	$30	$163	$163	$164	$164		$164	$169		$184	$0	$1,754	
WATER	320.572.43100		$1,872	$2,163	$3,418	$4,716	$2,387	$2,653	$627	$2,820	$2,507	$2,828	$2,392		$28,383	
TELEPHONE	320.572.41000		$129	$725	$841	$840	$1,520	$1,177		$718	$963		$963	$0	$9,580	
GAS/PROPANE	320.572.43200		$1,872	$2,163	$3,418	$4,716	$2,387	$2,653	$627	$2,820	$1,070	$1,077	$1,078		$23,881	
MAINTENANCE	320.572.46000		($264)				$334			$0				$0	$344	
TOTAL UTILITIES	$207,767		$14,7S2	$17,140	$19,399	$16,399	$15,710	$13,776	$1S,S90	$14,609	$15,652	$1S,170	$0	$172,149	
!TOTAL FIELD EXPENDITURES		$79,938	$67,389	$102,913	$94,090	$82,190	$86,609	$7S,71S	$86,608	$83,086	$77,831	$77,672	$0	$914,040 1	
FI RST QUARTER OPERATING RESERVES	$205,797						$0		$0	$0	$0	$0	$0		
OTHER SOURCES/IUSES/

$0

$0

$0

INTERFUND TRANSFER IN/(OUT)

($220,000)

$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	($220,000)

($220,000)

TOTAL EXPENDITURES
lexcESS/REVENUES(EXPENDITURES

$1,498,440	$115,994	$73,625	$112,030
($115,234)	($25,995)	$441,828

$100,432
$151,139

$88,911	$92,200	$83,615
($67,776)	($80,385)	$239,110

$96,950
($90,599)

$90,249
($35,785)

$93,103	$306,382
($92,443)    ($317,091)

$1,253,489
$0	$6,769 1

$0

$0

$0

SPEED LIMIT SIGNS	$0		$0			$0				$0	
lmTAl OTHER SOURCES/(USESJ	($220,000)	$0		$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	($220,000)	$0	($220,000)1	

CAMERAS FOR CLUB HOUSE

$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

$0
$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

.. ··----·-·-·----·-·----·-·-··-······------·-------

Page 4

------ -- . ···-···-·-·-·--·-·-·-·-----·-·-·-·- ··-·-·-- ·  ·····-  ··· ·-···-·---··---·-- -· ·

REVENUES:

LAKE ASHTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

CAPITAL PROJECTS
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures a nd Changes in Fund Balances For The Period Ending 
August 31, 2018
ADOPTED	PRORATED	ACTUAL
BUDGET	THRU 8/31/18	THRU 8/31/18	VARIANCE

CAPITAL RESERVE - TRANSFER IN	$220,000	$220, 000	$220,000		$0 CONTRIBUTIONS		$0		$0		$19,547	$19,547
I NTEREST EARNED	$0	$0	$6,652	$6,652

TOTAL  REVENUES	I	$220,000	$220,000	$246, 198	$26, 198 1

EXPENDITURES:

BANK CHARGES

CAPITAL PROJECTS - FY18

$0	$608	($608)

A THLETIC EQUIPMENT		$0		$0	$ 1,548	($1,548) POND REPAIRS AN D MAI NTENANCE	$25,000	$12,500	$9, 150		$3,350
PICKLEBALL COURTS	$30,000	$15,000	$50,000	($35,000)
PAVING PARKI NG LOT/LIGHTS	$90,000	$45,000	$50,377	-$5, 377
ROAD REPAI RS	$75,000	$37,500	$7,526	$29,974

DRAIN SYSTEM/G UTTERS	$0
WINDOWS/DOORS WCM

$5,275	($5, 275)
$0	$42, 260	($42, 260)

LED LIGHTING	$0	$0	$726	($726)
OUTDOOR FURN ITU RE-RECONIDITONING	$0	$0	$1,835	($1,835)
BATHROOM FLOORING	$0	$0	$7, 278	($7, 278)
HVAC/AC SYSTEM	$0	$14,543	($ 14,543)
OTHER CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENSES	$540, 139	$270,070	$0	$ 270,070

$188,943 1

TOTAL EXPENDITURES	I		$760, 139	$380,070	$191, 127 EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITU RES)	I	($540, 139)			$55, 072

$595,211 

$0

FUND BALANCE - Begin ning	$540, 139	$540, 139 FU ND BALANCE - Ending

Page s

 	 	 	 	 	 	

LAKE AS HTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE FUND - SERIES 2005A
STATEMENT OF REVENU ES, EXPEN DITURES AND CHANGES IN FU ND BALANCES
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 
August 3 1, 2018

ADOPTED BUDGET

PRORATED THRU 8/31/18

ACTUAL THRU 8/31/18

VARIANCE

REVENUES:
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - ON ROLL	$436, 872	$436, 872	$441, 193	$4, 321 
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - PREPAYM ENTS	$0	$67,032	$67,032
INTEREST EARN ED	$1,000	$917	$4,812	$3,896

TOTAL REVENUES	I	$437,872	$437,789	$513,037	$75,248 I EXPENDITURES:
SERIES 2005A:
INTEREST - 11/1	$139, 347	$139, 347	$139, 347	$0
SPECIAL CALL - 1 1/1	$30,000	$30,000	$80,000	($50,000)
INTEREST - 5/1	$139,347	$139,347	$137,304	$2,043
PRINCIPAL - 5/1	$160, 000	$160, 000	$160,000		$0 SPECIAL CALL - 5/1		$0		$0		$45,000	($45,000)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	I	$468,694	$468,694	$561,651	($92,957), EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)	I		($30,822)			($48,614)
FUND BALANCE - Beginning	$185,650	$519,737
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$154,828	$471,123

Page 6

LAKE ASHTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DEBT SERVICE FUND - SERIES 2006A
STATEM ENT OF REVENU ES, EXPEN DITU RES AND CHANG ES IN FUND BALANCES FOR TH E PERIOD EN DING 
August 31, 2018

REVENUES:

ASSESSMENTS - OFF ROLL ASSESSMENTS - PPMTS OTHER REVENUE SERVICES INTEREST INCOME 
TOTAL REVENUES	I
EXPENDITURES:
SERIES 2006A INTEREST - 1 1/1 INTEREST - 5/1 PRINCI PAL - 5/1
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	I

ADOPTED BUDGET

$315,038
$0
$79,288
$0
$394,326

$79,288
$104, 940
$105,000
$289, 228

PRORATED THRU 8/31/18

$315,038
$0
$79,288

$394,326

$79,288
$104, 940
$105,000

EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITU 1	$105,098	$141,085	
FUND BALANCE - Beginning 	$0	$78,999	
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$105,098	$220,084	

$289,228

Page 7

ACTUAL THRU 8/31/18

$320,741
$28,434
$89, 288
$1,849
$440,313

$79,288
$104, 940
$115,000
$299,228

VARIANCE

$5,703
$28,434
$10,000
$1,849
$45,987 I

$0
$0 ($ 10,000)
($10,000)1

 	 	 	 	 	 	

LAKE ASHTON 11 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS - SERIES 2006
Statement of Revenues, Expend itu res and Changes in Fund Ba lances
For The Period Ending August 3 1, 2018

ADOPTED BU DGET

PRORATED THRU 8/31/18

ACTUAL THRU 8/31/18

VARIANCE

I

$0
$0

$0
$0

$30,054
$30,054

($30,054)

REVENUES:

$0	$0	$44	
$0	$0	$44 I	

INTEREST EARNED 
TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES:
COi

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITU RES)	I	$0	($30,010)	
FU ND BALANCE - Beginning 	$0	$30,038	
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$0	$28	

Page 8