Lake Ashton II Community Development District
August 10, 2018

Lake Ashton II
Community Development District
5385 N. Nob Hill Road, Su11rise, Florida 33351 Pho11e: 954-721-8681-Fax: 954-721-9202
August 6, 2018
Board of Supervisors Lake Ashton II
Community Development District
Dear Board Members:
A meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Lake Ashton II Community Development District is scheduled for August 10, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at the Lake Ashton Health & Fitness Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida. Following is the advance agenda:
1.	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Audience Comments on Specific Items on the Agenda (speakers willfill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting. Individuals providing speaker cards will also have an opportunihJ to speak prior to Board action)
Approval of the Minutes of the Workshop Lake Ashton II CDD Meeting held on April 27, 2018, the Minutes of Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II CDD Joint Meeting held on May 11, 2018, and Minutes of the Lake Ashton II CDD Meeting held on May 11, 2018
Unfinished Business
Ratification of Agreement with National Golf Foundation Consulting for Acquisition Feasibility Study
Ratification of Agreement with Polk County Property Appraiser
New Business/ Supervisors Requests
Consideration of Resolution #2018-03 Designating Darrin Mossing as Secretary and Jillian Burns as Assistant Secretary of the Lake Ashton II CDD
Discussion of Increase in Salaries in Line Item for Fiscal Year 2019 (requested by Supervisor Wright)
Discussion on Interlocal Agreements (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Discussion  on  Requesting  Golf   Course  to  Resume  Mowing  Areas  Previously  Cut  (requested  by
Supervisor Mecsics)
Discussion on Board of Supervisor Operations (requested by Supervisor Murphey)
Discussion on Yellowstone Scope of Work (requested by Supervisor Murphey)
Public Hearing to Adopt the Fiscal Year 2019 Budget
Motion to Open the Public Hearing
Public Comment and Discussion
Consideration of Resolution #2018-04 Annual Appropriation Resolution
Consideration of Resolution #2018-05 Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments
Motion to Close the Public Hearing
Discussion on Pebble Beach Dog Park (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Staff and Board Reports
Attorney- Discussion of Notice to Cease and Desist Activities in CDD Wetland Buffer Area
Engineer
CDD Manager
Consideration of Proposed Fiscal Year 2019 Meeting Schedule
Discussion of Financial Disclosure Report from the Commission on Ethics
Lake Ashton II Community Directors
Monthly Report
Consideration of Landscaping Proposals
3) Consideration of Tile Proposals
Financial Reports
Approval of Check Run Summary
Combined Balance Sheet
Public Comments
Adjournment

MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON II
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A workshop meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District was held on April 27, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. at Lake Ashton II Health & Fitness Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida 33884.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Doug Robertson Jim Mecsics Stanley Williams Carla Wright

Also present were:

Darrin Mossing, Sr. Jillian Burns Darrin Mossing, Jr. Andrew d'Adesky Mary Bosman
Numerous Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman  Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager
Governmental Management Services Governmental Management Services District Counsel (by phone) Community Director

Roll	Call	and	Pledge	of Allegiance

Mr. Darrin Mossing, Sr. called the meeting to order, called the roll and the pledge of allegiance was recited.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience	Comments	on	Specific
Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting. Individuals .
providing speaker cards will also have an opportunity to speak prior to Board action.)

Mr. Darrin Mossing, Sr. indicated that a couple of speaker cards were submitted. Ms. Carol Pontious and Mr. John Velebir made brief statements.

 	

April 27, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion on  the  Proposed Fiscal
Year 2019 Budget
At this time, the proposed fiscal year 2019 budget was discussed.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	General Audience Comments
There were several general audience comments at this time.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
There not being any further business, the workshop meeting was adjourned.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairman / Vice Chairman

2

MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
and
LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District and Lake Ashton II Community Development District was held on Friday, May 11, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Health & Fitness Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida 33884.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Carol Pontious Borden Deane Brenda VanSickle Bob Ference Mike Costello

Doug Robertson James Mecsics Stanley Williams Carla Wright Daniel Murphey

Also present:

Jillian Burns Darrin Mossing Andrew d'Adesky
Numerous residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman  Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Chairman  Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager District Manager District Counsel

Roll	Call	and	Pledge	of Allegiance

Ms. Burns called the roll and everyone recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience Comments on Specific
Items on the Agenda (speakers willfill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning ofthe meeting)
Mr. Robertson: I have one audience comment request form. Mr. Velebir? Mr. Velebir: I am asserting my ability to speak later.
Mr. Robertson: Ok, thank you. In the West we have a slightly different format than in the East. If someone has a request to speak, they can speak  at the beginning and if at some point, if they have done that because they wanted to speak something when  we had a vote on that particular item, then they have another two minutes later on once the Board has had their conversation so they have a two minute opportunity to talk before we take a vote on something. That is the only difference. So Mr. Velebir said he wanted to speak at some point possibly on the golf course amenity policy.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	on	Status	of	Golf
Course Negotiations (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Mr. Robertson: First subject is the Discussion on the Status of Golf Negotiations, requested by Supervisor Mecsics.
Mr. Mecsics: I just asked that this be put on our joint agenda because it is a joint thing working as one community to approach this situation we have with the golf course. I know our two Chairpersons have been working diligently to come up with that and I believe there is some paperwork to go with that. At this point I am going to turn it over to both of them for their discussion on it.
Mr. Robertson: Thank you. I am going to go through some of my thoughts here to help people understand the various perspectives. Carol Pontious, Darrin, and I were tasked with getting information from the golf course. We have gone through a process. We had one formal meeting with Jim Lee about a month ago where we discussed pieces.
Ms. Burns: Supervisor Murphey has joined the meeting.
Mr. Robertson: All Board members are present. To try and put things in perspective so people understand when we went through all the pieces it is going to take

2

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

a while to get through all the pieces of it because it is pretty complicated and we don't know all the answers yet. Right now to put a boundary on what we are talking about is if we were to purchase a golf course the financial risk to the individual homeowners within the community at this point in time looks like it might be between nothing and

$20 a month, $250 a year is the limited exposure that we believe we would have if we purchased a golf course. I will get through all the pieces so when we talk about all the different things let's keep in mind that the current risk of buying a golf course from what we have seen is between no annual fees to maybe $250 a year to support golf course operations. That puts things in perspective because I have heard people say I am going to sell and leave this community, I don't want to have anything to do with a golf course. Understanding from what we can see, the total risk right now is about $250 a year if that at the top end. So then one of the things we looked at is what happens to this community if there are no golf courses. We made the analysis of we have all this greenspace in the community, which is currently mostly golf course, what do we do with the greenspace if there is no golfing. We still would have to maintain it in some format. We would still have to have a process of maintaining the bridges so we could turn this into a non-golfing community. Everybody can decide if they care or don't care about any change in their house values, but we got bids from our current company Yellowstone and we put them together. If there is no golf course to support our greenspace maintenance, the cost to live in this community would go up by $750 a year to maintain the greenspace. That is from official bids we have gotten. Obviously we are going to try and would have to try and get a better price if we could, but in the order of magnitude it is about $750 to run this community and maintain our greenspace. I don't think that is an option that I even want to consider from my perspective. Right now the golfers are paying 80 to 90% of the cost and they are doing it, while they don't like the fees necessarily, they are paying 80 to 90% of the cost to run the golf course and have the greenspace for all of us. If we were to change that then we would have no golf course and we would have that expense anyway, so keep that in perspective. I looked at the choice of this again, $250 a year. That's from using let's say 1,650 homes, which is approximately the number, we could generate only
3

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

if we were to take that money and put that as a supplement to how we operate our golf course. I talked to Mr. Maxwell and said if we were to generate that kind of income to support the golf course operation your golf course would not be losing any money, you would not be wanting to sell it. You would want to continue in operation because there are lots of people who said that he wants to stay because of the lots and wants to stay for other reasons. His answer came back very clear. That is a very generous offer. Not that it was an offer because I am not authorized to do that. It was a conversation of what would happen if we could make you this offer. He said that is a very generous offer. The golf course would be profitable but the answer is no, I don't want to run a golf course anymore. I am 73 years old, I have my grandchildren to play with, and I want to do other things. I don't want to be running Lake Ashton's golf course. I am saying but I could give you an opportunity to run this thing where you can actually generate profit rather than generating a loss. He said I understand that thank you very much, but I don't want to run a golf course anymore. That kind of set me back a little bit. I thought we had an opportunity to say let us buy the land so that no one else could come in and try and develop. We could own the land so that we could then protect our community and then you run the golf course for us because I know a lot of people including myself don't want to run a golf course. So would you consider running the golf course for us? His answer was no, I don't want to do that. So I said alright, we are done. I don't have anything else to say. I do not know how to do anything else but say I am going to walk away. There is nothing else to offer. This week when I finished playing golf on Tuesday, Jim Lee was in the Eagle's Nest and he said one more thing, we have now gone through our process and we have found a marketing company that will market these golf courses for us. Because it is a golf course that is not earning any money there is two ways to sell a golf course based on multiples of earnings, or if the golf course is not making money and everybody has heard there is lots of golf courses in the country that aren't making money but there is a whole professional business that revolves around that. They sell golf courses as a percentage of gross revenue. So they say 90% of the gross revenue is a reasonable number to sell the golf course because there is still revenue. There are still
4

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

opportunities to try and figure out how to work it better. They have already selected the company. They will put this golf course on the market through their marketing company for around $1,800,000. That was the number that was given to me. They will sign that contract in about 45 to 60 days. Like for us we have asked for data. They haven't given us all the data yet. A lot of it is done by Jim Lee, who is an accountant, and he has been busy with tax season. Up until the end of tax season Carol and I only got a couple of pieces of paper from him. He is now saying alright, I will continue to get all this data for you and give it to you but if you can't see your way clear to at least starting negotiations with us, the window closes for us when I put it for sale through this marketing company. That should take 45 to 60 days. That leaves us a window of opportunity to look at whether we want to pursue the opportunity of buying it. The difference between our owning it versus somebody owning it is if somebody else owns it here are things that happen; they continue to pay all the taxes on the land which we would avoid. If they pay in the order of $1,800,000 for the property there is reasonable expectation that they want to generate income off of that and so if we took a number say 10% of just the sales price that is $180,000 that they would hope to siphon out of the community in terms of gross margin to repay their investment.   So they need $180,000 and they also need about
$150,000 to $200,000 to pay for the taxes that we wouldn't have to pay. So from a standing
start between the two sides their expenses are about $400,000 more than ours I am told that somebody is going to buy in that order of magnitude. The marketing company said it takes about 350 days right now. That is the average time it takes to sell a golf course. So that is one offer. We can just say no thank you, pass, and he will go off and sell the golf course. It will take maybe a year to sell the golf course, and he will sell it for some price between $1,500,000 and $2,000,000 depending on what types of bids he gets. That is a professional expectation from the company in Tampa that he is dealing with. I didn't collect the name of the company. He told me the name of the company but it was irrelevant for our conversation at this point in time. Now the third option is what he said to us was I'll still come back and said, I still will offer you which is different from the first thing.   I would agree with you that I would sell the golf course, the Eagle's Nest, all the
5

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

machinery and everything for $470,000. If you recall if you were in the last meeting I netted that with these costs and he said I am going to get all the revenue from the other courses, I want $3,000,000 for my golf course. I immediately subtracted all those things I am not paying for that. I netted that out. So he came back and said $470,000 is a reasonable number that I would accept. I will also give you a long term lease on the building which is where the maintenance shed is where we do the maintenance. Without owning or having access to that maintenance is hard to run the golf course. He would include that. Once this whole place is built out he will change that building into self­ storage which he will rent to people who choose to use it. The part that is currently used for golf course maintenance would be leased to us at no charge or included in the price. So basically he said I will give you the land for nothing if you pay me $470,000 for the Eagle's Nest building and all the machinery I have, or I will go and sell it to somebody else at a higher price and once I sign the contract with another company my offer to you is off the table because I have a contract with another company. Just like when we sell our houses, if you find the buyer on your own once you sign the contract you still have to pay the real estate fees and everything else. Not trying to do anything nefarious, but in about 45 days to 60 days I will have all my documentation to give to this other company and I will sign a contract. If on the other hand you want to work with us I will still honor this lower price and I will work with you. I will give you all the same details that I would give the other company I will give you. I will give you all those details back to you so you can do your evaluation as well. That is what he told me on Tuesday. There was no formal meeting. He caught me basically in the hallway. He took me off from my buddies when everybody was having a beer. I wasn't. I have kidney stones. That is how he got a hold of me. I share this information with the community. So the way my perspective in looking at it, he considered $250,000 a year more than enough to augment his golf course operations to make it successful. More than enough. If we were to do the same thing with an outside company or if we were to open it up and try and solicit outside memberships from Traditions and other places, legally we have an obligation that anybody in the public can come in and sign a contract with either CDD and become a member of Lake
6

 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Ashton. It is required by public law. Though we live here and we don't pay that fee there is a fee to be paid so that you can become a member of Lake Ashton. There is a public component to our community. If we are to go and try and get 50 new members from the outside we could make up the difference. We could have the money with added numbers. We could have enough money to not increase anybody's fees at all. As it gets built out we also have the opportunity for more members to come in. In my head I am trying to figure out what is fair for the whole community. If the whole community chipped in to pay the initial down payment or the initial price for the thing, then I would expect the golf course operations to reimburse the two CDDs for all the money that we would spend to buy the golf course. I would then expect them to set a goal of creating a goal of $100,000 reserves. I have many people in my conversations, I have had open meetings in the public where people were worried to set a reserve in case a golf course green goes bad or something happens or some catastrophic event comes in the golf course I don't want you coming back to the CDD asking for money, create your own reserve to handle that and do that from your dues that you are collecting. Once that is accomplished, the CDDs are paid, there is $100,000 in reserves, and then why don't you reduce your dues and look at other ways to generate revenue. There are a lot of people who go out of this community. I am told that there is one list that is 120 that leave this community to go somewhere else to play golf because they think it is too expensive to play here. We have an opportunity to change our fee structure to try and encourage our own members to come back and play here. I don't think like anything else we are not trying to earn money off the golf course, we would just like it to be an amenity that is available to as many people as possible. So if we could reduce the fees because we have better participation in general that would be better for our community. That is how I looked at the three options at this point in time. So we can say we are not interested, please go ahead and sign your marketing agreement and we will take the risk downstream. We will take the risk of what some new company will do. They may make money which would be nice for them or they may lose some money. I don't know the answer to that. I can't forecast that. The other option is for us to take that opportunity. We would then

7

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

control our own destiny. We would own our own land basically for no dollars we could own the land. If we own the land that prevents anybody else from trying to come in, rezoning it, redeveloping it or doing any crazy other things that people have talked about. We have talked about the opportunity for someone to rezone this is minuscule. I have said that people in the community and I have had counter arguments coming back to me saying if someone really wanted to come in and build condo's by the lake they could take the golf course. It is wide enough to build a condo and build their own retention pond. I think that is kind of crazy, but that is some of the arguments. We don't have any of those problems if we own the land, there is no risk of rezoning, there is no risk of anything else. Our risk is how well could we utilize and maintain the greenspace that we already own. Right now the best way to do that is through two golf courses. The golfers enjoy that amenity and they will pay the lion's share if not 100% of the cost of running the golf course. So from my perspective if we were to go forward, all I would want from this joint meeting is the Board to look at it and say tell us and decide if you want me or somebody else to continue doing the negotiation. That is one issue. The second issue, do we just say no thank you, go sell it to somebody else, or do we say yes, we are interested. We certainly don't have enough information yet and how do we then go and try to collect that information going forward. I am not asking for a decision to buy the golf course at this point in time. We don't know enough details. We don't have a clue what all the numbers are. I do know that there is a commitment now to assemble all those numbers so that an outside corporation could then market it. I have a commitment from them to give us that same information. So what we need from the Board is a direction to say we don't want to do this anymore, let's just let an outside company come in and buy it. We will live with the consequences, or do we want to pursue the opportunity to buy it at a significantly different price then what someone else would get it at. Those are our choices. If an outside vendor buys it and is successful then we are fine, the golf course continues to operate. We all have enjoyed maintaining our property values and the people that want to play golf. They will pay the added costs of having to run a course with higher costs than we have. If we decide to do it, we end up reducing some of the risk. We can't reduce
8

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

all the risks but that land is in our community. Whether we like it or not, that land is in our community and somehow it has to be maintained. So we could give somebody on the outside, they could try and get $400,000 in income to pay the taxes and paythe return on their investment, or we could risk the same $400,000 that we wouldn't have to spend to supplement the golf course. To me I would continue to try and negotiate with them and work out all the details. That would be my preferred course of action. It doesn't mean by saying that we would are committed to buy it. We just say yes, we are interested and we will go through the due diligence process. We would have to come up with all the dates and all the information as other Board members have said, what the salaries were and all the information. All that stuff has to come. The question is whether we want to do that or do we just want to let them go off and sell the golf course to somebody else. I came to the conclusion that he was serious when I made the suggestion that we could pay him $400,000 a year to support the golf course operations. He acknowledged that was more than enough money and he said very nice deal, but I am leaving. That surprised me. I thought we might have makings of a deal that had some less risk for us, but he said no thank you. He really wants to be done with golf operations. So there is no motion on the Board. That is my report from what I have learned. Carol went to the first formal meeting we had. There is more data that is in this thing that talks about that. I guess we throw it out to discussion of how we want to go from here.
Mr. Deane: I think the benefit for us to own the golf course is there, but until we have the information to do it, I am for telling Mr. Lee or Mr. Maxwell or whoever it is that we are interested, I agree with that. We are interested, but we need all the information before any decision of any sort can be made.
Mr. Robertson: We have already made that commitment to the community before. We said we would hold public meetings with the community to explain everything. This is just an example. We would have open public meetings about what are our costs, what are our circumstances and do all that and solicit feedback from the community at large before we took a vote. You could put a motion on the floor to say let's buy it and I would vote against it because that would violate what we have already set up with the
9

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

community. We have told the community you need to know, you needto know the risks, you need to know all the pieces and so we are that point where he is saying if you are interested, I would like to go further and if you are not interested I am pursuing another path. It doesn't mean that we have to even buy it at the end of the process, we are just saying we are willing to invest our time to see if that a viable solution.
Ms. VanSickle: I think one of the things we were going to talk about today is the consultant, most importantly obtaining a consultant to get us that information. I think we also made a promise to the community that they were going to get a chance to weigh in on it. So I want us to be very cautious.
Mr. Costello: I agree that until we have a study done it is pretty hard to go forward with the decision. When you enter in a contract for a house you have somebody come in and do a home appraisal on it and everything else. I am not saying that I want to walk away from it, but by the same token I don't want to run into it. I want to go into it with a lot more knowledge then we have right now. I think like you said we want the input of the community also because they are the ones that are either going to benefit or suffer for it. I think that to give him any kind of a commitment other than we would like time to look into it I think would be wrong.
Mr. Robertson: Do we just walk away from it or continue the discussion? That is where we are. If they continue to do all these things we will have a good result.
Mr. Ference: There is no doubt about that. I ditto what everyone has said. We are going to ask for input and support from the community, but we are not going to send out a questionnaire out to every household and the majority wins. That is not the way you get input for any amenity in our community. Input is important but majority does not win. The majority of the people don't belong to the golf course. The responsibility is ours. That does not say that we do not encourage input because of other ideas, possibilities, etc. etc., but let's not forget we are in charge of making the decision not the majority of the members. It is not a popularity contest. So while we encourage input, we have to be mindful of the fact that we are not sending a questionnaire and the majority wins. We do or we do not, but the majority wants or does not want. Are we clear on that?
10

 	 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Costello: I am not saying every negotiation should be done by a referendum but I think the major part of our job here is to listen to what the people are saying. I think that we do have to find out what they are saying. Maybe I am wrong.

Mr. Mecsics: Mike, I agree with you. We made a commitment to this community when this first started going that we were going to listen and take in their advice and their feelings.   I agree with you Bob that yes ultimately it is our decision but each and every one of these people out here voted  for us to do the right thing. I think we owe it and are duty bound to give them that information.
Ms. VanSickle:   I think it is very important because this could go either way.  It could be a big risk, or you could be looking at quite an assessment to support this or as you are saying hopeful that it might cover itself but we don't know. There is a fear of the unknown so I think we have to listen to our people because they are ones paying for this.

Mr. Murphey: I think Brenda also mentioned about hiring the outside consultant to do a feasibility study. Are we still considering doing that? If we are would they be able to get us in this 45 day period?

Mr. Mecsics: I would like since we are discussing it and we're going to talk specifically about that because that is a crux of information that we need, I am not an expert in golf courses and if you saw my golf scores you would know that I am not an expert with golf. However, we need some experts to come in here and we talked about this as a joint meeting then maybe we need to have a motion for that to go forward with getting a consultant that will come, allocate or authorize the funding for that, then give them some parameters. They are going to be our contractors. We don't work for them they work for us. We give them a parameter of when we need it back and then we go forth with that.  If you need a motion I will make that motion.

Mr.  Robertson:  Not yet. I think if we were to indicate that we are interested in continuing this process and that 45 day would expire. He would be willing to work with us.  You will still do the same work over the next 45 days to get the information from an outside bidder. He has already agreed to give the same information to us. So if we were to say we were interested we would have I think more than 45 days because as we said
11 

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

we have more things to do. If they were to give it to an outside person it still takes a year to sell the golf course so there is some time of a window in there. If we say no right now, in 45 days it goes for sale.  If we say yes we are interested I think the deadline goes away. Mr. Deane:  I would like to make a motion that you tell Mr. Maxwell that we are interested in the golf courses. I believe that alleviates the time limits. Then we can do our due diligence and get the studies and the figures and everything else that we need to

make a decision. I make that motion.
Mr. Mecsics: I second.

Mr. Robertson: There is definitely more discussion. Did you want to add in that motion that because we have already done the homework, Carol and Darrin, too, have the National Golf Association, have they given us a quote? Do we want to include the expenditure of those funds by separate motion?
Mr. Deane: Separate motion.

Mr. Robertson: Ok, we will leave that as a separate motion. Ok then is there any further discussion?

Mr.  Williams:    So  far  I  agree  with  everything.    The  45  to  60  days  that  was mentioned if we indicate that we want to go forward you said you yield, if we don't come to a decision within the 45 to 60 days will he pass that then onto the marketing company?
Mr. Robertson: Yes.
Mr. Williams:  I don't know if it is possible, as you said it is probably another year before a sale would actually happen, I had a real estate license in a prior life in another state. I don't know what Florida state laws are, but I know that in some commercial real estate transactions we were able to put clauses in there that said he has a buyer at a given price and that no fees would be paid by that buyer or him if in fact it sold to that buyer. Something to that effect. Maybe Andrew can clarify that for me, I don't know, but we have had those kinds of clauses in those real estate deals.  I would suggest that if we talk to him at the same time if Florida law allows that kind of thing that we put some kind of clause in there. That would be to me, would give us more time to evaluate and look at what is going on. It might be another way.
12

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Ms. Pontious:   Sounds similar to a right of first refusal.
Mr.  d' Adesky:   That is permissible under Florida law.   If he is willing to give us a right of first refusal that is on his end. Also a standard thing in purchasing the sale of commercial versus the sale is the due diligence period. There is usually in most big deals I have worked on for example for Universal, there is a 90 day, sometimes even more of a due diligence period to investigate the deal and title and feedback information on that so that is also standard.
Ms.  Pontious:  I am somewhat offended by the 45 day thing. We have been trying to work with him for months now to get information to be able to assemble the facts and figures and he is the one that has been withholding the information. Been busy, I get that, but it has been on his side not ours that the lack of cooperation has been there. So I think he needs to back away from 45 days and if we are interested we need whatever time we need to get it worked out and if that expires then when we decide we are no longer interested in when he takes the ball from there.
Mr.  Robertson:   I  understand  that.  I  think we  are misinterpreting the 45  days.  It seems as though I wrote that into this documentation, my fault for not being accurate in what I am saying. He has said that is how long it is going to take for him to write a contract with an outside company.  That doesn't mean that we have 45  days  and that is it. Once he sends a contract then it is a done deal at that point, but if we express interest in doing something else I think that the window would definitely open. It is not a hard 45 days, more of a, that is what it is going to take to close this other deal, but if you are working with me on this deal I think that number instantly goes away. That is what he needs to make a deal with another company not with us. Now back to what Stan said we could tell him that we want to, in process with the other company that he has one bidder that is already available that the fees would be paid and I think that we could negotiate something like that. I did ask him in the same process, a term that is called a stocking horse, where you try and find the bidder on the outside to give you a price then you go underneath that. He  said that he was not going to do  anything like that.  What I think is if we express interest he would work with us. He would give us the documentation
13

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

information and that could take a lot more than 45 days to go through up until the time that we are satisfied that we have done our part. We can'tjust stringhim along for a year to see what happens. He would give us time to go through our proper analysis.
Mr. Costello: Can I ask one question? Precisely what is included in the price of the $470,000?
Mr. Robertson: From my understanding and again we have to go through the
pieces. Included in the price of $470,000 would be the Eagle's Nest, all the mowing machinery and equipment, all the golf course property, and a long term lease. He said 99 but that was Jim Lee just throwing it off the top of his head. He said a 99 year lease that is typical in some businesses. To take the piece of the maintenance building right now, there is the developer's offices and other things, there is a wood shop. No discussion of the woodshop at this point but the piece of that building that is used to maintain the golf course he would include that.  He would not sell it to us because that is part of a different parcel of land but he would give us a long term lease on that so that we could then maintain the golf course. So you could partition off, people know over there that there is a gate that is kept locked right now right at the end of the building, they could make their access to the golf course through that gate as opposed to the other way. So if someone owns the land in the other direction and they are doing something else we would still have access to the golf course through a different gate. He has already thought those things through for us.
Mr. Williams: Other than the $470,000 there would be no additional yearly fees for the maintenance?
Mr. Robertson: Correct.
Mr. Williams: Going back to the clause that I was talking about, even if we procrastinate and he decides in 60 days he is going to go, the clause goes with what he enters into that agreement so we wouldn't pay any fees. As far as I am concerned, there are other things in this document that I have concerns about or don't necessarily agree with, but until we have the other information there is no reason to go into all of this. There is no reason to discuss the document. It is just one person's thoughts.
14

 	 	 	 	

May 111 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Costello: The one thing I am trying to determine here is exactly what in the beginning, I was under the impression that it was going to include the sales office. What happened with that?
Mr. Robertson: I am sorry you got that wrong. Mr. Costello: I may have, I make mistakes.
Mr. Robertson: Me, too. He put a different sales price on the sales office and on the RV storage. There was a separate price for each one of those entities. At our last Board meeting, we agreed that we could not buy the sales business because the resale business is a business. We shoulddt be in commercial business as a CDD. That brings me to one thing that helps, I have been told and I believe it to be true, that if you buy a resale house with their office they offer one year free golf membership. That is an opportunity because they are going to continue to run that business. If we said ok just for argument sake, say we agree to the $47010001 but we say you know what, why dodt we donate a portion of that in reserve and then as you sell houses you deduct. We will allow to add one more member to our golf course because it won1t cost us anything to have an extra golf cart on the golf course, but we can compensate you by your free golf memberships as a way of us not giving you cash. So he still has that marketing opportunity which he likes to win the sales contracts. So there is a way of generating some revenue for us that way, as well.
Mr. Costello: Andrew, as our attorney, what is your legal opinion on this?
Mr. d1 Adesky: You did include this speculated information in the report, which is very important and a pertinent factor. However, the x-factor is the bond debt in the O&M allocation. So if you have currently between two CDD1s $500,000 in par debt which is remaining debt which would need to be settled or reallocated. In addition you have
$50,000 in O&M debt, which would need to be reallocated and once again could be reallocated amongst commercial parcels or perhaps reallocated amongst the community at large which would involve an assessment increase.
Mr. Robertson: We are pretty stingy on how we spend money and Andrew has agreed that he doesn1t want to spend any billable hours working on this unless it is a real thing. There are lots of questions that Andrew and I have and Carol have, but we are not
15

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

spending our money to have him research them unless we see that there is a reasonable thing going forward.  That is why all of those questions aren't answered.  We know that they are there, but they are waiting for the appropriate time to work on them.
Mr. d'Adesky: Until we have a deal and a structure, it is really not productive for me to go to research and say is this permissible, is this not permissible because let's say we were issuing additional debt or taking out a note that may or may not be permissible under certain indenture requirements of Lake Ashton or Lake Ashton II. We would have to investigate that but because we are fiscally responsible, we haven't done any of that work yet for either CDD.
Mr. Robertson: In the initial information that was given to us the very firstmeeting, there was an indication that if we wanted to go forward there was some flexibility on how this thing gets paid for. Why is he offering us a better deal than the outside? Well everybody has different opinions about him but I thinl, that this is one of his major projects and he would rather look at it as being a success rather than a failure. He doesn't need all the money. He is one of those people that doesn't care how much money he has in one sense. He would rather leave a community that was successful and he can say, look at how beautiful it is. It is still that way even after I left the premises. I can't tell you how much, but there is some amount of that he is willing to let us to take over the golf course and make this a long going successful community without his involvement.
Mr. Williams: Can we clarify the motion and give him a chance to speak?
Mr. Robertson: The motion that we recommunicated with Mr. Maxwell, saying that we are interested in pursuing the idea of buying the golf course. We want all the due diligence information would be due to us to come to that and then a further commitment that we would all share that information with the community through public meetings before we make any formal decision. Is that fair?
Mr. Williams: And that was already seconded right?

Mr. Robertson: That was already seconded. I haven't heard from Ms. Wright yet. Ms. Wright: I thought we were already at that point a long time ago.

16

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Robertson: Ok, so Carla is ok. As a joint meeting we vote as separate Boards, two votes, same motion. Before we vote, we have to give Mr. Velebir a chance to talk.
Mr. Velebir: First of alt I think your Option 3 is terrific. Turns things around and to buy the golf course for virtually nothing is a good deal. As you said we are stuck with this big chunk of land one way or the other. It is going to cost us money and the golf course seems to be the best way. I think most people are not concernedabout the purchase assuming you are going to take that out of reserves.
Mr. Robertson: That is one possibility yes.
Mr. Velebir: It has always been an ongoing maintenance. When you originally, when we were talking about this you were saying that the current agreement that the golf course has with the developer, I guess is that for every new home that is sold he gives the golf course $9,250, which includes that one year golf membership, so what I wanted to know is in this deal what happens to that $9,250 and are we still going to be obligated to provide a free year of golf? Thank you.
Mr. Robertson: Correct, good question. He would keep the reason we would get  it for that price is that he would keep all those dollars going forward. The $9,250 between the developer is not forever, that is just for the new house sales. Once they are sold that money goes away. For us as an entity if we own it having new members play for a year to see if they want to continue to play golf here is probably a good thing. It wouldn't cost us anything from a cash flow point-of-view. It is how it has worked always. That is how we get the price down from $3,000,000 down to $470,000. I will recognize you because you didn't know our rules, so please. You have two minutes.
Mr. Scali: Tom Scali, Dunmore Drive. Do we know what the current maintenance expenses are with the current developer? For the golf course?
Mr. Robertson: Yes, pretty much.
Mr. Scali: One of the concerns seems to be that you didn't want to run it. Is it possible that the CDD purchases the land and the people who are employed there want to continue to work here? Why not as a plan, let them continue to run it, just know what the costs are and go forward from there?
17

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr.  Robertson:  Absolutely.   That is  clearly  one  our  options.  It is  a  complicated conversation. IMG is in here right now, International Golf Management. They do the maintenance.  Their current contract is about $100,000 a month to do their part of the deal. That is a piece right now. That goes up or down depending on what is going on. That doesn't prevent us from going continuing with IMG.  We could go to Bill DeCasper Golf. We could go to other golf course operators and operate with them. That is still an option that we would have. We could use that as part of our due diligence to see where we wanted to go. None of those things are off the table. To me this issue is if we can end up owning the land and then that takes all the bad side risks away from us. Then as a community we try and figure out what is the best way to generate income from that land that keeps all of our maintenance fees down. Opening it up to more members on the outside, things like that, and reducing the membership dues to get more volume. We know that there is certainly more room on the golf course. Those are all things that we could do to make it nicer for people so that they wouldn't have to leave the community to play golf. They could play right here. We could have daily fees and stuff like that. The people who are avid golfers, they make their reservations a head of time and the people who are just walk-in golfers, they just come on the slots that are available on a daily basis. There are many ways to get maximum use of the golf course and for us to generate income so that it doesn't become any form of a burden on the entire community.
A resident: Do  we know what his  annual revenue is because in here we  say  that if a golf course is not making money, the normal sale is 90 % of the annual?
Mr. Robertson: Correct.
A resident: How could we even be thinking about buying something unless we know the cost of what the money is bringing in? Anytime you go buy a commercial piece of real estate they know. I feel that this company that told him the golf course could sell for $1,800,000, they have to knowwhat his income is before they even come up with that. So right now they are on a better footing then we are. I don't believe the figures you have here are near correct. I can support it, but we need to know what his annual income is.

18

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Robertson: I agree. There is an estimate that they gave to them that had the same kind of conversation that they have had with us.  That is just the ball park.  That is what the 45 days for them is to give them all that data that they are also going to give us.

A resident: So I estimate my house is worth $500,000 and I knowwell that it is not worth $500,000. Until we get that figure we can tell him yes, we are interested but we want to have the facts in front of us.

Mr. Robertson: Thank you. The way we get that figure is to say yes we are going to continue to negotiate but no one in this room wants us to buy the golf course today based on the facts we have. Not a single soul in this room. Does anybody want to buy the golf course today with the facts that we know? Great, we got not a single hand up that wants to do that. We want to get the data and we want to not let this opportunity pass by if it is a good opportunity. If it turns out to be a sour deal that won't work for us then we just take the chance of him selling it to somebody else and wish for the best.
Ms. Pontious: I think where he is getting these numbers is just round figures. This is not accurate. If you have 400 members and they are paying approximately $5,000 a year that generates $2,000,000. Now you have $100,000 plus in just IMG fees, so you take that
$1,200,000 right there which gives us $800,000 left.  Now we have to pay salaries.  Is that included in the IMG contract? We have to pay maintenance on the Eagle's Nest. We have to pay ponds, we have to pay bridges, and we have to pay expenses of operations, water, sewer, electric and all those things.  There are just so many unanswered questions that you don't know if they are included in there or anywhere.
Mr. Mecsics: I think that is why we have a motion on the table. We need a motion from Mr. Deane who has put in that we do this and then we can take another motion as far as who we want to study for that. But let's get this thing going.

Mr. Costello: One of the things that you told me, Doug, was that us buying the golf course as a government entity we don't pay taxes on it. Now due to the fact that we are collecting money and dues, does this become taxable at that point?
Mr. Robertson: I don't believe so.  Andrew agrees with me.

19

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. d'Adesky: No, once again, the CDD can't collect O&M on our own property.
That is not a factor.
Mr. Ference:	We talked about needing more information.  Can we move on and make a motion? Let's move on get the information.

Mr. Robertson: CDD II, all those in favor of pursuing the motion as stated?

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor the Lake Ashton II CDD Board authorized continuing to obtain information with Mr. Maxwell to purchase the golf course.

Ms. Pontious:  And those in favor of continuing to pursue as getting information only for CDD I?

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor the Lake Ashton CDD Board authorized continuing to obtain information with Mr. Maxwell to purchase the golf course.

Mr. Robertson: Ok, so I guess the next item would be to look at the contract.

Ms. Burns: Everybody should have a copy in front of them handed out to all the Supervisors. If you look on page 5 there is a breakdown of the fees. The total cost for all the expenses is $30,000. It would come out to $15,000 per District. There are task orders I have listed on here as optional. If we did want to pursue those the total cost would be
$16,000 or $8,000 per District.  You can see the breakdown. We were discussing earlier the timing of this report and how long it would take. What they have listed here is about 60 days. They handed in their proposal in March. It was authorized April 2nd. They have to report to us by June 1st and 60 days is about their timeline to complete this report.
Mr. d'Adesky:  Just an antidote, we had a golf course in another community and it was $35,000 so this is a comparable rate.
Mr. Robertson:  So then we have a motion for each Board to split the cost of $30,000 to undertake a study by NGF to help us in our evaluation of this purchase.
Mr. Mecsics: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we undertake the study with NGF to split the cost and get all the information so that we can make a fact based decision.
Mr. Ference: I second that motion.

20 

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Robertson: We have a motion.   I don't know if there is any more discussion that we need to have on this.
Ms. Pontious: On the closed golf course real estate value impact, I am wondering if the O'Reilys out of the kindness of their hearts didn't give us enough information that we could eliminate that $4,000 and do the first review and the second comprehensive physical review which is going to tell us I am sure what happens in the other part.
Mr. Mossing: I believe that you could lower that fee by that amount because there was a very comprehensive report behind it. It really did spell out that if the golf course closes, the results are going to negatively impact property values.
Mr. Robertson:   So that is an option that we could take out so we can work out. The only other thing is, is the Board willing to have Carol and I and Darrin continue in this process to be the point people are involved. Do we wish to change it around at all? I don't see anything on that so you don't need a motion on that. Before we spend the money to execute the contract I would suggest that we contact Mr. Maxwell and tell him this is what we want to do so that he will give us time to do this evaluation. I don't want to spend the money unless he is cooperating. I am assuming he will, but I just want to make sure that is clear.  We will not spend this money unless we get an agreement from Mr. Maxwell that this is appropriate.  If he says no that tells us something too.
Mr. Deane: Can we get this agreement in writing? Mr. Robertson: Yes.
Ms. VanSickle: I'd never agree to anything that wasn't in writing.
Mr. Robertson: This whole process of this information that we have that I shared today I made sure that I communicated to Mr. Lee based on what he gave me.   I won't even present this unless you give me an email back verifying that is what you believe. We are writing all of this down to written communication so that it can't be confused.
Mr. d'Adesky: Supervisor Ference and Supervisor Mecsics, do you agree to the revised motion?
Mr. Mecsics:  Yes, I do.
Mr. Robertson: Ok, Lake Ashton II. All those in favor?

2 1

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Ference with all in favor proposal from National Golf Foundation for an acquisition feasibility study was approved by  the Lake Ashton II CDD Board.

Mr.  Robertson:  Everyone is in favor.  Carol? Ms. Pontious: Lake Ashton I, those in favor?
On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Ference with all in favor proposal from National Golf Foundation for an acquisition feasibility study was approved by the Lake Ashton CDD Board.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	of
Amenities	Policy
Supervisor Robertson)

Common
(requested	by

Mr. Robertson: I have a discussion of our common amenity policy. We have two amenity policies that are fairly close and we have always said that we are trying to operate  as  one  community.  I  will  take  the  opportunity  now  to  add  a  little  extra seriousness. If you notice the difference in how Mr. Mecsics is dressing and how I am dressing he is running for re-election folks. I am not, but I am wearing my t-shirt that we are one.   West and East are  one community.   I would like to suggest that we  create a committee that works out our amenity policies. We have a joint amenity policy. There is some things that are exclusive to either side, but that can be an addendum that says these are all the common things so everybody reads one amenity policy. If there is something that applies just to the East it is in Addendum 1 and if it is just the West, it is Addendum
2. That way we again are telling the community, one amenity policy, one community, so I would like to do that if I can get support from the two Boards.
Mr. Mecsics: Cooperativeness and working as one community, I think we appoint a member from each one of our Boards to sit down.  You don't have to worry about the Sunshine laws and then work with the amenity policies with the two community directors and come up with one community amenity policy for both Boards that we agree on then work out whatever.  One of the things that you would have to talk about is we

22 

 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

have to define what a guest is for this community because there is some concern about folks that do not have a buy in or are not a resident or a renter and we need to define what truly a guest is so we don't run into any problems. I will make a motion that we appoint from each one of our Boards to discuss this, work with the community directors and then come up with a draft common amenity policy for the Board's consideration.
Mr. Costello: Second it.
Mr. d'Adesky:  Do you want to make that designation as part of the motion?
Mr. Robertson:   Sure let's do the vote and then we can assign someone to do it.
You want it in the motion?
Mr. d'Adesky: It makes it easier if it is part of the motion.
Mr. Robertson: Do we have a volunteer from CDD II to work on the amenity policy? Mr. Williams:  Let's everybody look down this way.
Mr. Mecsics:  Congratulations.  You noticed he wasn't looking at me. Mr. Robertson: Mr. Williams has graciously offered.
Ms. Pontious: Do we have an offer from the East side? Mr. Costello: Sure why not.
Ms. Pontious: Ok, Mike has volunteered to do it as well.
Mr. Robertson: Ok so we now have our two Board members.  On CDD II, all those in favor of the motion?
On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Costello with all  in  favor  Lake  Ashton  II  CDD  designated  Mr.     Stan Williams from Lake Ashton II CDD to meet with the community directors from both CDDs to discuss a common amenity policy for both CDDs.

Ms. Pontious: On the·East all those in favor?
On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Costello with all in favor Lake Ashton CDD designated Mr. Stan Williams from Lake Ashton II CDD to meet with the community directors from both CDDs to discuss a common amenity policy for both CDDs.

23

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II Mr. Robertson: Thank you very much.
FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion on Amenity Policies
and Definition of What a Guest is and Propriety of Recurring Guests (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Mr. Robertson: Discussion of Amenity Policy and Definition of what is a guest. Mr. Mecsics: I think we covered that.
Mr. Robertson: That is going to be included as part of the discussion between Stan, Mike, Mary, and Christine. So Mr. Mecsics is happy with that.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Joint Resident
Feedback Survey
Mr. Robertson: Consideration of a joint resident feedback survey. Mr. Williams: Wouldn't that be part of that?
Ms. Pontious: I don't think it is exactly. One is the amenity policy, thatis a separate issue. We also do a feedback survey. In the past it has been done by the East, a separate survey then the one done by the West. As we were talking about doing ours a month or so ago we said let's wait until the joint meeting and see if we can come up with a plan to do one so that we knew who thought what, when and where all in one place. So I think that is who would like to work on the feedback survey, or maybe Christine and Mary can merge them with the best questions that you feel is appropriate. If you want help from us we are happy to help.
Mr. Deane: I make a motion that the two community directors gettogether to build a feedback survey for one community.
Mr. Mecsics: If I may, Borden, can we amend that so with your approval to give that a specific time period of once we send it out they have let's say 90 days to get that thing together and back out to the community so we are not going 6 to 9 months?
Mr. Deane: That is fine, 90 days. Mr. Mecsics: Then I second.
Mr. Robertson: Any further discussion?

24

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor Lake Ashton II CDD approved for Community Directors Christine Wells and Mary Bosman to put together a Joint Resident Feedback Survey with a 90 day turnaround timeframe after it has been sent out.

Ms. Pontious: CDD I joint feedback survey, all those in favor.
On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Mecsics with all in favor Lake Ashton CDD approved for Community Directors Christine Wells and Mary Bosman to put together a Joint Resident Feedback Survey with a 90 day turnaround timeframe after it has been sent out.

Ms. VanSickle: Before we go on, we're talking about amenity policies and everything else we discussed, a letter that was going to go out about clubs and groups. We have the letter that Christine did a very nice job on but we thought it might be more meaningful if it went out jointly. Your Board needs to decide if they want to agree with that. We are ready for it to go out. We want it to go out.
Mr. Robertson:  They want a vote now.
Mr. Mecsics: I think in fairness to Mary and our side, she should take a look at it. If she has no disagreement with it then I would recommend to our Board that we concur.
Mr. Robertson: I think it means that we just have a chance to understand it and if we have no objections we agree to do it.
Mr. d'Adesky:  Yes, that is just staff direction, it doesn't need a motion. Mr. Robertson: We are certainly in favor of doing it together.
Ms. Pontious: I think at this point it needs to go out, so we would like to give you maybe to the next meeting to meet together and decide if you want to do it as a community wide event or whether we will just do it on our side.
Mr. Robertson:  We can do it within 30 days. Ms. Pontious: Ok, sounds good.
Mr. Mecsics: But it will be a joint one.
Ms. Pontious: Yes, it will come from the joint sides.

25 

 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion   of	Card Access for
Amenities
Mr. Robertson: Discussion of Card Access for Amenities. It doesn't say who put this on the agenda?
Mr. Mecsics: I will do it. Mike Costello and I were both designated at one of the
meetings to take a look at this. We talked at great length at our own expense at Nini's Restaurant by the airport. You have to mix business with pleasure, looked at the facilities, the resources that we are protecting and I drew upon my experience in the security side of the house. There is a lot that goes into setting a full card access system. There is a lot of impacts both known and unknown. At this time we do not or at least Mike and I both said we don't see it as a viable aspect for this. However, with a company that I did work for at one time because they found how much it would cost as far as the infrastructure and then just the maintenance of it to come up with what we used to call a constable program. In that case people in the community would be considered to be constables and if they see some kind of infraction going on or someone that doesn't belong there they can bring that up. It gives a little more credibility as folks have a commitment taking care of their community.
Mr. Costello: I think that what we both determined was that even with card access

you can with codes, you could go with so many different things that quite honestly it is nothing for me to hand another person my card. They are going to be able to use the amenities. The only way that you are truly going to get away with it, I remember when I was working in order to get in our communications center, we used to use fingerprint identification. It is just going to be an extremely expensive ordeal to even consider. You can go with that. You can go with face recognition. I think right now the best thing Jim and I came up with is we have to depend on the people that live in the community when they know that something is happening. When people are coming in using the amenities or attending different functions that they are not supposed to attend it is going to be up to them in order to help us help them. That is the way it goes. I don't think anybody wants to be part of being called a rat but by the same token you are spending your money

26

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

in order to keep these amenities running. I don't see where somebody should come in and just use them for free.
Mr. Deane: I agree with that. Have we thought about a gate access? A different gate access to come into the community because anybody can buy a clicker.
Mr. Costello: The problem being is the fact that these are considered public roads and anybody has access to this community.
Mr. Deane: They have to go through the gate. So the guard would have the information. We have lots of people that don't live here that have clickers to come in and out the resident gates.

Mr. Costello: That is going to be something that we are going to have to make some sort of a ruling where when the house is sold that we are assured that all of the gate passes are turned into the new owner.
Mr. Deane: They can't because I paid for it when I bought my house. You can't have it even when I sell my house because it is not sold with the house.
Mr. Costello: We will pay you whatever you paid for it.
Mr. Deane: People aren't going to do it. The sales personnel have them. They are not residents and never will be residents.
Mr. Costello: What do you suggest for the gate as far as being able to allow only residents in and keeping people who are prior residents out or other people?
Mr. Deane: They make a sticker that you put on your windshield. A bar code that you can eliminate when the house is sold.
Mr. d'Adesky: Just from a legal perspective, obviously they are public roads. We are obligated to have access through the visitor entrance but in terms of transponders your transponder policy clickers you can do whatever you want for that. We just had a District change their transponder policy, essentially issued new transponders.
Mr. Costello: The only thing there is the fact that they are going to come in through the gate, they are going to say I am visiting Joe Smith or going to the restaurant, whatever. They are going to do whatever they want to do once they get into the community. We can't follow each and every person. It is virtually impossible.
27

 	 	 	 	 	

May ll, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Mecsics: Borden, why don't you let Mike and I sit down like we did with the access card and we will look at our system that we have right now and see if there are any changes of what we have right now. How is that?
Mr. Deane: That is fine.
Ms. Pontious: I think what we need is something that the office staff can eliminate people when they are notified that someone has moved. It is just going into the equipment and eliminating them so there is no option of having any device to get in once you go out.
Mr. Robertson: The other thing that we will do is, and I have lived in a place that they have a bar coder reader, is your car drives up to a certain point and your bar code gets read. They know that it is your car and it also prevents people from as we all understand you press the button about 100 feet away and drive like crazy to get through the gate. It prevents all the stuff. You have to come up and get your bar code read before the gate will come up. The will eliminate some of the safety issues.
Mr. Costello: Jim and I will be more than happy to look into it. Like I said I don't think it is going to elevate the problem totally. I think is it going to slow it down some but I don't think it is going to end it.
Mr. Williams: We have been talking about after hours and I wasjust curious what is our responsibility of our staffs on both sides as far as watching people who are in the fitness room or in the bowling alley or whatever? Is there any responsibility of the staff to go around and check occasionally? Is that part of their job description?
Mr. Deane: The security people do it at the pool all day long.
Mr. Mecsics: Stan's concern there and I think we discussed this, Mary and I even Christine and I a little bit, every staff member has a responsibility to make sure our amenities are being used by the right people, whether they are security or not. We just don't rely on security. If you do, you are making a mistake. He is exactly right on that. I think it is inherit. As we were saying before it is inherit on all of us if you see somebody in there that doesn't look like they are supposed to be here or you don't know them. You can either ask them or have someone else do it.
28

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. Williams: So it is part of their job description. Mr. Mecsics: Yes.
Mr. Robertson:  We also just so you know, there have been some individuals who have lived here who have moved out and they start trying to come back and use the facilities. We have become aware of those people and have their picture available so we make it clear to them that if they are not paying they just can't come in and do that. It doesn't prevent in certain cases where individually they can invite anybody. If you are sponsoring somebody for an event that is ok but they have to be properly sponsored. I know there is a basketball group that plays. One individual from the community here likes to play basketball more aggressively than us other 70 year olds, and he gets some people from the outside. He signs them in every single week and they sign the liability waiver so they can play basketball with him.
Mr. Mecsics: I think that is part, Stan for you and Mike, part of our amenity policy is what defines a guest and what defines a recurring guest.  That will fall into his area.
Mr. Robertson:  Ok, no motion required, but any action will be taken for the next Board meetings.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of Community Security
Patrol (requested by Supervisor Mecsics)
Mr.   Robertson:     Mr.   Mecsics,  would  you  please  have  a  discussion  on  our community security patrol?
Mr. Mecsics:  I wrote these down so I get the facts right.  A little over a year ago we both completed our security contracts and we picked different companies to provide security  officer services.   The way I am looking  at this approach is one of an agnostic approach and does not involve the ethnicity of the selection of either company when that occurred. I was asked if we could have a shared patrol between two different companies. From my perspective with over 45 years in the security area, my opinion was it was needed for an efficient or effective from a commanding patrol and operational standpoint. I still feel that way but there is an opportunity for both of our CDDs to have one act as an executive agent for the community patrol and operate it with his company. Lake Ashton
29 

 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

II currently has a 24 hour community security patrol versus the 18 hour patrol car that Lake Ashton I has. I propose that Lake Ashton II CDD become the executive agent for that function. They supervise the community with one consistent approach to the security patrol as well as present a cost savings for both Districts. In the case of Lake Ashton I you will probably be about $30,000 and for Lake Ashton II about $60,000. If agreed to, accommodations could be made to absorb some of those security officers into the existing structure of the company. The actual oversight for the patrol operations would be a cooperative effort between our two community directors with an advisor function I would provide. Obviously a formal agreement would have to be drawn up among the operations strategy between the two CDDs. I recommend that Lake Ashton I CDD appoint a Supervisor, possibly Supervisor Costello with his public safety background to work with me on this. We talk about doing things together and I think this is an excellent area that we can prove we are capable of doing it. I open it for discussion.
Mr. Robertson: So if I understand it right, we have right now, we have two patrols going into the community. Ours works for 24 hours and the other one is less than that. Based on what we are doing now you feel that a single patrol could cover the entire community effectively. If that were the case we would have a joint patrol that went through the whole community with both realized cost savings as a result of eliminating that. Is that correct? But you would also, as we did in the past, when we transferred the employees that we would like to have we could still continue to have.
Mr. Mecsics: The employees with the present company if the CDD I would like some of those to come over we would work with our company to absorb them in so that we would have a meshed operation so it is one company taking care of all the business.
Mr. Robertson: Of just the patrols.
Mr. Mecsics: Yes. That would give you 24 hour patrol and save you money. It would give us the same thing and save money. Somebody asked about that, about the size of the community. I am just entering into I am going to be teaching a class of Patrol Allocation for a college and the size of this community is well worth it if you do it the right way. I believe you can do it.
30

 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Mr. d'Adesky: So to clarify because there is potential of interference of contract issue here. If you have one company perform a joint patrol both in the area of Lake Aston II and Lake Ashton I to go throughout the entire community, I would have to look at that contract because that might be a breach of the scope of the Lake Ashton I's current contract. There might be an amendment to their contract to carve that out to allow for a community wide patrol if they are amenable to that idea. So that is something I would need to look at.
Mr. Mecsics: That would have to be done. I know when we did our contract with Securitas we had a clause in there for expansion of that if we had to in the future.
Mr. Robertson: I don't know if that merits discussion at this point.
Mr. Ference: Jim, are we having a problem with our security that we have to go to this patrol?
Mr. Mecsics: No, it is efficiency, Bob. It is pure efficiency.
Mr. Ference: So nothing is broken and we are trying to fix it?
Mr. Mecsics; I don't go by if it is not broken don't fix it. I look for efficiencies, innovation and things in the future so is it broken, I would say yes, because we have two different contracts. Two different companies doing the same thing for just a smaller area. I think by allowing us to do that we can get an efficiency of that and save you money. It is avoidance of costs.
Mr. Ference: There is cost savings. It is not reducing the problem, just cost savings.
Ms. VanSickle: My concern is first of all we decided the two CDDs decided to go with separate contracts. I am pleased with our contractor for the most part. We always have room for improvement, but my concern was we are a growing community. We are a large community. We are getting ready to lose our pool officer as of May 1st. During the summer we don't have a pool officer. The pool is probably one of our areas that needs to be patrolled more often than anything else. During the summer our officer makes a concerted effort to get through there more often. Also if we have events and we need to pull a security officer for some reason, I think we are just too large that if we have an emergency at the clubhouse and the rover is way over at the far end of this new area or
31

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Hogan or somewhere, I worry about a response time issue. I think it is important. I don't see a duplication in service because I think to go the other way we get a loss of service because that trip around is going to be a lot longer. I look at that pool officer to go through that pool every 45 minutes. I think that is important. They also need to go through the clubhouse. During the day when we have staff it is not as important but when staff isn't there I think it is important especially when we have weddings and stuff like that. One of our rovers does what I call parking lot patrol because when there is no booze being served inside, they set up a bar in the trunks of one of the cars and she is on it. I like that
but because she is there and close by she can monitor that more often.  Jack and I were	

walking the dogs through the parking lot and she was way down on the golf cart path by the pavilion and she saw it. She got right back over there. That is the type of service that I really appreciate. I think we need to maintain that.
Ms. Pontious: I think just based on the volume of traffic for some reason our gate gets way more volume of traffic then the Lake Ashton II gate. We have more people coming through the community on our side to get wherever it is that they are going. I really like the community patrolled the way it is right now.
Mr. Costello: We had discussed it and I personally think that the community is a good size no denying it but by the same token my colleagues feel that they are more comfortable with what is going on now we should go with the vote and we will go with whatever the majority feels.

Mr. Deane: I like it the way it is. Mr. Mecsics: We tried, no vote.
Ms. Pontious: Ok, so we are just not interested in changing and we don't need a vote on it.
Mr. Mecsics: There is no motion.
Mr. Robertson: Ok, so we continue to do our patrols and you will continue to do yours and we will go to the next item.

32

May 11, 2018

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

Supervisor Requests and General Public Comments

Mr. Robertson:  Are there any Supervisor requests? Mr. Deane: When is the next joint meeting?
Mr. Robertson: Our next meeting is in August so I suggest we have a joint meeting in August as well so we can give an update. We can also, as we did in April, we had an extra meeting to get our budgeting done while there are more people around. We could also have an earlier meeting if something turned up quickly.   We are always willing to do that.  At this point let's schedule the next joint meeting in August.
Mr. Murphey:   Hold on a second, Doug. Don't you think we are going to need to meet again about any results we get back from the golf course consultant and so on? They said 60 days for that. Do you think they will be able to start virtually right away, Darrin?
Mr. Mossing:  Yes, I think so.
Mr. d' Adesky:  If we need to we could schedule another joint meeting. Mr. Murphey:  How much time do you need, a week?
Mr. d'Adesky: We prefer like two weeks notice. It makes it easier on staff to advertise and coordinate.
Mr. Robertson: I think mid-May to mid-July andthen we have a meeting in August so depending on how things get done we might need one, we might not.  We can always call a special meeting. So then we will just schedule one for at the clubhouse in August. Any other further items for business for the joint?
Mr. Scali:  I have to say I am from the East and I am disappointed in our Board not going to one security system. I think it is foolish to have two. If someone goes over the green line and he is right there it is on the other side of his territory he can't do anything. Plus we are talking about significant savings. You can in fact put together a plan that you still have the time after it is one security system. It is just a question of making it happen. I think you made a mistake. Thank you.
A resident: Brenda mentioned that we are losing the officer atthe pool because of the summer months. We have a lot of kids come down visiting the grandparents, etc.

33

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton CDD II

and I think we need it. We have had enough problems at that pool and we have enough problems with our amenity policy and here we  are  going to  make  another problem by not having an officer. I think we have to reconsider our contract and make sure we have an officer there 12 months a year.  That is it.
Mr. Scali: I'd really like to see the two Boards go to one budget, the entire complex. Mr. Deane: We can't do it.
Mr. Scali: You can do it if you make the effort. Split the cost and come up with two individual budgets that are the same.  We need to prioritize things as a community not as East and West. That is my recommendation.
Mr. Robertson: Any further? Accepting public comments.  You don't have to say it, Murray, we are going to change our General Audience Comments. We want to change that to Public. It is a public meeting and all public are welcome.  Thank you, Mr. Zacharia.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Ference seconded by Mr. Murphey with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

There not being any further business to discuss,
Assistant Secretary/Secretary	Chairman/ Vice Chairman

34

 	 	 	 	 	

MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON II
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District was held on Friday, May 11, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at Lake Ashton II Health & Fitness Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida 33884.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Doug Robertson Jim Mecsics Daniel Murphey Stanley Williams Carla Wright

Also present were:
Darrin Mossing Jill Burns
Andrew d1Adesky Alan Rayl
Mary Bosman Numerous Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman  Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager GMS
District Counsel District Engineer Community Director

Roll	Call	and	Pledge	of Allegiance

Ms. Burns called the meeting to order at approximately 1:30 p.m., called the roll and the pledge of allegiance was recited. All Supervisors were present.

SECOND  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments on Specific Items
on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting. Individuals providing speaker cards will also have an opportunity to speakprior to Board action.)
Mr. Robertson: I have two speaker cards; one from John Velebir and the other from Bob Zelazny via Ms. Gloria Crary-Leh. They will discuss their items later in the meeting. Are there any other comments before we proceed? Hearing none, we will move on.

 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval  of  the  Minutes  of the
Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II COD Joint Meeting held on February 9, 2018 Meeting and Minutes of the Lake Ashton II CDD Meeting held on February 9, 2018
There not being any comments or corrections,

On MOTION by Mr. Mecsics seconded by Mr. Williams with all in favor the Minutes of the February 9, 2018 Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II CDD Joint Meeting and the February 9, 2018 Lake Ashton II CDD Meeting were approved as presented.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
Consideration of Proposals for District Management
Mr. Mecsics: As you know, we approved going out for Request for Proposals (RFP) for District Manager and legal services at the last meeting. We sent it out to 16 different  companies.    Some  were  too  far  away  to  provide  us  the  services  that  they thought we wanted, which may have also been due to the size of our District. One proposal had what we needed, which was GMS.   We reviewed it and everyone has a copy of it. There was also a proposal for legal services from Latham, Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP.   Both companies met the legal requirements of the RFP.   GMS came in almost $3,000 less than what we are paying right now, so thank you very much.

Mr. Mecsics moved to accept the Government Management Services proposal for District Management Services and enter into negotiations to finalize the contract, and Mr. Murphey seconded the motion.

Mr. Murphey: I think GMS does a very good job and we are very satisfied with what they are doing. I'm speaking for myself.

Mr.  Mossing:  Thank you.   We very much appreciate that support and are very excited to be here and will continue our management services to the best of our abilities.

2

 	 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr.   Robertson:     Thank  you.     We   are  looking   forward   to   continuing   our relationship.   With all of the things that we have to  do with both Boards, it's nice that we have a common District Manager, so thank you very much. We have a motion. Are there any further comments? Hearing none,

On VOICE VOTE with all in favor accepting the Government Management Services proposal for District Management Services and entering into negotiations to finalize the contract was approved.

Mr. Robertson:	Mr. Mecsics, would you mind negotiating the final contract, since you handled the security contract?
Mr. Mecsics: If the Board wishes, I will.
Mr. Robertson:  We will delegate that to Mr. Mecsics.

Consideration of Proposals for District Counsel

On MOTION by Mr. Murphey seconded by Ms. Wright with all in favor accepting the Latham, Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP proposal for District Counsel Services and entering into negotiations to finalize the contract was approved.

Mr. d'Adesky:  It is Jan and my pleasure to serve this community and Lake Ashton.

Discussion	of	Yellowstone	Contract	Management	(requested	by Chairman Robertson)
Mr. Robertson: We had an event several weeks ago, where Yellowstone cut into the buffer zone, which is a violation of our permits. That was reported to me by a resident and I brought it to District Management. It was then brought to our law firm and they said that it was an inappropriate activity. Although, it was only cutting where we had already cut before, it had to stop, so a letter was written by our law firm to Yellowstone, telling them to never cut in the buffer zone again and to let it grow back to its natural state. As a result, the recommendation given to me was that we should bring the contract over to a District employee and we should step back and be more in the

3

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

supervisory role that we haven't had in the past. The recommendation was to make our Community Director, Mary Bosman responsible for that contract, which brings us more in line with what other communities do. I don't know if we need a motion to accomplish that or not.
Mr. d'Adesky: You could make a motion to re-delegate that.

Mr. Robertson moved to reassign the Yellowstone Management Contract to Mary Bosman for supervision, and Ms. Wright seconded the motion.

Mr.  Robertson:   I want to  thank Dan Murphey for providing oversight to this company for four years. You can see how beautifully green this community is. Dan has always been there to work with the company and get things done.  It is a tribute to him, the staff we have and the company we work with to accomplish that, so I want to thank him for all of his efforts on our behalf.
Mr. Murphey: You're welcome. I spoke to the Yellowstone Account Manager about working with Mary. From time to time, Mary will direct some of the off-site workers and they should cooperate with her. I think there were a couple of minor issues about where they park their equipment. Hopefully that's all resolved. Regarding cutting into the buffer zone, I spoke to the guy who was doing that. It was during the period when there was confusion about what they were supposed to cut or not cut. I wasn't a part of that. I was confused too on what we are allowed and not allowed to do. I talked with them over the last couple of weeks and the stakes are still up and they are cutting away from it.  Having Mary take on that responsibility is fine.
Mr.   Mecsics:     I've  been  working  with  Mary   on  the  security  contract  and recommend turning the contract over to her.

On VOICE VOTE with all in favor reassigning the Yellowstone Management Contract to Mary Bosman for supervision was approved.

4

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

On MOTION by Mr. Robertson seconded by Mr. Murphey with all in favor turning over the security contract to Mary Bosman for supervision was approved.

Mr. Robertson: Mr. Mecsics, thank you for all of your time and effort in supervising the security contract.
Mr. Mecsics: I'm just going to be a consultant.

Mr.  d'Adesky:   Just to be clear,  that doesn't  mean  that the Board can't consult with them or give advice. It just means that the management of the contract will be handled by Mary.

Mr. Robertson:	We are  now  back at  the more  traditional way of managing	

contracts.	Those were the only two contracts that were outside of the normal CDD bounds. Does this mean that we are now a more consistent organization?
Mr. d'Adesky: It is consistent with a general managerial structure. My liability concerns are now taken care of.

Ratification of Inspection Report for Southwest Water Management District Mr. Robertson: I will allow Mr. Rayl discuss this item, but I want to take an

opportunity to say that when we took this over, we had to spend a lot of time and effort to get our ponds back into shape, after many years of letting them go.  We worked with the golf course and Yellowstone, and I'm very happy to report that Mr. Rayl submitted an analysis to the Southwest Florida Water Management District (S.W.F.W.M.D.), which

was accepted.  We have no repairs to do on our ponds,  because we are now doing  it the	              correct way. We are maintaining our ponds and keeping them clean. I would like to

thank the people that were involved in that process.
Mr. Rayl: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The good news is that we submitted the Statement of Inspection for Permit .001 . We have a number of different permits. You may recall that Permit .001 is tied to Permit .002. Our other permit is .004 that has the majority of the ponds. I think 38 ponds are in Permit .004.  This one only  had two ponds, but they were the two that we repaired outside of Hogan Lane. I inspected all of

5

 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

the repairs and everything looks good.  It's reconstructed to function as it was originally permitted.    S.W.F.W.M.D.  accepted  our  certification.    Due  to  the  type  of  pollution abatement design that we have on those ponds, which is a side drain filtration system, they are required to be re-certified every 18 months, so we will be doing this again in November, 2019. Right now, everything is in great shape.
Mr. Murphey:  How often do you have to submit this report to S.W.F.W.M.D.?  Is it once every several years?
Mr. Rayl: Every 18 months for ponds of this type of design. Mr. Murphey:  Okay.  Thank you.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	New	Business	/	Supervisors
Requests
Consideration of Resolution #2018-02 Approving the Proposed Fiscal Year 2019 Budget and Setting the Public Hearing
Mr.  Robertson:   This  year  we coordinated our budget differently  than in  past years. We had a meeting in April to discuss the capital expenditures and applied all of those changes into our budget.   This is the budget that we are going forward with for the August meeting. We don't need a June meeting to discuss the budget, because we already had a budget workshop.  It's just a matter of approving the budget.  There were no significant changes from the workshop, but we can take comments.  Does someone want to make a motion to adopt our budget?
Ms. Burns:  We need a motion to set the public hearing date for August 10, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at this location and adopt the resolution.

Mr. Murphey moved to adopt Resolution #2018-02 Approving the Proposed Fiscal Year 2019 Budget and Setting the Public Hearing for August 10, 2018 at 1 :30 p.m., at this location and Mr. Mecsics seconded the motion.

Mr. Robertson: Mr. Zelazny had a comment and Ms. Gloria Crary-Leh is going to speak on his behalf. I think John Velebir might want to comment on the budget as well.

6

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Ms.  Crary-Leh:    Does  this  resolution  finalize  the  budget  for  next  year?    Can changes be made during the next Board meeting and prior to submission?  I  would like one more opportunity to refine the data.
Mr. Robertson:  When we pass this motion, the important thing is that we are not changing our fees this year, but there is often public comment. So, the budget could be changed if necessary at that time; however, if we were to change the amount of money that we want to collect, we would have to go through a rigorous  announcement process. We are foregoing that at this point in time and are staying with the budget that we have.  In August, we must stay within the $1,885 per household.   How did I do, Mr. d'Adesky?
Mr.  d'Adesky:   That was very good.   Keep  in mind that this  is  a ceiling, not a floor, so the budget could stay the same or decrease, but it can't increase. Otherwise,  there must be a mailed notice to residents.
Mr.  Velebir:    I  have  a  question  and  a  comment.    When  we  settled  with  the developer, we acquired a couple of lots and  put in additional parking. It looks like we still have a parking problem, because during events, people  are  parking  all  over  the grass and down the median. I noticed that in this year's budget, which goes through September, we have $540,000 allocated for capital projects and we have only spent
$107,000. I was just wondering if we can purchase the lot from the owner, at the end of the parking lot for future parking, before it is sold. It looks like we have the money already approved in capital expenses. The trees on the entrance are dying. I was wondering if we could increase our budget to buy larger trees.
Mr. Robertson: Thank you, John. The intention was never to have so much parking, so everyone could be in a nice cozy parking spot for an event that happens once every two months. The intention was to have enough parking for all regular events. If we had an outside event where there were a lot of cars, we have the ability for people to park across the street from our new parking lot. When we have a major event like that, as part of our security pla:n, we should have onsite security to help with the safety and the guidance. We also have the ability to park across the street at the

7

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

church. In the past, on Wednesdays, when bible study clears out, it will be cordoned off in  the  future,  unless we  have  a  major event.   We  would  then  open  it  up  and  allow parking.  I believe that we have enough parking to deal with major events.  I don't want to spend any more money on additional parking for the  three to four  events  per  year that might need it. We can handle it through the security process. In the last 10 years,  the City put in as many trees as parking spots and they are making it harder and harder for us. I think we have ample parking with the grassy areas to use it occasionally and solve the problem. That's my perspective.
Mr. Velebir: We talked about the need for an additional pool in the community.
You should look at locking in that vacant piece of land.
Mr. Robertson:  We will take that under consideration.  Thank you, John.  Is there any further discussion on the budget?
Mr. Mecsics:  Good job.
Mr. Robertson: It was excellent.

On VOICE VOTE with all in favor adopting Resolution #2018-02 Approving the Proposed Fiscal Year 2019 Budget and Setting the Public Hearing for August 10, 2018 at 1:30 p.m., at this location, was approved.

Mr. Robertson: We had a nice meeting before this and have a road map for the future.  We can look at purchasing larger trees going forward.  There was one suggestion to try to have someone purchase the trees that are thriving, but that's  not  going  to happen. They are probably infected as well. We tried that a year ago and it didn't work. No one wants to buy those trees, when there are diseased trees so close to them. We will just have to replace them. That will come up as an individual budgeted item.

Acceptance of Audit for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2017
Mr. Robertson: I will have Mr. Mossing discuss this item. As we said before, we are no longer in default.  The auditors are happy and the state will be very happy with our renewed fiscal responsibility and healthiness.

8

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Mossing:  I want to highlight two important statements. Mr. Robertson: Please do.
Mr. Mossing: Then I will ask the Board to accept this  audit and we will transmit it to the appropriate agencies, as required. On Page 1, the auditor states "In our opinion, the financial  statements  referred  to  above present fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the financial position of the governmental activities. " They are basically giving the District a clean opinion. On Page 25, there are two separate sections; one dealing with internal controls.      They   found   no   problems   with   our   internal   control   system.      Under " compliance", they found no issues of non-compliance. Lastly, as the Chairman just pointed out, in the Report to Management on Page 29, under " Current Years Findings and Recommendations", there are none. We also had no deteriorating financial conditions for the last five years.   That's the biggest change.   The financial position of the District is very strong. If the Board has any questions or comments, we  would  be  happy  to address them. If not, we would ask for a motion to accept the audit.

On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Mecsics  seconded  by  Mr.  Murphey with all in favor the audit  for fiscal year  ending  September 30, 2017 was accepted.

Approval of Aquatic Plant Management Agreement with Applied Aquatic Mr.  Robertson:	Our  current  contract  for  aquatic  plant management  is  up  for
renewal.  We have an application from Applied Aquatic to continue with the operations that were completed in the past. It's an annual contract.
Ms.  Bosman:    Right  now,  we  have  two  separate  contracts.    We  have  a  new contract for the new ponds, and soon I'm going to have a third contract for the other section. I spoke to Andrew before the meeting and asked him if we  could  combine those into a single contract. It would be much  better  for  bookkeeping  and recordkeeping purposes.
Mr. d'Adesky:   They should be amenable to that.   I'm sure if Darrin and Jill talk to them, they should be able to get that into one contract.

9

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Robertson: We could have a motion to approve the contract, which has an inflationary increase of 3 % .
Ms. Bosman: Yes.
Mr. Robertson:  We will combine the contracts into  one and allow the Chairman  the ability to execute the contract.

On MOTION by Ms. Wright seconded by Mr. Murphey with all in favor the Aquatic Plant Management Agreement with Applied Aquatic and authorization for the Chairman to sign the same, subject to combining all contracts into one, was approved.

Discussion of Procedures for the General Election
Ms.  Burns:   This District has  two  seats that will be  up  for  election this coming November, Seat 1, held by Jim and Seat 3, held by Dan. If anyone is interested in qualifying for those seats, the qualifying period with the Polk County Supervisor of Elections is June 18 through June 22. You have two ways to qualify. The first would be to get a petition with 25 signatures.   The second way would be to pay a $25 fee.   If you need more information, you can contact the Supervisor of Elections, but all of this information is on the sheet that was distributed before the meeting.
Mr.  d'Adesky:   We  don't  control  that  process.   The  only  situation where  you would have a say, is if no one qualified. Then you would have to appoint someone who was a Lake Ashton II resident.
Mr. Mossing:  This is just informational for the community.  No Board action is required.

Consideration of Cleaning Contract for Fiscal Year 2019 Ms. Bosman:  Everyone should have a copy of the contract.
Mr. Robertson: We have been using the Magic Genie Cleaning Company for the

past year.  Mary would like to extend their contract for another year.

Mr.  Mecsics  moved  to  extend  the  Magic  Genie  cleaning contract for one year and Ms. Wright seconded the motion.

10

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Ms. Wright:  Is there any change in the bottom line?

Ms. Bosman:   No, there is not.   She has two billings; one for the current cleaning of five days a week and another option for cleaning six days a week. That would be up to the Board.
Mr. Mecsics:  Is there a necessity to move to six days a week? Ms. Bosman:  For the most part, no.  We've been managing. Mr. Murphey:  Do they come in five consecutive days?
Ms. Bosman:  Yes.
Mr. Murphey:  They don't do weekends? Ms. Bosman:  Correct.
Mr. Murphey:  Have you revisited this contract with any other company?
Ms. Bosman: Yes. We spoke with two other companies, but they didn't want to clean any of the fitness equipment and the sauna.
Mr. Robertson:  We could end up with a potential cost savings.  If we change the flooring, that would change the cost structure for maintaining this floor. There is a high cost to wax and do everything else that we have to do with the carpet. That is a potential savings down the road.

On VOICE VOTE with all in favor extending the Magic Genie cleaning contract for five days a week cleaning by one year was approved.

Update on Hart Lake with FWC and S.W.F.W.M.D. Buffer Zone
Mr.  Robertson:    We  made  an  application  and  it  was  approved  by  the  Florida Wildlife Commission (FWC) to make modifications to Hart Lake. That is based on a request from individual homeowners adjacent to Hart Lake. They can contract with the Board's contract, either Applied Aquatic or two approved vendors. That becomes a modification to our permit, with a proper schedule of what's going to be completed. Then FWC can come in and monitor each and every individual area that will be changed, as they see fit. People who don't want to do anything at the lakefront level

11

 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

into the lake, don't have to pay anything. Those who want to, are committed to do it, as long as they remain within the guidelines and the contract is  done through our CDD. It's now been approved and we are open for business for modifications.  Mr. Murphey, do you want to make a comment?
Mr. Murphey:  So it has been approved. Mr. Robertson: Yes.
Mr. Murphey:  I had people inquiring about the status of it.  At this point, should they contact one of those vendors?
Mr. Robertson:  No, they should contact Mary.
Mr. Murphey:  Do we have two different contractors that can do the work? Mr. Robertson: Yes.
Mr.  Murphey:   We will  actually contract with the vendor  and the resident will reimburse.
Mr.  Robertson:   Correct.   This way  it protects  us.   We  have  a contract with  an authorized vendor that we know.  They will certify with FWC in the State of Florida, so that we can make those modifications safely, without any risk to the community.  It also grants an individual the ability to modify the lakefront in the water  as  they  see  fit. I think that's a good solution for people who want to do it. The second item is the buffer zone.   We received a letter from the S.W.F.W.M.D.   They are taking the exact opposite approach.    FWC  doesn't  mind  a  hodge  podge  of  different  things.    That's  natural, because of the way things grow at a  different rate  and  a  different way;  therefore,  they are more than happy to have individual homeowners modify the lake as they see fit,  as long as its within their guidelines. The S.W.F.W.M.D. considers the buffer zone to be a homogeneous piece of ground under the permit, and do  not want individualization.  It must be completed as a single entity. That's the direction that we received. With that direction, we have the issue of some people  wanting  to  make  modifications,  while others would like it to be totally natural. I don't see how we  can actually force people  who don't want to make changes to participate in the cost of making a  buffer  zone change. I think we are prohibited from taking any Board action at this level to solve

12

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

that problem, because it was permitted this way. We received very clear direction from the S.W.F.W.M.D. Is there further discussion on those items? If not, we can move on.

Consideration of Landscape Maintenance Proposal for Parking Lot
Mr. Rayl: Thank you Mr. Chairman. We had two bids submitted to date. One was from Yellowstone and the other was from a well-established firm based out of Bartow called Evolve. The Yellowstone bid was the higher of the two bids. After we started evaluating them, we felt like we could find a lower cost option for the irrigation portion of the installation through the sub of a local contractor that is currently doing work in the development. I spoke with him today and he looked at the plans that are at the HFC. He was going to provide a quote for the installation of the irrigation, which we expect to be lower than what was included in either of the other two bids. Then we can just consider the landscape planting only, and choose the more cost effective one of those two. I believe that the Yellowstone bid was in the neighborhood of $23,000 and the Evolve bid was in the $18,000 range.
Mr. Robertson: We have another contractor that does a lot of work in the community, which is Parker Landscaping. They have been looking after all of the lots for the developer. His activities are shrinking, because they are subcontracting to two individuals. He expressed a willingness to bid on this. I think he will do it for $20,000. Does the Board want to approve one of the three vendors once the bids are finalized and compared, as long as we don't exceed $20,000? We would proceed with our landscaping, according to the City plans, if that's the consensus of the Board.
Mr. Murphey: Is there some kind of timeframe that we must have this completed in?
Mr. Rayl: Honestly, I am surprised that the City has not been bothering us about this. Mr. Murphey: Does the $23,000 include the irrigation?
Mr. Rayl: The irrigation was between $5,000 and $8,000.
Mr. Robertson: That's why we wanted to get some additional bids. Parker is in here all the time. If we can approve a not-to-exceed of $20,000, we can start this process.

13

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Mr. Murphey: Who is the third vendor?
Mr. Robertson: We have Evolve, which is a large company, Parker Landscaping and Yellowstone.
Mr. Murphey: I agree with authorizing $20,000.

On MOTION by Mr. Murphey seconded by Ms. Wright with all in favor authorizing a not-to-exceed amount of $20,000 for Parker Landscaping to provide the parking lot landscaping was approved.

Discussion and Consideration of Bi-Monthly Meetings (requested by
Vice Chairman Mecsics)
Mr. Robertson: There was a request by Mr. Mecsics to change to bi-monthly meetings, as a result of all the new activities.   I thought about that and don't disagree,  but I suggest that we have winter residents, as well as sum.mer residents attend the meetings. I  drafted  a  schedule  that  made  sense  to  me.    We  could  have  meetings  in  October, December, February, April for our budget workshop, May and August. We should lean more towards winter when we have more people here and meet less in the sum.mer. It worked well in the past. Would six meetings per year be acceptable, Mr. Mecsics?
Mr. Mecsics: It would be for me. The most important part is that we want to com.m.unicate with you and give you a chance to com.m.unicate back to us.   To do that, we don't need to meet monthly. It would be more cost effective.
Ms. Gloria Crary-Leh:  Bob Zelazny agreed with this and would like the Board to approve bi-monthly meetings for the upcoming year, as there are many projects and initiatives, at this time that are time sensitive and call for in-depth discussion.
Mr. Mecsics: I agree to meeting according to Doug's schedule.
Ms. Burns: At the August meeting, we will have the Board adopt a resolution that would set the meeting schedule for the upcoming year.
Mr. Robertson: That's fine. For those that weren't at the joint meeting, if any golf course issues come up between now and August, we will have a joint Board meeting to discuss those matters.  We still have that opportunity this sum.mer as we see necessary.

14

May 11, 2018	Lake  Ashton  II COD

Discussion and Consideration of Policy when a Major Project (+$25,000) is brought up for a vote on Appropriation of funds to be done in Two Phases - Introduction and Consideration, then Voted on at Next Meeting (requested by Vice Chairman Mecsics)
Mr.  Robertson:   It was suggested that if we have a project over $25,000, that we bring it up at, not just one meeting, but two meetings.  We would bring it up, discuss it and postpone the final decision to a second meeting, so that gives us time to have more feedback from the community. That suggestion was made by Mr. Mecsics and supported by Mr. Zelazny.
Mr.  d'Adesky:   A  lot  of  cities  and  counties  do  this.   For  example,  the City  of Orlando calls it a "First Reading" and "Second Reading". The First Reading is the introduction and placing it on the next agenda, and the Second Reading is the adoption. I think that is how we can phrase it.

Mr. Mecsics moved to approve a policy to consider a major project (+$25,000) with a First Reading to introduce and consider the item, and a Second Reading at the next meeting for voting purposes and Mr. Williams seconded the motion.

Mr.  Murphey:    I'm  just  wondering  if  there's  some  project  that  needs  to  be completed quickly, because it could be several months, by the time that we approve it.
Mr. Robertson:  We could call an emergency meeting.
Mr. Williams:  There are a number of large projects that fall between $20,000 and
$25,000. Should the amount be $25,000 or $20,000? With our past projects, there were three that were $23,000.

On VOICE VOTE with all in favor amending the prior motion to approve a policy to consider a major project (+$20,000) with a First Reading to introduce and consider the item, and a Second Reading at the next meeting for voting purposes was approved.

Security Update (requested by Vice Chairman Mecsics)
Mr. Mecsics: I have a presentation to make. There was discussion from the Board about the security, regarding coverage and statistics about what they do and what they

15

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

are finding. We have security officer operations software called Securitas Connect, that not only can track incidents, but officers can print their reports or pictures in real time. We don't have to worry about downloading it. It could be pulled right  off  of  the website.  Mary can work with the  contractor to adjust schedules, patrol routes and make it much more proactive than they have done in the past. I'm going to work on posting  this information. Nothing personal or private will be on the website. We will have it out there if someone wants to know how active our security officers are. I am going to put my report into a written format. It allows you to get a yearly report on all incidents, whether there is a broken water main, open garage doors, broken lights or inoperable doors. We can go through this and see where we need to adjust our schedules. You can see the activity for a year or monthly, of what the security officers are doing and are finding out there. I'm not counting cars going through the gates. That has  been no impact on security; however, I know what those officers are doing while they are out there 24 hours a day. I will be breaking out the different instances and activities of the officers. Stan asked about that. We will be putting this on the web and providing quarterly information, so you can see what is going on, as far as our operations and what our officers are doing out there. I would like to get feedback from the Board and the community. We want to make sure that our security operations are well known within the community and that the officers are taking care of things for the District.
Mr. Williams: Jim, what type of activities are being reported? You listed 10 or 15
incidents.
Mr. Mecsics: We have everything from an unlocked door, to a major water leak that the officers discovered. An officer recently had to provide an emergency response for a medical emergency. This is all captured in our database. The nice thing about that is if someone is out there, not doing their job, my question to management is what are they doing about it?
Mr. Williams: Have we lost a number of security guards? Mr. Mecsics: Yes.
Mr. Williams: For what reasons?

16

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Mecsics: We lost about four security guards. As I tell them when they come in here, Lake Ashton is a very unique environment. If they aren't doing what we tell them to do, they are terminated. We have the capability of contacting Securitas and they have a large database of officers and can change the guards around.
Mr. Williams: How do you compare them to other security companies? They have been here a year-and-a-half now and we lost four guards.  Is that a big number for a security force of this size?
Mr. Mecsics: Its civilian guard entry. This is not a small commercial contract. The turnover rate is 25% across the country. Unfortunately, security is not a career that most people go into.
Mr. Williams: They were let go for disciplinary reasons.
Mr. Mecsics: Some were for disciplinary reasons, but some did not fit into the model that we want for our officers.
Mr. Williams: I checked on East and they have two officers. Mr. Mecsics: I have higher standards.
Mr. Robertson: We want officers in here that can understand and deal with us appropriately.  Some  are kind of rough and we want to find ones that fits our standards.  I know that Kate on the other side was a wonderful example. We like her very much. She knows how to handle us and we can communicate with her. We are trying to find a full staff of officers like Kate. Our turnover rate is fine. That's a good point.
Mr. Williams: Sooner or later the contract is going to come up for renewal. I just want to know what the national averages are.
Mr. Mecsics: That's a great question.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Attorney

Staff and Board Reports

Mr. d'Adesky: I don't have anything, other than what I was tasked with at the joint meeting and this meeting, unless there are any questions.

17

 	 	 	 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Engineer

Mr.  Rayl:   I just  wanted  to  touch on  a few items.   The  dog park  issues  were completed and transferred over. The last piece of paperwork that we need to complete  is to transfer the S.W.F.W.M.D. permit that was just issued for the dog park that allowed those modifications to our ownership.   It keeps their paperwork straight.   On
the  irrigation,  I  will be  coordinating with  our  recently engaged lighting  contractor to
make  sure  that  they  supply  power  to  run  the   irrigation  clock.	There  was  some	        discussion about additional parking. In the past we looked at how we could expand

parking by adding another lot on the other side,  but it didn't yield much.  You didn't  get a lot of "bang for your buck" with just one lot and it wasn't feasible. I recall that we had the ability to generate another two or three parking spaces, by re-striping the existing lot, because the spaces are slightly larger than standard.  This is something for you to think about.
Mr. Robertson: In the future.
Mr. Rayl:  If you wanted to go that route.  That's all I have.
Mr. Robertson:  Just for information, the dog park is ours and it only cost us $10. Some are asking why we are spending CDD money to buy a dog park when they don't have a dog.  The answer was that we spent $10 to allow people who own dogs to enjoy the dog park.
Mr. Murphey:  We have a couple of ponds that are waiting to be conveyed.
Mr.  Robertson:   When the grading company was here, we asked them to repair the pond on Sawgrass.   They said that they would and moved dirt over there, but the problem never disappeared.   I tried to get Varsity, but they can't do it, so I contacted two other companies. It's not a lot of money, but the issue is that one  area is washed  out and we want to fix it. The standard is that we want to be able to have the area mowed around the edge of the pond, and there are some spots where that cannot be done.  We are going to adjust the slope so that won't happen and fix it.  I solicited bids
from two companies, which should come in, in the next week or so.	

Mr. Murphey: So a subcontractor, Varsity was doing that work?

18

May 11, 2018

Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Robertson:  Yes.
Mr. Murphey:  Have we given up on them? Mr. Robertson:  Yes.
Mr. Rayl:  He wants to get paid, right.
Mr. Robertson: He didn't get  paid for it.  He  hauled the material for us to  use, but never spread it. I met with one vendor the other day and  showed  them what we wanted to do. The  resident was  very happy with what  we  were  planning  to  do.  We will probably have to put some  sod down.  One  of the  subcontractors suggested waiting a few weeks, as sod looks terrible right  now.  Sod gets better  or  worse,  depending on the time of year. Don't buy sod right now.  Let the rains  start again and take hold so we can get healthier sod. They  are going to need to fix  the  leveling,  fix the  washout and add sod. We are only going down about 10 feet, because beyond that 10-foot line is an area where water goes up  and  down.  It  makes  no sense to  put  sod all the way  down and then having the rains come out and kill the sod, so  we  are  only  doing it on the top part.  I received the contract for  the  lights for the north side.  The only thing that I have to do is to sign it. It is the TECO contract.
Mr. d'Adesky:  We just have to transfer it.
Mr.   Robertson:     I   don't  think  that  needs  Board  approval.     It  was   signed previously, but they wanted to modify it.
Mr.  d'Adesky:   The TECO  contract is non-negotiable.   It's  a standard  contract. We  don't have negotiating power.   I  suggest a motion to  accept the assignment of the contract to the District from the developer.

On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Mecsics  seconded  by  Mr.  Murphey, with all in favor assignment of the TECO contract to the District from the developer was approved.

Mr. Robertson: I will send a copy of the contract to Mr. Mossing. Once Andrew sees it and is happy with it, I will sign it.

19

 	 	 	

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

CDD Manager - Number of Registered Voters in the District - 626
Ms. Burns: The District is required to determine the number of registered voters within the District as of April 15 of each year. There are now 626 registered voters. That's all we have. Thank you for selecting us. We are  looking  forward  to working  with the community.
Mr. Robertson: Darrin Mossing is the President and Jill Burns is going to be the District Manager. Please pass on our sincere thanks to George Flint who managed us these many years and kept us going in the right direction. I know that you keep on growing and adding more contracts, which makes you successful and George has some other assignments to take care of.
Mr. Mossing: Yes, he does.
Mr. Robertson: We are very happy to have you here with us and thanks for joining the team.
Mr. Mossing: George does a great job and I will pass that on to him.

Lake Ashton II Community Director
Ms. Bosman: I distributed my report. I will briefly state that we have been very busy. We sent out 16 RFPs, but we didn't receive very many responses, because of our location and our size. That was quite a learning process. I would like to thank Jim Mecsics for helping me through that. In March, we had our fire sprinkler heads in HFC inspected. We passed. Two of the backflow systems were inspected. We are going to finish up with the other four in July; two here and the two at the gatehouse. Yellowstone was contacted to provide a quote to clean up the dog park They responded very rapidly and we were very pleased with their response. They cleaned the dog park in one day. I want to thank some of the volunteers for helping out there too. Yellowstone is handling the replacement of the 3 to 4-foot tree that was lost in the process.
Mr. Robertson: Adjacent to the dog park is the TECO area. Mr. Rayl: And the lift station.
Mr. Robertson: The shrubs that go around that dog park encroaches a house on the back side.

20

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Ms. Bosman: So we need to work with the owner.
Mr. Robertson: Is it our responsibility or is there some responsibility for TECO to maintain the shrubs? I see a lot of perplexed looks.
Mr. Rayl: It's a City maintained station.
Mr. Robertson: But it's the shrubs on the other side. Are we responsible for that? Mr. d'Adesky:	The  City  maintains  the  shrubs on  the other side.	If they are encroaching on our property, we can either maintain or remove them. Anything that encroaches upon our property, we have the right to remove. As a courtesy, we might
want to tell the City that they are encroaching if we intend to remove them.
Mr. Robertson: I don't think we want to remove them, because it would expose the resident to the dog park, but we should keep it cut down and not growing too far out. Is it our responsibility?
Mr. Rayl: A lot of times those are part of the screening requirements of the lift station. It's required by the municipality, but not maintained by the municipality.
Mr. Robertson: So it's ours.
Mr. Murphey: I think Yellowstone has been trimming the shrubs.
Mr. Robertson: We need to remind Yellowstone to do the opposite side because they are getting close to the house.

Ms. Bosman: Many items were already discussed today. The process of filing that permit was quite lengthy. The one thing that I want to ask the Board for was a procedure going forward. I have been working and speaking with Angie. The Board needs to be very specific about the type of vegetation, where you want to plant it, etc. We are going to need to get some communication out to the residents that are interested in doing that and something down on paper as soon as possible.
Mr. Robertson: If any individual owner wants to make a change, they have to submit a plan that will be annexed to our overall plan. That plan is what is going to be used to monitor that we are in compliance. That responsibility goes to TNT or Applied Aquatic through the contracting process.
A resident: So we have to tell the contractor?

21

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

Mr. Robertson: You can talk to the contractor, but the commitment for the contract will be done through Mary. They will tell us the price and we share that with you. If you want to do it that way, we will write the contract.
A resident: Do we complete the plan?
Ms. Bosman: Yes. That is what they want.
Mr. Robertson: As long as its compliant with the rules, you are free to select the plants that you want and the schedule that you want to plant them in.
A resident: The plan they need to see what we are doing, comes from us to you. Ms. Bosman: Yes.
Mr. Robertson: Correct. It's similar with the ARC rules. If someone wants to change their beds or landscaping, we make all of the comments in the site plan so that there's a referenced document that protects you, and when you complete the work, the County will inspect it and say if we are compliant with what was approved. No one can argue it, because its within compliance. If you are told something different than the next person, then you should have a document that says "I did this right and you can't come back to me".
Ms. Bosman: I can show you a couple of examples. We installed a new Wi-Fi system and upgraded the network since our last meeting. Its fully operational. I asked the gentleman that installed it who said "Hypothetically, where are we on the quality scale". He said that we are at a 9. I also asked "What would the scale be if you were at a store restaurant" and he said about a 4. So, we have a very good system and have been getting really good results. It's a good improvement to HFC. Speaking of improvements, digital controls had to be ordered to replace our non-functioning controls on our ceramic kiln. That has served us well. We are going to keep it, but we are just remodeling our kiln. In its entirely, it will be a practically new kiln. It will all be digitized. That should be happening this next week. That's exciting for many people. Three new heaters were recently installed, one in the pool and two in the spas. We had to replace one of the spa heaters, because it was a lemon. The company came out and they are going to be getting back with us very soon, as far as what they are

22

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II COD

going to do. Obviously, it will be under warranty. That's why you hear about us having to do heaters. Rosemary is working here part-time. We trained her and then moved her to full-time on the weekends. She did a time study, which the Board received a copy of. I gave a synopsis of my thoughts on it. Because of the results of the time study, my recommendation would be to return Rosemary to part-time immediately, with the caveat that there will occasionally be weekend work, as directed. There will be a cost savings through her. Are there any questions from the Board? Her time study was very thorough, as she listed all of her interactions with residents. We contacted the City of Winter Haven, because frequently we were finding that our bin in our new parking lot was full on Tuesday, after it was just emptied on Monday. We found out that residents were dumping trash in our dumpster. I called the City and we can actually get a larger bin that will fit inside our little gated area for the same price, with the exception of a one-time installation fee. Mainly, we have to educate the residents that this is not a proper place to dispose of their personal items.
Ms. Wright: Put a sign on the dumpster. Ms. Bosman: We will do that.
Mr. Robertson: Can we talk about the poker room?
Ms. Bosman: Yes. We installed LED lights in our poker room down the hall. Some time ago, we installed LED lights in the reception area and down the hallway, which made a difference in the brightness. Just by having LEDs in the reception area and the hallway, we saved $200 on our light bill. We wondered what would happen if we had more LED lights, so we considered the poker room, because it was small. We purchased the LEDs and are still making our first month1s payment. That will be an ongoing study and we will light that up as time goes on. That is a one-time installation, as the lights will practically last forever.

A resident: Does TECO offer any programs to reimburse or subsidize that type of upgrade? I know that around the County, many utility companies offer that.
Ms. Bosman: Not that I1m aware of.

23

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Mecsics: We are currently looking at ways at getting some grants. TECO has some grants, as well as FEMA.
Ms. Bosman: We will definitely pursue that. We wanted to have some statistics, before we went further. We are still in the process of getting the flooring. There are a few places that look like there's dirt on the floor. It's not dirt. Someone put tape on the floor and lifted off the top finish. This is a learning process. This building has been around since December of 2007, and things happen. We have a couple of spots on our dance floor. I would urge the Board to be ready to receive some quotes for that. Are there any questions?
Mr. Robertson: Yes. We were supposed to get a couple of samples.  I thought that they were going to be presented today for people to look at. Our walking track has a certain level of sponginess and absorption of energy when we walk on it. We want anything that we put in here, to be as good as the walking track, so that protects everybody. We asked a vendor to do that, but they came back and said that they didn't have the backing that we wanted, so we don't have a demonstration for you. We are going with another vendor. The idea is to get a quality surface that is maintenance free, allowing us to have a homogenous floor. We haven't given up on that objective.
Mr. Williams: You didn't mention that two windows and doors in HFC were measured for plantation shutters.
Ms. Bosman: That was voted on some time ago.
Mr. Williams: I recall that there was a different discussion about the size of the shutters. What did we finally decide on?

Ms. Bosman: We chose 3-inch plantation white shutters to go on two windows and a door in this room. There has been no request for the two windows looking out to the pool.
Mr. Williams: The other item I had was that the Board voted for weekend support. That's not changing, right?
Ms. Bosman: I just made a recommendation. Mr. Robertson: The Board has to decide.

24

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Williams: I am looking at it like the security. It's a deterrent by having a person here to help folks when they come in. I think it's needed. I think they should be here on Saturday and Sunday.
Mr. Robertson: It's for Board discussion.
Mr. Mecsics: Would you like to consider this matter in another three or six months, to make it more functional.  I know sometimes she is sitting out there looking   at the wall.  Mary, can you elaborate?  She could be at the front desk during slow times. It would be productive time.
Ms. Bosman: She would have interaction time with residents.
Mr. Williams: There is the interaction time, but you said that you gave her some of John's work to do, which she can complete on the weekends.
Ms. Bosman: I have nothing further.

Public Safety
Mr. Mecsics: I continue to talk with Chief Cullingford. He attends our committees. We have one on Monday morning and he comes in his unmarked car. He reminds me that I should turn the light off in my garage.  The  Security Officer's Report is included in Mary's report. I asked for additional training on active shooters, so the officers came in for an hour on Wednesday. We gave them a briefing on active shooters and their role as an unarmed security officer.
Landscaping and Lakes
Mr. d'Adesky:	Going forward, this item should probably be included in the Community Director's Report.
Mr. Murphey: I think we covered all of that. We had a couple of issues. Now Mary is going to be taking care of that. It was always a joint effort.
Financial Reports
Approval of Check Run Summary
Mr. Murphey:	I have a question on the Check Run Summary. Are we paying Securitas weekly?
Mr. Mecsics: Yes.

25

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

Mr. Murphey:  Why do we do that rather than monthly?
Mr. Mecsics: It's just the way that it was set in the contract. I keep track of their billing. Mary will be doing it from now on.
Mr.  Mossing:   We need  a motion to  approve  Checks 1947 through 2040,  totaling
$956,337.40. For the Capital Reserve, we have Checks 5 through 6, totaling $95,420.85. A large amount of the Check Run Summary  was  for  transferring  funds  between accounts and not necessarily expenditures.
Mr. Robertson: We have different things that we have to do to go to different accounts, such as writing checks from one account to another. So, it's not like we spent that  amount  of  money.    There  was  a  transfer  of  funds  from  different  accounts.    The auditors are very happy with that process and our funds are under control.   When there are large numbers, don't panic.

On MOTION by Mr. Williams seconded by Mr.  Murphey with all in favor the Check Run Summary was approved.

Combined Balance Sheet
Mr. Mossing:   If you have any questions, I will try to answer them.  We are 96 % collected on our on-roll and off-roll assessments.  A large payment came in April.
Mr.   Murphey:	This  was  through  March  31   and  we   still  short  by  several thousands of dollars. How much came in for April?
Mr. Mossing:   The actual distribution amount that we received was $517,669 for
both debt service and operations. I expect that we will be 100% collected next month.
Mr. Robertson: The good news in that process if you recall, it was my responsibility to collect monies from the developer each year.   This  year it was transferred over to our taxation process.  He paid them on time.  We have no liabilities with the developer.
Mr. d'Adesky: Once lots are platted and on the roll, if it was not paid, a tax certificate would be issued and a tax certificate owner would buy it. We would end up getting the taxes paid one way or another.

26

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Audience Comments
Ms. Crary-Leh:   I was taking notes and didn't hear anything about Item 4C.   I'm confused. Was there mowing where we shouldn't have mowed?  Is this a CDD expenditure that was part of their contract or an additional cost?
Mr. Robertson: Over the years we creeped into the buffer zone that was supposed to be left natural. We moved the landscapers back, so we didn't go into the buffer zone. Then we contracted to maintain the dog park, which was an additional cost, so we decided to reduce the mowing and told them not to do the buffer zone anymore.   Then they offered to mow the buffer zone for free.   We are always trying to manage our costs that way.
Ms. Crary-Leh:  So in other words, we are not in trouble with anybody.
Mr. Robertson: We are not in trouble at all. Our contract with Yellowstone did not increase as a result of taking over the dog park.  We made a tradeoff.
Ms. Crary-Leh:  Thank you for the clarification.
Mr. Robertson: Are there any other audience comments?
Mr.  Velebir:     One  of  my  concerns  is  interlopers  coming  in  and  using  our facilities, not only from the standpoint that we are paying for them and they are using our facilities for free, but they could be taking over a machine that a resident wants to use. I was here about 11 :30 a.m. on a Sunday, and it was the first time that I saw one of our security guards walking through the facility, but he just walked through. He didn't ask anyone in the pool for identification. I think that should be done. They could just request their resident ID or visitor pass nicely to try to discourage them from coming in here. There is a steady procession of young families on a Sunday afternoon using our pool. They may be visiting, but I don't know. I never see anyone ever requesting an ID. That should be taken into consideration.
Mr.  Robertson:   Over time, they will  see  a pattern and we will see  a pattern of behavior. I used to play pickleball on Sunday mornings with a couple. It created a pattern, but all of a sudden on a particular day, four gentlemen were playing tennis on our tennis courts, thinking that no one was here on Sunday playing tennis.  That wasn't

27

May 11, 2018	Lake Ashton II CDD

a regular pattern, so I immediately checked on it, because we are all responsible for looking  after  our  facilities.    I  checked  with  the  security  guard  and  he  said  that  he approached them and one said that he was a relative of a resident. I said " If you don't have your papers to sign in, go get your father and uncle that's going to sponsor you" . Within 10 minutes, they packed up their stuff and left and haven't been seen since. So, there is a process where we watch things and if it feels right, we let it go.   If it doesn't feel right, we immediately do something about it.  There's a balance between offending somebody and not offending somebody. I'm just giving you examples where we have actually done what you are asking and it was effective. If we  see  something outside  of our regular pattern, then we will do something about it.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
Mr. Robertson:	If there are no further comments from the public, then I will entertain a motion for adjournment.

On  MOTION  by  Mr.  Williams  seconded  by  Mr.  Murphey with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairman / Vice Chairman

28

March 1 2, 201 8

ONSULTING

Lake Ashton Community Development District c/o Darrin Mossing
Governmental Management Services - Central Florida, LLC 1 35 West Central Blvd, Suite 320
Orlando, Florida 3280 1
Re: Lake Ashton Golf Course Acqu isition Feasibility Study Dear Mr. Mossing:

Proposal #21 801 2

National Golf Foundation Consulting , Inc. ("NGF Consulting" or "NGF") is pleased to submit this proposal for consulting services concerning the due diligence related to the Lake Ashton Community Development District's ("Client") potential acquisition of the 36-hole Lake Ashton Golf Course ("Lake Ashton GC"). We understand that the Client would like an independent golf industry expert to evaluate the golf course in the context of its present condition, capital needs, the local/regional golf market, and net cash flow potential. The Client may also consider having NGF Consulting provide statistical review of the impact closed golf courses have on surrounding golf community real estate values.
As the unquestioned leader in golf facility consulting,  NGF Consulting is uniquely qualified and prepared to assist the Client in this effort. The National Golf Foundation and its Consulting division have more experience than any firm in the country in working with clients to understand the economic performance golf course assets, and helping to identify the most appropriate operational, physical and administrative structure for these facilities. NGF has worked with many entities all across the U.S.  in evaluating pqtential golf cou rse acquisitions, including recent engagements with clients in Florida communities such as the Twin Rivers HOA, Golden Lakes CDD, South Village CDD, Crossings at Fleming Island CDD, City of Casselberry, City of Tamarac and the City of Gainesville. Because NGF does not design, finance, construct, or operate any golf courses, we offer our clients the highest level of independence and objectivity in all consulting assignments.

This proposal has been designed to provide the Client with the appropriate information and insights to establish the proper course of action in consideration of the golf facility acquisition . In summary,  NGF Consulting sees its role as assisting the Client by estimating the expense associated with improving and operating the golf course (including deferred maintenance items and necessary im provements) and project the net cash flows that the facility will generate in order to determine an appropriate "warranted investment" for the golf course. This includes helping the Client identify areas in physical plant, operations and marketing that can lead to long-term sustainability of the golf course, if it w�re to be acquired as proposed. 

NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION CONSULTING, INC.
A Subsidiary ofthe National Golf Foundation
501 NORTH HIGHWAY A1A, JUPITER, FL 33477 • (561 ) 744--6006 • FAX: (581 ) 744-9065 • www.ngf.org

 	 	

SCOPE OF SERVICES

NGF will complete a comprehensive review of the su bject Lake Ashton GC operation and physical plant, both on-site and in review of data and documents. The operations and physical review of the subject property will be the basis for any subsequent facility improvement or operational recommendations made to the Client in this proposed acquisition.

Upon receiving authorization from the Client to proceed, NGF Consulting will begin the analysis of the Lake Wales / Winter Haven, FL area golf ma rket. Among the field activities expected for this project are:
Meet with appropriate Client staff to review the scope of work and discuss any necessary refinements.

Collect from the Client or property owner copies of any available relevant data and documents that pertain to the historical golf course operations.
 	
Collect demographic and economic data on the local market area.
Visit the key potentially competitive golf facilities in the market area, and obtain (to
. extent available) operating data and market pla·cement information on each.
Conduct a physical inspection and evaluation of the Lake Ashton GC facility.

These field activities will provide NGF Consulting with first-hand information on key market and site factors in the Lake Wales / Winter Haven area. These factors will include site characteristics, area competition, planned new golf facilities, present use levels, and community golfing needs.
Task One: Review of Lake Ashton Golf Course

NGF Consulting will review the operation and market of Lake Ashton Golf Course, including an analysis of recent historical activity levels and financial results. This inform ation, taken in context with our facility review and market analysis, will help us establish reasonable use projections, as well as revenue and expense estimates, for the continued operation of Lake Ashton GC after acquisition by the CDD. Our analysis will include a review of:
Fee structures
Financial statements (revenue and expense analysis)
Profit center performance and key operating metrics
Fee history / ma rket positioning
Marketing activities and strategies
Clubhouse operations (F&B,  merchandise, golf staffing, etc.)
Programs in place (customer service, lessons, tournaments, etc.)
Opportunities for potential membership, public rounds and/or revenue growth
Preliminary Review of Physical Plant
The lead NGF consultant will complete a preliminary inspection of all facilities subject to acquisition (golf course, maintenance facilities, cart barn, restaurant, pro shop). This will involve a cursory review of key "mission critical" systems for the purpose of establishing their present condition and identifying areas of primary concern for the new owners. This inspection will focus on areas of concern that are "readily apparent" upon initial inspection and will not constitute a

thoroug h physical plant inspection of the property that will be completed in Task Four of this engagement (see below as o ptional task).

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8012 - Lake Ashton CDD - 2

Task Two: Golf Market Analysis
NGF Consulting will develop an analysis to gain a thorough understanding of the supply/ demand dynamic that is driving the competitive public access golf market in the Leesburg market area. We will document relevant local competition  in terms of relative quality,  as well as trends with respect to fees and activity levels, so that we can identify the appropriate price value proposition for Lake Ashton after acquisition (memberships and public rounds) . We will also identify demographic and economic trends that may impact the continued operation of lake Ashton Golf Course.

Task Three: Recommendations and Financial Projections

Based on our market analysis and review of the subject Lake Ashton GC, NGF Consulting will summarize its findings and recom mendations related to the management, operations, market positioning, pricing , marketing strategies, and amenities/services offered that would give Lake Ashton GC the greatest chance for success in the area golf market under its new ownership. NGF Consulting will analyze key revenue and expense categories to estimate potential financial performance of Lake Ashton GC, assuming the implementation of NGF operations and capital improvement recommendations. In consideration of market conditions and proposed quality of services, we will estimate attainable fee levels, revenues and expenses for each facet of the golf operation. We will integrate market findings and expected use levels into a five-year cash flow pro forma for the golf facility. NGF Consulting's financial pro formas are prepared for feasibility purposes and therefore will be conservative and unbiased.
In context with the other potential benefits that the purchase may have for the Client, the needed capital improvements and the p rojected net cash flows, NGF will be able to provide the Client an estimated level of "warranted" investment in the facility. This can help to establish an appropriate purchase price for the facility that will meet the Client's objectives and required rate­ of-return. The NGF-estimated "warranted investment" will be prepa red so as to consider both direct acquisition costs (purchase price) and any new capital investment that may be required .
Task Four: Comprehensive Physical Review (Optional)

NGF Consulting will perform a comprehensive physical inspection and review of the maintenance and agronomic condition of the subject Lake Ashton GC, working in conjunction with a qualified golf course architect, engineer and/or Agronomist. This will include review of the physical condition · of the Lake Ashton GC and amenities (including clubhouse) for the purpose of documenting the present condition and identifying potential short-term and long-term capital investment needs that the Client will need to consider prior to purchase. The areas to be examined include but are not limited to:
Golf layout and playability

Overall maintenance condition and aesthetics
Condition of greens, tees, fairways, roughs, bunkers, and cart paths
I rrigation system
Equipment, including long-term capital expense related to replacement
Driving range + practice green
Clubhouse and other structures
Potential cost savings measures	

Potential capital upg rades

Property reconfigu ration options

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #2 1 801 2 - Lake Ashton CDD -3 

 	

PROJECT DELIVERABLES

NGF Consulting anticipates frequent communication with appropriate Client staff during this engagement. Deliverables to the client for this project include:

Consultant(s) activities on-site with the Client (or agents / attorneys) and at Lake Ashton GC, including meetings and presentations with Client and discussions with golf course operations staff.
At Client request, the lead NGF consultant will be available to complete an "out brief' interim report of initial findings after the opening site visit and facil ity inspection. This will allow the Client to understand preliminary findings and the direction of the full consulting engagement and final deliverable, before a draft report is complete.

A written report containing all key findings, recommendations, and documentation related to the proposed golf cou rse acquisition. A draft version of the document will be made available to the Client for review and comments. Upon authorization, up to 10 bound copies and an electronic version of the final report will be delivered.
At Client request, the lead NGF consultant will be available to make a formal presentation of findings to the Client and be available to answer questions from any group(s) the Client may deem appropriate (additional travel expenses may apply).

CLIENT REQUIREMENTS
Specific items to be provided by the Client within the first week of the engagement include:
Most recent three years of P&L statements (broken down by major line items}, plus current year-to-date P&L and budget for next year.
Rounds played by type 5-year history.
Golf membership history (if applicable) by category.
Recent fee history.
Golf course staffing with o rganizational chart (identify full/part time positions)

List of assets to be included in any sale of property (structures, equipment, shop inventory, carts, etc. ). 
List of recent and planned capital improvements.

PROFESSIONAL FEES AND TIMING
National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. proposes a total not-to-exceed price of

$26,000, including all Tasks and all project expenses. The engagement can be d ivided into two segments, with the facility, market and financial analyses in the first segment ($ 1 5, 000 + expenses) , and the physical / design review 8$ a second segment ($9,000 + expenses). This professional fee and expense limit is inclusive of all deliverables as noted up to and through the delivery of a final report to the Client. NGF Consulting will require approximately seven (7) weeks for completion of this engagement. Assuming the project is formally commenced during the week of May 1 4th , 201 8 with a site visit the week of May 281\ 201 8; NGF Consulting will be able to provide an initial d raft report to the Client by the week of July 2nd, 201 8 and a final by the week of July 23rd , 201 8.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 801 2 :_ Lake Ashton CDD - 4

Seivlce

---- ·" -·----····'    	__;,_

Lake Ashton Golf Course NGF Professional Fees by Service
Fees

Task 1: Review of Lake Ashton GC
Task 2: Golf Market Analysis	$1 5, 000
Task 3: Findings, Recommendations and Financial Projections
Total Direct Reimbursable Expenses*	$1 ,000

Total (i:ask 1 ·_3.<.... :

$'-1_6.:;_,o_o_o__c-,-

Task 4: Comprehensive Physical Review (Optional)	$9,000

-j

Additional Reimbursable Expenses*	$1 ,000

TOTAL (Including all Expenses)	$26,000 ·1

1  Total Task 4 (Optional):	$1 0,000

*Direct expenses are not included in the professional fees, and contain expen;;s for travel, including 2 ·7

visits to Leesburg (TBD). All travel expenses will comply with client guidelines and receip�s will be provided.  I
The NGF Consulting effort will be managed by Richard Singer, Sr. Director of Consulting, one of the most experienced golf consultants in the U.S. Mr. Singer will personally coordinate all NGF Consulting efforts on this project, serve as the primary point of contact between NGF and the Client, and complete any requi red meetings with Client officials and others (if applicable). John Sanford of the Jupiter-based architectural firm of Sanford Golf Design will provide golf course a rchitectu ral and agronomic support.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - P roposal #2 1 801 2 - Lake Ashton CDD - 5

ACCEPTANCE
Acceptance of this proposal may be indicated by signing one copy and returning it to NGF Consulting's Jupiter office. A retainer equivalent to 33% of professional fees for Tasks 1 �3 ($5,000) will be required for the project to commence. A second billing of 33% plus direct expenses for Task 1 -3 will be made upon completion of all on-site activities, with a final invoice at the delivery of a final report to the Client . Additional retainers of 50% of professional fees will also apply for Task 4 ($4,500) and will be required to commence activity on these task assignments. At the completion of Task 4 a final invoice will be provided to cover all outstanding professional fees and expenses on the engagement.

Mr. Mossing, we appreciate you thinking of the National Golf Foundation for this opportunity to work with the Lake Ashton Community Development District. If you need any clarification or additional information , please call me directly at the number below.

Sin�cere;vly,

------

��,,<<'
Richard B. Singer
Senior Director of Consulting Services 561 -354-1 642

rsinger@ngf. org

Acceptance _-....n__·· _ �__A-_L-.	 Date	'.>in I Z../,l(

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 801 2 - Lake Ashton CDD - 6

NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION CONSULTING, INC.

Addendum to Consulting Agreement - Standard Terms and Conditions

It is understood by the client that National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. (NGF Consulting) can make no guarantees concerning the recommendations which will result from ·the proposed assignment, since these recommendations must be based upon facts discovered by NGF Consulting during the course of the study and those conditions existing as of the date of the report. To protect you and other clients, and to assure that the research results of NGF Consulting's work will continue to be accepted as objective and impartial by the business community, it is understood that our fee for the undertaking of this project is in no way dependent upon the specific conclusions reached or the nature of the advice given by us in our report to you. 
Every reasonable effort will be exerted in order that the data contained in the written report reflects the most accurate and timely information possible, and is believed to be relia ble. However, no responsibility will be assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by the client, client's agents, or any other data source used in pre paring the report.
Contractual obligations do not include access to or ownership transfer of any electronic data processing files, programs, or models completed directly for or as a byproduct of this research effort.

It is agreed by the client that the report may not be used for any purpose other than th at for which it is prepared . Neither all nor any part of the contents of the study shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, news media, sales media, or any other public means of communication without the prior written consent and app roval of NGF Consulting. It is further agreed by the client that the re port will be presented to thi rd parties in its entirety and that no abstracting of the report will be made without first obtaining the permission of NGF Consulting. The client agrees that the report is not to be used in co njunction with any public or private offering of debt or equity securities or to otherwise induce investment without the prior written consent of NGF Consulting which may be conditioned upon client agreeing to pay an additional fee in an amount to be reasonably determined by NGF Consulting. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NGF Consulting agrees that the Client may disclose the report, in its entirety, to third parties for purposes of establishing an acquisition strategy for the golf course. NGF Consulting understands that some of those parties are public entities subject to the Florida Public Records Law.

It is agreed by the client that payment for the services of NGF Consulting is due upon receipt of the invoice; that full payment is due upon receipt of the completed d raft report;  and that NGF Consulting has the right to withhold delivery of the final report pending receipt of any overdue payments. In the event any invoice is not paid within 30 days after rendering of the invoice, it shall commence bearing interest on the date the invoice was rendered at the rate of 18 percent per annum (or such lesser rate as may be the maximum interest permissible under applicable law) and the client agrees to pay all accrued interest, together with the charges for services rendered as provided for in this agreement. In addition, should an unpaid invoice be referred to our attorneys for collection, the client agrees to pay their reasonable fee for such wo rk, as well as any costs of suit which may be incurred. 

It is understood by NGF Consulting that the findings to this report are the proprietary property of the client and they will not be made available to any other organization or individual without the consent of the client. This proposa l will remain in force for a period of 90 days from the date shown hereon.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - P roposal #21 8012 - Lake..Ashton CDD - 7

NGF QUALIFICATIONS AND PROJECT TEAM

National Golf Foundation Qualifications
The NGF's work is supported by a base of approximately 3, 500 members representi ng every facet of the industry: public and private golf facilities; Golf Resort architects; developers and builders; companies offering specialized services to the golf industry; national, regional, state, and local golf associations; instructors; schools, and i nd ividuals. The NGF's board of directors includes senior executives from the leading companies in each m ajor segment in the golf industry including officers from The First Tee , Callaway Golf Company, Billy Casper Golf, Myrtle Beach Golf Holiday, GOLF Magazine/Sports Illustrated, TaylorMade-Adidas Golf, Toro Golf Company, and the United States Golf Association.

There is no greater authority than the NGF on the economics of supply and demand in the business of golf. The NGF's exclusive Golf Demand Model provides best-in.:.class data on every

U.S. market and is utilized by many clients to improve both forecasting and customer targeting. The NGF's database of U.S. golf facilities is the industry's gold standard and is licensed by the USGA, PGA of America, Club Managers Association of America and the Golf Resort Superintendents Association of America, as well as private enterprise such as Weather. com and NAVTEQ.
Our most important research is published and distributed to NGF members and non-members and is widely quoted in local, national, and international press and are used by numerous other golf-oriented consulting and information firms. NGF publications include: Golf Participation in the
U. S., annual editions; Golf Facilities in the U. S. , annual editions; NGF Dashboard newsletter, published monthly; The Future of Public Golf in America, 201 0; Golf Industry Overview 2009; Golfer Technology Profile, 2009; Golf Consumer Buying Profiles, 2009; Golf Travel in the U. S. , 2009;  The Future of Private Golf Clubs in America, 2008; National Golf Rounds Playt;Jd Report quarterly with annual summaries; A Strategic Perspective on the Future of Golf, 2007; Operating & Financial Performance Profiles of 18-hole Golf Facilities in the  U.S.,  201 0.
The NGF's Consulting Division was established in 1 987 and has conducted more than 950 assignments throughout North America,  plus Europe, Asia, the Caribbean, and South America. These engagements cover a broad spectrum of services, although assistance to U.S. municipalities operating golf facilities has become the landmark service for which the NGF consultants are most well-known. Since the National Golf Foundation is not involved in the design, construction, or operation of golf facilities, we are able to provide our clients with completely independent advice, and our staff will not hesitate to identify operational deficiencies that affect the performance of an existing facility or to advise cl ients against proceeding with a golf project.
All consulting work is conducted under the direction of Richard B. Singer, MBA, Sr. Director of Consulting Services, and Ed Getherall, MBA, Director of Consulting Services at the National Golf Foundation. Other staff members work as part of the study team in providing professional insight, g athering additional data , applying participation models, conducting financial analyses, and reviewing the written report. Resumes of key professional staff appear on the following pages.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8012 - La ke Ashton COD - 8

Richard B. Singer, Senior Director of Consulti ng Services

Richard Singer first joined the National Golf Foundation (NGF) consulting staff in 1 989 after completing his Finance M BA at the University of Florida, and was named Director of Consulting Services in 1 997 and Senior Director in 201 5. Mr. Singer has successfully managed the NGF's well-known golf consulting practice with an industry-respected track record of success and a reputation for delivering projects on time and on budget. Mr. Singer is now widely viewed as the leading municipal golf facility consultant available in the United States .
Experience
Mr. Singer's background includes hands-on experience in the following functional areas:
-Golf Facility Feasibility Analysis	-Financial Analysis	-Golf Business Valuation
-Golf Operations Consulting	-Business Plan Preparation	-Golf Market Analysis
-Economic Impact Analysis	-Clubhouse Programming	-Staffing/HR

-Golf Course Master Planning	-Public P resentations	-Proposal Writing
-Expert Witness	-Golf Course Brokerage	-Portfolio Analysis

National Golf Foundation Consulting Experience - During his tenure with NGF Consulting , Mr. Singer has been responsible for prepari ng over 350 research studies for specific projects related to golf facil ities. Mr. Singer is a widely recog nized expert and frequent speaker on su bjects related to golf facility development, operation, management, finance and transactions. In his 28 years as a golf consultant, Mr. Singer has visited and/or profiled more than 2,900 public and private golf facility operations in the United States and internationally. Mr. Singer also has extensive experience as an expert witness in matters related to golf facility ope ration, providing litigation assistance to golf course owners for estimating economic damages and in helping to defend golf facility owners in civil l itigation. 

Golf Facility Consulting - Mr. Singer's operations consulting experience comprises all aspects of golf operations, with focus on maximizing profitability through revenue enhancements and expense control. This experience includes consulting for various public agencies (municipalities, CDD's, HOA's) as well as private owners. His extensive experience includes services to support new facilities (feasibility, site master plan, project management, business plans, etc.), acquisitions, and services to support ongoing operations (revenue enhancement, expense control , economic impact of alterations/renovations, staffing assessments etc. ).

Key Accounts Managed (201 0-201 7)
Representative CDD, HOA or Municipal Acquisition clients in 201 1 -201 7 include: City of Casselberry, FL; Twin Rivers HOA (FL); Golden Lakes COD (FL); City of Baytown, TX; South Village CDD; City of Tamarac, FL; Town of Acton , MA; Martin County, FL; State of Georgia (?­ course review of operations and outsource assistance); Yakama Nation, WA; Martin County, FL; Westworth Village, TX; City of Coral Gables, FL; City of Yonkers, NY; Town of Canton, MA; and the Wood Dale (IL) Park District. These public sector projects include extensive participation in public meetings and a defense of project work.
Backgroun d/Education

Mr. Singer is a long-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida and g rew up around the North Palm Beach Country Club. He earned his Bachelor's degree in .marketing and Insurance from the University of Florida in 1985, and worked as a financial consultant for Northwestern Mutual Life and Baird Securities before earning an M BA in Real Estate Finance from the University of Florida in 1 989. Mr. Singer is a Licensed Real Estate Broker in Florida (Lie. #BK30771 26) and is a member of the Palm Beach County Sports Commission and a Citrus Bowl scout.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8001 - Lake Ashton CDD - 9

 	 	

Edward Getherall, Director of Consulting Services

Ed Getherall joined the NGF Consulting staff as Project Analyst in 2000 after several years of subcontracting consulting services to the NGF. Mr. Getherall, who was promoted to Senior Project Director in 2001 and Director of Operations in 201 3 , returned to Consulting as Director in 201 5. Over his years at NGF, he has been instrumental in cementing NGF's status as the leader in municipal golf facility consulting, with a particular focus on improving municipal golf course operations and marketing, and helping public agencies analyze alternative operating structures for their golf systems.
Mr. Getherall has also directed NGF's effort to be the leading industry resource for accurate golf market information pertaining to facility activity levels, revenue center performance, and green fee levels and trends. Since joining NGF Consulting, Mr. Getherall has become a respected industry authority on food & beverage operations, clubhouse renovation I replacement, municipal golf management alternatives, outsourcing assistance (RFP preparation / analysis of responses / contract negotiations), and other areas of expertise.
NGF Consulting Projects Experience
Mr. Getherall's extensive business and marketing background has enhanced NGF Consulting's ability to provide expertise to the facility segment of the golf industry. In 15 years in NGF's Consulting division,  Ed has been the lead project director for more than 1 00 consulting assignments, covering a broad range of services, including public and private golf course feasibility studies, acquisition studies, operations reviews, golf-related real estate absorption analyses, pricing / market positioning analyses, and clubhouse renovation studies.

Partial list of Clients
City of Houston, TX City of Melbourne, FL

Cityof Palm Springs, CA	Mecklenburg County, NC Lake County (I L) Forest Preserve District City of Greeley, CO

City of Alameda, CA City of Omaha, NE City of New York, NY City of Clayton, OH
Miami-Dade County, FL City of Concord, CA City of Lake Havasu, f!.Z
Kealakehe Ahupua'a 2020, HI 
Background/Education

Town of Wallingford, CT

City of Yonkers, NY City of San Diego, CA City of Portland, OR
Ft. Belvoir GC (U.S. Army), VA City of Gilbert, f!.Z
City of Tempe, AZ.
City of San Francisco, CA

City of Concord, NC
City of White Plains, NY Woodbridge Township, NJ City of Gresham, OR Palm Beach County, FL City of Reno, NV
City of Oakland Park, FL City of Tarpon Springs, FL

Prior to joining the NGF, Mr. Getherall held several positions in the business community including extensive marketing work for such organizations as South Florida Blood Banks, Inc., the Florida Lottery, and the American Cancer Society. His areas of expertise cover a broad spectrum of marketing activity, including research, product management, and special event planning and consulting.

Originally from Queens, New York, Mr. Getherall earned his M. B.A. from the University of Florida with a concentration in finance. Ed also achieved his undergraduate degree at Florida with a B.S. in Business Administration (Marketing). With a diversified educational and professional background in both marketing and finance, Mr. Getherall has the experience and knowledge to evaluate all aspects of golf facility management, marketing, operations, and development.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8001 - Lake Ashton CDD -1 O

 	

Kevin Mclendon, Program Director - Golfer Survey Program
Kevin Mclendon enjoys eleven years' experience at National Golf Foundation and currently serves as Director of Database Services and Program Director of NGF's Customer Satisfaction Products. Mr. Mclendon provides his expertise in the design,  implementation,  interpretation,
and data analysis of NGF's Golfer Survey Program and GolfSA T products.
NGF Consulting Projects Experience
A foremost expert in the disciplines of customer satisfaction and direct marketing , Kevin is adept at walking clients through the implementation of the Golfer Survey Program , and analyzing and interpreting their customer survey data. Kevin's analysis of survey results helps golf facility operators identify strengths and deficiencies and formulate an action plan designed to improve performance.
Mr. Mclendon's recent clients include:

Golf Plus Inc. , DBA, Bloomingdale Golf Club
U.S. Air Force Services Premier Golf Centers, LLC Poppy Holding, Inc. Chomonix Golf Course Bald Head Island Club
Sagamore Hampton Golf Club Fort Mill Golf Club
Tumwater Valley Municipal Golf Course Decatur Park District
Sagamore Golf Center
Leroy Springs & Company, Inc.
Background and Education

Weibring Golf Club At Illinois State University KemperSports

Cleveland Metroparks
Honours Golf CourseCo
TPC Tampa Bay
Sirius Golf Advisors, LLC Augusta Ranch Golf Club
Town of Phoenix Parks, Recreation & Library
Town of Lakewood, Community Resources Department Great Northern Golf Co.
WinStar Golf Course

Kevin received his Bachelor's degree in Political Science from Furman Univers ity in 2001
and his Masters of Business Administration from Florida Atlantic University in 2009. Kevin is a member of the Phi Kappa Phi honor society and the Direct Marketing Association.
Prior to his formal education and joining the NGF, Kevin held several positions at Jericho N ational Golf Club in N ew Hope, PA
Jodi Reilly, Consulting Administrator
With five years client services experience at the National Golf Foundation and more than 17 yea rs of golf facility experience, Mrs. Reilly brings extensive knowledge of municipal, upscale public, semi-private and private club experience to NGF Consulting. She currently manages support services for the Consulting / Research division and specializes in coordinating responses to government Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and the administrative aspects of contract compliance. Mrs. Reilly provides assistance in market research and prepares GolfMAP statistical reports for NGF members and clients.
Background and Education
Prior to joining the NGF, Mrs. Reilly held several positions in the Philadelphia Section including: owning the pro shop at Twining Valley Golf & Fitness Club, Dresher, PA; Golf Operations Concierge at Philadelphia Cricket Club, Flourtown, PA; Buyer and Outing Coordinator for Blue Bell Country Club, Blue Bell, PA; Marketing Director for Center Valley Club, Center Valley, PA. In 1 997, she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Graphic Design from the Pennsylvania College of Technology.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8001 - Lake Ashton CDD-1 1

 	 	 	 	 	 	

John Sanford, ASGCA - Sanford Golf Design
John Sanford, ASGCA is the founder and lead designer for Sanford Golf Design of Jupiter, Florida. Sanford Golf Design has designed successful public and private golf cou rses throughout the world, with several of note in Florida . The key to their approach in redeveloping public golf facilities is working with the client to create realistic expectations and budgets, while matching the desire of the existing facility users with the client's vision. Examples of recent public golf course projects include The Links at Madison Green, a popular public golf course in Royal Palm Beach, and the new Course at Ferry Point Park in New York City. Bringing projects in on schedule and on budget is a hallmark of Sanford Golf Design, further helping to ensure long-term sustainability.

Sanford Golf Design is a team of golf course architects and construction management professionals , working together to provide you with the specialized services required for this project. The company was founded by John Sanford in 1 987 and has completed over 70 golf course design projects in the last 28 years. We believe that successfu l design begins with comprehensive analysis of the site features, extensive knowledge of the local environment and a clear understanding of your objectives. Our goal is to create a challenging golf experience that will enhance the natural features of your site and operate within budgetary constraints. Our design style is a traditional approach that avoids unnatural landforms and utilizes native materials.
John Sanford is a member of the American Society of Golf Course Architects - Executive Committee and has over two decades of experience in Golf Course design, having completed over 60 new designs and renovations in his career. John is a g raduate of Louisiana State University with a Bachelor degree in Landscape Architecture. After five years in landscape a rchitecture John landed his first golf course design in 1 986. The experience has allowed him to integrate golf courses into the surrounding land uses while maintaining the natural character of the site. John's early design influence came from playing courses by Dick Wilson, Jack Nicklaus and Pete Dye.
John has traveled the g lobe working in Asia, the Caribbean, the Middle East and throughout the United States. Designing courses on sites with diverse opportunities and constraints has given Sanford the experience and perspective that is unique to few architects.

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8001 - Lake Ashton CDD - 12 

REPRESENTATIVE STUDIES
The Club at Eaglebrooke - Lakeland, FL 
Acquisition Feasibility Study

In 2016 , NGF Consulting was retained by the Golden Lakes Community Development District (CDD) to assist in evaluating the possibility of the CDD acquiring the privately-owned Club at Eaglebrooke and operating it as a Community-owned golf course. The NGF review included a subject property inspection, comp rehensive market analysis, financial analysis and estimate of the total investment th at was "warranted" for the CDD to make the acquisition.
The NGF completed a comprehensive review of the su bject property with support of a golf course arch itect and agronomist, and documented specific capital projects that would be needed to bring the subject facility to its maximum market position . Coupled with the acquisition price, the needed capital improvements would be considered as part of the total investment in the golf facility. The CDD completed the acquisition in 201 7 and has retained an independent third-party to manage the day-to-day operations of the golf course.

Client: Scott D. Clark, Clark & Albaugh, LLP
Golden Lakes Community Development District
31 3 Campus Street
Celebration, FL 34747
(407) 647-7600
sclark@winterparklawy:ers.com

Eagle landing Golf Club - Orange Park, FL 
Acquis;t;on Feasibility Study

NGF Consulting was retained by South Village Community Development District's to help evaluate the economic feasibility of the CDD acquiring the developer-owned Eagle Landing Golf Club, which is located within the 800-home Eagle Landing community. The District required an independent golf industry expert to evaluate the golf course's potential to add new golf members from local/regional golf market, capital needs, and cash flow potential, and to provide an appropriate value estimate for purchase considerations. The result of this market and facility analysis was used to help determine the appropriate course of action regarding the acquisition. The NGF was subsequently retained for a second phase to complete a comprehensive physical inspection and review of the maintenance and agronomic condition of the subject facility,  in conjunction with a golf cou rse arch itect and Agronomist.
The CDD completed the purchase of the Eagle landing GC in 201 7, and included a provision to add a small monthly assessment to each homeowner for "social dues" that allowed for limited use of the golf facil ities. This collection of social dues from each homeowner allowed for an additional source of revenue to help the golf facility meet all obligations com fortably, and retain a reserve of funds for the improvement or replacement of items identified in NGF's capital improvement recommendations.
Client: Jim Oliver
South Village Community Development District c/o Governmental Management Services
475 West Town Place, Suite 11 4 St. Augustine, FL 32092
(904) 940-5850

Joliver@gmsnf.com

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #2 1 8001 - Lake Ashton CDD - 1 3

 	

City of Casselberry, FL

Acquisition Feasibility Study
In 201 3, the City of Casselberry retained NGF Consulting to assist in evaluating the possibility of the City acquiring the privately-owned Casselberry Golf Club and operating it as a City-owned municipal golf course. The NGF review included a subject property inspection and comprehensive market analysis.
The NGF documented physical deficiencies that would need to be addressed if the facility is to produce sufficient revenue to cover day-to-day expenses and make req uired payments to retire any capital for acquisition and upgrade. Even if the facility could be re-opened and improved , the City should expect that its economic interest in the facility would be "at risk" for unpredictable factors that may reduce revenue or increase costs. Thus, the NGF finding was that contribution from an alternative fu nding source, separate from the golf facility, would be req ui red to reduce the in itial capital investment. In 2015, the City voted to proceed with the acquisition of Casselberry GC and is now operating the facil ity as a City golf course.
Client:  Randy Newlon, City Manager City of Casselberry
95 Triplet Lake Drive Casselberry, FL 32707
(407) 262-7700

jnewlon@casselberry.ora

Twin Rivers HOA - Winter Park, FL
Acquistion Feasibility Study
In 201 5, the Twin Rivers Homeowner's Association (HOA) retained NGF Consulting to evaluate the possibility of the HOA acquiring the privately-owned Twin Rivers Golf Club and operating it as a Community-owned golf cou rse. The NGF review included a su bject p roperty inspection, comp rehensive market analysis, financial analysis and estimate of the total investment that was "warranted" for the HOA to make the acquisition. 
The NGF docu mented significant physical deficiencies that should be addressed prior to acq uisition, or through owner concessions in purchase price. The NGF also identified a need for an outside partner, possibly the City of Oviedo, as the Twin Rivers community was likely too small to fully support the golf course operation. As of December 201 7, the HOA is still reviewing its options and working with the City to either establish a funding program for the proposed acquisition , or create some new separate public­ private partnership with the City to keep the facility open.

Client:  Scott D Clark, Clark, Albaugh & Rentz, LLP Twin Rivers Homeowners Association 700 W. Morse Blv Suite 101
Winter Park, FL 32789 (407) 647-7600

sclark@winterparklawyers. com

National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. - Proposal #21 8001 - Lake Ashton COD - 1 4

CONTRACT AGREEMENT

This Agreement made and entered into on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 by and between the Lake Ashton II Community Development District, a local unit of special purpose government ofthe State of Florida hereinafter referred to as the 'Special District', and Marsha M. Faux, Polk County Property Appraiser, a Constitutional Officer of the State of Florida, whose address is 255 North Wilson Ave., Bartow, FL 33830, hereinafter referred to as the 'Property Appraiser'.
Section 197.3632 Florida Statutes, provides that special assessments ofnon-ad valorem taxes levied by the Special District maybe included in the assessment rolls ofthe County and collected in conjunction with ad valorem taxes as assessed by the Property Appraiser. Pursuant to that option, the Property Appraiser and the Special District shall enter into an agreement providing for reimbursement to the Property Appraiser ofadministrative costs, including costs of inception and maintenance, incurred as a result ofsuch inclusion.
The parties herein agree that, for the 2018 tax year assessment roll, the Property Appraiser will include on the assessment rolls such special assessments as are certified to her by the Lake Ashton II Community Development District.
The tenn ofthis Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2018 and shall rununtil December 3 1, 2018, the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement shall not automatically renew.
The Special District shall meet all relevant requirements of Section 197.3632 & 190.021 Florida Statutes.
The Special District shall furnish the Property Appraiser with up-to-date data concerning its boundaries and proposed assessments, and other information as requested by the Property Appraiser to facilitate in administering the non-ad valorem assessment in question. Specifically, the Special District shall provide proposed assessments no later than Friday, July 20, 2018, for inclusion on the 2018 TRIM notice which is statutorily mailed within 55 days of July 1. The Special District's assessments shall, as far as practicable, be uniform (e.g. one uniform assessment formaintenance, etc.) to facilitate the making ofthe assessments by the mass data techniques utilized by the Property Appraiser.
The Special District shall certify to the Property Appraiser the Special District's annual installment and levy no later than Friday, September 14, 2018. The Property Appraiser shall, using the information provided by the Special District, place the Special District's non ad-valorem special assessments on prope1iies within the district for inclusion on the
20 18 tax roll.
The Property Appraiser shall be compensated by the Special District for the administrative costs incurred in canying out this Agreement at the rate of 1 % ofthe amount levied on the TRIM Notice. The Property Appraiser will require payment on or before Friday, September 14, 2018 for processing within the Property Appraiser budget year (October
! st- September 30th).
Ifthe actual costs of performing the services under this agreement exceed the compensation provided for in Paragraph 7, the amount ofcompensation shall be the actual costs of performing the services under this agreement.
Iftax roll conections are requested by the Special District, the Property Appraiser shall be compensated by the Special District for the administrative costs incurred at the rate of$5 .00 for each tax roll conection exceeding ten (10) corrections per tax year.
The Special District shall indemnify and hold hatmless, to the extentpermitted by Florida law and without waiving its right of any applicable sovereign immunity, the Property Appraiser and all respective officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of defense, which the Prope1iy Appraiser and all respective officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result ofclaims, demands, suits, causes ofactions or proceedings ofany kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions ofthe Special District or its employees, agents, servants, patiners, principals, or subcontractors arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the performance ofthe Agreement. The Special District shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions ofany kind or nature in the name of the Property Appraiser where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorneys' fees whichmay issue thereon.

Marsha M. Faux, CFA, ASA Polle Col!nty Property Appraiser

Title	.	I

Marsha M. Faux, Propetiy Appraiser

RESOLUTION 2018-03

A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DARRIN MOSSING AS SECRETARY AND JILLIAN BURNS AS ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District desire to appoint Darrin Mossing as Secretary and Jillian Burns as Assistant Secretary;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

Darrin Mossing is appointed as Secretary.

Jillian Burns is appointed as Assistant Secretary.

Adopted this 10th day of August 2018.

Chairman / Vice Chairman

Secretary / Assistant Secretary

 	 	 	 	 	

Proposed Budget
Fiscal Year 2019

lake Ashton II Community Development District

August 11, 2018

 	 	 	 	 	

Lake Ashton II
Community Development District

TABLE OF CONTENTS

General Fund 
Budget
Narrative-Administrative Narrative-Field

Capital Projects Fund Budget

Debt Service Fund
Budget - Series 2005A Amortization Schedule - 2005A
Budget - Series 2006A Amortization Schedule - 2006A

Page 1-2
Page 3-4
Page 5-6

Page 7

Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11

Lake Ashton II 
Community Development District					

General Fund 	

Description	Adopted Budget FY 2018	Actual Thru 6/30/2018	Projected Next
3 Months	Total Projected 9/30/2018	Proposed Budget FY 2019	
REVENUES:						

Special Assessments - Tax Collector

Interest Earned

$1,218,686

Rental Fees

$5,000

$1,500

$1,254, 149

$0

$1,254,149

$1,218,686

$11,293

$4, 643

$1,548

$500

$6,191

$1,500

Carry Forward Surplus TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES:
ADMINISTRATIVE

Miscellaneous Revenues

$273, 254
$1,498,440

$0

$262,847

$223

$0

$11,793

$223

$5,000

$0

$1,S33,155

$0
$2,048

$262,847
$1,535,203

$205,797
$1,430,984

Arbitrage Consultant	$2,500	$600	$600	$1,200	$1,200
Annual Audit	$5,600	$5,600	$0	$5,600	$6,000
Atto rney	$20,000	$11,833	$3,944	$15,778	$20,000
Computer Time	$1,000	$750	$250	$1,000	$1,000
Dissemination Agent	$6,000	$4,500	$1,500	$6,000	$6,000
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$175	$175	$0	$175	$175
Insurance	$30,558	$30,033	$0	$30,033	$33,036
Legal Advertising	$500	$230	$196	$426	$500
Management Fees	$47,408	$35,556	$11,852	$47,408	$45,000
Office Supplies	$300	$74	$98	$300
Other Current Charges	$2,000	$4,251	$2,830	$7,082	$2,700
Postage	$1,500	$1,111	$370	$1,481	$1,500
Printing & Binding	$ 1,200	$755	$252	$1,007	$ 1,500

Trustee Fees	$6,500	$0	$6,500	$6,500	$6,500	
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES	$125,290	 	$95,468 	$28,344	 	$123,812 	$125,461	

Telephone	$SO	$0	$25	$25	$50

Page 1

Lake Ashton II 
Community Development District	General Fund
Adopted	Actual	Projected	Total	Proposed

Description
FIELD EXPENDITURES

Budget		Thru		Next		Projected	Budget FY 2018	6/30/2018	3 Months	9/30/2018	FY 2019

Athletic Equipment	$6,000	$0	$6,000	$6,000	$10,000
Building Contract Services	$46,920	$47,402	$20,990	$68,392	$51,160 Building/Grounds Maintenance Supplies	$16,700	$74,218		$9,000	$83,218	$27,248 Contingency	$20,000		$8,563	$11,437	$20,000	$30,000
Engineering	$12,000	$11, 244	$2,736	$13,980	$8,000
HFC Special Events	$3,000	$1,294	$1,706	$3,000	$3,000
La ndscape/Lake Contract Services	$152,712	$128,303	$41,630	$169,933	$172,222
Office Supplies/Printing/Binding	$10,000	$4,881	$1,627	$6,508	$10,000
Permits/Inspections	$1,500	$970	$317	$1,287	$1,500
Personnel Expenses	$214,455	$137,728	$45,909	$183,637	$214,283
Plant/Tree Replacement		$10,000			$0		$4,500		$4,500		$0 Pond Repairs			$0		$5,900		$1,350		$7,250		$0 Security Contract Services	$246,300	$189,153	$57, 147	$246,300	$250,804
Utilities	$207,767	$141,327	$56,984	$198,311	$207,767
TOTAL FIELD EXPENDITURES	$947,354	$750,983	$261,334	$1,012,316	$985,983
First Quarter Operating Reserves	$205,797	$0	$0	$0	$205,797
TOTAL RESERVE EXPENDITURES	$205,797 	$0	$0	$0	$205,797 OTHER SOURCES/( USES)
lnterfund Transfers ln/(Out)	($220,000)	$0	($193, 277)	($193,277)	($113,742)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$1,498,440	$846,451	$482,955	$1,329,406	$1,430,984
Assigned Fund Balance	$0	$686,704	($480,907)	$205,797	$0

NET ASSESSMENTS PLUS COLLECTION FEES (7%)
GROSS  ASSESSMENTS

FY 2016	FY 2017	FY 2018	FY 2019
$1,259,017	$1,259,017	$1,218,686	$1,218,686
$94,765	$94,765	$91,729	$91,729
$1,353,782	$1,353,782	$1,310,416	$1,310,416

NO. OF TOTAL PLANNED UN ITS	703	703	680	680
GOLF COURSE	15	15
GROSS PER UNIT ASSESSMENT	$1,885	$1,885	$1,885	$1,885

Page 2

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
GENERAL FUND BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2019

REVENUES:

Special Assessments - Tax Collector:
The District wi ll levy a non ad-valorem special assessment on the platted property within the District and certify to the Polk County Tax Collector fo r collection to fund operating expenditures of the District.

Interest Earned:
The District will have all excess funds invested with the State Board of Administration. The amount is based upon the estimated average balance of funds available during the fisca l year.

Rental Fees:
Represents miscellaneous income received for a ctivities held at the HCF.

EXPENDITURES:

ADMINISTRATIVE:

Arbitrage
The District is required to annually have an arbitrage rebate ca lculation on the District's Series 2005A& B and Series 2006A& B Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds.

Annual Audit
The District is required annually to condu ct an audit of its financial records by an Independent Certified Public Accounting Firm. 

Attorney
The District's legal counsel wi ll be providing general legal services to the District, i.e., attendance and preparation for monthly meetings, review operating and maintenance contracts, etc.

Computer Time 
The District processes all ofits financial activities, i. e., accounts payable, financial statements, etc. on a mainframe computer leased by Governmental Management Services.

Dissemination Agent
The District is required by the Security and Exchange Commission to comply with Rule 15{c) (2)-12{b) (5), which relates to additional reporting requirements for un-rated bond issu es.

Dues. Licenses & Subscriptions
The District is required to pay an annual fee to the Department of Economic Opportunity for $175 . This is the only expense under this category for the District.

Insurance
The District's General Liability & Public Officials Liabil ity Insurance policy is with Florida Insurance Allia nce. Florida Insurance Alliance specializes in providing insurance coverage to governmental agencies.

Page 3

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DI STRICT
GENERAL FUND BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2019

Legal Advertising
The District is required to advertise various notices fo r monthly Board meetings, public hearings, etc. in a newspaper of general circu lation.

Management Fees

The District receives Management, Accounting and Administrative services as part of a Management Agreement with Governmental Management Services. These services are further outlined in Exhibit "A" of the Management Agreement.

Office Supplies
Miscellaneous offi ce supplies.

Other Current Charges

Bank charges and any other miscellaneous expenses that are incurred during the year.

Postage:
Mailing of agenda packages, overnight del iveries, correspondence, etc.

Printing & Binding
Pri nting and Binding agenda packages for board meetings, printing of computerized checks, stationary, envelopes etc.
Telephone
Telephone and fax machine.

Trustee Fees
The District issued Series 2005A& B and Series 2006A& B Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds which are held with a Trustee at US Bank. The amount of the trustee fees is based on the agreement between US Bank and the District.

Page 4

Athletic Equipment

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
GENE RAL FUND BUDG ET FISCAL YEAR 2019

Annual Contract

All exercise equipment purchased/repaired. Maintenance with Commercial Fitness.

Building Contract Services Alarm/Fire Sprinklers-Ha rtline Cleaning-Magic Genie 

Pool & Spa - Pool Sure

Building/Grounds Maintenance & Supplies
Building - Paper goods, small repair items, misc. chemicals and cleaning supplies Grounds - HFC Grounds, Dog Park. Blvd ., Courts
Pest Control

Contingency
A contingency for any unanticipated and/or unscheduled costs to the District.

Engineering Fees
The District's engineer will b providing general engineering services to the District including attendance and preparation for board meetings, etc.

HFS Special Events
The District will have shows, dances, and other events throughout the year.

$10,000

Annual Contract
$1,800
$39,360
$10,000

Annual Contract
$9,848
$15,400
$2,000

$8,000

$3,000

Landscape Contract Services	Annual Contract	
Lake Maintenance-Applied Aquatics	$14,200	
Mowing, irrigation, and plant replacement - Yellowstone 	$156,022	
Irrigation Repairs	$2,000	

Office Supplies/Printing & Binding DEX-Copier lease and printing costs
The District will have office supplies such as paper, toner, etc.

Permits/Inspections
The District is required to renew permits and other inspections on a annual basis with the City of Winter Haven, Polk County, and The State of Florida to comply with regu lations.

$3,314
$6,686

Personnel Expenses	$214,455
1099 Hourly Employees
FICA-Employer's share of Social Secu rity and Medicare taxes withheld from employee wages.
Health Insurance Coverage-Reimbursement to the HFC employees fo r thei r health insurance coverage. Salaries & Wages-The District has employed personnel to manage and supervise the Health Fitness Center. WC Insurance-The District's Workers Com pensation Insurance policy is with SUMM IT.

Security Contract Services
Gate Attendants and Roving Patrols - Securitas Video Security - ADT

Annual Contract

$249,504
$1,300

Page 5

	LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
GENERAL FUND BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2019		
Utilities
Electric - TECO			

ACCOUNTS	SERVICE
ADDESS	
ANNUAL	
0921-0564191	7900 CR 653 IRR 	$560	
0921-0564001	7900 653 RD GRD HSE 	$ 1, 550	
0921-0568421	4000 MULLIGAN LN 	$ 2,000	
0921-0568501	6052 PEBBLE B EACH BL 	$ 25,600	
0921-0579621	PEBBLE BEACH/ASHTON BL	$3,400	
0921-0567531	ASHTON PALMS PHl DR	$61,200	
0921-0679410	HOGAN LANE 	$5,500	
	SAWGRASS DRIVE, ST LIGHT	$24,700	
	LA PHASE II N, ST LIGHT	$ 16, 220	
	TOTAL	$140,730	
Refuse - Florida Refuse	$4,550	
Propane - Amerigas	$ 25,000	
Telephone/Internet - Brighthouse (Spectrum)	$ 14,000	
Water - City of Winter Haven		
ACCOUNT	SERVICE		
NUMBER	ADDRESS	ANNUAL	
NEW ACCOUNTS		
792401	7900 COUNTY RD-653 GUARD HOUSE 		
792402	6052 PEBBLE BEACH BLVD	$12,755	
792403	5135 WINGED FT LN D PARK #lRR	$2,284	
792406	LOT 293 W 5. DOG PARK	$915	
TOTAL	$23,487	

CAPITAL RESERVES

Capital Projects
Represents the estimated capital reserve funding for capital expenditures that will be transferred to the Capita l Proj ects Fund. See page 7 for the Capita l Projects Fund Budget.

Page 6

Lake Ashton II 
Community Development District

Description

Revenues
Capital Reserve - Transfer In Interest Income
Carry Forwa rd Surplus
TOTAL REVENUES

Expenditures
Capital Projects - FY18
Athletic Equipment Drain System/Gutters
Pond Repairs and Maintenance Pickleball Courts
Paving Parking Lot/Lights Road Repairs Windows/Doors
LED Lighting
Other Current Charges - Bank Charges Other Capital Project Expenses
TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS REVENUES

Revenues
Capital Reserves - Transfer In Interest Income
Carry Forward Surplus
Total
Annual Proiected Expenses:

Capital Projects

Adopted Budget FY 2018

Actual Thru 6/30/2018

Projected Next
3 Months

Total Projected 9/30/2018

Proposed Budget FY 2019

$220,000
$0
$540, 139

$0
$4,919
$540,139

$193,277
$1, 640
$0

$545,058

$194,917

$193,277
$6,559
$540,139
$739,975

$113,742
$1,000
$598,589

$760,139

$713,331

$0
$0
$25,000
$30,000
$90,000
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
$540, 139
$760,139
$0

$1,414
$5,275
$9,150
$43,742
$37,861
$7,526
$34,760
$726
$466
$0
$140,919
$404,139

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$466
$0

$1,414
$5,275
$9,150
$43,742
$37,861
$7,526
$34,760
$726
$932
$0

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$177,839

$466
$194,450

$141,385
$598,589

$177,839
$53S,492

Fiscal Year 2019	Fiscal Year 2020	Fiscal Year 2021	Fiscal Year 2022	Fisca l Year 2023
$113,742	$100,000	$100,000	$100,000	$100,000
$1,000	$5,395	$5,748	$6,106	$6,467
$598,589	$539,445	$574,840	$610,588	$646, 694
$713,331	$644,840	$680,588	$716,694	$753,161

(1)

HFC Building	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000
Roadways	$25,000	$25,000	$25,000	$25,000	$25,000
Computers	$5,000	$5,000	$5,000	$5,000	$5,000
Equipment		$5,000		$5,000		$5,000		$5,000		$5,000 Landscape Replacement	$15,000	$15,000	$15,000	$15,000	$15,000 Other Capital Projects	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000
Specific Projects:
Microphone/Sound System		$5,000	$0	$0	$0	$0 Sandblast Patio Furniture		$2,540	$0	$0	$0	$0 Kitchen Upgrades/Microwaves		$5,000	$0	$0	$0	$0 Handicap Entrance Door		$3,000	$0	$0	$0	$0 Tree Replacement - Ashton Blvd .	$10,000	$0	$0	$0	$0 LED Lighting Fixtures	$10,860	$0	$0	$0	$0
Window Coverings	$22, 165	$0	$0	$0	$0 Replace Flooring - H FC	$23,000	$0	$0	$0	$0 Landsca ping - New Parking Lot	$26,274	$0	$0	$0	$0

Total Exeenditures	$177,839	$70,000	$70,000	$70,000	$70,000
Excess Revenues	$535,492	$574,840	$610,588	$646,694	$683, 161

Page 7

Lake Ashton II 
Community Development District

Description

Debt Service Fund
Series 2005A

Adopted

FY 2018

Budget

Actual

6/30/2018

Thru

Projected

Total

Proposed

3 Months

Next

9/30/2018

Projected

FY 2019

Budget

Revenues
(1)   Assessments - On Roll (A)	$436,872	$445,823	$0	$445,823	$436,872 Prepayments		$0		$40,219	$0		$40,219		$0
Interest Income	$1,000	$3,735	$1, 245	$4,979	$1,000

TOTAL REVENUES
Expenditures
Series 2005A
Interest - 11/1 Special Ca ll - 11/1 Interest - 5/1 Principa l - 5/1 Special Ca ll - 5/1
TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS REVENUES

$623,522

$722,174

$ 1,245

$723,419 

$599,640

$139,347
$30,000
$139,347
$160,000
$0

$468,694
$154,828

$139,347
$80,000
$137,304
$160,000
$45,000

$561,651
$ 160,523

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0

$0
$1,245

$139,347
$80,000
$137,304
$160,000
$45,000

$561,651
$ 161,768

$131,688
$0
$131,688
$165,000
$0

$428,375
$171,265

(2)	Carry Forward Surplus	$185,6S0	$232,397	$0	$232,397	$161,768
(1)	Maximum Annual Debt Service	11/1/2019 Interest	$127,253
(2)	Carry forward surplus is net of the reserve requirement and Deferred Costs	2005 A

NET ASSESSMENTS

GROSS ASSESSMENTS

PLUS COLLECTION FEES (7%)

GOLF COURSE

NO. OF UNITS

GROSS PER UNIT ASSESSMENT

$443,921.99
$33,413 .48
$477,335 .47
351
$33,868
$1,263 .44

$436,871.99
$32,882.84
$469,754.83
345
$33,868
$1,263 .44

$436,871.99
$32,882.84
$469,754.83
345
$33,868
$1,263.44

FY 2017	FY 2018	FY 2019

Page B

Lake Ashton II		Amortization Schedule Community Development District	Series 2005A, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds

DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL	INTEREST	TOTAL

05/01/18	$	5, 105,000.00	5 .38%	$	205,000.00	$	137, 196.88	$
11/01/18	$	4,900,000.00	5 .38%	$	$	131,687.50	$	473,884.38
05/01/19	$	4,900,000.00	5 .38%	$	165,000.00	$	131,687.50	$
11/01/19	$	4,735,000.00	5 .38%	$	$	127,253.13	$	423,940.63
05/01/20	$	4,735,000.00	5 .38%	$	175,000.00	$	127,253.13	$
11/01/20	$	4,560,000.00	5 .38%	$	$	122,550 .00	$	424,803 .13
05/01/21	$	4,560,000 .00	5 .38%	$	185,000.00	$	122,550 .00	$
11/01/21	$	4,375,000 .00	5 .38%	$	$	117,578.13	$	425, 128. 13
05/01/22	$	4,375,000 .00	5 .38%	$	195,000.00	$	117,578.13	$
11/01/22	$	4, 180,000 .00	5.38%	$	$	112,337.50	$	424,915.63
05/01/23	$	4, 180,000.00	5.38%	$	205,000.00	$	112,337.50	$
11/01/23	$	3,975,000.00	5.38%	$	$	106,828.13	$	424, 165.63
05/01/24	$	3,975,000.00	5.38%	$	215,000. 00	$	106,828.13	$
11/01/24	$	3,760,000.00	5.38%	$	$	101,050 .00	$	422,878.13
05/01/25	$	3,760,000.00	5.38%	$	230,000.00	$	101,050 .00	$
11/01/25	$	3,530,000.00	5.38%	$	$	94,868.75	$	425,918 .75
05/01/26	$	3,530,000.00	5.38%	$	240,000.00	$	94,868.75	$
11/01/26	$	3,290,000.00	5 . 38%	$	$	88,418.75	$	423, 287.50
05/01/27	$	3, 290,000.00	5. 38%	$	255,000.00	$	88,418.75	$
11/01/27	$	3,035,000.00	5.38%	$	$	81,565 .63	$	424,984.38
05/01/28	$	3,035,000.00	5. 38%	$	270,000.00	$	81,565.63	$
11/01/28	$	2,765,000.00	5.38%	$	$	74,309.38	$	425,875.00
05/01/29	$	2,765,000.00	5.38%	$	285,000 .00	$	74,309.38	$
11/01/29	$	2,480,000.00	5 .38%	$	$	66,650.00	$	425,959 . 38
05/01/30	$	2,480,000.00	5 .38%	$	300,000.00	$	66,650.00	$
11/01/30	$	2, 180,000.00	5 .38%	$	$	58,587.50	$	425,237.50
05/01/31	$	2, 180,000.00	5 .38%	$	315,000.00	$	58,587.50	$
11/01/31	$	1,865,000.00	5.38%	$	$	50,121 .88	$	423,709.38
05/01/32	$	1,865,000.00	5.38%	$	335,000.00	$	50, 121 .88	$
11/0 1/32	$	1,530,000.00	5.38%	$	$	41,118.75	$	426,240 .63
05/01/33	$	1,530,000.00	5.38%	$	355,000 .00	$	41,118.75	$

11/01/33	$	1,175,000.00	5 .38%	$	$	31,578.13	$	427,696.88
05/0 1/34	$	1,175,000.00	5 .38%	$	370,000.00	$	31,578.13	$
11/0 1/34	$	805,000.00	5.38%	$	$	21,634 .38	$	423,212.50
05/01/35	$	805,000 .00	5.38%	$	390,000.00	$	21,634.38	$

11/01/35	$	415,000 .00	5.38%	$	$	11,153.13	$	422, 787.50
05/01/36	$	415,000.00	5 .38% 	$	415,000.00	$	11, 153.13	$	426,153 .13	
TOTAL			$	5, 105,000 .00	$	3,015,778.13	$	8,120,778 .13	

Page 9

Lake Ashton II 
Community Development District

Debt Service Fund

Series 2006A

	Adopted
Budget	Actual Thru	Projected
Next	Total
Projected	Proposed
Budget	
Description
	FY 2018	6/30/2018	3 Months	9/30/2018	FY 2019	
Revenues						
Other Revenue Sources	$79,288	$89,288	$0	$89,288	$0	
Special Assessments	$315,038	$324,108	$0	$324,108	$315,038	
Interest Earned	$0	$1,367	$750	$2,117 	$0	
Carry Forward Surplus	$0	$0	$0 	$0 	$116,284	
TOTAL REVENUES	$394,326	$414,762	$750	$415,512	$431,322	

Expenditures						
Interest - 11/1	$79,288	$79,288	$0	$79,288 	$101,893	
Interest - 5/1	$104,940	$104,940	$0	$104,940	$101,893	
Principal - 5/1	$105,000	$115,000	$0	$115,000	$110,000	
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$289,228	$299,228	$0	$299,228	$313,785	
EXCESS REVENUES	$105,098	$115,534	$750	$116,284	$117,537	
				11/1/2019 Interest	$98,978	
					FY 2019	
NETASSESSMENTS	$315,037.50	
PLUS COLLECTION FEES (7%)	$23,712.50	
GROSS ASSESSMENTS	$338,750.00	
NO. OF UNITS	271	
GROSS PER UNIT ASSESSMENT	$1,250.00	

 	

Page 10

Lake Ashton II	Amortization Schedule

Community  Development  District		Series 2006A, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL		INTEREST	TOTAL
05/01/18	$	3,960,000.00	5.30%   $	115,000.00	$	104,940.00
11/01/18	$	3,845,000.00	5.30%   $	$	101,892.50	$	321,832.50
05/01/19	$	3,845,000.00	5.30%  $	110,000.00	$	101,892.50
11/01/19	$	3,735,000.00	5.30%   $	$	98,977.50	$	310,870.00
05/01/20	$	3,735,000.00	5.30%   $	115,000.00	$	98,977.50
11/01/20	$	3,620,000.00	5.30%   $	$	95,930.00	$	309,907.50
05/01/21	$	3,620,000.00	5.30%   $	125,000.00	$	95,930.00
11/01/21	$	3,495,000.00	5.30%  $	$	92,617.50	$	313,547.50
05/01/22	$	3,495,000.00	5.30%  $	130,000.00	$	92,617.50
11/01/22	$	3,365,000.00	5.30%   $	$	89,172.50	$	311,790.00
05/01/23	$	3,365,000.00	5.30%   $	135,000.00	$	89,172.50
11/01/23	$	3,230,000.00	5.30%   $	$	85,595.00	$	309,767.50
05/01/24	$	3, 230,000.00	5.30%   $	145,000.00	$	85,595.00
11/01/24	$	3,085,000.00	5.30%   $	$	81,752.50	$	312,347.50
05/01/25	$	3,085,000.00	5.30%   $	155,000.00	$	81,752.50
11/01/25	$	2, 930,000.00	5. 30%   $	$	77,645.00	$	314,397.50
05/01/26	$	2,930,000.00	5.30%   $	160,000.00	$	77,645.00
11/01/26	$	2,770,000.00	5.30%   $	$	73,405.00	$	311,050.00
05/01/27	$	2,770,000.00	5.30%  $	170,000.00	$	73,405.00
11/01/27	$	2,600,000.00	5.30%  $	$	68,900.00	$	312,305.00
05/01/28	$	2,600,000.00	5.30%  $	180,000.00	$	68,900.00
11/01/28	$	2,420,000.00	5.30%  $	$	64, 130.00	$	313,030.00
05/01/29	$	2,420,000.00	5.30%  $	190,000.00	$	64,130.00
11/01/29	$	2,230,000.00	5.30%   $	$	59,095.00	$	313,225.00
05/01/30	$	2,230,000.00	5.30%   $	200,000.00	$	59,095.00
11/01/30	$	2,030,000.00	5.30%   $	$	53,795.00	$	312, 890.00
05/01/31	$	2,030,000.00	5.30%   $	210,000.00	$	53,795.00
11/01/31	$	1,820,000.00	5.30%   $	$	48,230.00	$	312,025.00
05/01/32	$	1,820,000.00	5.30%   $	220,000.00	$	48,230.00
11/01/32	$	1,600,000.00	5.30%   $	$	42,400.00	$	310, 630.00
05/01/33	$	1,600,000.00	5.30%  $	235,000.00	$	42,400.00
11/01/33	$	1,365,000.00	5.30%   $	$	36,172.50	$	313,572.50
05/01/34	$	1,365,000.00	5.30%   $	245,000.00	$	36,172.50
11/01/34	$	1,120,000.00	5.30%   $	$	29,680.00	$	310,852.50
05/01/35	$	1,120,000.00	5.30%   $	260,000.00	$	29,680.00
11/01/35	$	860,000.00	5.30%   $	$	22,790.00	$	312,470.00
05/01/36	$	860,000.00	5 .30%   $	275,000.00	$	22,790.00
11/01/36	$	585,000.00	5.30%   $	$	15,502.50	$	313,292.50
05/01/37	$	585,000.00	5 .30%   $	290,000.00	$	15,502.50
11/01/37	$	295,000.00	5.30%   $	$	7,817.50	$	313,320.00
05/01/38	$	295,000.00	5. 30%   $	295,000.00	$	7,817.50	$	302, 817.50

TOTAL	$	3, 960,000.00	$	2,595,940.00	$	6,555, 940 .00

Page 11

A  RESOLUTION OF  THE	COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (THE "DISTRICT") RELATING TO THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2018, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019.

WHEREAS, the District Manager of the District has, prior to the fifteenth (15th) day in June, 2018, submitted to the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") a proposed budget for the next ensuing budget year along with an explanatory and complete financial plan for each fund of the District, pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.008(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and

WHEREAS, at least sixty (60) days prior to the adoption of the proposed annual budget and any proposed long-term financial plan or program of the District for future operations (the "Proposed Budget") the District did file a copy of the Proposed Budget with the local governing authorities having jurisdiction over the area included in the District pursuant  to  the provisions of Sections 190.008(2)(b) and 218.34(3), Florida Statutes; and

WHEREAS,  on  May  2018, the Board set August 10, 2018 as the date for a public hearing thereon and caused notice of such public hearing to be given by publication pursuant to Section 190.008(2)(a) Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, Section 190.008(2)(a\ Florida Statutes, requires that prior to October 1 of each year, the District Board by passage of the Annual Appropriation Resolution shall adopt a budget for the ensuing fiscal year and appropriate such sums of money as the Board deems necessary to defray all expenditures of the District during the ensuing fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the District Manager has prepared a Proposed Budget on a Cash Flow Budget basis, whereby the budget shall project the cash receipts and disbursements anticipated during a given time period, including reserves for contingencies for emergency or other unanticipated expenditures during the fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, Section 190.021, Florida Statutes, provides that the Annual Appropriation Resolution shall also fix the Maintenance Special Assessments and Benefit Special Assessments upon each piece of property within the boundaries of the District benefited by the adopted maintenance and capital improvement program of the District, such levy representing the amount of assessments for District purposes necessary to provide for payment during  the ensuing budget year of all properly authorized expenditures to be incurred by the District, including principal and interest of special revenue, capital improvement and/or benefit assessment bonds.

 	

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THAT;

Section 1.	Budget

The Board of Supervisors has reviewed the District Manager's Proposed Budget, a copy of which is on file with the office of the District Treasurer and the office of the Recording Secretary, and hereby approves certain amendments thereto, as shown in Section 2 below.

The District Manager's Proposed Budget as amended by the Board, is hereby adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 190.008(2)(a), Florida Statutes, and is incorporated herein by reference; provided, however, that the comparative figures contained in the adopted budget may be subsequently revised as deemed necessary by the District Manager to reflect actual revenues and expenditures for the fiscal year 2018 and/or revised projections for fiscal year 2019.

The adopted budget as amended, shall be maintained in the office of the District Treasurer and the District Recording Secretary and identified as "The Budget for the Lake Ashton II Community Development District for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2018, as Adopted by the Board of Supervisors on August 10, 2018."

Section 2.	Appropriations

That there be, and hereby is appropriated out of the revenues of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District, for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018, and ending September 30, 2019 the sum of $	to be raised by the levy of assessments and otherwise, which sum is deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be necessary to defray all expenditures of the District during said budget year, to be divided and appropriated in the following fashion:

Total General Fund Total Debt Service Capital Proj ects Total All Funds

Section 3.	Supplemental Appropriations

The Board may authorize by resolution supplemental appropriations or revenue changes for any lawful purpose from funds on hand or estimated to be received within the fiscal year as follows:
The Board may authorize a transfer of the unexpended balance or portion thereof of any appropriation item.

The Board may authorize an appropriation from the unappropriated balance of any fund. The Board may increase any revenue or income budget account to reflect receipt of any additional unbudgeted monies and make the corresponding change to appropriations or the unappropriated balance.
The District Manager and Treasurer shall have the power within a given fund to authorize the transfer of any unexpended balance of any appropriation item or any portion thereot provided such transfers do not exceed Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars or have the effect of causing more than 10% of the total appropriation of a given program or project to be transferred previously approved transfers included. Such transfer shall not have the effect of  causing a more than $10,000 or 10% increase, previously approved transfers included, to the original budget appropriation for the receiving program. Transfers within a program or project may be approved by the applicable department director and the District Manager or Treasurer. The District Manager or Treasurer must establish administrative procedures, which require information on the request forms proving that such transfer requests comply with this section.

Introduced, considered favorably,  and adopted this 10th	of August, 2018.

  II	Development District

Chairman / Vice Chairman

Attest:

Secretary / Assistant Secretary

 	 	

2018-05

A RESOLUTION LEVYING A NON AD VALOREM MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND ADOPTING AN ASSESSMENT ROLL OF THE LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019.

Whereas, certain improvements exist within the Lake  Ashton II Community Development District (the "District") and certain costs associated with the operation, repairs and maintenance of these improvements are being incurred; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton II Community Development District (the "Board") find that the District's total General Fund Assessment during Fiscal Year 2019, will amount to =----------___,· and

WHEREAS, the District has previously levied an assessment for debt service, which the District desires to collect on the tax roll pursuant to the Uniform Method authorized  by Chapter 197, Florida Statutes; Alternatively, the district may choose to directly collect and enforce all or a portion of the debt service assessment.

WHEREAS, the Board finds that the costs of administration of the Debt Service Fund provide special and peculiar benefit to certain property within the District; and

WHEREAS, the Board finds that the assessments on the affected parcels of property to pay for the special and peculiar benefits are fairly and reasonably apportioned in proportion to the benefits received;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS   OF   THE	ASHTON	COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT;

Section 1. A special assessment for maintenance as provided for in Chapter 190 Florida Statutes (hereinafter referred to as "assessment" or IIassessments") is hereby levied on all assessable land within the District.

Section 2. That the collection and enforcement of the aforesaid assessments on assessable lands within the District shall be by the Tax Collector serving as agent of the State of

Florida in Polk County ("Tax Collector") and shall be at the same time and in like manner as ad valorem taxes and subject to all ad valorem tax collection and  enforcement procedures which attend the use of the official annual tax notice under Section 190.021(3), Florida Statutes. Alternatively, the District may choose to directly collect and enforce all or a portion of these assessments.

Section 3. That a portion of said assessment levies on the assessable lands within the District as shown in the Assessment Roll, Exhibit "A", are hereby certified to the Polk County Property Appraiser, to be extended on the Polk County Tax Roll and shall be collected by the Tax Collector in the same manner and time as Polk County taxes pursuant to the uniform collection methodology Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes; this specifically excludes any delinquent assessments which have been accelerated to date. The proceeds there from shall be paid to the District. The chairman of the Board of the District shall designate the District Manager these certification duties; this specifically excludes any delinquent assessments which have been accelerated to date. The balance of said assessment levies as shown in the Assessment Roll, Exhibit "A", are directly assessed to the landowner(s) by the District pursuant to Chapters 170 and 190, Florida Statutes.
Section 4. The District Manager shall keep appraised of all updates made to the Polk County property roll by the Property Appraiser after the date of this Resolution, and shall amend the District's Assessment Roll in accordance with any such updates, for such time as authorized by Florida law, to the Polk County property roll. After any amendment of the Assessment Roll, the District Manager shall file updates to the Assessment Roll in the District records.

Section 5. Be it further resolved, that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the proper public and governmental officials so that its purpose and effect may be carried out in accordance with law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF AUGUST, 2018, BY THE BOARD OF	 SUPERVISORS OF THE LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairman / Vice Chairman

Exhibit "A" Assessment Roll

LATHAM, SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MICHAELJ. Bl'AUDINE M!CRAEL G. CANDIOTII JAN A. CARPENTER DANlEL H. COULTOFF ANDREW C. D'ADP.SKY MAR!ANE L. DORRIS J6NNIF�R S. EDEN DDROltlY F, GREEN JOSliUA D. (lRQSSHANS f!Rl/CE D. KNAPP

111 NORTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE, SUITE 1400 ORI,ANDQ, FLORIDA 32801
POST OFFICE BOX 3353
ORLANDO, f-LORIDA 32802
TELEPHONE: (407) 48 I -5800
FACSlMlLE: (407) 481 -5801 WWW.f.:�EBLAW.(:C)M

June 19, 2018 

l'E;TeR G, LATtJJ,M Jl/STlN M. Ll!NA  l',ITRJCI,\ R. MCCONNELL
LORI T. MILVAIN

R. ScoTr SHUKER JONATI-IAN A, ST!Ml�R ClllJlSTINA Y. TAYLOR KRISTEN E. TRUCCO DANIEL, A. VELASQUEZ

Sent Via Certified MaU John Velebir, III Merisa S. Velebir
5205 Green Drive
Winter Haven, Florida 33884
Re:	NOTICE TO CEASE AND Dli�SIST ACTIVITIES IN WETLAND BUFFER AREA LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
John Velebir, III and Merisa S. Velebir;

Based on information provided to the Lake Ashton II Community Development District (the "District"), you, someone in your household, employees, contractors or other agents at 5205 Green Drive, Winter Haven, Florida have engaged in unauthorized and impe1missible activities within the wetland and wetland buffer area (the "Wetland Buffor'') subject to the Southwest Florida Water M;magement District (SWFWMD) permit no. 44027710.004. These activities include mowing, clipping and clearing within the Wetland Buffer, as well as, removal of boundary stakes placed by the District to mark the Wetland Buffer, as depicted on the �lat of Lake Ashton West Phase 1, Plat Book 138, Pages l 1 -21, Lot 91 in the Official Records of Polk County.

This letter is sent on l;Jehalf ofthe District to demand that all activities, including but not limited to those activities described above, within the Wetland Buffer CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATELY.

Anyone found intentionally violating the requirements of the S\\TFWMD permit may be fined by the SWFWMD and �lso face criminal penalties (both misdemeanor and felony). The SWFWMD penalties are ba.sed on EPA and FDEP matrices ruid are assessed on a ''per day" and '1per count" basis that can run into tens ofthousands ofdollars. Further failure to cmµply may result in the construction of a boundary fonce to mark and protect the Wetland Buffer, as well as, any other civil or criminal a9tions the District may pursue to enforce the SWFWMD permit.

 	

John Velebir, III and Merisa S. Velebir June 19, 2018 
Page Two

Any questions regarding this notice should be sent to the Lake Ashton II CDD Community Director, Mary Bosman, 6052 Pebble Beach Boulevard, Winter Haven, Florida 33884 or via email to Mbosmanfcfllakeashton2cdd.com, who will forward on to the District Engineer, District Manager and/or District Counsel for review as appropriate,
Regards,

Andrew C. d'Adesky District Counsel
cc:
Mary Bosman, Community Djrector Doug Robertson, District Chairman Darrin Mossing, District Manager Alan Rayl, District Engineer
Jan Carpenter, Esq.

 	 	 	 	 	

MEETINGS LAKE ASHTON II

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

The Board of Supervisors of the  Lake  Ashton  II  Community  Development  District  will hold their regularly  scheduled public  meetings  for Fiscal  Year  2019  at the  Lake  Ashton  II Health & Fih1ess Center, 6052 Pebble Beach Blvd., Winter Haven Florida 33884 at 1:30 PM on the second Friday of each month as follows:

October 12, 2018
December 14, 2018
February 08, 2019
April 12, 2019 Workshop Meeting
May 10, 2019
August 09, 2019

There may be occasions when two or more members of the Lake Ashton Community Development District board are in attendance. These meetings  are  open to the public  and  may be continued to a time, date and  place  certain.  Supervisors  may  attend  the  meeting  by telephone as long as there is a quorum present at the meeting  place.  Any  person wishing  to receive a copy of the minutes of the meeting may contact the District Office at 407-841-5524.

Each person who decides to appeal any action taken at these meetings is advised that person will need a record of the proceedings and that accordingly, the person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which such appeal is to be based.

Darrin Mossing Manager

- ,

Search for Financial Disclosure Filers

Search Results

ln the table below, organization names are linked to coordinator contact information. Supervisor of Election and Commission on Ethics links display the relevant contact information.

Once we have logged in a Form 6, the status will contain the date received and the message "Form Available Soon!" When the Form 6 becomes available online, the Filing Requirement Fulfilled status will have a link to "View Form." 
If you filed with the Commission or the Supervisor of Elections and no date appears in the "Filing Requirement Fulfilled" column, ft means either the Supervisoror Commission has not yet recorded receipt of your fonn. Generally, forms are recorded within a few days of receipt. If you are concerned about the status of your form, please use the contact information under "Statutory Filing Requirement."
Section 112.31445, Florida Statutes, requires that all CE Form 6 Full and Public Disclosure of Financia l Interests, other than those ofjudges and judges of compensation claims, be posted on line. Before being posted onllne, any information required by law to be maintained as confidential must be redacted. For persons other than those who have filed as candidates with the Department of State, this process may take up to five business days.
Your Search for " Lake Ashton II Community Development District - Board of Supervisors " returned the following results:

Coordinator:
Rkh Hans

Governmental Management Services 5385 N. Nob Hill Rd
Sunrise, FL, 33351
(954) 721 ·8681
rhans@gmssf.com
Fi ler ID  Form Year		Full Name 254979	201 7	Mecsics , James J.

254980	2017	Murphey , Daniel

243539	201 7	Robertson , Doug

26551 3	201 7	Williams , Stanley

265514	201 7	Wright, Carla J

Narrow results to a particular suborg:
All Suborganizations
Board of Supervisors
Employees

Organizations

Lake Ashton II Community Development District-Board of Supervisors
Lake Ashton II Community Development District-Board of Supervisors
Lake Ashton II Community Development District-Board of Supervisors

Lake Ashton II Community Development District-Board of Supervisors

Lake Ashton II Community Development District-Board of Supervisors

Statutory Filing Requirement Form 1 with Polk County SOE

Form 1 with Polk CountySOE Form 1 with Polk County SOE Form 1 with Polk County SOE
Form 1 with Polk County SOE

Filing Requirement Fulfilled
� 06/05/201 8

ii Form Receipt Not Recorded

� 06/06/2018 

� 06/11/201 8

� 06/1 8/2018

j

Fillng History
j View Filing History j View Filing History
j View FIiing History

I I

j View Filing History I I View Filing History I

General Information about Filing Financial Disclosure

I Search Again I

Brochure: A Guide to the Sunshine Amendment and Code of Ethics (PDF)
Financial Disclosure laws
The Commission on Ethics Rules on Financial Disclosure
Forms and Detailed Instructions

For assistance with financial disclosure, you may wish to contact the Commission's Financial Disclosure Coordinator, Kimberly Holmes, at disclosure@leg.state.fl.us or (850) 488-7864, Address correspondence to P .0. Drawer 15709 Tallahassee, FL 32317-5709,
Under Florida law, e�mail addresses are publlc records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a publlc-records request, do not send electronic mall to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.

Evolve Contracting, Inc.

(863) 537-7537
jil lian.evolve@ gmail .com
PROFESSIO NAL	www.evolveyou rlawn.com LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT
ESTI MATE 
ADDRESS	ESTIMATE # 6691

Mary Bosman Lake Ashton HOA

DATE 07/27/201 8

ACTIVITY
Tree  Services:Tree  Services REMOVE 1 5- MEDJOOL PALMS AN D GRIND STUMP 
REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM SITE
Landscape Services:Fill Dirt
INSTALL FILL DIRT TO BACK FILL ( 36 CY)
Landscape Services:Plants
INSTALL CRAPE MYRTLE MULTI STEM 30G 1 0-1 2' HT
(*** OPTION FOR 65G 1 4-1 6' HT IS $600 PER TREE ; 15 X $600=$9000.00
Irrigation Services:lrrigation Diagnostic Check
REPAI RS AND RE ROUTING OF ANY PVC LINE AN D WI RES UNDER OR @ ROOT BALLS TO BE BILLED SEPARATELY ON TIME AND MATERIALS AT A RATE OF $60 PER HOU R FOR SKILLED TECH LABOR PLUS PARTS USED 
(*** ALLOWANCE OF $1 500.00 )
Disclaimer
TERMS AN D CONDITIONS:
Any design/layout/drawings produced by Evolve Professional Landscape Management, LLC Evolve are strictly proprietary and confidential. In the eve nt, Evolves proprietary and confidential design/layout/d rawings are executed by another ind ividual and/or company other than Evolve, a landscape design fee will be assessed for immediate payment. This proposal serves as notice of these terms and conditions herein. In absence of a signed contract, the acceptance of this proposal/scope/te rms and conditions serves as a binding mutual agreement between Evolve and the client.
Sod/Plant/I rrigation Installation Evolve Professional Landscape Management, LLC (Evolve) offers a 30-day (weed-free sod) guarantee on all grass. Plant material is guaranteed to be delivered in

QTY
15 

36

15 

RATE
800.00

25.00

300 .00

1 ,500 .00

0.00

AMOUNT
1 2,000.00

900.00

4,500.00

1 ,500.00

0.00

P. O. BOX 2362 - BARTOW - FL - 3383 1

ACTIVITY
a good, healthy condition. Evolve is not responsible for watering methods, existing soil conditions, insects, and weather. Evolve also offers a 30-day warranty for installed irrigation systems. However, some parts have 1 -5 year manufacturer warranty. Evolve must be notified within 30 days of delivery in
writing prior to any grass/plant material/irrigation parts being replaced. Replacement of parts is included in warranty; however a fee may apply for labor to replace warrantied parts. These terms and conditions are hereby agreed upon based on the acceptance of this bid.
**SOD General Care Instructions:
0 Sod must have at least 6 hours of direct sunlight per day
O Water every day 30 minutes for the first 1 O d ays. May require more depending on weather conditions, seasons, etc.
0 Water 20 minutes per day 3 times a week once established
0 A fungicide & insecticide should be applied within 7-1 O days of installation (highly recommended)
***TREE DISCLAIMER***
Evolve is not responsible for collateral damage to lawn, sprinkler system, plants or lawn ornamentals that occurs during any tree trimming or removal services. It is our goal to prevent any and all
collateral damage; however, in some
instances minor damage is unavoidable due to position of tree, access, etc.
***LAWN CARE DISCLAIMER*** PRO-RATED INVOICES FOR NEW LAWN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
INCLUDE A ONE TIME $1 0 FEE. Please
know that we require a minimum 14 days advance written notice to cancel your lawn maintenance agreement.
Termination requests received without proper notice may result in additional
fees. Please know the deadline to send in approved estimates for new monthly
maintenance is Thursdays at 2 PM (if you want to start the following week).
***CONCRETE DON'TS***
Do not drive on new concrete for 7 days min. 
Do not allow water to drain beneath the slab as this will cause settlement cracks
***PROJECT SCH EDULING PLEASE
READ***
When we receive your estimate we will notify you of our current turnaround time for job scheduling. Please know
scheduled jobs are occasionally moved up without advance notice to owner due to working ahead of schedule, cancellation or changes in schedules.
***LATE FEES***

QTY

RATE	AMOUNT

P.O. BOX 2362 - BARTOW - FL - 33831

ACTIVITY
Payment is due immediately upon receipt of job completion. Monthly lawn services are net 30 days. Any accounts past due 31 + days may incur a one time 1 8% late fee as penalty. Any cost associated with collection efforts on a past due account will be the responsibility of the customer.

****DOWN PAYMENT POLICY****
50% down payment required at time of scheduling for all concrete, landscaping, new irrigation installation and sod projects. 3 day cancellation allows full refund of deposit. Cancellations made 4-6 days after deposit are subject to a penalty of 25% of deposit being retained. Cancellations made 7+ days after deposit are subject to a penalty of 50% of deposit being retained.
****PROJECT SCHEDULING ****
When we receive your estimate we will notify you of our current turnaround time for job scheduling. Please know scheduled jobs are occasionally moved up without advance notice to owner due to working ahead of schedule, cancellation or changes in schedules. By signing this estimate, you are agreeing to the terms herein including Disclaimer (if applicable).
**To schedule, please sign and return this estimate to jillian.evolve@gmail.com or fax to 863-223-0275. PLEASE CONFIRM RECEIPT OF THIS PROPOSAL TO JILLIAN.EVOLVE@GMAIL.COM.

Accepted By

QTY

TOTAL

Accepted Date

RATE	AMOUNT

$1 8,900.00

P.O. BOX 2362 - BARTOW - FL - 33831

 	 	

LAKE ASHTON 11 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Check Run Summary GF 
5/1/2018 - 7/31/2018

Date	Check Numbers	Amount	
5/2/2018	2041-2058	$52,342 .17	
5/3/2018	2059-2060	$740.00	
5/16/2018	2061	$4,199.04	
5/18/2018	2062-2082	$49,535 .84	
5/21/2018	2083	$2,500.00	
5/29/2018	2084-2095	$14,402.07	
6/5/2018	2096-2113	$27,890.88	
6/7/2018	2114-2116	$1,125.00	
6/28/2018	2117-2133	$46,332.49	
6/29/2018	2134-2136	$2,643 .00	
7/10/2018	2137-2143	$18,676.08	
7/17/2018	2144-2150	$6,870.30 	
7/20/2018	2151-2155	$23,791.26 	
7/30/2018	2156-2166	$41,484.14	
Total		$292,532.27	
	Check Run Summary CR		
Date	Check Numbers	Amount	
5/18/2018	9-11	$35,422.45	
6/1/2018	12	$7,500.00	
6/5/2018	13-14	$177.71 	
6/28/2018	15	$40.98 	
7/10/2018	16	$134.82	
Total		$43,275.96	

AP* 3* 0 0R

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGI S TER

RUN	8/ 02/18 

PAGE	1

*	CHECK NOS . 00 2041- 00 21 66 

LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .    . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

S TATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

5/ 02/18 00 051 

4/12/18 30 774071 201 804 320 -57200- 4310 0

*	626 . 7 3

PROPANE -POOL HEAT

AMERIGAS

- - -

- - - - - - - -

- 6 2- 6 -. 7 3-

002 041 

5/ 02/18 00081 

4/01 /18 
4/24/18 
4/ 01/18 
4/01 /18 
4/24/18 
4/24/18 
4/ 01/18 

4/24/18 

041818	20 1804 320-57200- 23000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT
042418	201804 320-57200- 34100 
SVC THRU 04/24/18 
041818	201804 320-57200-23000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT
041818	20 18 04 320-5720 0-23000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT
042418	20 18 04 320-5720 0-34100 
SVC THRU 04/24/18 
042418	201 804 320- 57200- 3410 0
SVC THRU 04/24/18 
041818	20180 4 320- 57200- 23 000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT
042418	20 18 04 320- 57200- 34100 
SVC  THRU  04/24 /18	MARY BOSMAN

*
* V V V V
*
*

- - - - -

250 . 0 0
4 90 . 0 0

250 . 0 0 -
250 . 0 0- 

4 90 . 00- 
4 90 . 00- 
250 . 0 0
490 . 0 0

- - - - -

. 0 0 0020 42 

5/02/18 00064

5 /02/18 00070 

4/2 0/18 APR-18	201804 320 -57200- 432 00 
WATER-APRIL 20 18	CITY OF WINTER HAVEN 4/11/17 8252785	20180 4 32 0-5720 0-3 4800 
PEST CONTROL SVC-APRIL 1 8
4/17/18 8256505	20180 4 320 -5720 0-348 00 

*
*	- -
*

- - -

2, 503 . 3 8
-  -  -  -   -
79 . 0 0
125 . 0 0

- 2 -, 5 0- 3 -. 3 8-

002043 

5 /02/18 00 011 

PEST CONTROL  SVC -APRIL 18	FLORIDA PEST CONTROL 5/01 /18  170	201805 310 -513 00-34000 

MGMT FEES- MAY 20 18 
5/01 /18 1 70	2018 05 310-51300- 35100 
COMPUTER TIME- MAY 20 18 
5/01/18 170	20 18 05 310-51300- 31300 
DISSEMINATION-MAY 201 8
5/ 01/18  170	20 18 05 310-51300- 35110 
WEBS ITE ADMIN- MAY 20 18 
5/01 /18  170	2018 05 31 0- 513 00- 42 000 
POS TAGE /DELIVERY-MAY 2 018 
5/01 /18 1 70	201 8 05 31 0-5 13 00-42500 

COPIES- MAY 20 18	GMS - SO FLORIDA , LLC
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

*	3 , 9 50 . 6 7
*	83 .3 3
*	5 00 . 0 0
*	27 . 7 5
*	25 . 12
*	23 .40 

204 . 0 0  002 044 

4 , 6 1 0 . 2 7  002 045 

* * * 

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS . 002041- 002166 

YEAR- TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	2

CHECK VEND# DATE

. . . . . INVOICE . . . . . . . . EXPENSED TO . . . DATE	INVOI CE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB

SUBCLASS

VENDOR NAME

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

5/02/18  00086 

5/02/18  00 173 

5/02/18 00170 

5/02/18 00107 

5/02/18 00101 

5/02/18  00080 

5/02/18 00152 

3/28/18  53279	20 1803 320 -57200-46030 

3/28/ 18	SUPPLIES20 1803 320-5720 0-46020 	*	3 . 38 	
SUPPLIES20180 3 320 -57200-46030 	*	231 . 60- 	
3/ 29/18	SUPPLIES20180 3 32 0- 57200-46020 	*	500 . 00 	
3/3 0/18	SUPPLIES20 1803 	320-57200- 46030 	*	47 . 05	
4/06 /18	SUPPLIES20 1804 	320- 57200-46020 	*	78 .7 9	
4/06 /18	SUPPLIES201804	320- 57200-46020 	*	250 . 0 0	
4/06 /18	SUPPLIES201 804 	32 0- 57200-46020 	*	207 . 8 8- 	
4/11/18	SUPPLIES20 1804 	320-57200- 46020 	*	146 . 63	
4/19/18	SUPPLIES201804	320 -57200 -46020 	*	96 . 05 	

53279 
3/29/18 20421 
900426 
9053434 
2054214 
29 00733 
2900738 
7054775
9055 674 
SUPPLIES	HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVI CES 4/17/18 L06 0G0IE 201 804 310- 513 00-48000 
WORKSHOP MEETING NOTICE	LAKELAND LEDGER PIBLISHING 4/01/18  041818	20 1804  320 -57200- 23000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT	JAMES MARGESON
4/12/18  041218	201804 320 -57200- 46400 
POOL/ PATIO SUPPLIES
4/12/18  041218A	201804 320- 57200- 46400 
POOL/ PATIO  SUPPLIES &  SVC	POOL & PATIO CENTER
5/01/18 10129558 201805 320- 57200- 46400 
WATER MGMT SVC-MARCH 18	POOLSURE
4/14/18  0654-000 20 1805 320- 57200-34900 
SVC  THRU  05/31/18	REPUBLIC SERVICES #654 4/05/18 E4 058157 20 1804 320- 57200-34500 
SECURITY SVC THRU 4/5/18 

*	52 .7 9

*	59 . 0 0

*	250 . 0 0

*	5 . 39 
*	2 , 949 . 0 0

*	540 . 0 0

*	163 . 92

*	4 , 6 71 . 8 8

735 .2 1 002046 

59 . 0 0 002047 

250 . 0 0 002048 

2, 954 .39 002049 

540 . 0 0 002050 

163 . 92 002051 

LKA2  LAKE  ASHTON 2	SROS INA

* * *

AP3 0 0R
CHECK NOS . 002041- 002166 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	3

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS
4/19/18 E4 070942 20 1804 320-5720 0-34500 SECURITY SVC THRU 4/19/18 
4/26/18 E4 074906 201804 320 -5720 0-34500 

SECURITY  SVC  THRU  4/26/18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC

STATUS
*
*

AMOUNT

5 , 128 . 13
4, 671 . 8 8

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

14 ,4 71 . 8 9 002052 

5/02/18 00091 

4/19/18  21151	20 1804 320 -57200-49300 
ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER INS 4/19/18  21151	20 1804 320 -57200-49300 

AANUAL BACKFLOW TEST	S TATE FIRE EXT SERVICE INC

*
*

- - -

- - -

350 . 0 0
200 . 0 0
- - - -

-  - 5 5- 0 -. 0 0-

002053 

5/02/18  00062 

5/02/18  00087 

5/02/18 00094 

5/02/18  00 119 

5/02/18  00067 

4/13/18  APR-18	20 1804 320 -57200- 43 000 
ELECTRIC-APRIL  2018	TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY 4/01/18  040118	201804 320-5720 0-23000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT	KAREN VANKIRK
4/23/18 5604-042 20 1804 320 -57200- 49400 
CC CHARGES-APRIL 2018 
4/23/18 5604-042 201804 320 -57200-46020 
CC CHARGES -APRIL 2018 
4/23/18 5604-042 20 1804 320-5 7200-5 1000 
CC CHARGES -APRIL 20 18 
4/23/18 5604-042 20 1804 320 -57200-46030 
CC CHARGES-APRIL 2018	WELLS FARGO
4/11/18  68268101 20 1805 320- 57200 -51000 
KYOCERA COPIER- 06/23/18	WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SERV 3/31/18 00 002097 201802 320 -57200- 46210 
IRRIGATION REPAIR- FEB 18 
3/ 31/18 00002097 201801 32 0-5 7200 -46210 
IRRIGATION   REPAIR- JAN   18 4/01/18  00002068 20 1804 320- 57200-46200 

*
*	-  -
-  -
*
*
*
*
*	-  -
*	-  -
*
*

-  -  -

-  -  -

-  -  -

-  -  -

9, 904 .8 5
-  -  -   -  -
204 . 44
- - - - -
10 8 . 22 
794 . 5 8
97 .2 1
14 8 . 5 0
-  -  -  -   -
13 8 . 6 8
-  -  -  -  -
76 . 0 6
199 . 0 1
13 , 0 01 . 8 3

- 9 -, 9 0-4 -. 8 5-
-  - 2 0- 4 -. 44-

- 1 -, 14- 8 -. 5 1-
-  - 1 -38 -. 6 8-

002054 

002055 

002056 

002057 

5/03/18 00081 

LANDS CAPE MAINT-APRIL 18	YELLOWSTONE LANDSCAPE

4/0 1/18  041818	201804 320- 5720 0-23000 
HEALTH INS SUPPLEMENT	MARY BOSMAN
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSINA

*	250 . 0 0

13 , 2 7 6 . 9 0  002058 

250 . 0 0 002059 

 	

AP3 00R
*** CHECK NOS . 002041-002166 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	4

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS 

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

5/03/18 00 14 0

5/16/18   00 094 

4/24/18  042418	20 1804 320 -57200 -34100 
PAYROLL  THRU  04/24/18	RYAN A BUSWELL
5/16/18 MAY2 018	20 1805 300-15500-10000 

*
*	- -

490 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - -
4 , 199 . 04

-4 9- 0 -. 0 0-

002060 

BALANCE AS OF 5/16/18 

WELLS FARGO

- - -

- - - - - - -

- 4 -,1 -9 9 -. 04-

002061 

5/ 18/18 	00092 	4/30/18 	
		4/30/ 18 	
5/ 18/18 	00074	5/ 09/18 	
5/18/18 	00081 	5/01/18 	
5/ 18/18 	00076	5/05/18 	
5/i8/18 	00 14 0	5/08 /18 	
5/ 18/18 	00003	5/01/18 	
5/18/18 	00070 	4/30/ 18 	
5/ 18/18 	00022 	5/01/18 	
5/18/18 	00161 	4/12/18 	

169183 

201804 320- 57200-46500 

*	725 . 0 0

AQUATIC  PLANT MGMT-APR 18	*

169184 

201804 32 0-57200- 46500 

150 . 0 0

AQUATIC  PLANT MGMT-APR 18	APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT , INC .

- - -

- - - - - - -

-  - 8 7- 5 -. 0 0-

002062 

202292	201805 320 -57200 -34520 
ARTS GOLF CARTS INC .

*

*	- -

192 .6 6
- - - - - - - - -

- 1 9-2 -. 6 6-

002063 

050118	201805 320-57200-23000 
SUPPLEMENT  FOR HEALTH  INS	MARY BOSMAN
05018300 20 1805 310-51300- 41000 
6052  PEBBLE BEACH BLVD	BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS
050818	201805 320- 57200- 34100 
TECH  SUPPORT- 05/ 07 /18	RYAN A BUSWELL
6-168-38 20 1804 310 -513 00- 42000 

*	-  -
*	-  -
*	-  -

250 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - -
696 . 74 
- - - - - - - - -
14 0 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - -
51 .20 

- 2 5- 0 -. 0 0-
- 6 9- 6 -. 74-
- 1 4- 0 -. 0 0-

0020 64

002065 

002066 

DELIVERIES  THRU  04/20/18	FEDEX 825650	201804 32 0-5 7200-34800 

*	- -

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
125 . 0 0

-  -  5- 1 -. 2 -0   002067 

PEST  CONTROL THRU  4/30/18	FLORIDA PEST CONTROL
16771	201805 310-5130 0-32200 

*	- -

- - - - - - - - -
2 , 100 . 0 0

- 1 2- 5 -. 0 0-

002068 

AUDIT   FYE  09/3 0/18	GRAU & ASSOCIATES 172355	20 1804 320 -57200-46020 
ANNUAL   FIRE ALARM  INSPEC	THE  HARTLINE  ALARM  CO INC

LKA2  LAKE  ASHTON 2	SROS INA

*	- -

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
552 . 9 0

- 2 -, 1 0- 0 -. 0 -0   002069 

552 . 9 0 002070 

* * * 

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS. 002041- 002166 

YEAR- TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	5

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLAS S

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

5/ 18/18 00040 

5/ 18/18 00126 

5/18/18 00170 

5/18/18 00107 

5/ 18/18 00172 

5/18/18 00150 

5/ 18/18 00065 

5/18/18  00152 

5/18/18  00 062 

5/18/18  00005 

5/18/18  00087 

5/ 17/18  80995	201804 310 -51300-31500	* LEGAL   SVC THRU  04/16/18	LATHAM , SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE LLP
5/14/18  CDD  II-1 201804 320 -57200 -46010	*
HFC  CLEANING-APRIL  20 18	MAGIC GENIE CLEANING SERVI CES, INC .
5/01/18  050118	201805 320- 57200-23 000	*
SUPPLEMENT  FOR HEALTH  INS	JAMES MARGESON
3/23/18  10104660  201803 320-57200-46400	*

*

REMOVAL OF OLD HEATER
4/02/18 10104660 201804 320-57200 -46400 
HEATER  INSTALL	POOL & PATIO CENTER
5/10/18  18053	201805 320 -57200-46020	*
REPAIR  PI CNIC  BARS	PRECICION SAFE & LOCK, LLC
4/27/18   17-101-1  201804 310-51300- 31100	*
SERVICE  THRU  04/27/18	RAYL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , LLC
5/11/18  10514016  201805 320 -57200-45000	*
WORKERS COMP POLICY	RETAILFIRST INSURANCE COMPANY
5/03/18 E4 08 0766  201805 320-57200- 34500	*

*

SERVICE THRU 05/03/18 
5/10/18 E4 087362 201805 320 -57200-34500 
SERVICE  THRU  05/10/18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES  USA, INC 5/14/18  MAY-18	20 1805 320-57200- 43000	*
SERVICE  THRU  05/08/18	TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY
5/ 06/18  1012 844	20 1804 310- 513 00-48000	*
NOTICE OF WORKSHOP	THE LEDGER/NEWS CHIEF
5/01/18  050118	201805 320-57200-23000	*
SUPPLEMENT  FOR HEALTH  INS	KAREN VANKIRK
LKA2  LAKE  ASHTON 2	SROSINA

1, 504 . 0 0

3 , 2 80 . 0 0

250 . 0 0

3 , 049 . 0 0
2 , 3 49 . 0 0

125 . 0 0

891 . 9 0

459 .36 

4, 671 . 8 8
4 , 9 90 . 0 0

9, 716 . 93

59 . 0 0

204 . 44

1,5 04 . 0 0  002071 

3 , 2 80 . 0 0  002072 

250 . 0 0 002073 

5,3 98 . 0 0  002 074 

125 . 0 0 002075 

891. 90 002076 

459 .36 002077 

9, 661 . 8 8  002078 

9, 716 . 93 002079 
59 . 0 0  002080	
204 .44 002081 

AP3 0 0R
*** CHECK NOS . 00 2041-002166 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/0 2/1 8

PAGE	6

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOI CE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

S TATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

5/18/18 00 067 

5/21/18 00 174 

5/31/18 INV- 0000 201805 32 0-57200- 46200 
LANDS CAPE MAINT- MAY 2018	YELLOWSTONE LANDSCAPE

3/12/18 031218	20 1805 31 0- 51300- 49000 

*
*	- -

13 , 0 01 . 8 3
-   -  -  -   -   -   - -
2 , 5 00 . 0 0

1- 3 -, 0 0- 1 -. 8 3-  00 2 08 2

5/29/18 00140 

5/29/18 0 00 64 

GOLF COURSE ACQUI SI TION	NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION CONSULTING 5 /20/18 052018	20 1805 320- 572 0 0-34100 

PAYROLL  FOR IT SVC	RYAN A BUSWELL

5/18/18 MAY -18	201805 320 -57200- 43200 

5/ 29/18 	0 0084	5/07 /18 AR340102 20 1805 320 -57200- 51000 	*	526 . 2 6	
		5 /10/18	COPIER LEASE THRU 8/4/18 -51000 
AR341 310 201805 320 -57200 
SUPPLIES FOR COPIER	DEX IMAGING	*	8 . 0 0	
5 / 29/18 	0000 3	5/15/18 6 -182 -58 20 1805 310 -51300- 42 000 
DELIVERIES THRU  05/04/18	FEDEX	- - - - - - - - -
*	104 . 9 0	
5/ 29/18 	00070 	5 /15/18  826647	20 1805 320-57 200- 34800 	*	- - - - - - - - -
125 . 0 0	

UTILITIES -MAY 2018	CITY OF WINTER HAVEN

-  -
*
*	-  -
-  -

-  -   -  -   -   -  - -
35 . 0 0
-  -   -  -  -  -  -   -
2, 1 70 .2 9
- - - - - - - -

2 , 5 00 . 0 0  00 2083 

35 . 00 002 084 

- 2 -, 1 7- 0 -.2 -9   00 2 085 

-  -   - 5 3- 4 -.2 6-

-   -   - 1 0- 4 -. 9 0-

00 2 086 

00 2 087 

5/29/18 0 0161 

PEST INSPECTION	FLORIDA PEST CONTROL 5/1 8/18 173 912	201805 320 -572 00 -34510 

- - -
*

-   -  -  -  -  -   -
13 0 . 0 0

-  - 12- 5 -. 0 -0   002088 

5/29/18 00 164 

5/29/18 00170 

5/29/18 0 0101 

MAINTENANCE SVC -MAY 2018	THE HARTLINE ALARM CO INC

5/25/18 052518	20 1805 300 -58100 -10000 

ROADWAY REPAIR TXFER	LAKE ASHTON II C/O CAPITAL PROJECTS 3/ 3 0/18 MAR- 18	20 1803 320-57200- 46050 
MILEAGE RIEMB- MARCH 2018 
4/30/18 APR-18	201804 320 -57200- 46050 
MILEAGE RIEMB -APRIL 2018	JAMES MARGES ON

6/01 /18 10125 581 201806 320- 572 00- 46400 

*	-  -
-  -
*
*
*	- -

-  -   -   -   -   - -  -
300 . 0 0
-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
65 .4 0
45 . 7 8
-   -   -  -  -   -   - -
540 . 0 0

-   - 1 3- 0 -. 0 0-
- - 3 -0   0 -. 0 0-

-   - 1 1- 1 -. 1 8-

00 2 089 

002090 

002 091 

WATER MGMT-JUNE 20 18	POOLSURE

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSI NA

54 0 . 0 0 00 209 2

* * *

AP3 0 0R
CHECK NOS . 00 20 41 -002166 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGIS TER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/0 2/18 

PAGE	7

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS 

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

5/29/18 00080 

5/ 29/18 00152 

5/29/18 00119 

6/ 05/18 00 051 

6/ 05/18 00092

6/05/18 00081 

6 /05 /18 00113 

6/05/18 0000 3

6/05/18 000 11 

5/ 14/18 065 4-000 2018 06 320- 572 00- 34900	* SERVICE  THRU  06/ 3 0/18	REPUBLIC SERVI CES # 654 

5/17/18 E4 092786 2018 05 320 -57200- 34500	*

*

SERVI CE THRU 05/17/18 
5/24/18 E4 095918 20 18 05 320-57200- 345 00 

SERVICE THRU  05/24/18	SECURITAS SECURI TY SERVICES USA, INC 5/13/18 6 8374550 201806 320 -57200- 51000	*
KYOCERA  COPIER 6/4 -7 /23	WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SERV

5/23/18 30 788105 2018 05 320-57200- 43100	*
PROPANE #6323 01 762	AMERIGAS

*

5/31/18 16983 7	20 18 05 320-57 200- 46500	* AQUATIC PLANT MGMT-MAY 1 8
5/31/18 169838	20 1805 320 -57200- 46500 
AQUATIC  PLANT  MGMT- MAY 1 8	APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT , INC .

6/ 01/18 0601 18	20 1806 320-57 20 0-23 000	* HEALTH  INS -JUNE 2018	MARY BOSMAN

2/09 /18 124 08	20180 2 320 -57200- 46030	*
YARD WASTE SI GN W S TAKES	EXTREME GRAPHICS

5/22/18 6-188-9 5  2018 05 310-51300- 4 2000	* DELIVERIES THRU  05/16/18	FEDEX

6/01 /18  171	201806 310-51300- 34000	*

*

MGMT FEES- JUNE 2018 
6/01/18 1 71	20 1806 310-51300- 35100 

*

COMPUTER TIME- JUNE 2018 
6/01 /18  171	20 1806 31 0-51300- 31300 

*

DISSEMINATION- JUNE 20 18 
6/01 /18  171	2018 06 310-51300- 51000 

*

SUPPLIES- JUNE 2018 
6/01/18 171	20 18 06 310-51300- 42 000 
POSTAGE/DELIVERY- JUNE 18 

16 9 . 0 0

5 , 021 . 8 8
5, 021 . 8 8

138 . 6 8

2, 820 .2 3

725 . 0 0
15 0 . 0 0

250 . 0 0

2 80 . 0 0

78 . 0 7

3 , 9 50 . 6 7
83 . 3 3
5 00 . 0 0
25 . 0 0
26 . 7 0

16 9 . 0 0  00 2 093

10 , 043 . 7 6  002 094

1 3 8 . 6 8  002095 

2 , 8 20 .2 3  00 2096 

875 . 0 0  00 2097 

250 . 0 0 002098 

280 . 0 0  00 2099 

7 8 . 0 7 002100 

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSI NA

AP3 00R
*** CHECK NOS . 00 2041- 002166 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	8

CHECK	VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .    . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE			DATE	INVOI CE	YRMO	DPT  ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS
6/ 01/18 17 1	2018 06 310 -513 0 0 -4 2500 

COPIES - JUNE 20 18	GMS - SO FLORIDA , LLC

S TATUS
*
- -

AMOUNT

268 . 3 0
- - - - - - -

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

-  - 4 -, 8 5- 4 -. 0 0   002101 

6/ 05/18 00177 

6/05/18 060 518	20 1806 300- 36900-1 0100 

*	190 . 0 0

DEPOSIT REFUND

ROSA GONZALEZ

190 . 0 0 002102 

- - - - - - - - -
6/05/18 00086 

- - - - - - - -
4/28/18 244325 

- - - -
201804 

- - - - - - - - - - -
45 . 1 6

- - - -

	4/30/18 	
	5/ 01/18 	
	5/04/18 	
	5/10/18 	
	5/14/18 	
	5/17/18 	
6/05/18 	00170 	6/01 /18 	
6 /05/18 	00 175 	6/05/18 	
6/05 /18 	00107 	5/25/18 	
6 /0 5/18 	00150 	5/31/18 	
6/05/18 	00 178 	6/05/18 	

SUPPLIES 
80 56853	20 1804 

057018 

7 SUPPLIES 201 805 

2018 05 

SUPPLIES 4254994 

20 18 05 

SUPPLIES 80 81556 
4 SUPPLIES 

35 . 3 6
12 . 3 2
232 .2 7

196 . 22 

050766	2018 05 

201805 

SUPPLIES 1081639 

SUPPLIES 

320 -57200- 46030 	*	
320-57200- 46020 
320 -57200- 4603 0	*
*	
320-57200- 46020 	*	
320-57200- 46020 
320- 57200-46020 	*
*	
320 -572 00 -46400 	*	

HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVI CES

56 . 8 0
2 67 .4 9
- - - - - - - - - - -

- 8 4- 5 -. 6 2-

00 2103 

0601 18	20 1806 320-57200- 23000 
HEALTH  INS - JUNE 201 8	JAMES MARGESON

060518	2018 06 30 0-36900-10100 
DEPOS IT REFUND	MALLORY MEYER

052518	20 18 05 320 -57200- 46400 

*
*	-  -
-  -
*

250 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - -
5 00 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - -
3 , 198 . 9 9

- 2 5- 0 -. 0 0   00 2104 

- 5 0- 0 -. 0 -0   00 21 05 

PUMP /HEATER INSTALL	POOL & PATIO CENTER 17-101-1 20 18 05 310- 5130 0-31100 

SERVICE  THRU  05/31/18	RAYL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , LLC

*	-  -

-  -

-   -   -   -   -  - -
2 , 9 30 . 8 9
- - - - - - -

-   - 3 -, 1 -98 -. 9 9-
- - 2 -,  9 3- 0 -.  8 9-

002106 

002107 

060 518	2018 06 300- 369 00-10100 

*	462 .50 

6 /05 /18 0015 2

DEPOS IT REFUND	JANAY RODRIGUEZ 5/31/18 E4 100993 20 18 05 320-57200- 345 00 

SERVI CE THRU  05/31/18	SECURI TAS SECURI TY SERVICES USA, INC
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSI NA

- - - - - - - - - - -
*	5, 170 . 9 2

- 4 6- 2 -. 5 -0   002108 

5 , 170 . 9 2  002109 

* * * 

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS . 002041-002166 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/ 02/18 

PAGE	9

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLAS S

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

6/05/18 00176 

6/05/18  00005 

6/05/18  060518	201806 300 -36900-10100 
DEPOSIT REFUND	SHELLY SPRAGUE
5/21/18 L06 0G0IG 201805 310-5130 0-48000 
NOTICE  OF CANIDATES BOS	THE LEDGER/NEWS CHIEF

6/05/18 	00087 	6/01/18 	
6/05/18 	00094 	5/22/18 	
		5/22/18 	
		5/22/18 	
		5/22/18 	
6/07 /18 	00 074 	5/30 /18 	
6/07/18 	00180 	6/07/18 	
6/07 /18 	00 179 	6/04/18 	
6/28/18 	00051 	6/20/18 	
6/28/18 	00 092 	6/12/18 	
6/28/18 	00076	6/05/18 	

06 0118	20 1806 320- 5720 0- 23 000 
HEALTH  INS- JUNE  2018	KAREN VANKIRK
5604- 052 201805 300 -15500-10000 
CC CHARGES THU 05/22/18 
5604-052 201805 320- 572 00-46020 
CC CHARGES THU 05/22/18 
5604-052 201805 320- 57200-51000 
CC CHARGES THU 05/22/18 
5604-052 201805 310 -51300- 49000 

*
-  -  -
*
-  -  -
*
*	-  -  -
*
*
*

500 . 0 0

- - - - - - -
53 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -
204. 44
- - - - - - - -
4 , 0 00 . 0 0
375 . 0 0
13 .22 
39 . 0 0

50 0 . 0 0  002110 

-  5- 3 -. 0 -0   002111 
- 2 0- 4 -. 44-  0021 12

CC  CHARGES  THU  05/22/18	WELLS FARGO 202360	201805 320 -57200-34500 

*	- - -

-  -  -  -  -  -   -
125 . 0 0

- 4 -, 4 2- 7 -.2 2-

002 113 

BRAKE DRUM HUB	ARTS GOLF CARTS INC . 06 0718	201806 300-36900 -10100 

- - -
*

-  -  -  -   -  -  -
500 . 0 0

-  - 1 2- 5 -. 0 0-

002 114

DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND	MENDY MASSEY
060418	201806 320-57200 -49400 

*	- - -

- - - - - - - -

50 0 . 0 0

-5 0- 0 -. 0 -0   002115 

SPONSRED EVENT	PINXSTER ENTERTAINMENT GROUP 30 797743 201806 320- 57200- 43100 

*	- -

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
1, 070 . 0 6

-  - 5 0- 0 -. 0 0-

002116 

PROPANE-POOL HEAT	AMERIGAS
170217	201806 320-57200-46500 

*	- - -

-  -  -  -  -  -  -
70 0 . 0 0

- 1 -, 0 -70 -. 0 -6   002117 

AQUATIC  PLANT MGMT- JUN  18	APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT , INC . 05018300 201806 320- 5720 0-41000 
6052  PEBBLE BEACH BLVD	BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS

LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSINA

*	- -

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
696 . 74 

-  - 7 -00 -. 0 0-  002118 

696 . 74 002119 

* * *

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS . 002041-002166 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	10 

CHECK	VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .  .  . . EXPENSED  TO .  . .		VENDOR NAME DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT  ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

6/28/18 00140 

6/28/18   00 064 

6/19/18  06 1918	20 1806 320 -5720 0-34100 
TECH   SUPPORT-06/02/18	RYAN A BUSWELL
6/15/18  JUN-18	201806 320 -57200-43200 

*

*	- -

- - -

14 0 . 0 0
- - - - - -
2 , 507 . 12

- 1 4- 0 -. 0 0-

002120 

6/28/18 00155 

WATER-JUNE  2018	CITY OF WINTER HAVEN 6/28/18 53-BI-38 20 1806 320-57200- 493 00 

*	- -

- - -

-  -  -  -  -
280 . 0 0

- 2 -, 5 -07 -. 12-

002121 

6/28/18 

PERMIT #53 -60 -00 789 
53 -BID-3 201806 320 -57200-49300 

PERMIT  #53 -60-00822	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

*

- - -

14 0 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -

- 4 2- 0 -. 0 -0   002122 

6/28/18  00 161 

6/28/18 00095 

6/28/18 00135 

6/15/18  174611	201807 320 -57200 -34510 
FIRE ALARM  MONITORING	THE HARTLINE ALARM CO INC 6/05/18  45626	20 1806 320 -57200-46020 
KILN  INSTALL	JEN- KEN KILNS
6/11/18  92683	201806 320- 57200-49000 

*

-  -
*

*	-  -

-  -  -

-  -  -

203 .29 
- - - - - -
860 . 0 0
- - - - - -
475 . 0 0

- 2 0- 3 -. 2 9-

- 8 6- 0 -. 0 0-

002123 

002124 

GENERAL  REPAIRS	KINCAID ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC

- - -

- - - - - - -

-  - 4 7- 5 -. 0 -0   002 125 

6/28/18 00040 

6/15/18 

LEGAL SVC- MAY 20 18 

513 00- 31500 

*	28 . 6 1

81297	20 1805 310- 
6/15/18   81297	201805 31 0-51300-31500 

V	28 . 6 1- 

6/28/18 	00101 	7/01/18 	
6/28/18 	00080 	6/14/18 	
6/28/18 	00152 	6/07 /18 	
		6/14/18 	

LEGAL  SVC-MAY  2018	LATHAM, SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE LLP 10129558 20 1807 320-57200- 46400 
WATER  MGMT- JULY  2018	POOLSURE
0654-000 201807 320- 57200-34900 

*	- -

*

- - -

. 0 0	002126 	
540 . 0 0	002127 	
391 .15	002128 	

- - - - -
540 . 0 0

391 . 15

SERVICE THRU 07/3 1/18 

REPUBLIC SERVICES #654 

E4 10672 8 20 1806 320- 57200-34500 SERVICE THRU 06/07 /18 
E4113 099 20 1806 320- 57200-34500 SERVICE THRU 06 /14/18 
6/21/18 E4118154 201806 320- 572 00-34500 SERVICE THRU 06/21/18 

*	4 , 646 . 8 8
*	4 , 646 . 8 8
*	4 , 646 . 8 8

LKA2   LAKE  ASHTON  2	SROSINA

* * * 

AP3 00R

CHECK NOS. 002041-002166 

YEAR- TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/ 02/18 

PAGE	11

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

STATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

6/07/ 18 
6/14/18 
6/21/18 

E4 10672 8  201806 320- 57200-34500	V
SERVICE THRU 06/ 07/18 
E4113 099  201806 320 -57200-34500	V
SERVICE THRU 06/14/18 
E4118154  201806  320 -57200-34500	V

SERVICE  THRU  06/21/18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC

4, 646 .8 8- 
4 , 646 . 8 8- 
4, 646. 88- 

. 0 0 002129 

6/28/18 00062 

6/28/18  00036 

6/28/18   00 119 

6/28/18  00067 

6/29/18 00135 

6/29/18 00040 

6/29/18  00 152 

6/13/18  JUN-18	201806 320- 57200- 43 000	*

*

ELECTRIC- JUNE 2018 
6/13/18  JUN-18	201806 300 -15600-10000 
SECURITY DEPOSIT	TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY
6/28/18  Q122	201806 320 -57200-49000	* REPLACE  MITSU .  MINI  SPLIT	TRADITION CENTRAL AIR, INC .
6/10/18  68464033  20 1808 320-57200- 51000	*
KYOCERA COPIER- 08/23/18	WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SERV
6/01 /18  20045	201806 320 -57200 -46200	*
LANDSCAPE MAINT- JUNE  2018	YELLOWSTONE LANDSCAPE
6/11/18  92684	201806 320-57200- 49000	* GENERAL REPAIRS	KINCAID ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC
6/15/18  812 97	201805 310- 513 00- 31500	*

*

LEGAL SVC-MAY 2018	LATHAM , SHUKER , EDEN & BEAUDINE  LLP 6/07/18  E4106728  201806 320 -57200-34500	*

9, 899 .7 6
952 .3 9- 

2,2 72 . 0 0

138 . 6 8

13 , 0 01 . 8 3

1, 850 . 0 0

746 . 61

4, 671 . 8 8

8, 947 .37 00213 0

2,2 72 . 0 0  002131 

138 . 6 8 002132 
13 , 0 01 . 8 3  002133	
1, 8 50 . 0 0  002134 

746 . 61 002135 

6/14/18 
6/21/18 

SERVICE  THRU   06/ 07/18 

*

E4113 099 201806 320 -57200-34500 SERVICE THRU 06 /14/18 
E4118154 201806 320-57200- 34500 

SERVICE   THRU  06/ 21/18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC

4, 671 . 8 8
4, 671 .8 8

14 , 0 15 . 64 002136 

7/10/18 00 092 

6/30/18  170493	201806 320 -57200-46500	*

*

AQUATIC PLANT MGMT-JUN 18 6/30/18  170494	201806 320- 57200 -465 00 

AQUATIC  PLANT MGMT- JUN  18	APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT , INC .
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROSINA

725 . 0 0
150 . 0 0

875 . 0 0 002137 

 	

AP* 3 00 R

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	12

* * CHECK NOS . 002041-0 02166 

LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

CHECK    VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .    . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT  ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

S TATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

7 /10/18 000 84 

6/28/18 AR350669 20 1806 320- 57 200-51000 

*	8 . 0 0

TONER

DEX IMAGING

- - -

- - - - - - -

8 . 0 0 002138 

7 /10/18 00 058 

7/02/18 
7/02/18 
7/02/1 8
7/02/18 
7/02/18 
7/02/18 

2	201807 31 0-51300- 34 000 

2

MGMT FEES- JULY 2018 
201807 31 0- 513 00-35100 
COMPUTER TIME- JULY 20 18 
2	201807 310-51300- 313 00 

2

DISSEMINATION- JULY 20 18 
20 1807 310-51300- 51000 

2

SUPPLIES - JULY 20 18 
20 18 07 310 -51300- 4 2000 

2

POSTAGE - JULY 2018 
201807 31 0- 5130 0- 425 00 
COPIES-JULY 20 18	GMS - CENTRAL FLORIDA , LLC

*
*
*
*
*
*

- - -

3 , 3 33 . 3 3
83 .3 3
500 . 0 0
25 . 0 0
72 .4 9
2 69 .3 5
- - - - - -

- - 4 -, 2 8- 3 -. 5 -0 00 2139 

7 /10/18 00086 

7 /10/18 00 181 

6/21/18 8 869-06 2 20 1806 320-57 20 0- 4603 0
SUPPLIES 
6/21/18 8 869- 062 20 18 06 320- 57200-46020 
SUPPLIES		HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 7/10/18 071018	201807 300- 36 900-10100 

*
*

*	- -

- - -

1, 172 . 0 0
271 . 03 
- - - -
5 00 . 0 0

-  - 1 -, 4 4- 3 -. 0 3-

00 2140 

7 /10/18 00152 

7/10/18 00094

RIEMB DAMAGE DEPOS IT	CELESTINE J ROBERTS

6/28/18 E4123148 20 1806 320-57200-34500	*

*

SERVICE THRU 06/28/18 
7/05/18 E4 128010 20 18 07 320 -57200- 34500 

SERVI CE THRU  07/05/18	SECURI TAS SECURI TY SERVI CES USA, INC 6/22/18 5604-06 2  2018 06 320 -57200- 46030	*

*

CC CHARGES THRU 06/22/18 
6/22/18 5604-062 2018 06 320-5720 0-51000 

*

CC CHARGES THRU 06/ 22/18 6/22/18 560 4-06 2 20 1806 320-57 200- 49400 

*

CC CHARGES THRU 06 /22/18 6/22/18 5 604- 062 201806 320 -5720 0-49000 

*

CC CHARGES  THRU  06/22/18 6/22/1 8  5604-062 2018 06 320 -57200- 46020 

*

CC CHARGES THRU 06/22/18 6/22/18 5604-062 2018 06 320-57200- 46400 

CC CHARGES  THRU 06/ 22/ 1 8	WELLS FARGO
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

4, 671 . 8 8
4 , 9 70 . 9 3

172 .3 7
103 . 7 0
81 .2 4
3 81 . 1 7
9 09 . 9 4
2 75 . 3 2

500 . 0 0  00 2141 

9, 64 2 . 8 1  002142 

1 , 9 23 . 74 00214 3

AP3 00 R
** * CHECK NOS . 002041-0 02166 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGI STER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	13 

CHECK    VEND#	. . . .  . INVOICE .  .  .  . . .  .  . EXPENSED  TO .  . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS 

S TATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  

AMOUNT	#

7 /17/18 00081 

7 /17/18 00 076 

7/17/18 00170 

7 /17/18 00152 

7/01 /18 0 70118	20 1807 320-57 200- 23000 
RIEMB HEALTH  INS - JULY  18	MARY BOSMAN
7/06 /18 0 501 83 00 20 18 07 320 -57200- 41000 
60 52  PEBBLE BEACH BLVD	BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS
7/ 01/18 0701 18	20 1807 320-57 20 0- 23 000 
RIEMB HEALTH INS - JULY 18 7/17/18 071718	20 18 06 320 -5720 0-46050 
MILAGE RIEMB- MAY/JUNE 18	JAMES MARGESON

7/12/18 20700381 2018 07 320 -57200- 34500 

*
*	-  -
*	-  -
*
*	-  -

250 . 0 0
- - - - - - - - -
6 96 . 74 
- - - - - - - - -
250 . 0 0
67 . 5 8
- - - - - - - - -
4, 671 . 8 8

- 2 5- 0 -. 0 0-  00 2144 

- 6 9- 6 -. 7 4-  00 2145 

- 3 1- 7 -. 5 -8   00 2146 

7 /17/18 00087 

SERVI CE THRU  07/12/18	SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC 7/01 /18 070118	20 1807 320-5720 0- 23 000 

*	- -

-  -  -  -   -  -  -   -
2 04 . 44 

- 4 -, 6 7- 1 -. 8 8-

00 2147 

7/17/18  00 119 

7 /17/18 0006 7

7/20/1 8 00050 

RIEMB HEALTH  INS - JULY  18	KAREN VANKIRK

7/11/18 6 8568609 20 18 09 320 -57200- 51000 

KYOCERA COPIER- 09 /23/18	WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SERV 6/3 0/18 INV- 0000 2018 06 32 0-572 00- 462 00 
TIMER REPLACEMENT LA II 
6/30/18 INV-0000 20 1805 320-57200- 46210 
IRRIGATION-MAY 20 18 
6/30/18 INV- 0000 201804 320- 57200- 46210 
IRRIGATION  REPAIRS -APR 1 8	YELLOWSTONE LANDS CAPE

7/20/18 53 -BID-3 201807 320-5 72 00- 493 00 

*	-  -
*	- -
*
*

*	-  -

- - - - - - - - -
13 8 . 6 8
- - - - - - - - -
2 93 .2 7
187 . 3 3
1 10 .38 
- - - - - - - - -
140 . 0 0

- 2 -0 4 -. 4 4-  00 2148 

- 1 3- 8 -. 6 8-  00 2149 

- 5 9- 0 -. 9 -8   00 2150 

7/20/18 00 107 

7/20/18 00062

PERMIT #53 -6 0-008 23	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN

7/03/18 070318	20 1807 320-57200- 46400 
TAYLOR TESTING
7/05/18 070 518	201807 320 -572 00-46400 
RE-PIPE HEATER ON POOL	POOL & PATIO CENTER

7/13/18  JULY-18	201807 320 -57200- 43 000 

*	-   -  -
*

*	-   -  -

- - - - - - - -
25 . 6 1

2 20 . 0 0
- - - - - - - -
10 , 3 92 . 3 2

- 1 4- 0 -. 0 0-

- 2 4- 5 -. 6 1-

002151 

00 21 52 

ELECTRIC- JULY 2018	TAMPA  ELECTRIC  COMPANY
LKA2  LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

-------- ---------------	--

10 , 392 . 3 2  00 21 53 

AP300 R
** * CHECK NOS . 002041-0 02166 

YEAR-TO- DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGI STER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND
BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	14 

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT#  SUB	SUBCLASS

S TATUS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

7/20/18 00102 

7/20/18  00067 

7/3 0/18  00 051 

7/3 0/18  00064

7/30/18  00070 

6/25/18  6960	20 1806 320-57200- 510 00 
NAME  BADGE	THE TROPHY SHOP 7/01/18 INV- 0000 20 1807 320- 57200- 46200 
LANDS CAPE   MAINT- JULY 201 8	YELLOWSTONE LANDSCAPE
7/18/18 3 0807 144 201807 320- 57200- 43100 
PROPANE	AMERI GAS
7/20/18  JUL-18	20 1807 320- 5720 0-432 00 
UTILITY   SVC- JULY 20 18	CITY OF WINTER HAVEN
7/17/18 828456 4 20 1807 320- 57200- 34 800 
INSPECT RODENT S TATION

7/20/18 82808 2 8 201807 320- 57200- 348 00 

*	11 . 50 

*	13 , 0 01 . 8 3

*	1, 077 . 4 6

*	2 , 828 . 4 7

*	125 . 0 0
*	79 . 0 0

11 . 50  00 21 54 

13 , 0 01 . 8 3  00 2155 

- - - - - - - - -

- - - -

PEST CONTROL

7/30/18 00 016 	7/30/18 	073 018 	201807 30 0-20700 -10100 	*	42 6 , 138 . 5 8	
	7/30/18 	073018 	20 1807 300- 20700- 10100 	V	426 , 138 . 5 8- 	
	7/30/18 	TXFER OF TAX RCPTS	*	18 , 984 . 5 6	

TXFER OF TAX RCPTS

FLORIDA PEST CONTROL

073018	201807 300- 20700 -10100 

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

TXFER  OF   TAX   RCPTS	LAKE  A- SH- TO-N - I I-

C/O   u- s -BA- NK-

- - - - - -

1 , 07 7 . 4 6	00 2156 	
2 , 8 2 8 . 4 7	00 2157 	

204 . 0 0	
00 21 58 	

18 , 984 . 5 6	
00 2159 	

7/3 0/18 00 168	7/3 0/18 073018 

20 1807 300- 20700 -103 00 

*	309, 79 7 . 0 8

7/3 0/ 1 8

TXFER 073 018 TXFER

OF TAX RCPTS
201807 3 0 0- 20700-10300 
OF TAX RCPTS

V	30 9 , 797 . 0 8- 
*

7/3 0/18 073018 

201807 300- 20700-1 0300 

13 , 801 . 52 

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

TXFER

OF  TAX  RCPTS	LAKE

A- SH- TO-N - I I-

C- / O-

u- s - BANK

- - - - - -

13 , 8 01 . 52 00 2160 

7/3 0/18 00040	7/23/18 81859 

20 1806 310-51300- 31 500 

*	2 , 157 . 2 5

LEGAL

SVC THRU 06/30/18 

LATHAM , SHUKER , EDEN & BEAUD INE LLP

2 , 1 57 . 2 5 00 2161 

7 /3 0/18  00107	7/25/18  072518	20 1807 320-57200- 46400	*

DRAIN/ACID  WASH  S PA  SURFC	POOL & PATIO CENTER
LKA2  LAKE  ASHTON 2	SROSINA

-	--  -------·-···----- -------�---- --

600 . 0 0

600 . 0 0 00 2162 

* * * 

AP3 00R
CHECK NOS . 002041- 002166 

YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/ COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON II - GENERAL FUND

VENDOR NAME	STATUS

BANK A LAKE ASHTON II - GF

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	15 

CHECK   VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . . . . . EXPENSED TO . . .
DATE	DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . . 

#

AMOUNT

7/3 0/18 00080 

7/3 0/18 00102 

7/3 0/18 00182 

7/3 0/18 00087 

7/14/18 0654-000 201808 320-57200- 34900	* PICKUP SVC THRU 8/31/18	REPUBLIC SERVICES #654 
7/19/18 7028	201807 320- 57200-51000	* NAME BADGE	THE TROPHY SHOP
6/06/18 2078001	201806 320-57200-46600	* REPAIR ERROSI ON PROBLEMS	TOOLE 'S TRACTOR SERVICES
7/23 /18   0H7E5A8 L3T0H23 IN2 S0U1R8A0N8 CE3 2-A0U-G572 0 10 -843000	*
KAREN VANKIRK
TOTAL FOR BANK A TOTAL FOR REGISTER

LKA2 LAKE ASHTON 2	SROS INA

183 . 94

92 .50 

1,3 5 0. 0 0

204 .44

292, 532 .2 7

292, 5 32 .27 

183. 94 002163 

92 .5 0 002 164 

1, 3 50 .0 0 002165 

204 .44 002166 

A* *P3* 00R	YEA*R* *-TO- DATE  ACCOUNTS   PAYABLE   PREPAID/COMPUTER   CHECK  REGISTER

RUN	8/02/18 

PAGE	1

CHECK DATES 05/01/2018 - 07/31/2018 

LAKE ASHTON II - CAPITAL PROJC BANK B LAKE ASHTON II - CR

CHECK  VEND#	. . . . . INVOICE . . . . .   . . . EXPENSED  TO . . .		VENDOR NAME	S TATUS DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS

AMOUNT

. . . . CHECK . . . . .  
AMOUNT	#

5/18/18  00 003 

5/ 18/18 00005 

5/03/18  050318	20 1805 600-20700 -10000 
RIEM  SVC  EXP  FOR RAYL  ENG	LAKE ASHTON II - GF
4/27/18 17-101-1 20 1804 600-53800-630 10 
SERVICE THRU 04/27/18 

4/27/18 17-101-1 201804 600-53800-63000 

*
*	- -
*

- - -

15, 925 . 0 0
-  -  -  -  -
1, 200 . 0 0
1, 123 . 75

1- 5 -, 92- 5 -. 0 -0   000009 

5/18/18 	00004	4/18/18 	6002 	20 1804 600-53 800-63010 	*	13 , 5 00 . 0 0	
		4/18/18 	PI CKLEBALL COURT
6002	20 1804 600 -53 800-63000 	*	3 , 6 73 . 7 0	

SERVICE  THRU  04/27/18	RAYL   ENGINERING SURVEYING,  LLC	- -

- - -

- - - - -

- 2 -, 3 2- 3 -. 7 5-

000010 

6/01/18 00006 

PARKING LOT	VARSITY COURTS , INC .

2/ 14/18 QUOTE -DE  201806 600-53800-66000 
DEP  QUOTE  DATED  2/14/18	BLACKBURN ' S INTERIORS , INC . C805214	201805 320- 5720 0-6 0000 

*	-  -
*	-  -

-  -  -

-  -  -

-  -  -  -  -
7,5 0 0 . 0 0
-  -  -  -  -
177 .7 1

1- 7 -, 1 7- 3 -. 7 -0   00 00 11

- 7 -, 5 -00 -. 0 -0   000012

6/05/18 00002

5/23/18 

PEDALS FOR RECUMBENT BIKE

5/23/18  C805214	201805 320 -5720 0-6 0000	V	177 . 71- 

6/05/18  00 002 

6/28/18  00002

PEDALS  FOR RECUMBENT BIKE	COMMERCIAL FITNESS PRODUCTS 5/23/18  C805214	20 1805 600 -53800-60000 

PEDALS  FOR RECUMBENT BIKE	COMMERCIAL FITNESS PRODUCTS 6/15/18  C806112	201806 600-53800-60000 

-  -  -  -  -
*
*	-  -   -  -  -

-  -  -  -  -
177 . 7 1
- - - - -
40 .9 8

. 0 0 00 0013

-  - 1 7- 7 -. 7 1-  000 014

7/10/18 00 002 

SUPPLIES	COMMERCIAL FITNESS PRODUCTS
5/ 29/18  18094	201805 600-53800-60000 
50% DEPOSIT- PART  INSTALL	COMMERCIAL FITNESS PRODUCTS
TOTAL FOR BANK B TOTAL FOR REGISTER

LKA2  LAKE  ASHTON 2	SROS INA

- - -
*

-  -  -  -  -  -   -
134 . 8 2

43 ,2 75 . 9 6
43 ,2 75 . 9 6

40 . 9 8  000 015 

134 . 82 000016 

 	

------- ·- -----  ------    --�·--- -  -

-

LAKE ASHTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT RECEIPTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

TOTAL ASSESSED AMOUNTS

$').';$iQ;4i5,55/   ..  .  $465;964.S'.IS( ..  i $$38;:Z!>0;00  •	• i$2;115;130:06 I

300-363-100

300-363-100	300-363-102

11/15/2017
11/17/2017

$19,515.63 
$49,722.15

$780.64
$ 1,988.92

$0.00
$0.00

$0.00
$0.00

$374.70
$954.67

$ 18,360.29 . :
$46,778.56 i

$11,375 .00
$28,981.36

$4,044.78
$10,305.35

$2,940.50
$7,491.85

$18,360.29
$46,778.56

$462,010. 14 !:

$286,235.48

Percentage Collected

100% 1

D[S TRANSFERS

D[S S2005

D[S S2006

CHECK #

$94.47

I

1 1/22/2017	$12,361.78	$649.02	$0.00	$0.00	$234.25	$ 11,478.51	$7,111.44	$2,528.72	$ 1,838.35	$11,478.51 	
12/06/17	$148,583.08	$5,943.44	$0.00	$0.00	$2,852.79	$ 139,786.85	$86,604.07	$30,795.13	$22,387. 65	$139,786.85	
12/13/17	$308,443.04	$12,337.96	$0.00	$0.00	$5,922.11 	$290,182.97 I	$179,781.04	$63,927.49	$46,474.44	$290,182.97	
12/20/17	$491,082.62	$19,643.70	$0.00	$0.00	$9,428.78			$101,781. 13	$73,993.53	$462,010.14	
0 1/16/18	$419,444.96	$12,569.10	$0.00	$0.00	$8,137.52	$398,738.34 /	!	$247,035.84	$87,842.31	$63,860. 19	$398,738.34	
02/15/18	$34,624.79	$692.51	$0.00	$0.00	$678.64	$33,253.64	'	$20,602.08	$7,325. 80	$5,325.76	$33,253.64	
0 1/31/18	$815.99	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$815.99	$505.54	$179.76	$130.69	$815.99	
03/15/18	$15,744.65	$157.43	$0.00	$0.00	$311.74	$15,275.48	$9,463.83	$3,365.20	$2,446.45	$15,275 .48	
04/13/18	$528,265.54	$31.48	$0.00	$0.00	$10,564.68	$517,669.38 	$320,718.81	$114,042.90	$82,907. 67	$517,669.38	
04/26/18	$375.90	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$375.90	$375.90	$0.00	$0.00	$375.90	
05/15/18
06/15/18	$3,148.93
$3,148.93	$0.00
$0.00	$0.00
$0.00	$94.46	$64.87
$64.87	$3,178.52
$3,178.53	$1,969.23
$1,969.24	$700.23
$700.23	$509.06
$509.06	$3,178.52
$3,178.53	
06/21/18	$81,043.96	$0.00	$0.00	$3,647.02	$1,693.82	$82,997.16	$51,420.37	$18,284.33	$13,292.46	$82,997.16 	
TOTALS	$2,116,321.95	$54,794.20	$0.00	$3,835.95	$41,283.44	$2,024,080.26	$ 1,254,149.23	$445,823.37	$324,107.66	$2,024,080.26	

12/19/17	$7, 199.83	$0.00	due from prior yr	
12/19/17	$9,679.02	$12,270.70	1889/1890	
0 1/12/18	$196,503.76	$142,855. 62	1918/1919	
03/13/18	$95,168. 11	$69,185.95	1988/1989	
03/20/18	$179.77	$130.69	2001/2002	
04/17/18	$117,408.09	$85,354.12	2036/2037	
TOTAL TRANSFERS	$426,138.58	$309,797.08		

 	 	

LAKE ASHTON II 
COM MUNITY DEVELOPM ENT DISTRICT BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2018

$9

Page l

REVENUES:

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT GENERAL FUND 
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITU RES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 
JUNE 30, 2018
ADOPTED	PRORATED	ACTUAL
BUDGET	THRU 6/30/2018	THRU 6/30/2018	VARIANCE

$7,543

SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - TAX COLLECTOR	$1, 218,686	$1,218,686	$1, 254,149	$35,463 INTEREST EARNED		$1, 500		$1,125		$4, 643		$3,518

$1,225,186

$1,223,561

$1,270,308

RENTAL FEES	$5,000	$3,750	$11,293 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME		$0		$0		$223
TOTAL REVENUES

EXPENDITURES:
ADMINISTRATIVE:

$223

ARBITRAGE	$2,500	$1,875	$600	$1,275

ANNUAL AUDIT	$5,600	$5,600
ATTORNEY	$20,000	$15,000

$5,600
$11,833

$3,167

COMPUTER TI ME	$1,000	$750	$750	$0
DISSEMINATION	$6,000	$4,500	$4,500	$0

$35,556

DUES, LICENSES, SUBSCRIPTIONS		$175		$131		$175		($44) INSURANCE	$30,558	$30,558	$30,033	$525 LEGAL ADVERTISING		$500		$375		$230	$145

MANAGEMENT	$47,408	$35, S56
OFFICE SUPPLIES	$300	$225

($0)
$ 151

OTH ER CURRENT CHARGES	$2,000	$1,500	$4,251	($2,751)
POSTAGE	$ 1, 500	$1,125	$1,111 

$50

$38

PRINTING & BINDING	$1, 200	$900	$755	$145
TELEPHONE	$0
TRUSTEE FEES	$6,500	$4,875	$0	$4,875

TOTAL ADMINISTRA TIVE EXPENDITURES	$125,290	$ 103,007	$95,468	$7,539 1

FIELD EXPENDITURES
ATHLETIC EQU IPMENT	$6,000	$4,500	$0	$4,500
BUILDING CONTRACT SERVICES	$46,920	$35, 190	$47,402	($12,212)
BU ILDING GROUNDS MAI NTENANCE & SUPPLIES	$16,700	$12,525	$74,218	($61,693) CONTINGENCY	$20,000	$ 15,000		$8,563		$ 6,437
ENGINEERRING	$12,000	$9,000	$11,244	($2,244)
HFC SPECIAL EVENTS		$3,000		$2,250		$1,294		$956 LANDSCAPE /LAKE CONTRACT SERVICES	$1S2,712	$114,534	$128,303	($13,769)
OFFICE SU PPLIES/PRI NTING/BINDING	$10,000	$7,500	$4,881	$2,619 PERMITS/INSPECTIONS		$1,500	$1,125		$970		$155
PERSONNEL EXPENSES	$214,455	$160,841	$137,728	$23,113
PLANT/TREE REPLACEMENT	$10,000	$7,500	$0	$7,500
POND REPAI RS	$0	$5, 900	($5,900)
SECURITY CONTRACT SERVICES	$246,300	$184,725	$189,153	($4,428)
UTILITIES	$207,767	$155,825	$141, 327	$14,498
TOTAL FIELD EXPENDITURES	$947,354	$710,515	$750,983	($40,468) 1

FIRST Q UARTER OPERATING RESERVES	$205,797	$0
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES	$20S,797

$0
$0	$0 I

TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$1,278,441	$813,S22	$846,451 OTHER SOURCES/(USES):
INTERFU ND TRANSFER IN/(OUT)	($220,000)	$0	$0	$0

TOTAL OTHER SOURCES/{USES)	($220,000)	$0 EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)

$0 I
$423,857	I

FUND BALANCE · Beginning	$273,254	$ 262,847
FUND BALANCE . Ending	($0)	$686,704

Page 2

ADOPTED BUDGET

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN 

JUL 

AUG

SEPT

TOTAL

I

REVENUES:

LAKE ASHTON II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

GENERAL FUND - FY 2018

SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS	$1,218,686

$47,468	$552,621	$247,541	$20,602	$9,464	$321,095	$1,969	$53,390	$0

$0 $1,254,149

$279
$3,750

INTEREST EARNED	$1,500	$210	$92	$551	$670	$1,146	$1,144	$0	$0	$0	$4,643

RENTAL FEES	$5,000	$550

$1,200

$20	$1,800	$960	$3,013	($70)	$0

$0	$11,293

MISCELLANEOUS	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$223	$0	$0	$0	$0	$223

CARRY FORWARD SURPLUS	$273,254	$0

$1,498,440

$760

$47,630	$553,858	$251,570

$21,135

$11,815	$322,725

$6,351

$54,464

$0

$1,270,308

TOTAL REVENUES

EXPENDITURES: ADMINISTRATIVE

$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

ARBITRAGE	$2,500	$0	$0	$0	$600	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$600

ANNUAL AUDIT	$5,600	$0	$0	$2,000	$0	$0	$0	$1,500	$2,100	$0	$0

$83

ATTORNEY	$20,000	$976	$1,429	$1,847	$906	$1,702	$565	$1,504	$747	$2,157	$0	$0

$0	$5,600
$11,833

COMPUTER TIME	$1,000

$83

$83

$83	$83

$0	$0	$0	$750

DISSEMINATION	$6,000	$500	$500	$500	$500	$500	$500	$500	$500	$500	$0	$0	$0	$4,500
DUES, LICENSES AND SU8SCRIPTIONS	$175	$175	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$175

INSURANCE	$30,558	$30,033	$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0	$0

$30,033

$3,951

$74

LEGALADVERTISING	$500	$59	$0	$0	$0	$0	$118	$53	$0	$0	$0	$0	$230

MANAGEMENT FEES	$47,408	$3,951

$3,951

$3,951

$3,951	$3,951	$3,951	$0	$0	$0

$84

OFFICE SUPPLIES	$300	$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

OTHER CURRENT CHARGES	$2,000	$182	$193	$220
POSTAGE	$1,500	$72	$45	$495	$17	$123

$315	$135	$2,677	$152	$0	$0	$0	$4,251

$76

$208	$27	$0	$0	$0	$1,111

$6,500	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	
$125,290	$36,056	$6,236	$9,117	$6,342	$6,721	$5,591	$7,900	$10,342	$7,163	$0		$0	

PRINTING AND BINDING	$1,200	$35	$22	$201	$19	$128	$34	$23	$268	$0	$0	$0

TELEPHONE TRUSTEE FEES
TOTAL ADM. EXPENDITURES

$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0	$0

FIELD:

ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT	$6,000	$0

$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

$3,455

BUILDING CONTRACT SERVICES	$46,920	$6,617	$3,780	$4,949	$5,476	$5,312	$7,194	$9,123	$4, 136	$815	$0	$0	$0	$47,402

BU1LDING /GROUNDS MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES	$16,700	$6,080	$3,082	$27,155	$18,940	$4,370	$5,413

$3,958

$0	$0	$0	$74,218

CONTINGENCY	$20,000	($630)	$0	$0	$0	$0	$4,101

$5,046	$0	$0

$8,563

$56

$154

ENGINEERING	$12,000	$1,061	$183	$1,971	$182	$701	$92	$892	$2,931	$3,231	$0	$11,244

HFC SPECIAL EVENTS	$3,000	$0

$0	$230

$0	$108	$165	$581	$0	$0

$1,294

LANDSCAPE/LAKE CONTRACT SERVICES	$152,712	$14,322	$13,877	$14,577	$14,076	$13,953	$14,577	$13,987	$14,064	$14,870	$0	$0	$0	$128,303
OFFICE SUPPLIES/PRINTING/BINDING	$10,000	$301	$707	$493	$650	$189	($4)	$1,017	$262	$0	$0	$0	$4,881

PERM ITS/INSPECTIONS		$1,500		$0		$0		$0		$0		$0		$0		$550		$0		$420	$0	$0	$0		$970 PERSONNEL EXPENSES	$170,675	$12,711	$11,734	$13,047	$16,320	$20,740	$15,423	$16, 195	$16,173	$15,386	$0	$0	$0	$137,728

PLANT/TREE REPLACEMENT	$10,000

$0	$0

$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

POND REPAIRS	$0	$0	$0

$0	$0	$0

$0	$1,350	$0

$0	$5,900

SECURITY CONTRACT SERVICES	$246,300	$25,523	$19,219	$19,031	$18,818	$19,296	$23,910	$19,276	$25,293	$18,786	$0	$0	$0	$189,153
UTILITIES	$207,767	$13,9S3	$14,752	$17,140	$19,399	$16,399	$1S,710	$13,776	$15,590	$14, 609	$0	$0	$141,327

TOTAL FIELD EXPENDITURES	$903,S74

$67,389	$102,913	$94,090	$82,190	$86,609	$75,71S	$83,328	$78,811

$0	$0	$750,983

FIRST QUARTER OPERATING RESERVES	$249,577	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
OTHER SOURCESIIUSES/

$0	$0	$0

INTERFUND TRANSFER IN/(OUT}	($220,000}	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	($300)	$0	$0	$0	$0	($300)

TOTAL OTHER SOURCES/{USES)	{$220,000}	$0	$0

$1,498,441	$115,994	$73,625	$112,030	$100,432	$88,911	$92,200	$83,615	$93,970	$85,975	
($1)	{$11S,234}	($25,995}	$441,828	$151,139	{$67,776)	{$80,385)	$239,110	{$87,619}	{$31,511}	

TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS/REVENUES{EXPENDITURES

$0	$0	$0	$0	($300)	$0	$0	$0	$0	($300) 1
$0	$0	$846,751

$0	$0	$0	$423,557

Page 3

 	

LAKE ASHTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS
Statement of Revenues, Expenditu res and Changes in Fund Balances
For The Period End ing JUNE 30, 2018

ADOPTED	PRORATED	ACTUAL

REVENUES:

BU DGET	TH RU 6/30/2018	THRU 6/30/2018	VARIANCE

INTEREST EARNED	$0	$0	$4,919	$4,919	

				

					

					

					

					

CAPITAL RESERVE - TRANSFER IN 

TOTAL REVENU ES EXPENDITURES:
BANK CHARGES
CAPITAL PROJECTS - FY18
A THLETIC EQUIPMENT
POND REPAIRS AN D MAI NTENANCE PICKLEBALL COU RTS
PAVING PARKI NG LOT/LIGHTS ROAD REPAI RS
D RAIN SYSTEM/GUTTERS WINDOWS/DOORS WCM LED LIGHTI NG 
OTHER CAPITAL PROJ ECT EXPENSES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES OTHER SOURCES & USES:
INTERFU ND TRANSFER IN/(OUT)
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES & USES

EXCESS REVEN U ES (EXPENDITU RES)
FUND BALANCE - Beginn ing FU ND BALANCE - Ending

$220,000

$220,000

$0

$0
$25,000
$30,000
$90,000
$75,000
$0 
$0 
$0 
$540, 139
$760, 139

$0
$0 ($540, 139)

$404, 139

$540, 139

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$12,500
$15,000
$45,000
$37,500
$0
$0
$0
$270,070
$380,070

$0
$0

$0

$4,919 

$466

$1,414
$9,150
$43,742
$37,861
$7,526
$5, 275
$34,760
$726

$140,919

$0
$0 ($136,000)
$540, 139

$0

$4,919 I ($466)

($1,414)
$3,350 ($28,742)
$7,139
$29,974 ($5, 275)
($34,760)
($726)
$270,070
$239, 1so 1

$0

Page 4

REVENUES:

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE FUND - SERIES 2005A
STATEMENT OF REVENU ES, EXPENDITU RES AN D CHANG ES IN FUND BALANCES
FOR TH E PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2018
ADOPTED	PRORATED	ACTUAL
BUDGET	THRU 6/30/2018	THRU 6/30/2018

VARIANCE

SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - ON ROLL			$436,872		$436,872		$445,823		$ 8,951 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - PREPAYMENTS				$0				$0			$40, 219	$40, 219   I NTEREST EARNED				$ 1,000			$750				$3,735		$2,985 TOTAL REVENUES	I	$437,872			$437,622			$489,777		$52,155 J
EXPENDITURES:
SERIES 2005A:
I NTEREST - 11/1	$139,347	$139,347	$139,347	$0
SPECIAL CALL - 11/1	$30,000	$30,000	$80, 000	($50,000)
INTEREST - 5/1	$139,347	$139,347	$137,304	$2,043
PRI NCI PAL - 5/1	$160,000	$160,000	$160,000		$0 SPECIAL CALL - 5/1		$0		$0		$45,000	($45,000)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	I	$468,694	$468,694	$561,651	($92,957) 1 EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)	I		($30,822)			($71,874)
FUND BALANCE - Beginning	$185, 650	$519,737
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$154,828	$447,862

Page s

REVENUES: 

LAKE ASHTON II 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE FUND - SERIES 2006A
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITU RES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
FOR THE PERIOD EN DING JUNE 30, 2018
ADOPTED		PRORATED		ACTUAL BUDGET	THRU 6/30/2018	THRU 6/30/2018

VARIANCE

ASSESSMENTS - OFF ROLL

$315,038	$315,038	$324, 108

$9,070

ASSESSMENTS - PPMTS	$0

$14,217 

$14,217

OTH ER REVENUE SERVICES	$79, 288	$79,288	$89,288	$10,000	
INTEREST INCOME 	$0		$1,367	$1,367	

TOTAL REVENUES	I

INTEREST - 11/1	$79,288	$79, 288	$79,288	$0	
INTEREST - 5/1	$104, 940	$ 104,940	$104, 940	$0	
PRINCIPAL - 5/1	$105,000	$105,000	$115,000	($ 10,000}	
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	I	$289,228	$289,228	$299,228	($10,000)1	
EXCESS REVENU ES (EXPENDITU 1	$105,098	$129,751	
FUND BALANCE - Beginning	$0	$78,999	
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$105,098	$208,750	

EXPENDITURES: SERIES 2006A

$394,326	$394,326	$428,979

$34,653 I

Page 6

LAKE ASHTON II 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS - SERIES 2006
Statement of Revenues, Expend itu res and Changes in Fund Balances
For The Period Ending JUNE 30, 2018

REVENUES:
INTEREST EARNED 

ADOPTED BU DGET

TOTAL REVENUES	$0	$0	$44	$44 I	
EXPENDITURES:					
COi	$0	$0	$30,054	($30,054)	
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$0	$0	$ 30,054	($30,054) 1	
EXCESS REVEN U ES ( EXPENDITU RES)	I	$0		($30,010)		
FUND BALANCE - Beginn ing 	$0		$30,038		
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$0		$28		

$0

Page 7

PRORATED TH RU 6/30/2018

$0

ACTUAL THRU 6/30/2018

$44

VARIANCE

$44